Kama Diş Anomalisine Sahip Maksiller Lateral Kesici Dişlerin Direkt Kompozit Veneerlerle Tedavisi : Olgu Sunumu

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 434 - 438, 27.12.2024

Ahmet Cankut Karamehmet , Fikret Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1571597

Öz

Kama lateraller; sıklıkla maksiller kesici dişlerde rastlanan, normalden küçük, sivri şekilli dişlerdir. Bilateral
olarak kama laterallere sahip hasta, estetik beklentilerle kliniğimize başvurdu. Yapılan intraoral ve radyolojik muayenelerin ışığında hastaya tedavi seçenekleri anlatıldı. Hastanında onayı alınarak dişlerin direkt kompozit veneer uygulaması ile tedavisine karar verildi. Diş rengi belirlenerek kullanılacak kompozit rezinler ve renkleri seçildi. Tabakalama yöntemiyle kompozitler dişe yerleştirildi ve tedavi tek seansta
bitirildi. Restorasyonların yüzeyleri bitirme frez ve diskleri, polisaj lastikleri kullanılarak düzenlendi. Bu olgu sunumunun amacı, hastanın estetik görünümünden rahatsız olduğu kama laterallerdeki şekil bozukluklarının direkt kompozit veneerlerle estetik bir şekilde tedavi edilebildiğini anlatmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Estetik, Kompozit, Veneer, Diş Anomalileri

Treatment of Maxillary Lateral Incisors Teeth With Peg-Shaped Tooth Anomalies by Direct Composite Veneers

Öz

Peg-shaped laterals are dental anomalies that are frequently encountered in maxillary teeth and may have smaller than normal, pointed shapes. A patient with bilateral peg-shaped laterals presented to our clinic with aesthetic expectations. Treatment options were explained to the patient in the light of intraoral and radiologic examinations. With the patient’s consent, it was decided to treat the teeth with direct
composite veneer application. Tooth color was determined, composite resins and theirs colors to be used were selected. The composites were applied using a layering technique in a single session. The surfaces of the restorations were finished using finishing burs and discs, polishing rubbers. The aim of this case report is to describe the aesthetic treatment of the deformities of the peg-shaped laterals, which the patient was uncomfortable with the aesthetic appearance, with direct composite veneers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aesthetic, Composite, Veneer, Dental Anomalies

Kaynakça

• 1. Devasya A, Sarpangala M. Dracula tooth: a very rare case report of peg-shaped mandibular incisors. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8:164–6.
• 2. Vastardis H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(6):650-656.
• 3. Grahnen H. Hypodontia in the Permanent Dentition. A Clinical and Genetical Investigation. Odontologisk Revy. 1956;7:1-100.
• 4. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res. 1973;81(1):12- 21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb01489.x. PMID: 4510864.
• 5. Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orhodontic patients. Aust Dent J 1998;43:395-8.
• 6. Hua F, He H, Ngan P, Bouzid W. Prevalence of peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(1):97-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.025. PMID: 23810051.
• 7. Ucheonye IJ, Tokunbo AA. Prevalence of peg-shaped laterals in south western Nigeria: a comparison of field and clinic findings. Internet J Dent Sci 2009;8:1-5.
• 8. Apostolska S, Rendzova V, Eftimoska M, Filipovska V, Elenchevski S, Janeva N. Minimally invasive restorative treatment with direct composite veneers – case report. Stomatološki Glasnik Srbije. 2017;64(2):88–93. doi: 10.1515/sdj-2017-0009.
• 9. Satifil I. Veneer Labial Direk (Direct labial veneering). Makassar Dent J. 2018;7(1):10–3. doi: 10.35856/mdj.v7i1.9.
• 10. Demirekin ZB, Turkaslan S. Laminate veneer ceramics in aesthetic rehabilitation of teeth with fluorosis: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02079-4. PMID: 35172796; PMCID: PMC8851797.
• 11. Kam Hepdeniz O, Temel UB. Clinical survival of No-prep indirect composite laminate veneers: a 7-year prospective case series study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;3:23(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02949-5. PMID: 37138297; PMCID: PMC10158390.
• 12. Izgi AD, Ayna E. Direct restorative treatment of peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors with resin composite: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:526–529. doi: 10.1016/j. prosdent.2005.03.016.
• 13. Miller WB, McLendon WJ, Hines FB. Two treatment approaches for missing or peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors: a case study on identical twins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92(3):249-56. doi: 10.1016/0889- 5406(87)90419-7. PMID: 3477090.
• 14. Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic alternatives for the restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:437– 440. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70056-8.
• 15. Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. Composite laminate veneers: a clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:439–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00180.x.
• 16. Sneha, Manjunath Malur, Yogesh Sahu, Praveen Mishra, Prajakta Bisen. New Approach of Esthetic Restoration Using Putty Matrix Technique. Int J Adv Case Reports. 2020;7(2):- 28.
• 17. Asher C, Lewis DH. The integration of orthodontic and restorative procedures in cases with missing maxillary incisors. Br Dent J. 1986;160:241–245. doi: 10.1038/ sj.bdj.4805823.
• 18. Omeish N, Nassif A, Feghali S, Vi- Fane B, Bosco J. Esthetic and functional rehabilitation of peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors: Practical recommendations. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10:e05507. doi:10.1002/ccr3.5507.