Investigating the Relation between Pedestrian Attitudes and Behaviors in Turkey

Öz

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between pedestrian safety attitudes and pedestrian behaviors by using the attitude questionnaire developed for this study. For this purpose, in the process of data collection, the data were collected from a total of 553 pedestrians whose age ranged from 18 to 55 by using the newly developed Pedestrian Attitude Questionnaire and Pedestrian Behavior Scale developed by Nordfjærn ve Şimşekoğlu (2013). Exploratory factor analysis for the newly developed Pedestrian Attitude Questionnaire showed a two-factor structure named as attitudes towards other road users and attitudes towards traffic rules. To examine the relationship between pedestrian attitudes and pedestrian behaviors, hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. The results showed that attitudes toward other road users were positively related to transgressions and aggressive violations and negatively related to attentional violations, and attitudes toward traffic rules were positively related to transgressions, attentional violations, and aggressive pedestrian behaviors. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• pedestrian behaviors,pedestrian attitudes,pedestrian behavior scale,pedestrian attitude questionnaire

Türkiye’de Yaya Tutumları ve Yaya Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı yaya tutum ve davranışları arasındaki ilişkiyi, bu çalışma kapsamında geliştirilen bir yaya tutum ölçeğini kullanarak incelemektir. Bu amaçla, veri toplama sürecinde yeni geliştirilen Yaya Tutum Ölçeği ve Nordfjærn ve Şimşekoğlu (2013) tarafından geliştirilen Yaya Davranış Ölçeği kullanılarak, yaşları 18 ile 55 arasında değişmekte olan 553 kişiden veri toplanmıştır. Yeni geliştirilen Yaya Tutum Ölçeği’nin faktör yapısı açımlayıcı faktör analizi kullanarak analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda Yaya Tutum Ölçeği’nin diğer yol kullanıcılarına ilişkin tutumlar ve trafik kurallarına ilişkin tutumlar olmak üzere iki faktörden oluştuğu görülmüştür. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla hiyerarşik regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, diğer yol kullanıcılarına ilişkin tutumların kural ihlalleri ve saldırgan davranışlar ile pozitif, dikkate dayalı ihlaller ile negatif ve trafik kurallarına ilişkin tutumların yayaların kural ihlalleri, dikkatsiz ihlalleri ve saldırgan davranışlarıyla pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yaya davranışları,yaya tutumları,yaya davranış ölçeği,yaya tutum ölçeği

Kaynakça

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behavior Human Decission Process, 50, 179–211.
2. Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J. ve Vredenburg, D. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 213–226.
3. Alicke, M. D., Dunning, D. ve Krueger, J. I. (2014). The self in social judgment. New York: Psychology Press.
4. Barton, B., K., Kolongi, S., M. ve Siron, A. (2016). Distracted pedestrians in crosswalks: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 37, 129–137. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.12.012.
5. Bungum, T. J., Day, C. ve Henry, L. J. (2005). The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk. Journal of Community Health, 30, 269–279.
6. Charlton, J., Day, R., Fildes, B., Ihsen, E. ve Oxley, J. (2001). Road crossing behaviour of older pedestrians.10th European Conference on Developmental Psychology. Sweden, Uppsala: European Society for Developmental Psychology. Erişim Tarihi Kasım 7, 2017, http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/3888
7. Elliott, M. A., Armitage, C. J. ve Baughan, C. J. (2003). Drivers' compliance with speed limits: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 964–972. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.964.
8. Evans D. ve Norman, P. (1998). Understanding pedestrians’ road crossing decisions: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Health and Education Research, 13, 481–489.

9. Diaz, E. M. (2002). Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians’ intentions to violate traffic regulations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 169–175.
10. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. Global Status Report on Road Safety. Supporting Decade of Action. 2013. http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78256/1/9789241564564 eng.pdf.
11. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. Global Status Report on Road Safety. 2015. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2015/en/
12. Granie, M-A., Pannetier, M. ve Gueho, L. (2013). Developing a self-reporting method to measure pedestrian behaviors at all ages. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 830–839.
13. Iversen, H. H. ve Rundmo, T. (2004). Attitudes towards traffic safety, driving behaviour and accident involvement among the Norwegian public. Ergonomics, 47, 555–572.
14. Holland, C. ve Hill, R. (2007). The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians' intentions to cross the road in risky situations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 224–237. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.003.
15. Martin, A. (2006). Factors Influencing Pedestrian Safety : A Literature Review (p. 109, Rep. No. PPR241). London, England. Erişim http://content.tfl.gov.uk/factors-influencing-pedestrian-safety-literature-review.pdf
16. Nordfjærn, T. ve Şimşekoğlu, Ö. (2013). The role of cultural factors and attitudes for pedestrian behavior in an urban Turkish sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 21, 181–193.
17. Papadimitriou, E., Theofilatos, A. ve Yannis, G. (2013). Patterns of pedestrian attitudes, perceptions and behaviour in Europe. Safety Science, 53, 114–122.
18. Razzaghi, A., Salehi, A., Heidar, İ. K. ve Zolala, F. (2014). Exploring the barriers and facilitators in using of pedestrian bridges among pedestrians: a qualitative study. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention, 2, 173–9.
19. Şimşekoğlu, Ö. (2015). How do attitudes, personality traits, and driver behaviors relate to pedestrian behaviors?: A turkish case. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16, 84-89. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.880785
20. Tabak, A., Erkuş, A. ve Meydan, C. H. (2010). Denetim odağı ve yenilikçi birey davranışları arasındaki ilişkiler: Belirsizliğe tolerans ve risk almanın aracılık etkisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 159–176.
21. Yagil, D. (2000). Beliefs, motives and situational factors related to pedestrians self-reported behavior at signal-controlled crossings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3, 1–13.
22. Yannis, G., Golias, J. ve Papadimitriou, E. (2007). Modelling crossing behaviour and accident risk of pedestrians. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 33(11), 634–644.
23. Zaig, R. (2010). Pedestrians’ injuries in road crashes. Vantage-Point on Road-Safety, 7, Israeli National Road Safety Authority. http://www.rsa.gov.il/InformationResearchCenter/ResearchSurveyCenter/tazpit/Documents/NekudatTazpit7.pdf
24. Zhang, G., You, K. K. W. ve Zhang, X. (2014). Analyzing fault and severity in pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 73, 141–150.
25. Zhou, R., Horrey, W. J. ve Yu, R. (2009). The effect of conformity tendency on pedestrians’ road-crossing intentions in china: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 491–497.