Görüş Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 20, 129 - 146, 01.03.2017

Öz

The Achaemenid architecture is the most exquisite art of this culture due to the artistic and technical features. New
excavations in the cultural region of the Black Sea and the southern Caucasus represent accumulation of Achaemenid
artistic evidences and the effects of the Persian Style on the architecture. It contains palaces, columned halls, Gates,
and temples. Achaemenid palaces with pedestals in Pontus and Oluz Höyük other monuments from Sari Tepe,
Gumbati, Benjamin, Qaracamirli, Samadlo, Sarikhe, Zikhiagora are identified. All of them have similar features as
Achaemenid’s.
They reveal a kind of concordance in structures and decorations. Whence there are a vast number of the Achaemenid
architecture evidences, an extensive scientific investigation is discussed. The most important question of this research
is to introduce the homogeneity state of the Achaemenid architecture in the area of research. It is a fundamental
investigation Conducted by a descriptive – Analytic method and documentation based in quantitative method and
analysis the evidences.

Kaynakça

  • BABAEV, I. / GAGOSHIDZE, I. / KNAUSS, F. S., 2007 “An Achaemenid « Palace» at Qarajamirli (Azerbaijan) Preliminary Report on the Excavations in 2006”, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 13/1: 31-45.
  • BABAEV, I. / GAGOSHIDZE, I. / KNAUSS, F. S., 2009 “Excavations in the Achaemenid Palatial Complex near the Village Karacamirli in the Shamkir Region, Azerbaijan - Land between East and West.” Transfer of Knowledge and Technology during the “First Globalization” of the VIIth - IVth Millennium BC. International Symposium Baku. April 1-3. Baku: 88-91.
  • BILL, A., 2010 “Achaemenids in the Caucasus?” Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11, (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm) Aarhus: 15-27.
  • CURTIS, J., 2005a “Jewellery And Personal Ornaments”, Forgotten Empire the World of Ancient Persia (Eds. J. E. Curtis / N. Tallis) London: 132-149.
  • DÖNMEZ, Ş., 2007 “The Achaemenid Impact On the Central Black Sea Region”, The Achaemenid Impact on Local Populations and Cultures in Anatolia. İstanbul: 107- 116.
  • DÖNMEZ, Ş., 2011 “Oluz Höyük kazısı Dördüncü Dönem (2010) Çalışmaları: Değerlendirmeler ve Sonuçlar”, Colloqium X: 103-128
  • DÖNMEZ, Ş., 2012 “Oluz Höyük, Karadeniz Persler”, Aktüel Arkeoloji 25: 104-145
  • DZHAVAKHISHVILI, K., 2007 “Achaemenian Seals Found in Georgia”, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 13/1: 117-128.
  • ERLIKH, V. R., 2010 “Recent Investigations of the Ulski Kurgans”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11, (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 47-65.
  • GERGOVA, D., 2010 “Orphic Thrace and Achaemenid Persia”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 67-86.
  • IGNATIADOU, D., 2005 “Achaemenid and Greek Colourless Glass”, The World of Achaemenid Persia: History, Art and Society in Iran and, the Ancient Near East (Eds. J. Curtis / St. J. Simpson). Proceedings of a Conference at the British Museum, 29th September–1st October. London: 419426.
  • KHATCHADOURIAN, L. 2008 Social Logics under Empire, The Armanian “Highland Satrapy “ and Achaemenid Rule 600-300 BC., (A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Classical Art and Archaeology in the University of Michigan). Michigan.
  • KNAUSS, F., 2005 Caucasus, L’archéologie de l’Empire achéménide: nouvelles recherches, pp. 179- 220.
  • KNAUSS, F., 2006 “Ancient Persia and the Caucasus”, Iranica Antiqua XLI: 79-118.
  • KNAUSS, F. / GAGOSHIDZE, I. / BABAEV, I., 2010 “A Persian Propyleion in Azerbaijan Excavations at Karacamirli”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 111-122.
  • LUKONIN, V. / ANATOLY, I. 2012 The Lost Treasure Persian art. USA.
  • NIELING, J., 2010 “Persian Imperial Policy Behind the Rise and Fall of the Cimmerian Bosporus in the Last Quarter of the Sixth to the Beginning of the Fifth Century BC”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm) Aarhus: 123-136.
  • REHM, E., 2010 “The Classification of Objects from the Black Sea Region Made or Influenced by the Achaemenids”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm) Aarhus: 162-194.
  • SHEMAKHANSKAYA, M. / TREISTER, M. / YABLONSKY, L., 2009 “The Technique of Gold Inlaid Decoration in the 5th – 4th Centuries BC: Silver and Iron Finds from the Early Sarmatian Barrows of Filippovka, Southern Urals”, ArcheoSciences, revue d’archéométrie 33: 211-220.
  • SIMPSON, St. J., 2005 The Royal Table, Forgotten Empire the World of Ancient Persia (Eds. J. Curtis / E. N. Tallis). London: 104- 131.
  • SIDERIS, A., 2008 Achaemenid Toreuticsin the Greek Periphery, Ancient Greece and Ancient Iran: Cross-Cultural Encounters. 1st International Conference, Athens 11-13 November, (Eds. S. M. R. Darbandi / A. Zournatzi). 339-354.
  • SUMMERER, L., 2003 Achämenidische Silberfunde aus der Umgebung von Sinope, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 9/1: 17-42.
  • SUMMERER, L. / VON KIENLIN, A., 2010 “Achaemenid Impact in Paphlagonia: Rupestral Tombs in the Amnias Valley”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 195-221.
  • TER-MARTIROSSOV, F. I., 2001 “The Typology of the Columnar Structures of Armenia in the Achaemenid Period”, The Royal Palace Institution in the First Millennium BC: Regional Development and Cultural Interchange between East and West (Ed. I. Nielsen). Copenhagen: 155-163.
  • ТРЕЙСТЕР, М.Ю (БОНН)., 2010 Серебряный ритон и золотая гривна из Новокумакского кургана №1/1971, Археология и палеоантропология евразийских степей и сопредельных территорий, Герасимова М.М., Малашев В.Ю., Мошкова М.Г. (ред.), МИАР № 13, pp.355-377.
  • ТРЕЙСТЕР, М.Ю., 2013A Золотые бляшки ахеменидского стиля из кургана Б аксы в Восточном Крыму, Древности Боспора.17, pp.345-362.
  • ТРЕЙСТЕР, М.Ю., 2013b Клад серебряных ритонов ахеменидского круга из Эребуни, Scripta antiqua, Ancient History,Philology,Arts and Material Culture, Volume Three, pp:341-422.
  • TREISTER, M. YU., 2007 “The Toreutics of Colchis in the 5th - 4th Centuries BC Local Traditions, Outside Influences, Innovations”, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 13/1: 67-107.
  • TRIANTAFYLLIDIS, P., 2001 Achaemenian Glass Production, Annales,du 15e Congrès, pp.13-17.
  • VENEDIKOV, I., 1977 “The Archaeological Wealth of Ancient Thrace”, The Metropolitan Museum Of Art Bulletin 53/1: 7-71.
  • YABLONSKY, L. T., 2010 “New Excavations of the Early Nomadic Burial Ground at Filipponka (Southern Ural Region, Russia)”, American Journal of Archaeology 114: 129-143.

GÜNEY KAFKASYA VE KARADENİZ KÜLTÜR HAVZASI’NDA AKHAİMENİD MİMARİSİ

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 20, 129 - 146, 01.03.2017

Öz

Akhaimenid mimarisi, artistik ve teknik özelliklerinden dolayı bu kültürün en enfes sanatıdır. Kara denizin kültürel
bölgesi ve Güney Kafkasya’da yapılan yeni kazılarda Akhaimenid artistik bulgular ve mimaride Pers etkileri
bulunmuştur. Bu bulguların arasında saraylar, sütunlu salonlar, kapılar ve tapınaklar vardır. Pontos ve Oluz
Höyükte ki, Akhaimenid saraylarda bulunan kaideler, Sari Tepe, Gumbati, Benjamin, Qaracamirli, Samadlo,
Sarikhe, Zikhiagora da bulunan başka anıtların tamamında Akhaimenid etkileri görülmüştür.
Bu yapılar yapım ve süsleme açısından bütünlük içerisindedir. Her ne kadar pek çok Akhaemenid mimari buluntu ve
geniş bilimsel araştırmalar tartışılsada, önemli olan Akhaemenid devletinin mimarisinin homojen yapısının ortaya
çıkartılmasıdır. Bu durum en azından çalışmamızın odağını oluşturan bölge için geçerlidir. Bu temel araştırma
betimleyici-analitik yöntem kullanılarak ve dokümantasyon nicelik olarak incelenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • BABAEV, I. / GAGOSHIDZE, I. / KNAUSS, F. S., 2007 “An Achaemenid « Palace» at Qarajamirli (Azerbaijan) Preliminary Report on the Excavations in 2006”, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 13/1: 31-45.
  • BABAEV, I. / GAGOSHIDZE, I. / KNAUSS, F. S., 2009 “Excavations in the Achaemenid Palatial Complex near the Village Karacamirli in the Shamkir Region, Azerbaijan - Land between East and West.” Transfer of Knowledge and Technology during the “First Globalization” of the VIIth - IVth Millennium BC. International Symposium Baku. April 1-3. Baku: 88-91.
  • BILL, A., 2010 “Achaemenids in the Caucasus?” Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11, (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm) Aarhus: 15-27.
  • CURTIS, J., 2005a “Jewellery And Personal Ornaments”, Forgotten Empire the World of Ancient Persia (Eds. J. E. Curtis / N. Tallis) London: 132-149.
  • DÖNMEZ, Ş., 2007 “The Achaemenid Impact On the Central Black Sea Region”, The Achaemenid Impact on Local Populations and Cultures in Anatolia. İstanbul: 107- 116.
  • DÖNMEZ, Ş., 2011 “Oluz Höyük kazısı Dördüncü Dönem (2010) Çalışmaları: Değerlendirmeler ve Sonuçlar”, Colloqium X: 103-128
  • DÖNMEZ, Ş., 2012 “Oluz Höyük, Karadeniz Persler”, Aktüel Arkeoloji 25: 104-145
  • DZHAVAKHISHVILI, K., 2007 “Achaemenian Seals Found in Georgia”, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 13/1: 117-128.
  • ERLIKH, V. R., 2010 “Recent Investigations of the Ulski Kurgans”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11, (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 47-65.
  • GERGOVA, D., 2010 “Orphic Thrace and Achaemenid Persia”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 67-86.
  • IGNATIADOU, D., 2005 “Achaemenid and Greek Colourless Glass”, The World of Achaemenid Persia: History, Art and Society in Iran and, the Ancient Near East (Eds. J. Curtis / St. J. Simpson). Proceedings of a Conference at the British Museum, 29th September–1st October. London: 419426.
  • KHATCHADOURIAN, L. 2008 Social Logics under Empire, The Armanian “Highland Satrapy “ and Achaemenid Rule 600-300 BC., (A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Classical Art and Archaeology in the University of Michigan). Michigan.
  • KNAUSS, F., 2005 Caucasus, L’archéologie de l’Empire achéménide: nouvelles recherches, pp. 179- 220.
  • KNAUSS, F., 2006 “Ancient Persia and the Caucasus”, Iranica Antiqua XLI: 79-118.
  • KNAUSS, F. / GAGOSHIDZE, I. / BABAEV, I., 2010 “A Persian Propyleion in Azerbaijan Excavations at Karacamirli”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 111-122.
  • LUKONIN, V. / ANATOLY, I. 2012 The Lost Treasure Persian art. USA.
  • NIELING, J., 2010 “Persian Imperial Policy Behind the Rise and Fall of the Cimmerian Bosporus in the Last Quarter of the Sixth to the Beginning of the Fifth Century BC”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm) Aarhus: 123-136.
  • REHM, E., 2010 “The Classification of Objects from the Black Sea Region Made or Influenced by the Achaemenids”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm) Aarhus: 162-194.
  • SHEMAKHANSKAYA, M. / TREISTER, M. / YABLONSKY, L., 2009 “The Technique of Gold Inlaid Decoration in the 5th – 4th Centuries BC: Silver and Iron Finds from the Early Sarmatian Barrows of Filippovka, Southern Urals”, ArcheoSciences, revue d’archéométrie 33: 211-220.
  • SIMPSON, St. J., 2005 The Royal Table, Forgotten Empire the World of Ancient Persia (Eds. J. Curtis / E. N. Tallis). London: 104- 131.
  • SIDERIS, A., 2008 Achaemenid Toreuticsin the Greek Periphery, Ancient Greece and Ancient Iran: Cross-Cultural Encounters. 1st International Conference, Athens 11-13 November, (Eds. S. M. R. Darbandi / A. Zournatzi). 339-354.
  • SUMMERER, L., 2003 Achämenidische Silberfunde aus der Umgebung von Sinope, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 9/1: 17-42.
  • SUMMERER, L. / VON KIENLIN, A., 2010 “Achaemenid Impact in Paphlagonia: Rupestral Tombs in the Amnias Valley”, Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers, Black Sea Studies 11 (Eds. J. Nieling / E. Rehm). Aarhus: 195-221.
  • TER-MARTIROSSOV, F. I., 2001 “The Typology of the Columnar Structures of Armenia in the Achaemenid Period”, The Royal Palace Institution in the First Millennium BC: Regional Development and Cultural Interchange between East and West (Ed. I. Nielsen). Copenhagen: 155-163.
  • ТРЕЙСТЕР, М.Ю (БОНН)., 2010 Серебряный ритон и золотая гривна из Новокумакского кургана №1/1971, Археология и палеоантропология евразийских степей и сопредельных территорий, Герасимова М.М., Малашев В.Ю., Мошкова М.Г. (ред.), МИАР № 13, pp.355-377.
  • ТРЕЙСТЕР, М.Ю., 2013A Золотые бляшки ахеменидского стиля из кургана Б аксы в Восточном Крыму, Древности Боспора.17, pp.345-362.
  • ТРЕЙСТЕР, М.Ю., 2013b Клад серебряных ритонов ахеменидского круга из Эребуни, Scripta antiqua, Ancient History,Philology,Arts and Material Culture, Volume Three, pp:341-422.
  • TREISTER, M. YU., 2007 “The Toreutics of Colchis in the 5th - 4th Centuries BC Local Traditions, Outside Influences, Innovations”, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 13/1: 67-107.
  • TRIANTAFYLLIDIS, P., 2001 Achaemenian Glass Production, Annales,du 15e Congrès, pp.13-17.
  • VENEDIKOV, I., 1977 “The Archaeological Wealth of Ancient Thrace”, The Metropolitan Museum Of Art Bulletin 53/1: 7-71.
  • YABLONSKY, L. T., 2010 “New Excavations of the Early Nomadic Burial Ground at Filipponka (Southern Ural Region, Russia)”, American Journal of Archaeology 114: 129-143.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Arkeoloji (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Saba Beikzadeh Bu kişi benim

Farshid Iravani Ghadim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Sayı: 20

Kaynak Göster

APA Beikzadeh, S., & Iravani Ghadim, F. (2017). ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi(20), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.22520/tubaar.2017.20.007
AMA Beikzadeh S, Iravani Ghadim F. ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN. TÜBA-AR. Haziran 2017;(20):129-146. doi:10.22520/tubaar.2017.20.007
Chicago Beikzadeh, Saba, ve Farshid Iravani Ghadim. “ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, sy. 20 (Haziran 2017): 129-46. https://doi.org/10.22520/tubaar.2017.20.007.
EndNote Beikzadeh S, Iravani Ghadim F (01 Haziran 2017) ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 20 129–146.
IEEE S. Beikzadeh ve F. Iravani Ghadim, “ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN”, TÜBA-AR, sy. 20, ss. 129–146, Haziran2017, doi: 10.22520/tubaar.2017.20.007.
ISNAD Beikzadeh, Saba - Iravani Ghadim, Farshid. “ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 20 (Haziran2017), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.22520/tubaar.2017.20.007.
JAMA Beikzadeh S, Iravani Ghadim F. ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN. TÜBA-AR. 2017;:129–146.
MLA Beikzadeh, Saba ve Farshid Iravani Ghadim. “ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, sy. 20, 2017, ss. 129-46, doi:10.22520/tubaar.2017.20.007.
Vancouver Beikzadeh S, Iravani Ghadim F. ACHAEMENID ARCHITECTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE BLACK SEA CULTURAL BASIN. TÜBA-AR. 2017(20):129-46.

Yayıncı

34406

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

tuba-ar@tuba.gov.tr
(+90) (212) 219 16 60

34047  34057   34059 34410   34061

TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi / Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR), dergide yayımlanan makalelerde ifade edilen görüşleri resmî olarak benimsememekte ve derginin basılı ya da çevrim içi sürümlerinde yer alan herhangi bir ürün veya hizmet reklamı konusunda garanti vermemektedir. Yayımlanan makalelerin bilimsel ve hukuki sorumluluğu yazar(lar)a aittir.

Makalelerle birlikte gönderilen resim, şekil, tablo vb. materyaller özgün olmalı ya da daha önce yayımlanmışlarsa, hem basılı hem de çevrim içi sürümlerde yayımlanmak üzere eser sahibinden alınmış yazılı izinle birlikte sunulmalıdır. Yazar(lar), dergide yayımlanan çalışmalarının telif hakkını saklı tutar. Makale dergide yayımlandığında, mali haklar ve umuma iletim hakları, işleme, çoğaltma, temsil, basım, yayın ve dağıtım hakları TÜBA’ya devredilecektir. Yayımlanan tüm içeriklerin (metin ve görsel materyaller) telif hakları dergiye aittir. Dergide yayımlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler için telif hakkı ya da başka bir ad altında ödeme yapılmaz ve yazar(lar)dan makale işlem ücreti alınmaz; ancak yeniden baskı (reprint) talepleri yazarın sorumluluğundadır.

Bilimsel bilgi ve araştırmalara küresel açık erişimi teşvik etmek amacıyla TÜBA, çevrim içi olarak yayımlanan tüm içeriklerin (aksi belirtilmedikçe) okuyucular, araştırmacılar ve kurumlar tarafından serbestçe kullanılmasına izin vermektedir. Bu kullanım, eserin kaynağının belirtilmesi koşuluyla ve ticari amaç dışında, herhangi bir değişiklik yapılmaksızın Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Uluslararası Lisansı kapsamında mümkündür. Ticari kullanım için lütfen yayıncı ile iletişime geçiniz.