High School Students' Perceptions About Social Media: An Example of Metaphor Analysis

Öz

Abstract The aim of this research is to examine the daily social media usage times of 10th grade high school students and their perceptions and perspectives on the concept of social media with the metaphors they use.The phenomenological pattern, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The sample of the research consists of a total of 155 10th grade students, 80 of whom are girls and 75 of whom are boys. To collect data from students, the "Social Media Metaphorical Perception Scale", which also asked about gender and daily social media time, was used.In order to determine students' mental images, that is, metaphors, regarding social media, they were requested to fill in the blanks in the statement includes the following words: "Social media is like/similar to ………………;" "because………………". Content analysis was used to analyze the data collected to examine students' metaphorical perceptions towards social media. First of all, the data obtained was divided into coded categories and themes. The percentages and frequencies of metaphors used for each theme were calculated.When the data obtained was examined, a total of 101 metaphors were identified. The identified metaphors are divided into 3 categories: positive, negative and both positive and negative. The positive category is divided into 8 different themes: obtaining information, entertainment, needs, communication and socialization, family, independence, place to collect memories and source of income. The negative category is divided into three different themes: waste of time, addiction and harm. Both positive and negative categories were discussed as a separate section in line with the metaphor explanations. The findings of the research were discussed in the light of similar studies and suggestions were made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social media
• High school students
• Metaphor

Lise Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Medyaya İlişkin Algıları: Metafor Analizi Örneği

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı lise 10. sınıfta eğitim gören öğrencilerin günlük sosyal medya kullanım sürelerinin ve sosyal medya kavramına ilişkin algılarının ve bakış açılarının kullandıkları metaforlarla incelenmesidir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden olgubilim deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 80’i kız 75’i erkek olmak üzere toplam 155 10. sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Öğrencilerden verileri toplamak için cinsiyet ve günlük sosyal medya sürelerinin de sorulduğu “Sosyal Medya Metaforik Algı Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Ölçekte öğrencilerin sosyal medyaya ilişkin zihni imgelerini yani metaforları belirlemek adına “Sosyal medya ………………gibidir/a benzer; çünkü………………” ifadesindeki boşlukları doldurmaları talep edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin sosyal medyaya yönelik metaforik algılarının incelenmesi amacıyla toplanan verilerin analizinde içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Öncelikle elde edilen veriler kodlanmış kategorilere ve temalara ayrılmıştır. Her tema için kullanılan metafor yüzde ve frekansları hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler incelendiğinde toplam 101 adet metafor belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen metaforlar olumlu, olumsuz ve hem olumlu hem olumsuz olmak üzere 3 kategoriye ayrılmıştır. Olumlu kategorisi bilgi edinme, eğlenme, gereksinim, iletişim ve sosyalleşme, aile, bağımsızlık, hatıra biriktirilen yer ve gelir kapısı şeklinde 8 farklı temaya ayrılmıştır. Olumsuz kategorisi ise zaman kaybı, bağımlılık yapma ve zarar verme şeklinde 3 farklı temaya ayrılmıştır. Hem olumlu hem olumsuz kategorisi ise metafor açıklamaları doğrultusunda ayrı bir kısım olarak ele alınmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları benzer çalışmalar ışığında tartışılmış ve önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal medya
• Lise öğrencileri
• Metafor

Etik Beyan

Çalışmamızın etik kurul izni 24/04/2024 tarihinde İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik Komisyonu'ndan alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

1. Abeele, M. M. P., Halfmann, A. ve Lee, E. W. (2022). Drug, demon, or donut? Theorizing the relationship between social media use, digital well-being and digital disconnection. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.007
2. Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
3. Anderson, M., Faverıo, M. ve Park. E. (2023). How teens and parents approach screen time. Pew Research Center Survey. Erişim adresi: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/03/11/how-teens-and-parents-approach-screen-time/
4. Ansari, J. A. N. ve Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7
5. Asare‑Donkoh, F. (2018). Impact of social media on Ghanaian High School students. Library Philosophy and Practice (ejournal), 1914. Erişim adresi: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1914
6. Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). The role of social media in shaping public opinion and its influence on economic decisions. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i1.37
7. Ausat, A. M. A., Permana, R. M., Angellia, F., Subagja, A. D., ve Astutik, W. S. (2023). Utilisation of social media in market research and business decision analysis. Journal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 652–661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i2.12485
8. Avcı, F. (2020). Öğretmenlerin sosyal medya kullanımları ve sosyal medya kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (UKSAD). https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.808818

9. Aydın, M. ve Çelik, T. (2016). Öğrencilerin gözünden sosyal medyanın yarar ve riskleri üzerine bir inceleme. USBES V 2016 Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Sempozyumu: Bildiriler Kitabı.
10. Balcı, A. (2003). Eğitim örgütlerine yeni bakış açıları: kuram araştırma ilişkisi. II. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 9(1), 26-61.
11. Barry, C. T., ve Wong, M. Y. (2020). Fear of missing out (FoMO): A generational phenomenon or an individual difference?. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(12),2952-2966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520945394
12. Bat, M. (2012). Dijital platformda sosyal medyanın stratejik kurumsal iletişime etkisi [The effect of social media on strategic corporate communication in digital platform] (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
13. Berryman, C., Ferguson, C. J., ve Negy, C. (2018). Social media use and mental health among young adults. Psychiatric Quarterly, 89, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-017-9535-6
14. Bostancı, M. (2010). Sosyal medyanın gelişimi ve iletişim fakültesi öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
15. Bote‑Vericad, J. (2021). Challenges for the educational system during lockdowns: A possible new framework for teaching and learning for the near future. Education for Information, 37(1), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-200008
16. Brailovskaia, J., Schillack, H., ve Margraf, J. (2018). Facebook addiction disorder in Germany. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 450–456. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0140
17. Breakenridge, D. (2009). New media, new tools, new audiences. New Jersey: FT Press.
18. Brown, L., ve Kuss, D. J. (2020). Fear of missing out, mental wellbeing, and social connectedness: Aseven‑day social media abstinence trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124566
19. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. ve Kılıç, E. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
20. Cerit, Y. (2008). Öğretmen kavramı ile ilgili metaforlara ilişkin öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin görüşleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 693-712.
21. Crawford, K. (2009). Listening as participation: Social media and metaphors of hearing online. In The Good, The Bad and The Challenging: The User and The Future of Information and Communication Technologies, COST 298 Conference journal. Copenhagen: COST.
22. Crawford, M. (2015). The world beyond your head: Becoming an individual in an age of distraction. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
23. Creswell, W. J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaxhes (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Çelik, T. (2017). Paydaşların gözünden sosyal medyanın yarar ve risklerine yönelik bir inceleme (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimler Enstitüsü, Denizli.
25. Çelik, T. (2019). Teknoloji ve medya okuryazarı vatandaş yetiştirme sürecinde öğrencilerin sosyal medya algılarının metaforlar aracılığıyla incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmacıları Dergisi, 2(1), 40-57.
26. Deng, T., Kanthawala, S., Meng, J., Peng, W., Kononova, A., Hao, Q., ... ve David, P. (2019). Measuring smartphone usage and task switching with log tracking and self-reports. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918761491
27. Dhoest, A., ve Van Ouytsel, J. (2023). Negotiating platforms and sexual ıdentities: digital and social media use in four generations of flemish MSM. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218085
28. Doğan, S., ve Erkan, İ. (2019). Z kuşağının sosyal medyaya yönelik algılarının metafor analizi yoluyla incelenmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 14, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.633557
29. Egüz, Ş. ve Kesten, A. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin sosyal medya algılarının metafor yoluyla belirlenmesi. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 7(3), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.403147
30. Elhai, J. D., Hall, B. ve Erwin, M. (2018). Emotion regulation's relationships with depression, anxiety and stress due to imagined smartphone and social media loss. Psychiatry Research, 261, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.045
31. Elmas, S. A., ve Demir, E. (2018). 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin okul olgusuna yönelik metaforik algıları. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 51(3), 45-70. http://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.427496
32. Erdem, A., Alkan, M. F., ve Erdem, Ş. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal medya kavramına ilişkin algıları. Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 169-179.
33. Fang, J., Wang, X., Wen, Z., ve Zhou, J. (2020). Fear of missing out and problematic social media use as mediators between emotional support from social media and phubbing behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 107, 106430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106430
34. Forceville, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00007-8
35. Gall, C., Gall, I. ve Jalali, A. (2020). Social media usage among university students during exams: Distraction or academic support. Education in Medicine Journal, 12, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2020.12.3.6
36. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. ve Hughes, J.E. (2009), “Web 2.0 and classroom research: what path should we take now?”. Educational Researcher, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 246-259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671
37. Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J. ve Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Social networking addiction: An overview of preliminary findings. Behavioral Addictions: Criteria, Evidence and Treatment, 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407724-9.00006-9
38. Hayran, C., Anik L. ve Gurhan‑Canli, Z. (2020). A threat to loyalty: Fear of missing out (FOMO) leads to reluctance to repeat current experiences. Plos One, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232318
39. Infante, A. ve Mardikaningsih, R. (2022). The potential of social media as a means of online business promotion. Journal of Social Science Studies (JOS3), 2(2), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.56348/jos3.v2i2.26
40. Jarman, H. K., McLean, S. A., Griffiths, S., Teague, S. J., Rodgers, R. F., Paxton, S. J., ... ve Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2022). Critical measurement issues in the assessment of social media influence on body image. Body Image, 40, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.12.007
41. Kaplan, A. ve Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
42. Kaptan, S. Y. ve Beldağ, A. (2020). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının medya okuryazarlığı hakkındaki görüşleri. Sosyal Bilimler ve Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.29329/jsve.2020.298.1
43. Karabulut, R., Mertol, H. ve Alkan, A. (2017). Üstün yetenekli/zekâlı öğrencilerin medyaya yönelik metafor algıları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 187-196.
44. Kardaras, N. (2016). Glow kids: How screen addiction is hijacking our kids, and how to break the trance. New York, NY: St Martin’s Griffin.
45. Karim, F., Oyewande, A. A., Abdalla, L. F., Chaudhry Ehsanullah, R. ve Khan, S. (2020). Social media use and its connection to mental health: A systematic review. Cureus, 12(6), e8627. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8627
46. Kulandairaj, A. J. (2014). Impact of social media on the lifestyle of youth. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 2(8), 22-28.
47. Lembke, A. (2021). Digital addictions are drowning us in dopamine. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/digital-addictions-are-drowning-us-in-dopamine-11628861572
48. Maitri, W. S., Suherlan, S., Prakosos, R. D. Y., Subagja, A. D. ve Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). Recent trends in social media marketing strategy. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i2.12517
49. Martin, F., Wang, C., Petty, T., Wang, W. ve Wilkins, P. (2018). Middle school students’ social media use. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 213-224.
50. Martinez‑Cardama, S. ve Caridad‑Sebastian, M. (2019). Social media and new visual literacies: Proposal based on an innovative teaching project. Education for Information, 35(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180214
51. Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study (Vol. 2, pp. 214-253). The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods.
52. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.
53. Miles, M. B., ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA
54. Moreno, M.A. ve Kota R. (2014). Social Media. In: Strasburger VC, Wilson BJ, Jordan AB, eds. Children, Adolescents, and the Media. 3rd ed. Thou¬sand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
55. Moreno‑Guerrero, A., Rodríguez, C., Navas‑Parejo, M., Costa, R. ve Lopez‑Belmonte, J. (2020). WhatsApp and google drive influence on pre‑service students’ learning. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00152
56. Nesi, J. (2020). The impact of social media on youth mental health: challenges and opportunities. North Carolina medical journal, 81(2), 116-121.
57. Nurudeen, M., Abdul-Samad, S., Owusu-Oware, E., Koi-Akrofi, G. Y. ve Tanye, H. A. (2023). Measuring the effect of social media on student academic performance using a social media influence factor model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 1165-1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11196-0
58. Obar, J.A. ve Wildman, S. (2015), “Social media definition and the governance challenge: an introduction to the special issue”. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 39 No. 9, pp. 745-750.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647377
59. Olannye-Okonofua, D. (2021). Twitter ban in Nigeria: A metaphor for impediment on uses and gratification theory. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1665
60. Otrar, M. ve Argın, F. S. (2014). Ergenlerin Sosyal Medyaya İlişkin Tutumlarının Çok Boyutlu İncelenmesi [Multidimensional Examination of the Adolescents’ Attitude Concerning Social Media]. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 5(10), 3-22.
61. Pires, F., Masanet, M. J. ve Scolari, C. A. (2021). What are teens doing with YouTube? Practices, uses and metaphors of the most popular audio-visual platform. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1175-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1672766
62. Pumper, M., Yaeger, J. ve Moreno, M. (2013). Perceptions and use of social networking sites in the United States and Ecuador: A mixed-methods approach. College Student Journal, 47(3), 478-484.
63. Ra, C., Cho, J., Stone, M., Cerda, J., Goldenson, N., Moroney, E., Tung, I., Lee, S. Ve Leventhal, A. (2018). Association of digital media use with subsequent symptoms of attention‑deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adolescents. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 320, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.8931
64. Reinhardt, J. (2020). Metaphors for social media‐enhanced foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12462
65. Saban, A. (2020). Examining metaphors, usage and views of secondary school students on Youtube. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 111-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.646872
66. Sağar, M. E. (2022). Yetişkinlerde sosyal medya bağımlılığının yordayıcısı olarak psikolojik esneklik ve problem çözme becerileri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.1080674
67. Sağar, M. E. ve Özçelik, T. (2023). Metaphor perceptions of adolescents towards the concept of social media. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, 8(1), 25-40.
68. Sankar, V. ve Pushpa, B. (2020). Impact of social media on academic performance of university students-a field survey of academic development. TechnoLearn an International Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1&2). https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-4105.02.2020.1
69. Sanlav, Ü. (2014). Sosyal medya savaşları. İstanbul: Hayat Yayınları.
70. Schüll, N. D. (2014). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Sela, Y., Zach, M., Amichay‑Hamburger, Y., Mishali, M. ve Omer, Haim. (2019). Family environment and problematic internet use among adolescents: The mediating roles of depression and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106226
72. Shabir, G., Hameed, Y. M. Y., Safdar, G. ve Gilani, S. M. F. S. (2014). The impact of social media on youth: A case study of bahawalpur city. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(4), 132-151.
73. Shakya, H. B. ve Christakis, N. A. (2017). Association of Facebook use with compromised well‑being: Alongitudinal study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww189
74. Shi, C., Yu, L., Wang, N., Cheng, B. ve Cao, X. (2020). Effects of social media overload on academic performance: A stressor‑strain‑outcome perspective. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(2),179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1748073
75. Stephens, C. ve Breheny, M. (2013). Narrative analysis in psychological research: An integrated approach to interpreting stories. Qualitative Research in Psychology 10(1): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.586103
76. Tham, J. C. K., Burnham, K. D., Hocutt, D. L., Ranade, N., Misak, J., Duin, A. H., ... ve Campbell, J. L. (2021). Metaphors, mental models, and multiplicity: Understanding student perception of digital literacy. Computers and Composition, 59, 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102628
77. Twenge, J. M. ve Campbell, W. K. (2019). Media use is linked to lower psychological well‑being: Evidence from three datasets. Psychiatric Quarterly, 90, 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09630-7
78. Üztemur, S. ve Dinç., E. (2020). Medya okuryazarlığı bağlamında ortaokul öğrencilerinin sosyal medya algıları: Bir metafor çalışması. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 6(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.698764
79. Vanden Abeele, M. M. ve Mohr, V. (2021). Media addictions as apparatgeist: What discourse on TV and smartphone addiction reveals about society. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211038539
80. Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Halfmann, A., ve Lee, E. W. (2022). Drug, Demon, or Donut? Theorizing the Relationship Between Social Media Use, Digital well-being and Digital Disconnection. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.007
81. Vannucci, A., Flannery, K. M. ve Ohannessian, C. M. C. (2017). Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jad.2016.08.040
82. Wahyoedi, S., Suherlan, S., Rijal, S., Azzaakiyyah, H. K. ve Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). Implementation of information technology in human resource management. Al-Buhuts, 19(1), 300–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30603/ab.v19i1.3407
83. Wheatley, D. ve Vatnoey, E. (2022). Understanding attitudes towards social media segregation: Spatial metaphors in the discussion of Twitter blocklists. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1749696
84. Wiederhold, B. K. (2020). Social media use during social distancing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(5), 275-276. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29181.bkw
85. Wyatt, S. (2021). Metaphors in critical Internet and digital media studies. New Media & Society, 23(2), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929324
86. Yıldırım A. ve Şimşek H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
87. Yohanna, A. (2020). The influence of social media on social interactions among students. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 34–48.
88. Zeytinli, F. ve Ekici, G. (2023). 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kavramına yönelik bilişsel yapıları: sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı ile ilişkisi örneği. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(21), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1217654