SHIFTING THE ISLAND SECTION LINE IN RECONSTRUCTION ISLANDS ACCORDING TO THE DEPTH CRITERIA WITH VECTOR TECHNIQUE

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 51 - 61, 29.12.2022

Selim Taşkaya

Öz

Zoning islands are referred to as areas surrounded by road networks with different features such as various residences, commercial, social facilities, official institutions in the implementation development plans. Some of these islands contain zoning parcels with different building regulations on the same island with the island division line. Sometimes, as a cadastral base, some parcels may coincide with a zoning island with more than one feature, separated by an island line. In the study, an examination was made about how the island division line will be given on the ground according to the planned areas type zoning regulation in Turkey, based on the side where the front and depth of the parcels formed in this way are excessive. This examination was created by the vectorial addition technique, which is called as longitudinal, the correlation between the lengths and the angles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Zoning Island, Island Division Line, Vectorial Insertion

İMAR ADALARINDA ADA BÖLÜM ÇİZGİSİNİN VEKTÖREL TEKNİK İLE CEPHE DERİNLİK KRİTERLERİNE GÖRE KAYDIRILMASI

Öz

İmar adaları uygulama imar planlarında çeşitli konut, ticari, sosyal donatı, resmi kurum, gibi farklı özelliklere sahip etrafı yol ağları ile çevrili alanlar olarak adlandırılır. Bu kimi adalar ada bölüm çizgisi ile aynı ada üzerinde farklı yapı nizamlarına sahip imar parsellerini barındırırlar. Kimi zaman kadastral altlık olarak bazı parseller ada çizgisi ile ayrılan birden fazla özellikteki imar adasına denk gelebilirler. Çalışmada, bu şekilde oluşan parsellerin cephe ve derinliklerinin fazlaca olduğu taraftan baz alınarak ada bölüm çizgisini Türkiye’deki planlı alanlar tip imar yönetmeliğine göre nasıl zeminde verileceği hakkında irdeleme yapıldı. Bu inceleme uzunluk ve açıların arasındaki korelasyon uzunlu adı verilen vektörel ekleme yani uç uca ekleme tekniği ile meydana getirildi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İmar Adası, Ada Bölüm Çizgisi, Vektörel Ekleme

Kaynakça

• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning re-examination. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (5), 743-758.
• Alexander, E. R. (2012). Institutional design for value capture and a case: The TelAviv Metropolitan Park. International Planning Studies, 17 (2), 163– 177.
• Alfasi, N., (2006). Planning policy? Between long-term planning and zoning amendments in the Israeli planning system. Environment and Planning A, Volume 38, pp.553-568.
• Alterman, R., (2012). Land use regulations and property values: The 'Windfalls Capture' Idea Revisited. The Oxford Handbook on Urban Economics and Planning, Chapter 3, pp.755-786, Oxford University Press.
• Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Rivolin, U.J., & Solly, A. (2020). Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development:a European typology. European Planning Studies. 29 (1), p.181-200.
• Booth, P. (2003). Planning by Consent. The Origins and Nature of British Development Control London, Routledge.
• Buitelaar, E., & Sorel, N. (2010). Between the quest for control and the rule of law: legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy 27, 983-989.
• Cullingworth, J. B. (1997). Planning in the USA: Policies, Issues, and Processes, Routledge, London. Faludi, A. (1987). A Decision- Centered View of Environmental Planning. Oxford: Pergaon Press.
• Gunday, M. (2002). Administrative law. Image Publications, Ankara. Gursoy, N. (2015). Integrating the Strategic Planning Approach into the Regulatory Plan System: Planning Studies in Fikirtepe Urban Transformation Area. (Master Thesis), Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
• Güzel, S. 2021. Examining the Field Knowledge of Elementary Mathematics Education Undergraduate Students on Vector and Mixed Product, Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Master's Thesis, Izmir.
• Kilinc, N. 2021. Examining the Development Plan Changes from the Perspective of Legal, Spatial and Urban Rent: The Case of Istanbul, Istanbul Technical University Graduate Education Institute, Department of City and Regional Planning, PhD Thesis, Istanbul.
• Kırık, B. 2016. Vector fields on some special manifolds, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematical Engineering, PhD Thesis, Istanbul.
• Moroni, S. (2007). Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Planning Theory, 6(2), 146– 163.
• Muñoz Gielen. D., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2010). Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands, European Planning Studies, 18 (7), 1097-1131.
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008). European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. The Planning Review, 44 (172), 35–47.
• Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2020). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe, Regional Studies, Vol, 55 (5), p,791-803.
• Planned areas zoning regulation, (2017). Official Gazette Date: 03.07.2017 Number of Official Gazette: 30113. Rivolin, U. J. (2008). Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning, Practice & Research, 23 (2), 167-186.
• Steele, W., & Ruming, K. J. (2012). Flexibility versus certainty: Unsettling the land use planning shibboleth in Australia. planning. Practice and Reasearch, 27 (2), 155-176.
• Tang, B., Choy, L. H., & Wat, J. K. F. (2000). Certainty and Discretion in Planning Control:A Case Study of Office Development in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, Vol. 37, (13). 2465-2483.
• Taşan-Kok, T. (2008). Changing Interpretations of 'Flexibility' in the Planning Literature: From Opportunism to Creativity? International Planning Studies, 13 (3), 183-195.
• Turk, S. S. (2016). Urban Law Practices Lecture Notes. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul. Valtonen, E., Falkenbach, H., & Viitanen, K. (2017). Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland. European Planning Studies, 25 (6), 1053-1075.
• Willis, K.G. (1995). Judging development control decisions, Urban Studies, 32, pp. 1065-1079.
• Zakhour S., & Metzger, J. (2018). From a “Planning-Led Regime” to a “Development-Led Regime” (and Back Again?): The Role of Municipal Planning in the Urban Governance of Stockholm, disP - The Planning Review, 54, (4), 46-58 .