İzolasyon, Kamuoyu ve İngiltere’nin Yakındoğu Politikasının Sınırları: Salisbury’nin İngiliz-Rus Ortak Yönetimi Girişimi

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 84, 602 - 620, 20.09.2025

Serdar Bay

https://doi.org/10.62425/turcology.1627306

Öz

İngiltere’de üç kez başbakanlık yapan Salisbury, aynı zamanda Dışişleri Bakanlığı görevini de üstlenerek dış politikada belirleyici bir etki kurmuştur. Sultan II. Abdülhamid’e karşı mesafeli bir tavır sergilemesine ve Türklerin Avrupa’dan çekilmesi gerektiği görüşüne yakın olmasına rağmen, Osmanlı Devleti’ni desteklemeyi öngören geleneksel İngiliz politikasını sürdürmek istemiştir. Salisbury, imparatorluğun çöküşünün Rusya’nın Boğazlar’a ilerlemesine imkân tanıyacağından ve bunun özellikle Hindistan’daki İngiliz prestijini zedeleyeceğinden endişe duymuştur. Bu nedenle Yakındoğu’da statükonun korunması en uygulanabilir politika olarak görülmüştür. Ancak 1895’te yaşanan Ermeni olayları bu dengeyi bozmuş, Salisbury’yi hem Rusya’nın krizden yararlanmasını engellemeye hem de kamuoyundaki artan baskılara cevap vermeye zorlamıştır. İngiliz donanmasını Boğazlar’a göndermeyi düşünse de Amirallik bu seçeneğe karşı çıkmıştır. Öte yandan, ayaklanmaların bastırılması sırasında uygulandığı iddia edilen sert tedbirlere dair raporlar İngiliz kamuoyunda tepkileri artırmış ve Osmanlı yanlısı bir siyaset izlenmesini imkânsız kılmıştır. Bunun üzerine Salisbury, iç kamuoyundaki hoşnutsuzluğu yönetebilmek amacıyla Osmanlı karşısında daha eleştirel bir yaklaşım benimserken, İngiliz çıkarlarını korumaya çalışmıştır. Ancak 1895 yılının sonuna gelindiğinde, bölgedeki İngiliz hedeflerinin Rusya ile iş birliği olmadan gerçekleştirilemeyeceğini fark etmiştir. Buna rağmen, bu girişim literatürde sistematik olarak incelenmemiştir; mevcut çalışmalar daha çok Ermeni meselesine veya genel olarak İngiliz-Rus rekabetine odaklanmıştır. İngiliz Dışişleri belgelerine dayanan ve ikincil literatürle desteklenen bu çalışma, Salisbury’nin Osmanlı Devleti üzerinde Rusya ile ortak bir kondominyum kurma girişiminin bağlamını, saiklerini ve sınırlılıklarını incelemektedir. Çalışma, bu girişimin başarısızlığının yalnızca İngiliz dış politikasındaki izolasyonculuğun sınırlarını ortaya koymakla kalmadığını, aynı zamanda XIX. yüzyılın sonlarında İngiltere’nin Yakındoğu politikasında önemli bir dönüm noktasını işaret ettiğini ileri sürmektedir. Böylelikle çalışma, insani kaygılar, kamuoyu ve büyük güç diplomasisi arasındaki etkileşimin geç Osmanlı bağlamında daha derinlemesine anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dış Politika , İngiltere , Rusya , Osmanlı Devleti , Kondominyum

Isolation, Public Opinion, and the Limits of British Policy in the Near East: Salisbury’s Anglo-Russian Condominium Attempt

Öz

During his three terms as Prime Minister of Britain, Salisbury also served concurrently as Foreign Secretary, exerting decisive influence over foreign policy. Although unsympathetic toward Sultan Abdulhamid II and inclined to the view that the Turks should withdraw from Europe, he nevertheless sought to preserve Britain’s traditional policy of supporting the Ottoman Empire. Salisbury feared that the Empire’s collapse would allow Russia to advance toward the Straits, undermining Britain’s international standing, particularly its prestige in India. For this reason, maintaining the status quo in the Near East appeared the most viable policy. Yet the Armenian disturbances in 1895 destabilized this balance, forcing Salisbury to deter Russia from exploiting the turmoil while addressing mounting public pressure at home. Although he contemplated sending the British fleet to the Straits, the Admiralty opposed such action. Reports of alleged harsh measures during the suppression of the uprisings inflamed British opinion, making a pro-Ottoman stance politically untenable. Consequently, Salisbury sought to manage domestic discontent through a more critical approach toward the Ottoman Empire while safeguarding British interests. By the end of 1895, however, he recognized that Britain’s objectives in the region could not be secured without Russian cooperation. Despite its significance, this episode has not been systematically examined in the literature, which has focused mainly on the Armenian Question or broader Anglo-Russian rivalry. Based on British Foreign Office documents, supported by secondary scholarship, this article examines the context, motivations, and limitations of Salisbury’s attempt to establish a joint Anglo-Russian condominium over the Ottoman Empire. It argues that the initiative’s failure not only reflected the constraints of British isolationism but also marked a turning point in Britain’s Near Eastern policy at the close of the nineteenth century. In doing so, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between humanitarian concerns, public opinion, and great power diplomacy in the late Ottoman context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foreign Policy , Britain , Russia , Ottoman Empire , Condominium

Kaynakça

• Primary Sources
• The National Archives (NA), Foreign Office (FO) NA, FO 424/186, No. 40, Sir M. Durand to the Marquess of Salisbury. 10 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 424/184, No. 696, Mr. Gosselin to the Marquess of Salisbury. 7 December 1895.
• NA, FO, 424/186, No. 116, Sir H. Wyndham to the Marquess of Salisbury. 18 January 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 424/186, No. 126, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir Clare Ford. 1 February 1896.
• NA, FO, 424/186, No. 183, Sir Clare Ford to the Marquess Salisbury. 5 February 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 64/1351, No. 299, Sir F. Lascelles to the Marquess of Salisbury. 9 December 1895.
• NA, FO, 64/1376, No. 21, Sir F. Lascelles to the Marquess of Salisbury. 24 January 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 64/1376, No. 26, Sir F. Lascelles to the Marquess of Salisbury. 31 January 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 65/1492, No. 255, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 4 November 1895. Confidential
• NA, FO, 65/1492, No. 270, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 17 November 1895. Confidential
• NA, FO, 65/1492, No. 285, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 17 December 1895. Very Confidential.
• NA, FO, 65/1492, No. 358, The Marquess of Salisbury to Mr. Goschen. 26 November 1895.
• NA, FO, 65/1493, No. 112, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 17 November 1895. Confidential
• NA, FO, 65/1494, No. 116, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 13 December 1895.
• NA, FO, 65/1514, Inclosure in No. 11, Mr. Goschen to Prince Lobanow. 3 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 65/1514, Memorandum of the Contents of a Despatch from Prince Lobanow, dated St. Petersburgh, January 10 (22), 1896, in reply to a Note from Mr. Goschen of January 15 (Communicated January 25.)
• NA, FO, 65/1514, No. 11, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 16 January 1896. Very Confidential.
• NA, FO, 65/1514, No. 18, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 30 January 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 65/1514, No. 22, The Marquess of Salisbury to Mr. Goschen. 29 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 65/1514, No. 23, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 10 February 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 65/1517, No. 7, Mr. Goschen to the Marquess of Salisbury. 25 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1229 No. 371, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 17 December 1895. Most Confidential.
• NA, FO, 7/1229, No. 352, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 29 November 1895. Confidential
• NA, FO, 7/1229, No. 369, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 15 December 1895.
• NA, FO, 7/1230, No. 100, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 30 November 1895. Very Confidential
• NA, FO, 7/1230, No. 101, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 3 December 1895.
• NA, FO, 7/1230, No. 107, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 7 December 1895. Most Confidential.
• NA, FO, 7/1230, No. 90, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 18 November 1895. Confidential
• NA, FO, 7/1230, No. 96, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir E. Monson. 6 December 1895.
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 10, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir E. Monson. 28 January 1896. Confidential
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 11, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir E. Monson. 28 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 13, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 12 January 1896. Secret.
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 2, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 1 January 1896. Secret.
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 28, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 23 January 1896. Secret
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 41, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 2 February 1896. Confidential.
• NA, FO, 7/1241, No. 8, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 11 January 1896. Secret.
• NA, FO, 7/1243, No. 112, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir E. Monson. 23 September 1896. Very Confidential.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 10, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 22 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 11, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir E. Monson. 22 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 112, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 24 September 1896. Confidential
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 13, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir E. Monson. 22 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 15, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 29 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 17, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 31 January 1896.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 18, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 1 February 1896. Confidential
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 19, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 1 February 1896.Confidential.
• NA, FO, 7/1245, No. 9, Sir E. Monson to the Marquess of Salisbury. 21 January 1896. Secret.
• NA, FO, 78/4629, No. 688, Mr. Herbert to the Marquess of Salisbury. 15 November 1895. Secret.
• NA, FO, 78/4629, No. 699, Mr. Herbert to the Marquess of Salisbury. 16 November 1895.
• NA, FO, 78/4723, No. 4, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir P. Currie. 11 January 1896. Secret.
• NA, FO, 800/15, Sir T. Sanderson to Sir F. Lascelles. 26 December 1895. Private.
• NA, FO, 800/16, The Earl of Kimberley to Sir F. Lascelles. 25 June 1895. Private
• NA, FO, 800/16, The Marquess of Salisbury to Sir F. Lascelles. 27 July 1895. Private.
• NA, FO, 800/17, No. 41, Sir F. Lascelles to Sir T. Sanderson. 22 May 1895.
• NA, FO, 800/17, No. 44, Sir F. Lascelles to the Earl of Kimberley. 6 June 1895.
• NA, FO, 800/17, No. 59, Sir F. Lascelles to Sir T. Sanderson. 30 July 1895.
• TNA, FO, 65/1514, Inclosure in No. 11, Mr. Goschen to Prince Lobanow. 15 January 1896. Very Confidential
• TNA, FO, 78/4625, No. 967, Sir P. Currie to the Marquess of Salisbury. 19 December 1895. Confidential.
• NA, Cabinet Office, (CAB)
• NA, CAB, 37/42/35, Report by Lord Salisbury on his conversation with the Tsar. Signed in 1896 September 27.
• UK Parliament House of Commons Hansard/ House of Lords Hansard
• HC Deb 17 February 1896 vol 37 cc456-7.
• HL Deb 11 February 1896 vol 37 cc3-6
• HC Deb 13 February 1896 vol 37 c241.
• Newspapers
• Daily News, 4 March 1896.
• The Times, 12 February 1896.
• Secondary Sources
• Akarlı, E. D. (1976). The problems of external pressures, power struggles, and budgetary deficits in Ottoman politics under Abdulhamid II (1876–1909): Origins and solutions (Publication No. 7629879) [Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
• Avcı, H. E. (2014). İngiltere’nin Asya politikalarında Ermeniler. In M. Hülagü, M. Şaşmaz, İ. E. Atnur, T. N. Karaca, M. Çolak, & R. Karacakaya (Eds.), Tarihte Türkler ve Ermeniler: Ermeni meselesinin ortaya çıkışı ve yabancı devletler (pp. 183–221). Türk Tarih Kurumu.
• Bartlett, C. J. (1996). Peace, war and the European powers, 1814–1914. St. Martin’s Press.
• Bodger, A. (2005). Russia and the end of the Ottoman Empire. In M. Kent (Ed.), The great powers and the end of the Ottoman Empire (pp. 77–106). Frank Cass.
• Bray, D. M. (2015). Joseph Chamberlain and foreign policy, 1895–1905 [Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia].
• Bridge, F. R., & Bullen, R. (2005). The great powers and the European states system, 1814–1914. Pearson Longman.
• Cecil, A. (1927). British foreign secretaries 1807–1916: Studies in personality and policy. G. Bell and Sons.
• Charmley, J. (1999). Splendid isolation? Britain and the balance of power 1874–1914. Hodder & Stoughton.
• Daly, M. W. (1986). Empire on the Nile: The Anglo-Egyptian Sudan 1898–1934. Cambridge University Press.
• Deringil, S. (1999). The well-protected domains: Ideology and the legitimation of power in the Ottoman Empire, 1876–1909. I. B. Tauris.
• Emerson, B. (2024). The first cold war: Anglo-Russian relations in the 19th century. Hurst & Company.
• Fata, A. (2022). Revisiting “splendid isolation”: Analysing late-Victorian British foreign policy, 1871–1902. The Webster Review of International History, 2, 2–14.
• Gerd, L. (2014). Russian policy in the Orthodox East: The patriarchate of Constantinople (1878–1914). De Gruyter.
• Granville, Edgar. (1917). Le tsarisme en asie-mineure. La Revile Politique Internationale, 149-208.
• Grenville, J. A. S. (1958). Goluchowski, Salisbury, and the mediterranean agreements, 1895-1897. The Slavonic and East European Review, 36(87), 340-369.
• Grenville, J. A. S. (1964). Lord Salisbury and foreign policy the close of the nineteenth century. The Athlone Press.
• Gürpınar, D. (2014). Ottoman imperial diplomacy: A political, social and cultural history. I. B. Tauris.
• Hanioğlu, Ş. (1995). The young Turks in opposition. Oxford University Press.
• Howard, C. (1962). Splendid isolation. History, 47(159), 32–41.
• Howard, C. (1967). The policy of isolation, The Historical Journal, 10(01), 77-88.
• Howard, C. H. D. (1967). Splendid isolation: A study of ideas concerning Britain’s international position and foreign policy during the later years of the third Marquis of Salisbury. Macmillan.
• Hunter, A. (2007). Power and passion in Egypt, a life of Sir Eldon Gorst, 1861-1911. I. B. Tauris.
• Jefferson, M. M. (1960). Lord Salisbury and the eastern question, 1890-1898. The Slavonic and East European Review, 39(92), 44-60.
• Karaca, T. N. (2014). 19. yüzyılda İngiltere’nin Ermeni politikaları. In M. Hülagü, M. Şaşmaz, İ. E. Atnur, T. N. Karaca, M. Çolak, & R. Karacakaya (Eds.), Tarihte Türkler ve Ermeniler: Ermeni meselesinin ortaya çıkışı ve yabancı devletler (pp. 221–262). Türk Tarih Kurumu.
• Kennedy, G. (Ed.). (2008). Imperial defence: The old world order 1856–1956. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Langer, W. L. (1960). The diplomacy of imperialism 1890-1902. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Lauterpacht, H. (1947). Recognition in international law. Cambridge University Press.
• Lowe, C. J. (1965). Salisbury and the mediterranean, 1886-1896. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Lowe, C. J. (1967). The reluctant imperialists: British foreign policy 1878-1902. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Macfie, A. L. (2014). The eastern qestion 1774–1923. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Marder, A. J. (1940). The anatomy of British sea power, a history of British naval policiy in the pre-dreadnought era, 1880-1905. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Marriott, J. A. R. (1944). Anglo-Russian relations 1689-1943. Methuen & Co.
• Menning, R. R. (1996). The art of the possible: documents on great power diplomacy, 1814-1914. McGraw-Hill.
• Muñoz, C. R. (2005). La crisis de las alianzas en Europa (1895-1896). Hispania, 65(220), 643-681.
• Neilson, K. (1995). Britain and the last tsar: British policy and Russia, 1894-1917. Clarendon Press.
• Oppenheim, L. (1905). International law: A treatise (Vol. 1). Longmans, Green & Co.
• Otte, T. G. (2002). Floating downstream?: Lord Salisbury and British foreign policy, 1878–1902. In T. G. Otte (Ed.), The makers of British foreign policy from Pitt to Thatcher (pp. 98–139). Palgrave Macmillan. Otte, T. G. (2011). The foreign office mind: The making of British foreign policy, 1865–1914. Cambridge University Press.
• Otte, T. G. (2018). Lord Salisbury, 1830–1903. In A. Best & H. Cortazzi (Eds.), British foreign secretaries and Japan, 1850–1990: Aspects of the evolution of British foreign policy (pp. 62–73). Renaissance Books.
• Özbek, N. (2012). The politics of taxation and the “Armenian Question” during the late Ottoman Empire, 1876–1908. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54(4), 770–797.
• Pearce, R. (1996). Britain and the European powers, 1865–1914. Hodder & Stoughton.
• Ramm, A. (1984). Lord Salisbury and the Foreign Office. In R. Bullen (Ed.), The Foreign Office 1782–1982 (pp. 46–65). University Publications of America.
• Rose, A. (2017). Between empire and continent: British foreign policy before the First World War. Berghahn.
• Rothstein, T. (1910). Egypt’s ruin: A financial and administrative record. A. C. Fifield.
• Shaw, M. N. (2008). International law. Cambridge University Press.
• Sinnreich, R. H. (2011). About turn: British strategic transformation from Salisbury to Grey. In W. Murray, R. H. Sinnreich, & J. Lacey (Eds.), The shaping of grand strategy: Policy, diplomacy, and war (pp. 111–146). Cambridge University Press.
• Sontag, R. J. (1925). The Cowes interview and the Kruger telegram. Political Science Quarterly, 40(2), 217–247.
• Spinner, T. J. (1973). George Joachim Goschen: The transformation of a Victorian liberal. Cambridge University Press.
• Steele, D. (2006). The place of Germany in Salisbury’s foreign policy, 1878–1902. In A. M. Birke, M. Brechtken, & A. Searle (Eds.), An Anglo-German dialogue: The Munich lectures on the history of international relations (pp. 57–76). K. G. Saur.
• Steele, D. (2014). Three British prime ministers and the survival of the Ottoman Empire, 1855–1902. Middle Eastern Studies, 50(1), 43–60.
• Steiner, Z. (1963). The last years of the old Foreign Office, 1898–1905. The Historical Journal, 6(1), 59–90.
• Steiner, Z. S., & Neilson, K. (2003). Britain and the origins of the First World War. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Taylor, A. J. P. (1954). The struggle for mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. Oxford University Press.
• The Encyclopaedia Britannica. (1911). Labanov-Rostovski. (Vol. 16, pp. 835–836). Cambridge University Press.
• Thornton, A. P. (1968). For the file on empire. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Walters, E. (1950). Goluchowski and Aehrenthal. Contemporary Review, 1018, 217–224.
• Wilson, K. M. (1983). Constantinople or Cairo: Lord Salisbury and the partition of the Ottoman Empire, 1886–1897. In K. M. Wilson (Ed.), Imperialism and nationalism in the Middle East: The Anglo-Egyptian experience, 1882–1982 (pp. 26–56). Mansell Publishing.