A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Surveillance and New Media Concepts in The Web of Science Database

Öz

In the contemporary era shaped by rapid advancements in internet technologies, the intersection of surveillance and new media has experienced profound transformations in both professional and academic domains. This shift necessitates a comprehensive review of the existing literature on these converging concepts. To this end, a bibliometric analysis based on quantitative data is conducted using the Web of Science (WoS) database as of June 23, 2024. The study aims to identify both the density and the gaps in current research, while also offering guidance for future scholarly work. A total of 323 publications—comprising articles, book chapters, and reviews across 51 fields—are analyzed. Using VOSviewer software, the study maps co-authorship networks, citation patterns, keyword trends, and institutional contributions. The results reveal a marked increase in scholarly attention to these topics, particularly after 2010. Influential concepts such as the panopticon, transparency society, algorithmic security, and surveillance capitalism emerge prominently. Ethical concerns, privacy, and data politics dominate recent discussions, highlighting the growing need for interdisciplinary inquiry. Ultimately, this study provides a robust overview of the academic landscape surrounding surveillance and new media, outlines key research trajectories, and offers a foundational reference for scholars exploring the socio-technical dynamics of digital surveillance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Surveillance
• New Media
• Social Media
• Panopticon
• Bibliometric Analysis

Gözetim ve Yeni Medya Kavramlarına Yönelik Web of Science Veritabanında Yer Alan Yayınların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Günümüzde internet teknolojilerinde yaşanan hızlı gelişmeler neticesinde gözetim ve yeni medya alanlarının kesişiminde profesyonel ve akademik araştırmalar noktasında büyük ve köklü değişimler yaşanmıştır. Bu değişim iki kavramın ortaklığındaki literatürün incelenmesi gerekli kılmaktadır. Nicel veriler aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilen bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle söz konusu kavramların 23 Haziran 2024 tarihi itibariyle WoS veri tabanında yer alan yayınlar ekseninde bir özetinin çıkarılması, kavramlara yönelik çalışmalardaki yoğunlukların, boşlukların aktarılması ve daha sonra bu kavramlar üzerine yayın ve araştırma yapmayı hedefleyen araştırmacılara kılavuzluk etmesi amaçlanmıştır. Söz konusu kavramlara yönelik 323 eserin 2002 ve 2024 yılları arasında 51 farklı alanda makale, kitap bölümü, kitap incelemesi vb. türlerde yayınlandığı görülmüştür. VOSviewer yazılımı aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilen analizler, gözetim ve yeni medya kavramlarının özellikle 2010 sonrası dönemde artan biçimde ele alındığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, bu alanda etkili olan yazarlar, yayınlar ve kavramsal çerçeveler hakkında kapsamlı bir görünüm sunmaktadır. Çalışma, özellikle panoptikon, şeffaflık toplumu, algoritmik güvenlik ve gözetim kapitalizmi gibi kavramların literatürde öne çıktığını göstermektedir. Etik, mahremiyet ve veri politikaları gibi konuların merkezde yer aldığı güncel tartışmalar, disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşımı zorunlu kılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu analiz, gözetim ve yeni medya alanındaki akademik üretimin haritasını çıkararak alana dair eğilimleri belirlemekte ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için yönlendirici bir kaynak işlevi görmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gözetim
• Yeni Medya
• Sosyal Medya
• Panoptikon
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

Kaynakça

1. Abuhassna, H. (2024). The information age for education via artificial intelligence and machine learning: A bibliometric and systematic literature analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 700–711. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.5.2095
2. Acquisti, A., Gritzalis, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., & De Capitani di Vimercati, S. (Eds.). (2008). Digital privacy: Theory, technologies, and practices. Auerbach Publications.
3. Arora, P. (2019). Decolonizing privacy studies. Television & New Media, 20(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418806092
4. Awad, A. I., Ahmad, A., Choo, K.-K. R., & Hakak, S. (Eds.). (2023). Internet of things security and privacy: Practical and management perspectives (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003199410
5. Barassi, V. (2020). Datafied times: Surveillance capitalism, data technologies and the social construction of time in family life. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1545–1560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913573
6. Baudrillard, J. (2012). The consumer society: Myths and structures (Reprinted). SAGE.
7. Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Polity Press.
8. BBC. (2021). Twitter Trump’ın hesabını kalıcı olarak engelledi [Twitter permanently suspends Trump's account]. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-55601333

9. Boghosian, H. (2021). ‘I have nothing to hide’: And 20 other myths about surveillance and privacy. Beacon Press.
10. Bruder, J., & Maharidge, D. (2020). Snowden’s box: Trust in the age of surveillance. Verso.
11. Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
12. Burgess, J., Marwick, A. E., & Poell, T. (Eds.). (2019). The Sage handbook of social media (Paperback Edt). Sage Reference.
13. Cadwalladr, C. (2019a, 10 Haziran). Facebook’s role in Brexit—And the threat to democracy | Carole Cadwalladr [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSMr-3GGvQ
14. Cadwalladr, C. (2019b, Temmuz). It’s not about privacy—It’s about power (B. Giussani, Interviewer) [TED]. https://blog.ted.com/its-not-about-privacy-its-about-power-carole-cadwalladr-speaks-at-tedsummit-2019/
15. Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
16. Coşkun, A. (2023). Dijital gözetim kavramının literatürdeki gelişimi: Bibliyometrik bir inceleme [The development of the concept of digital surveillance in the literature: A bibliometric review]. Kastamonu İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11, 51–75. https://doi.org/10.56676/kiad.1358349
17. De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.
18. Dershowitz, A. M., Greenwald, G., Ohanian, A., & Hayden, M. V. (2014). Does state spying make us safer? Hayden and dershowitz vs. Greenwald and ohanian: The munk debate on mass surveillance. House of Anansi Press, Inc.
19. Dice, M. (2011). Big brother: The Orwellian nightmare come true. The Resistence.
20. Diglin, G. (2014). Living the Orwellian nightmare: New media and digital dystopia. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(6), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.6.608
21. Doyle, A. (2011). Revisiting the synopticon: Reconsidering Mathiesen’s ‘the viewer society’ in the age of web 2.0. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610396645
22. Duffy, B. E., & Chan, N. K. (2019). ‘You never really know who’s looking’: Imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society, 21(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818791318
23. Dwoskin, E., & Tiku, N. (2021). How Twitter executives finally decided to ban Trump. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/16/how-twitter-banned-trump/
24. Foucault, M. (2020). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Penguin Classics.
25. Fuchs, C. (2012a). Google capitalism. Triple C, 1(10), 42–48.
26. Fuchs, C. (Ed.). (2012b). Internet and surveillance: The challenges of Web 2.0 and social media. Routledge.
27. Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
28. Giblin, R., & Doctorow, C. (2022). Chokepoint capitalism how big tech and big content captured creative labor markets and how we’ll win them back. Beacon Press.
29. Han, B.-C. (2015). The transparency society. Stanford Briefs.
30. Hobsbawm, E. J. (2020). Kısa 20. yüzyıl: Aşırılıklar çağı 1914-1991 [The short 20th century: The age of extremes 1914-1991] (Y. Alogan, Trans.; 13th ed.). Everest Yayınları.
31. Inamdar, Z., Raut, R., Narwane, V. S., Gardas, B., Narkhede, B., & Sagnak, M. (2021). A systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis of big data analytics adoption from period 2014 to 2018. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1), 101–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0267
32. Johnson, P. A. (2021). Hidden in plain sight: The spatial and industrial logics of home fitness technologies. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 19(4), 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2021.1960099
33. Kaiser, B. (2023, 3 Nisan). Own your data: Empowering our digital future | SXSW 2023 SXSW [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qNpLvurA04
34. Karlsson, K., & Dalipi, F. (2024). Exploring the surveillance technology discourse: A bibliometric analysis and topic modeling approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1406361. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1406361
35. Kim, Y., Chen, Y., & Liang, F. (2023). Engineering care in pandemic technogovernance: The politics of care in China and South Korea’s COVID-19 tracking apps. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1432–1450. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211020752
36. Kokas, A. (2023). Data trafficking and the international risks of surveillance capitalism: The case of Grindr and China. Television & New Media, 24(6), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221137250
37. Kornbluh, A. (2023). Immediacy, or the style of too late capitalism. Verso.
38. Lyon, D., Haggerty, K. D., & Ball, K. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. Routledge.
39. Mak, M. K., Koo, A. Z.-X., & Rojas, H. (2024). Social media engagement against fear of restrictions and surveillance: The mediating role of privacy management. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1984–2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221077240
40. Marx, G. T. (2018). What’s new about the “new surveillance?” Classifying for change and continuity. In T. Monahan, & D. M. Wood (Eds.), Surveillance studies: A reader (pp. 22–26). Oxford University Press.
41. Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s `Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480697001002003
42. Mattelart, A. (2012). Gözetimin küreselleşmesi: Güvenlileştirme düzeninin kökeni [The globalization of surveillance: Origins of the securitization order] (O. Gayretli & S. E. Karacan, Trans.). Kalkedon.
43. Nedzhvetskaya, N. (2019). Brave new (digital) world: Translating knowledge into collective action - Shoshana Zuboff, the age of surveillance capitalism. European Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975619000444
44. Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Shah, A. Q., Wieland, L. S., & Moher, D. (2023). Characteristics of bibliometric analyses of the complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine literature: A scoping review protocol. F1000Research, 12, 164. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130326.2
45. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (First edition). Crown.
46. O’Shea, L. (2021). Geleceğin tarihleri [Dates of the future] (A. Ay, Trans.). Metis.
47. Radanliev, P., & De Roure, D. (2023). New and emerging forms of data and technologies: Literature and bibliometric review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(2), 2887–2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13451-5
48. Rosen, J. (2005). The naked crowd: Reclaiming security and freedom in an anxious age. Random House.
49. Rosso, M., Nasir, A., & Farhadloo, M. (2020). Chilling effects and the stock market response to the Snowden revelations. New Media & Society, 22(11), 1976–1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820924619
50. Sahid, A., Maleh, Y., & Ouazzane, K. (2025). Changing landscape of fake news research on social media: A bibliometric analysis. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 901-954 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02048-9
51. Scott, J. (2022). A datalogical reading of online performance. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 18(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2021.2018222
52. Sefton-Green, J. (2022). Towards platform pedagogies: Why thinking about digital platforms as pedagogic devices might be useful. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(6), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.1919999
53. Sprauge, R. (2007). From taylorism to the omnipticon: Expanding employee surveillance beyond the workplace. UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law, 25, 1–35.
54. VOSviewer. (t.y.). VOSviewer. https://www.vosviewer.com//
55. Ziada, H. (2020). The digital crowd. Architecture and Culture, 8(3–4), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1794419
56. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.