A Study of Two Arrowheads from the Excavations at Kef Fortress
Öz
This study aims to introduce to the academic literature two unique arrowheads, previously unknown in Urartian archaeology, which were discovered in the “Great Hall” area during the 2024 excavation season at Kef Fortress (Adilcevaz, Bitlis), a significant fortress of the Urartian Kingdom. One of the artefacts is made of flint, while the other is crafted from iron. The flint arrowhead is of great importance as it represents the first recorded instance of an arrowhead made from this material in the Urartian weapon repertoire. Measuring 2,5 cm in length and weighing 2 grams, this arrowhead is evaluated as potentially being used for long-distance hunting, given its lightweight structure and unique wing form. The second arrowhead, made of iron, distinguishes itself from the known “leaf/willow-leaf” form of Urartian ironworking. It is notable for its width of up to 3 cm, its triangular form, and its flat body structure lacking a pronounced midrib. This form represents a type hitherto unencountered in other Urartian centres across Anatolia. The article examines these two exceptional finds in detail using typological, material-based, and comparative methodologies, and opens a discussion on their place in Urartian archaeology and weapon typology. Both arrowheads allow us to pose new questions regarding the diversity in weapon design by Urartian craftspeople and potential inter-regional interactions.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Iron Age, Urartian Archaeology, Kef Fortress, Weapon Typology, Arrowheads
Etik Beyan
To the Editorial Board of TÜBA-AR
Dear Editors,
We hereby submit our study entitled "TWO UNIQUE ARROWHEADS FROM THE EXCAVATIONS AT KEF FORTRESS" for publication in the TÜBA-AR journal.
We respectfully declare that the submitted manuscript:
• Has not been previously published,
• Has not been sent to nor is under review by any other journal,
• Is an original study prepared in accordance with scientific methods and principles, and
• Fully complies with research and publication ethics.
The study has been prepared with the joint contribution of all authors; each author has reviewed the final version, approved its submission for publication, and accepts full scientific responsibility. We also declare that we will act in accordance with the publication policies and ethical principles of your journal.
We kindly submit the manuscript for your evaluation.
Respectfully
Kaynakça
- Abbasoğlu, H. (1996). Perge Akropolisinde 1994 yılında yapılan çalışmalar. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 17(2), 121–129.
- Bahşaliyev, E., & Bahşaliyev, V. (2019). Urartu devletinin Güney Kafkasya politikasında Nahçıvan’ın yeri (Nahçıvan, Azerbaycan). Amisos, 4(6), 15–34.
- Balkan-Atlı, N. (1994). La Neolithisation de L’Anatolie. Institut Français d’Etudes Anatoliennes-Georges Dumézil.
- Balkan-Atlı, N. (2005). Yontmataş Endüstrisi. In R. Duru (Ed.), Höyücek 1989–1992 yılları arasında yapılan kazıların sonuçları (pp. 130–138). Türk Tarih Kurumu.
- Barnett, R. D., & Gökçe, N. (1953). The find of Urartian bronzes at Altıntepe, near Erzincan. Anatolian Studies, 3, 121–129.
- Baş, A. (2016). Urartuda askeri bir ekipman: Kalkanlar. Uluslararası Amisos Dergisi, 1(1), 107–134.
- Batmaz, A. (2003). Urartu Krallığı’nın II. Rusa dönemindeki tarihi ve kültürü [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ege Üniversitesi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=zsBrvnBtSjRgck_mc0glvQ&no=bUFQS1soR_qhXgdSz8iQXA
- Belli, O. (1998). Anzaf kaleleri ve Urartu tanrıları. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
- Belli, O. (2004). Urartu: Savaş ve estetik. Yapı Kredi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
- Belli, O., & Tozkoparan, M. (2005). 2003 yılı Van-Yoncatepe Kalesi ve Nekropolü kazısı. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 26(1), 189–203.