Self-Control Scale – SCS: Reliability and Validity Study

Öz

Self-control is regarded as one’s capacity to change and adapt the self to have a better and optimal fit between self and the world. In thisway, self-control is one of the most important and beneficial processes in personality structure. However, there are individual differences in people’s capacity for self-control. People with high self-control and low self-control structure their worlds in different ways. In this manner, there is a need to evaluate people’s self-control with a valid and reliable assessment instrument. The study which has been done to fulfill that need aims to determine the validity and reliability for Turkey of self-control schedule developed by Rosenbaum (1980). At the end of the study, it has been found out that the schedule consists of three dimensions and it is valid and reliable for Turkish society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-control,schedule,reliability and validity.

ÖZ-DENETİM ÖLÇEĞİ - ÖDÖ: GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Öz-denetim, kişinin kendisi ve dünya arasında daha iyi, daha ideal uyuma sahip olması için kendini değiştirme ve uyarlama kapasitesi olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu yönüyle öz-denetim, insanın kişilik yapısında en önemli ve en yararlı süreçlerden biridir. Ancak insanların öz-denetim kapasitelerinde bireysel farklılıklar bulunmaktadır. Öz-denetimi düşük olan ve öz-denetimi yüksek olan insanlar, dünyalarını farklı biçimlerde yapılandırmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, insanların öz-denetim durumlarını geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı ile değerlendirme gereksinimi hissedilir olmuştur. Bu gereksinimi karşılamak üzere gerçekleştirilen çalışma, Rosenbaum (1980) tarafından geliştirilen Öz- Denetim (Self-Control Schedule) Ölçeği’nin Türkiye için geçerliğini ve güvenirliğini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yapılan bu çalışmanın sonucunda, Öz-Denetim Ölçeği’nin üç boyuttan oluştuğu, Türk toplumu için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öz-denetim,ölçek,geçerlik ve güvenirlik.

Kaynakça

1. Alicke, M. D. and Sedikides, C. (2009). Selfenhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1-48.
2. Allahverdipour, H., Hidarnia, A., Kazamnegad, A., Shafii, F., Fallah, P. A. and Emami, A. (2006). The status of self-control and its relation to drug abuse-related behaviors among Iranian male high school students. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(4), 413-424.
3. Anderson JC ve Gerbing DW. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness of fit indices for maximum likelihood comfirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49:155-173.
4. Arneklev, B. J., Elis, L. and Medlicott, S. (2006). Testing the general theory of crime: comparing dinal indicator of “low self-control”. Western Criminology Review 7(3), 41–55.
5. Cole DA. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. J Consult Clin Psych, 55:1019-1031.
6. DeLisi, M, Beaver, K.M., Vaughn, M.G., Trulson, C.R., Kosloski, A. E., Alan J. Drury, A. J. And Wright, J. P. (2010). Personality, gender, and self-control theory revisited: results from a sample of institutionalized juvenile delinquents. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 6(1), 31- 46.
7. Ezinga, M. A. J., Weerman, F. M, Westenbergb, P. M. and Bijleveld, C. C. J. H. (2008). Early adolescence and delinquency: Levels of psychosocial development and self-control as an explanation of misbehaviour and delinquency. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 339-356.
8. Friese, M. and Hofmann, W. (2009). Control me or I will control you: impulses, trait self-control, and the guidance of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 795–805.

9. Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15(4), 352–366.
10. Higgins, G. E. and Boyd, R. J. (2008). Low selfcontrol and deviance: Examining the moderation of social support from parents. Deviant Behavior, 29, 388-410.
11. Higgins, G. E., Wolfe, S. E. and Marcum, C. D. (2008). Digital piracy: an examination of three measurements of self-control. Deviant Behavior, 29, 440-460.
12. Hu L ve Bentler PM. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6:1-55.
13. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Marsh HW ve Hocevar DA. (1988). New more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J Appl Physiol, 73:107-117.
14. Marsh HW, Balla J.R. ve McDonald R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size, Psychological Bulletin, 102: 391-410.
15. Mehta, R. (2010). Exploring self-control: Moving beyond depletion hypothesis. Advances in Consumer Research, 37. 174-178.
16. Oaten, M. and Cheng, K. (2006). Improved selfcontrol: the benefits of a regular program of academic study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 1–16.
17. Phythian, Keane ve Krull (2008). Family structure and parental behavior: Identifying the sources of adolescent self-control. Western Criminology Review 9(2), 73–87.
18. Rosenbaum, M. (1980). A Schedule for assessing self-control behaviors: Preliminary findings. Behavior Therapy, 11(1): 109–21.
19. Rosenbaum, M. (1993).The three functions of self-control behavior: Redressive, reformative, and experiential. Work and Stress, 7, 33-46.
20. Schmeichel, B.J. and Zell, A. (2007). Trait selfcontrol predicts performance on behavioral tests of self-control. Journal of Personality, 75, 743- 755.
21. Sinha, S. P., Nayyar, P. and Sinha, P. (2002). Social support and self control as variables in attitude toward life and perceived control among older people in India. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142 (4), 527–540.
22. Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R. F. and Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 272- 322.
23. Tullett, A.M and Inzlicht, M. (2010). The voice of self-control: blocking the inner voice increases impulsive responding. Acta Psychologica 135, 252-256.
24. Wolfe, S. E and Higgins, G. E. (2008). Selfcontrol and perceived behavioral control: An examination of college student drinking. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 4(1), 108- 134.