Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A New Look to the Pottery of the Late Iron and Hellenistic Ages in the Kızılırmak Bend Region in the View of Two Painted Vessels at the Amasya Museum

Yıl 2001, Sayı: 4 , 89 - 99 , 15.12.2001
https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP

Öz

In the Late Iron Age (650- ca. 500/350 B.C.), the Central Anatolian Region was divided into two areas as mentioned in the Western ancient sources, in Western sources of which the Western part of the Kilirmak (Halys) was known as Phrygia and the easter part as Cappadocia. In Ancient Eastern sources the middle part of the Kralırmak region was known as Tabal, the nort hern part as Kashku, the southwestern part as Tuvana (Tukhana) and the eastern part as Melid. Due to the cosmopolitan nature of this region's population structure, the painted pottery group with stylized deer representations of silhouette technique with concentric motifs, which were fo- und in the main settlements of the region and known as Alişar IV, are considered to be the ma in characteristic pottery of the Kızılırmak Bend in the Middle Iron Age (850-650 B.C.). The effects of political developments in the Late Iron Age (650- ca 500/350 B.C) were reflected in the new techniques introduced into the pottery production of the workshops that had been the centres of the Middle Iron Age tradition. The stylized deer figures began to be produced with new line- ar and reserve techniques and gained a more naturalized in appearance. The numbers and vari ety of bird representations increased and these began to be the used as the main elements of compositions consisting of representations of bulls, horses, donkeys, wild goat, roe deer, lions, dogs and fish. In addition to these, representations of hybrid creatures such as winged bulls and sphinxes and unidentifiable strange creatures also appeared. Human figures, which were very few in number and extremely stylized in the Middle Iron Age, became important in the Late Iron Age. Kybele, the mother goddess of the Phrygians who was in fact worshipped in Anatolia from Neolithic times, was portrayed on pottery in this period. It is apparent that the pottery workshops of the Kızılırmak Bend Region continued to use traditional characteristics but also incorporated external influences into their pottery production from around the beginning of the 5 century BC. From this period onwards some noticeable differences began to occur in pottery decoration techniques, for example the number of types of animal representations lessened while series of birds began to be widely used as the main element in compositions. Changes in plant motifs also occur from the beginning of the 5 century. The composition of ivy leaf seen on a bowl from Amasya Museum (Fig.1) can be attributed on the basis of technique to influence from the Ae- gean and must have entered the Late Iron Age pottery decoration repertoire of the Kızılırmak Bend during the first half of the 5th century BC. However it seems that, on the basis of typological and decoration characteristics, the complete bowl with a decoration of ivy leaves (Fig 2-3) belongs to the 3" century BC. The evaluations and examples presented above suggest that the Lar te Iron Age and Hellenistic Age chronology of the Kızılırmak Bend Region and the pottery ter minology need to be reviewed. It is apparent that, in spite of some changes in the details of motifs, the Late Iron Age tradition within the Kızılırmak Bend continues to be strong until around the Middle of the 4 century BC, that is up to the Hellenistic Period. It is therefore clear that there was no real gap between the Late Iron Age and the Hellenistic Age but instead a cultural con- tinuity in pottery development can be traced and the pottery workshops, in existence from the Middle Iron Age, continued without interruption into the Hellenistic Period. In the light of this, the chronological boundary of the Late Iron Age within the Kızılırmak Bend can be said to extend to the middle of the 4 century BC.

Kaynakça

  • AKARCA, A. 1990 "Yerli Pontos Seramig. V. Terk Tarih Kongrest, Ankara, 142146

Amasya Müzesi'nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış

Yıl 2001, Sayı: 4 , 89 - 99 , 15.12.2001
https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP

Öz

In the Late Iron Age (650- ca. 500/350 B.C.), the Central Anatolian Region was divided into two areas as mentioned in the Western ancient sources, in Western sources of which the Western part of the Kilirmak (Halys) was known as Phrygia and the easter part as Cappadocia. In Ancient Eastern sources the middle part of the Kralırmak region was known as Tabal, the nort hern part as Kashku, the southwestern part as Tuvana (Tukhana) and the eastern part as Melid. Due to the cosmopolitan nature of this region's population structure, the painted pottery group with stylized deer representations of silhouette technique with concentric motifs, which were fo- und in the main settlements of the region and known as Alişar IV, are considered to be the ma in characteristic pottery of the Kızılırmak Bend in the Middle Iron Age (850-650 B.C.). The effects of political developments in the Late Iron Age (650- ca 500/350 B.C) were reflected in the new techniques introduced into the pottery production of the workshops that had been the centres of the Middle Iron Age tradition. The stylized deer figures began to be produced with new line- ar and reserve techniques and gained a more naturalized in appearance. The numbers and vari ety of bird representations increased and these began to be the used as the main elements of compositions consisting of representations of bulls, horses, donkeys, wild goat, roe deer, lions, dogs and fish. In addition to these, representations of hybrid creatures such as winged bulls and sphinxes and unidentifiable strange creatures also appeared. Human figures, which were very few in number and extremely stylized in the Middle Iron Age, became important in the Late Iron Age. Kybele, the mother goddess of the Phrygians who was in fact worshipped in Anatolia from Neolithic times, was portrayed on pottery in this period. It is apparent that the pottery workshops of the Kızılırmak Bend Region continued to use traditional characteristics but also incorporated external influences into their pottery production from around the beginning of the 5 century BC. From this period onwards some noticeable differences began to occur in pottery decoration techniques, for example the number of types of animal representations lessened while series of birds began to be widely used as the main element in compositions. Changes in plant motifs also occur from the beginning of the 5 century. The composition of ivy leaf seen on a bowl from Amasya Museum (Fig.1) can be attributed on the basis of technique to influence from the Aegean and must have entered the Late Iron Age pottery decoration repertoire of the Kızılırmak Bend during the first half of the 5th century BC. However it seems that, on the basis of typological and decoration characteristics, the complete bowl with a decoration of ivy leaves (Fig 2-3) belongs to the 3" century BC. The evaluations and examples presented above suggest that the Lar te Iron Age and Hellenistic Age chronology of the Kızılırmak Bend Region and the pottery ter minology need to be reviewed. It is apparent that, in spite of some changes in the details of motifs, the Late Iron Age tradition within the Kızılırmak Bend continues to be strong until around the Middle of the 4 century BC, that is up to the Hellenistic Period. It is therefore clear that there was no real gap between the Late Iron Age and the Hellenistic Age but instead a cultural continuity in pottery development can be traced and the pottery workshops, in existence from the Middle Iron Age, continued without interruption into the Hellenistic Period. In the light of this, the chronological boundary of the Late Iron Age within the Kızılırmak Bend can be said to extend to the middle of the 4 century BC.

Kaynakça

  • AKARCA, A. 1990 "Yerli Pontos Seramig. V. Terk Tarih Kongrest, Ankara, 142146
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Helenistik Dönem Arkeolojisi, Türk Coğrafyası Arkeolojisi, Geç Demir Çağ
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Şevket Dönmez

Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Haziran 2001
Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Aralık 2001
IZ https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2001 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Dönmez, Ş. (2001). Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 4, 89-99. https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP
AMA 1.Dönmez Ş. Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış. TÜBA-AR. 2001;(4):89-99. https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP
Chicago Dönmez, Şevket. 2001. “Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, sy 4: 89-99. https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP.
EndNote Dönmez Ş (01 Aralık 2001) Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 4 89–99.
IEEE [1]Ş. Dönmez, “Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış”, TÜBA-AR, sy 4, ss. 89–99, Ara. 2001, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP
ISNAD Dönmez, Şevket. “Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 4 (01 Aralık 2001): 89-99. https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP.
JAMA 1.Dönmez Ş. Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış. TÜBA-AR. 2001;:89–99.
MLA Dönmez, Şevket. “Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, sy 4, Aralık 2001, ss. 89-99, https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP.
Vancouver 1.Şevket Dönmez. Amasya Müzesi’nden Boya Bezekli İki Çanak Işığında Kızılırmak Kavsi Geç Demir ve Helenistik Çağları Çanak-Çömleğine Yeni Bir Bakış. TÜBA-AR [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2001;(4):89-9. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA78HJ72HP

Yayıncı

34406
https://tuba.gov.tr/tr/  

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

tuba-ar@tuba.gov.tr
(+90) (212) 219 16 60
 

34047  34057    34410   34061

 

TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi / Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR), dergide yayımlanan makalelerde ifade edilen görüşleri resmî olarak benimsememekte ve derginin basılı ya da çevrim içi sürümlerinde yer alan herhangi bir ürün veya hizmet reklamı konusunda garanti vermemektedir. Yayımlanan makalelerin bilimsel ve hukuki sorumluluğu yazar(lar)a aittir.

Makalelerle birlikte gönderilen resim, şekil, tablo vb. materyaller özgün olmalı ya da daha önce yayımlanmışlarsa, hem basılı hem de çevrim içi sürümlerde yayımlanmak üzere eser sahibinden alınmış yazılı izinle birlikte sunulmalıdır. Yazar(lar), dergide yayımlanan çalışmalarının telif hakkını saklı tutar. Makale dergide yayımlandığında, mali haklar ve umuma iletim hakları, işleme, çoğaltma, temsil, basım, yayın ve dağıtım hakları TÜBA’ya devredilecektir. Yayımlanan tüm içeriklerin (metin ve görsel materyaller) telif hakları dergiye aittir. Dergide yayımlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler için telif hakkı ya da başka bir ad altında ödeme yapılmaz ve yazar(lar)dan makale işlem ücreti alınmaz; ancak yeniden baskı (reprint) talepleri yazarın sorumluluğundadır.

Bilimsel bilgi ve araştırmalara küresel açık erişimi teşvik etmek amacıyla TÜBA, çevrim içi olarak yayımlanan tüm içeriklerin (aksi belirtilmedikçe) okuyucular, araştırmacılar ve kurumlar tarafından serbestçe kullanılmasına izin vermektedir. Bu kullanım, eserin kaynağının belirtilmesi koşuluyla ve ticari amaç dışında, herhangi bir değişiklik yapılmaksızın Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Uluslararası Lisansı kapsamında mümkündür. Ticari kullanım veya lisans istisnaları ile ilgili izinler için lütfen dergi ile iletişime geçiniz.