Dijital Video Oyun Anlatılarında Gelenek ve Modern Çatışması: Ghost of Tsushima Örneği

Öz

Gelenek ve modern arasındaki etkileşim toplum kuramının en temel konuları arasında yer almaktadır. Modern olanın geleneksel olan üzerindeki etkisi veya ilkinin ikincisine direnmesi gibi olgular, toplum bilimcilerin ve anlatı sanatının her daim ilgisini çekmiştir. Söz konusu ilgi çeşitli veçhelerde günümüzde de sürmektedir. Özellikle yeni medya teknolojilerinin sağladığı olanaklarla çeşitlenen anlatı sanatı da bu konuya ilgisiz kalmamıştır. Bir dijital anlatı olarak oyun anlatısı, gelenek ve modern arasındaki etkileşimin işlenebildiği bir mecra olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu noktada çalışmada, bir dijital video oyunu olan Ghost of Tsushima’da gelenek ve modern arasındaki tematik çatışma ele alınmaktadır. Oyunun söz konusu bu çatışmayı temel bir anlatı aracı olarak ne şekilde kullandığı incelenmektedir. Diyaloglar ve karakter yapıları üzerinden kurgulanan tematik eksenler aracılığıyla gelenek ve modern çatışmasının bir anlatı tetikleyicisi olarak nasıl işlevsel kılındığı üzerinde durulmaktadır. Analiz aracı olarak tematik analiz yönteminin tercih edildiği çalışmada, “modern karşısında bir gelenek aracı olarak onur”, “geleneksel etik modern etik karşısında” ve “teknik ilerleme bağlamında gelenek ve modern çatışması” başlıkları altında üç ana tema tespit edilmiştir. Buna göre çalışmada, Ghost of Tsushima oyununun gelenek ve modern arasındaki çatışmayı farklı boyutlarda ele aldığı; bu çatışmanın dijital anlatılarda işlevsel bir unsur olarak kullanıldığı örneklerin var olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Oyun Anlatısı
• Gelenek
• Modern
• Kültürel Çatışma
• Ghost of Tsushima

Conflict of Tradition and the Modern in Digital Video Game Narratives: The Case of Ghost of Tsushima

Öz

The interaction between tradition and the modern is one of the most fundamental issues in social theory. Especially the art of narrative, which has diversified with the opportunities provided by new media technologies, has not remained indifferent to this issue. Game storytelling, as a digital narrative, has emerged as a medium for portraying the interaction between tradition and the modern. At this point, the study examines the thematic conflict between tradition and the modern in Ghost of Tsushima, a digital video game. Through the thematic axes established through the dialogues and character structures in the game, it is emphasized that this conflict serves as a narrative trigger. In the study, in which the thematic analysis method was preferred, three main themes were identified under the titles “honour as a traditional value versus the modern,” “traditional ethos versus modern ethos,” and “technological development and the tradition–modern conflict.” Based on this, the study found that the game Ghost of Tsushima explores the conflict between tradition and the modern across multiple dimensions, and that there are examples where this conflict is used as a functional element in digital narratives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Game Narrative
• Tradition
• Modern
• Cultural Conflict
• Ghost of Tsushima

Kaynakça

1. Abbott, H. P. (2008). Narratives and life. In The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative (pp. 1–12). Cambridge University Press.
2. Banfield, E. C. (1967). Moral basis of a backward society. Free.
3. Barthes, R., & Howard, R. (1988). The semiotic challenge. Basil Blackwell.
4. Benedict, R. (2006). Patterns of culture. Mariner.
5. Bold, C. (2012). What is narrative. Sage.
6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
8. Chatman, S. (1975). Towards a theory of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/468421

9. Creswell, D., & Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
10. Domsch, S. (2013). Storyplaying: Agency and narrative in video games. De Gruyter Publications.
11. Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. Free.
12. Durkheim, É. (2013). The division of labor in society. Palgrave.
13. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1966). Modernization: Protest and change, Englewood Cliffs. Prentice–Hall.
14. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.
15. Elson, M., Ivory, J. D., & Quandt, T. (2014). More than stories with buttons: Narrative, mechanics, and context as determinants of player experience in digital games. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12096
16. Gaonkar, D. P. (2000). Alternative modernities. Duke.
17. Gernsheim, E. B. (2002). Reinventing the family: In search of new lifestyles. Polity Press.
18. Glassie, H. (1995). Tradition. The Journal of American Folklore, 108(430), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.2307/541653
19. Goodson, I. F., & Gill, S. R. (2011). The concept of narrative. Counterpoints, 386, 3–16.
20. Greenhalgh, T., & Hurwitz, B. (1999). Why study narrative? Bmj, 318(48). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.48
21. Harrison, L., & Huntington, S. P. (2000). Culture matters: How values shape human progress. Basic.
22. Hefner, R. W. (1998). Market cultures: Society and morality in the new Asian Capitalisms. Westview.
23. Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. John Wiley & Sons.
24. Iegorova, A. V. (2021). Nature and constitutive features of narrative as universal discourse pattern. Trаnscarpathian Philological Studies, 18, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2021.18.32
25. IMDb. (n.d.). Ghost of Tsushima. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7651352/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk
26. Inkeles, A. (1969). Making men modern: On the causes and consequences of individual change in six developing countries. American Journal of Sociology, 75(2), 208–322. https://doi.org/10.1086/224767
27. Ip, B. (2011). Narrative structures in computer and video games: Part 1: Context, definitions, and initial findings. Games and Culture, 6(2), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364982
28. Keever, J. (2022). Videogames and the technicity of ideology: The case for critique. Game Studies, 22(2).
29. Koenitz, H. (2024). Narrative in video games. In N. Lee (Ed.), Encyclopedia of computer graphics and games (pp. 1230–1238). Springer.
30. Koenitz, H., Barbara, J., & Eladhari, M. P. (2022). Interactive digital narrative (IDN)—New ways to represent complexity and facilitate digitally empowered citizens. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 28(3–4), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2023.2181503
31. Kokonis, M. (2014). Intermediality between games and fiction: The “ludology vs. Narratology” debate in computer game studies: A response to Gonzalo Frasca. Film and Media Studies, 9, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1515/ausfm-2015-0009
32. Launer, J. (2009). Why narrative? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 85(1001), 267–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2009.079871
33. Leerssen, J. (2010). Setting the scene for national history. In S. Berger & C. Lorenz (Eds.), Nationalizing the Past. Writing the Nation: National Historiographies and the Making of Nation States in 19th and 20th Century Europe (pp. 71–85). Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. Free.
35. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
36. Malkowski, J., & Russworm, T. M. (2017). Gaming representation: Race, gender, and sexuality in video games. Indiana University Press.
37. Martin, L. (1943). On Tradition, belief, and culture. The Journal of Philosophy, 40(4), 100–105.
38. McClelland, D. (2010). The achieving society. Martino Fine.
39. McManus, A., & Feinstein, A. H. (2006). Narratology and ludology: Competing paradigms or complementary theories in simulation. Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference, 33.
40. Mejeur, C. (2020). Playing with playthroughs: Distance visualization and narrative form in video games. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 14(3).
41. Nisbet, R. (1994). History of the idea of progress. Routledge.
42. Ochs, E. (1997). Narrative. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 185–207). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n7
43. Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. Routledge.
44. Shils, E. (1971). Comparative Studies in Society and History, 13(2), 122–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500006186
45. Šisler, V. (2008). Digital Arabs: Representation in video games. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407088333
46. Soderman, B. (2010). Every game the same dream? Politics, representation, and the interpretation of video games. Dichtung Digital Journal für Kunst und Kultur digitaler Medien, 12(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/17734
47. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.
48. Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and civil society. Cambridge University Press.
49. Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France 1870–1914. Stanford University Press.
50. Zafar, Q., Jabeen, G., Asif, M., & Rauf, Z. (2024). Exploration of how digital media and technology are changing narrative forms and literary consumption. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 13(3), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00486
51. Zarzycki, A. (2016). Epic video games: Narrative spaces and engaged lives. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077116663338