Horticultural Therapy from Ecological Social Work Perspective

Öz

As a result of technology, urbanization and industrialization, anxiety in individuals, depression, social isolation and increase in chronic diseases have led to a focus on the rehabilitative relationship between human and nature. The experience of interacting with the natural environment has been associated with physical and mental health, and has led to the introduction of horticultural therapy (horticultural therapy), a treatment and therapy method in which plants and gardens are used as tools. The applicability of horticultural therapy to all people is similar to the principle of universality in the social work profession; In terms of having a therapeutic experience within the framework of human and nature relationship, it is very close to the discipline of ecological social work which has a theoretical application ground for serious changes in human relations with the earth to help all living and inanimate beings to survive in harmony with each other. It may be associated. In this article, it will be explained from the perspective of ecological social work, which emphasizes the importance and goodness of human and nature relations by explaining the components and effects of horticultural therapy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Horticulture,Ecological Social Work,horticultural therapy,social work

EKOLOJİK SOSYAL HİZMET PERSPEKTİFİNDEN HORTİKÜLTÜREL TERAPİ

Öz

Teknoloji, kentleşme ve sanayileşmenin sonucunda bireylerdeki endişe, depresyon, sosyal izolasyon ve kronik hastalıklardaki artış, insan ve doğa arasındaki rehabilite edici ilişkiye odaklanmayı da beraberinde getirmiştir. Doğal çevre ile etkileşimde olma deneyimi, fiziksel ve zihinsel sağlıkla ilişkilendirilerek, günümüzde, bitki ve bahçelerin araç olarak kullanıldığı bir tedavi ve terapi yöntemi olan hortikültürel terapinin (bahçecilik terapisi) uygulanmaya başlamasını sağlamıştır. Hortikültürel terapinin tüm insanlarla uygulanabilir olması, sosyal hizmet mesleğindeki evrensellik ilkesi ile benzerlik göstermeke ve insan ve doğa ilişkisi çerçevesinde terapötik bir deneyim taşımaktadır. Bu açıdan tüm canlı ve cansız varlıkların birbirleri ile uyumlu bir şekilde varlıklarını sürdürmelerine yardım etmek üzere, insanlığın yeryüzü ile olan ilişkilerinde ciddi değişiklikler yapılmasına yönelik teorik bir uygulama zeminine sahip olan ekolojik sosyal hizmet disiplini ile de çok yakından ilişkilendirilebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada hortikültürel terapi, bileşenleri ve etkileri ile birlikte açıklanarak, insan ve doğa ilişkisinin önemi ve iyiliğini vurgulamayı bünyesinde barındıran ekolojik sosyal hizmet perspektifinden değerlendirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bahçecilik,Ekolojik Sosyal Hizmet,hortikültürel terapi,sosyal hizmet

Kaynakça

1. Açıksöz, S., Bollukçu, P., Gökçe, G. ve Yar, Z. (2016). Zihinsel ve ruhsal engellilere yönelik terapi bahçeleri: Özel bakım merkezleri örneği. International Science and Technology Conference (ISTEC), Vienna-Austria.
2. Akın, Z. Ş. (2006). Çocuklar için iyileştirme bahçeleri. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
3. Arslan, M., Katipoğlu, E. (2011). Kentsel çevrede yaşlı kişilerin sağlığı ve etkinlikler için bitki yetiştiriciliğinin önemi. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, (1-2), 44-52.
4. Arslan, M. ve Ekren, E. (2017). Yaşlı kişilerin sağlığı ve etkinlikleri için terapi bahçeleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 3(2): 361-373.
5. Atkinson, J. (2009). An Evaluation of the Gardening Leave Project for Ex-Military Personnel with PTSD and Other Combat Related Mental Health Problems. Commissioned by Gardening Leave. Funded by The Pears Foundation.
6. Bay, U. (2015). “Ecological social work”, in Enclyclopedia of Social Work. UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Besthorn, F. H. (2012). Deep ecology’s contributions to social work: A ten-year retrospective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21 (3), 248–259.
8. Borrell, J., Lane, S. and Fraser, S. (2010). Integrating environmental issues into social work practice: Lessons learnt from domestic energy auditing. Australian Social Work, 63 (3), 315–328.

9. Bulut, Y., Göktuğ, T. H. (2006). Sağlık bulma yönünde çevresel bir etken olarak iyileştirme bahçeleri. GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (2), 9-15.
10. Caan, W. (2004). Social exclusion and embracement: A helpful concept? Primary Health Care Research and Development, 5, 191–192.
11. Catlin, P. (1998). Developmental disabilities and horticultural therapy practice. In: Simpson, S. P., Strauss, M. C., (Eds). Horticulture as therapy. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
12. Cimprich, B. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention to cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Nursing, 16 (2), 83-92.
13. Clatworthy, J., Hinds, J. and Camic, M.P. (2013). Gardening as a mental health intervention: A review. Mental Health Review Journal. 18(4): 214-225.
14. Coates, J. (2003). Ecology and social work: toward a new paradigm. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
15. Colley, T., Burgin, S., Webb, T. and Bassett, H. (2012). Defining eco-social capacity building and its evaluation: A case study in environmental community engagement in western Sydney. Third Sector Review, 18 (1), 29.
16. Cooper Marcus, C. and N. A. Sachs. (2014). Therapeutic landscapes: An evidence-based approach to designing healing gardens and restorative outdoor spaces. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17. Dadvand, P., Bartoll, X., Basagana, X., Dalmau-Bueno, A., Martinez, D., Ambros, A., Cirach, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Gascon, M., Borrell, C. and Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2016). Green spaces and general health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment International, 91, 161–167.
18. Davis, S. (1998). Development of the profession of horticultural therapy. In: Simpson, S. P., Strauss, M. C. (Eds.), Horticulture as therapy. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
19. Demirkan, G. (2019). İyileştirici bahçeler ve tasarım kriterlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Tarım – Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 7 (1), 148-151. doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v7i1.148-151.2339.
20. Diehl, E., Park Brown, S. (2016). Horticultural Therapy. (Erişim: ).
21. Dominelli, L. (2014). Promoting environmental justice through green social work practice: A key challenge for practitioners and educators. International Social Work, 57 (4), 338-345. Doi: 10.1177/0020872814524968.
22. Dominelli, L. (2012). Green social work: From environmental crises to environmental justice. Cambridge, Polity.
23. Dylan, A. (2012). Rethinking sustainability on planet Earth: A time for new framings. Electronic Green Journal, 1 (34), 1–16.
24. Dylan, A. and Coates, J. (2012). The spirituality of justice: Bringing together the eco and social. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 31 (1-2), 128-149.
25. Faver, C. A. (2013). Environmental beliefs and concern about animal welfare: Exploring the connections. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40 (4), 149.
26. Ferreira, S. B. (2010). Eco-spiritual social work as a precondition for social development. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4 (1), 3-23.
27. Frazel, M. (1998). Botanical gardening: design, techniques, and tools. In: Simpson, S. P., Strauss, M. C., (Eds.). Horticulture as therapy. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
28. Fried, G. G. and Wichrowski, M. J. (2008). Horticultural therapy: A psychosocial treatment option at the Stephen D. Hassenfeld children’s center for cancer and blood disorders. Primary Psychiatry, 15 (7), 73-77.
29. Gerlach-Spriggs, N., Kaufman, R. E. & Warner, S. B. (1998). Restorative gardens: the healing landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Germain, C. B. and Gitterman, A. (1980). The life model of social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Gesler, W. (1992). Therapeutic landscapes: medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Social Science and Medicine, 34 (7), 735–746.
32. Gesler, W. (1993). Therapeutic landscapes: theory and case study of Epidauros, Greece. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11 (2), 171–189.
33. Gesler, W. (1996). Lourdes: healing in a place of pilgrimage. Health and Place, 2 (2), 95–105.
34. Gonzalez, M. T. (2010). Therapeutic horticulture for clinical depression in a green care context: prospective studies on mental health benefits, active components and existential issues. Philosophia Doctor (PhD) thesis. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences.
35. Gonzalez, M. T., Hartig, T., Patil, G. G., Martinsen, E. W. and Kirkevold, M. (2010). Therapeutic horticulture in clinical depression: a prospective study of active components. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66 (9), 2002–2013.
36. Gonzalez, M. T., Hartig, T., Patil, G. G., Martinsen, E. W. and Kirkevold, M. (2009). Therapeutic horticulture in clinical depression: A prospective study. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal 23 (4), 312–328.
37. Gray, M. and Coates, J. (2013). Changing values and valuing change: Toward an ecospiritual perspective in social work. International Social Work, 56 (3), 356–368.
38. Haas, K., Simpson, S. P. and Stevenson, N. C. (1998). Older persons and horticultural therapy practice. In: Simpson, S. P., Strauss, M. C., (Eds.). Horticulture as therapy. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
39. Haigh, R. (2008). Epilogue: Growing together. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 29 (3), 338–342.
40. Haller, R. L., and C. L. Kramer. (2006). Horticultural therapy methods: Making connections in health care, human service, and community programs. Binghamton, NY: Hawthorne Press.
41. Hanrahan, C. (2011). Challenging anthropocentricism in social work through ethics and spirituality: Lessons from studies in human–animal bonds. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 30 (3), 272–293.
42. Hassink, J. and van Dijk, M. (2006). Farming for health: Green-care farming across Europe and the United States of America. Dordrecht: Springer.
43. Hayward, R. A., Miller, S. E. and Shaw, T. V. (2013). ‘Social work education on the environment in contemporary curricula in the USA’, in Gray, M., Coates, J. and Hetherington, T. (Eds), Environmental Social Work, Oxon, Routledge.
44. Heinsch, M. (2012). Getting down to earth: Finding a place for nature in social work practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21 (3), 309–318.
45. Hetherington, T. and Boddy, J. (2013). ‘Ecosocial work with marginalized populations’, in Gray, M. Coates, J. and Hetherington, T. (Eds), Environmental Social Work, Oxon, Routledge.
46. Hine, R. (2008). Care farming: Bringing together agriculture and health. ECOS, 29 (2), 42–51.
47. Jarroyy, S.E., Kwack, H.R. and Relf, D. (2002). An observational assessment of a dementia- specific horticultural therapy program. HorTechnology. 12(3): 403-410.
48. Jarvis, D. (2013). Environmental justice and social work: A call to expand the social work profession to include environmental justice. Columbia Social Work Review, 4 (1), 26–45.
49. Kam, C.Y.M. and Siu, H.M.A. (2010). Evaluation of a horticultural activity programme for persons with psychiatric illness. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(2): 80-86.
50. Kasar, K. S., Yıldırım, Y. ve Özer, S. (2018). Rehabilitasyon hemşireliğinde hortikültürel terapi. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 34 (3), 119-127.
51. Kemp, S. P. (2011). Recentring environment in social work practice: Necessity, opportunity, challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 41 (6), 1198–210.
52. Keçecioğlu, P. (2014). Ruh sağlığı kurumlarında iyileştirme bahçelerinin irdelenmesi ve peyzaj tasarım ilkelerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
53. Lantz, B. (2006). Therapeutic gardening with physical rehabilitation patients. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 17, 35-38.
54. Leck, C., Upton, D. and Evans, N. (2015). Growing well-beings: The positive experience of care farms. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 745–762.
55. Lee, S., Kim, M. S. and Suh, J. K. (2008). Effects of horticultural therapy of self-esteem and depression of battered women at a shelter in Korea. Acta Horticulture, 790, 139–142.
56. Lee, Y. and Kim, S. (2008). Effects of indoor gardening on sleep, agitation, and cognition in dementia patients – a pilot study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 485–489.
57. Lewis, C. A. (1976). Fourth annual meeting of national council for therapy and rehabilitation through horticulture. September 6, Philadelphia, PA. in Development of the Profession of Horticultural Therapy in “Horticulture as Therapy: Principles and Practice” 3-20. NY: The Food Products Press.
58. McDowell, J.M. (1997). The role and application of horticultural therapy with institutionalized older people. McGill University, The School of Social Work Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research. Montreal, Canada.
59. McHugh, A. and Ord, G. (2018). Therapeutic gardening. Washington State University.
60. McKinnon, J. and Alston, M. (2016). Ecological social work towards sustainability. UK: Red Globe Press.
61. McKinnon, J. (2013). The environment: A private concern or a professional practice issue for Australian social workers? Australian Social Work, 66 (2), 156–170.
62. Morris, J. L. and Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2002). Garden-enhanced nutrition curriculum improves fourth-grade schoolchildren’s knowledge of nutrition and preferences for some vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102, 91-93.
63. Nutsford, D., Pearson, A. L. and Kingham, S. (2013) An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public Health, 127, 1005–1011.
64. Oh, Y.A., Park, S.A. ve Ahn, B.E. (2018). Assessment of the psychopathological effects of a horticultural therapy program in patients with schizophrenia. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 36, 54-58.
65. Özmete, E. (2010). Sosyal hizmette sürdürülebilir kalkınma anlayışı: Kavramsal analiz. Aile ve Toplum, 6 (22), 79-90.
66. Peeters, J. (2012). The place of social work in sustainable development: Towards ecosocial practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21 (3), 287–298.
67. Peeters, J. (2009). Social work and sustainable development. ENSACT Join European Conference, 26-29 April, Dubrovnick, Croatia.
68. Perrins-Margalis, N. M., Rugletic, J., Schepis, N. M., Stepanski, H. R. and Walsh, M. A. (2000). The immediate effects of a groupbased horticulture experience on the quality of life of persons with chronic mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 16 (1), 15–32.
69. Perveen, F. (2013). Effects of horticulture therapy for elderly with dementia in an institutional settıng: a literature review. Degree thesis. Arcada University of Applied Sciences Human Ageing and Elderly Services.
70. Pope, D., Tisdall, R., Middleton, J., Verma, A., van Ameijden, E., Birt, C., Macherianakis, A. and Bruce, N. G. (2018). Quality of and access to green space in relation to psychological distress: results from a population-based cross-sectional study as part of the EUROURHIS 2 project. European Journal of Public Health, 1 (28), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv094.
71. Pouya, S. (2018). Huzur evindeki yaşlılara yönelik hortikültürel terapinin ve bahçeciliğin önemi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 8(2),146-166. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.529734.
72. Rappe, E., Koivunen, T. and Korpela, E. (2008). Group gardening in mental outpatient care. Therapeutic Communities, 29, 273–284.
73. Sakıcı, Ç., Var, M. ve Hocaoğlu, Ç. (2014). Türkiye’deki ruh ve sinir hastalıkları bölge hastane bahçelerinin terapi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Ormancılık Dergisi. 10(1): 59-71.
74. Schmutz, U., Lennartsson, M., Williams, S., Devereaux, M. and Davies, G. (2014). The benefits of gardening and food growing for health and wellbeing. Sydenham Gardens, South London.
75. Sempik, J., Hine, R. and Wilcox, D. (2010). Green Care: A conceptual framework, COST Action 866, green care in agriculture. Loughborough: Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough University.
76. Sempik, J. (2010). Green care and mental health: gardening and farming as health and social care. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 14 (3), 15-22.
77. Sempik, J., Aldridge, J. and Becker, S. (2005). Health, well-being and social inclusion: Therapeutic horticulture in the UK. Bristol: The Policy Press.
78. Sempik, J., Aldridge, J. and Becker, S. (2003). Social and Therapeutic Horticulture: Evidence and messages from research. Reading and Loughborough: Thrive and Centre for Child and Family Research.
79. Serez, A. (2011). Tarihsel süreç içerisinde sağlık bahçeleri. Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
80. Shaw, T. V. (2011). Is social work a green profession? An examination of environmental beliefs. Journal of Social Work, 13 (1), 3–29.
81. Shaw, T. V. (2006). Social workers knowledge and attitude toward the ecological environment, Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68 (3), 1162.
82. Shepard, B. (2013). ‘Community gardens, creative, community organizing and environmental activism’, in Gray, M., Coates, J. and Hetherington, T. (Eds), Environmental Social Work, Oxon, Routledge.
83. Simson, S. P., and M. C. Straus. (2003). Horticulture as therapy: Principles and practice. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
84. Söderback, I., Söderström, M. and Schalander, E. (2004). Horticultural therapy: The ‘healing garden’ and gardening in rehabilitation measures at Danderyd Hospital Rehabilitation Clinic. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 7 (4): 245-260.
85. Stigsdotter, U. A. (2005) Urban green spaces: Promoting health through city planning. In: Inspiring Global Environmental Standards and Ethical Practices, The National Association of Environmental Professionals’, NAEP, 30th Annual Conference, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
86. Szofram, J., Meyer, S. (2004). Horticultural therapy in a mental health day program. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 15, 32-35.
87. Taft, S. (2004). Therapeutic horticulture for people living with cancer: The healing gardens program at cancer lifeline in Seattle. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 15, 16-23.
88. Toyoda, M. (2012). Horticultural therapy in Japan: History, Education, Character, Assessment. In Physiological and Psychological Effects of Horticulture, International Conference of Healthcare and Therapeutic Design (ICHTD), Tunghai University in Taichung, Taiwan.
89. Tuke, D. H. (1882). Chapters in the history of the insane in the British Isles. London: Kegan Paul Trench.
90. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.
91. Uslu, A. ve Shakouri, N. (2012). Zihinsel ve fiziksel engelliler için hortikültürel terapi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi. 12(1): 134-143.
92. Webber, J., Hinds, J. and Camic, P. M. (2015). The well-being of allotment gardeners: A mixed methodological study. Ecopsychology, 7, 20–28.
93. Weber, B. A. (2012). Social work and the challenges of the green economy. Advances in Social Work, 13 (2), 391–407.
94. Wichrowski, M., Whiteson, J., Haas, F., Mola, A., Rey, M. J. (2005). Effects of horticultural therapy on mood and heart rate in patients participating in an inpatient cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 25 (5), 270-274.
95. Williams, A. (2007). The continuing maturation of the therapeutic landscape concept. In: Williams, A. (Ed). Therapeutic Landscapes (Geographies of Health Series). Aldershot: Ashgate.
96. Verra, M. L., Angst, F., Beck, T. Lehmann, S., Brioschi, R., Schneiter, R. and Aeschlimaan, A. (2012). Horticultural therapy for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: Results of a pilot study. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 18 (2), 44-50.
97. Yanardağ, U. (2019). Türkiye’de çevre odaklı sosyal çalışma uygulamalarını düşünmek. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 30(1), 309-329.
98. Yılmaz, E. (2017). Hastanelerde Terapi Bahçelerinin İyi Olma Haline Etkilerinin Araştırılması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
99. Young, T.,M. (1994). Environmental modification in clinical social work: A self-psychological perspective. Social Service Review, 68(2), 202-218.