Kültürlerin Diyalogu veya Diyalogsuzluğu Bağlamında Halkbilimi Çalışmalarının Yeri ve Önemi

Yıl 2004, Sayı: 1, 149 - 164, 01.12.2004

Özkul Çobanoğlu

Öz

Folkloristics has a very functional situation in the context of dialogue of cultures, especially to introduce ethnicities to each other and erase prejudices. Particularly, the characteristics of folkloristics is that, having multi-paradigms helps it a great deal to perform its aforementioned task. In this work these two basic characteristics of folklore studies are taken into consideration and uses of such pracses are evaluated for the future of mankind.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Folkloristics, Pracsis, Dialog of culture, ethnicity, the Other

Kaynakça

• Abrahams, Roger D. 1968. "Introductory Remarks to a Rhetorical Theory of FaIklare." Journal of American Folklore, S. 81, s.143-148.
• Abrahams, Roger D. 1969."On Meaning and Gaming." " Journal of American Folklore, S. 82, s. 268-270.
• Amold, Mattew. 1988 (1869). Culture and Anarchy. Ed. J. Dover Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Aron, Raymond.1989.(Çev. K. Alemdar) Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Evreleri. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.
• Bascom, William. 1983. "Malinowski's Contributions to the Study of Folklore ." Folklore, C.94, S. 2, s. 163-172.
• Bauman, Richard.197!."Differential Identity and the Social Base of Folklore" Journal of American Folklore, C.84, S. s.
• Bauman, Richard.1977. Verbal Art as Performance. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waweland Press Inc.
• Bauman, Richard.1992."Folklore" Folklore, Cultural Performances, and Popular Entertainments, (ed. R. Bauman), s. 29-40, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ben-Amos, Dan. 197!." Toward a Definition of Folklore in Context" Journal of American Folklore, C.84, S. s.
• Ben-Amos, Dan. 1976.(ed.) Folklore Genres. Austin: University of Texas Press. Brodbeck, May.1968. Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: University of Minnesota.
• Bronner, Simon. 1984b. "Folklore and the Behavioral Sciences. Anthropos, S. 79, s. 251-255.
• Bronner, Simon.1986.American Folklore Studies: An Intellectual History. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
• Burry, J. B. 1960. The Idea ofProgress. New York: Dover Publications.
• Coccchiara, Giuseppe.! 98!.(çev. J. McDaniel) The History of Folklore in Europe. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
• Çobanoğlu, Özkul. 1999. Halkbilimi Kuramları ve Araştırma Yöntemleri Tarihine Giriş.Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.
• Degh, Linda. ı986. "Introduction." Journal of Folklore Research, C. 23, S. 2/3, s.77-85 .
• Dow, J. R. ve H. Lixfeld.1986. German Volkskunde: A Decade of Theoretical Contfrontation, Debate and Reorientation (1967-1977). B1oomington: Indiana University Press.
• Dundes, Alan. ı964."Texture, Text and Context." Southern Folklore Quarterly, S.28, s.25 ı-265.
• Dundes, Alan.l977. "Who are the Folk?" Frontiers of Folklore, (ed. W. Bascom), Boulder: Westview Press for the AAAS, s.17-35.
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973.The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books Inc., Publishers.
• Georges, Robert.1969. "Toward an Understanding of Storytelling Events." Journal of American Folklore, S. 82, s. 313-328.
• Güvenç, Bozkurt.1984. İnsan ve Kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Hanson, N.R.1961. Scientific Change. Oxford: Basic Books.
• Herzfeld, Michae1.l986. Ours Once More: FoIklore, Ideology, and the Making of Modern Greece. New York: PeIla Publishing Company.
• Keat, R. ve J. Urry.1975. Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge & Kegan PauL.
• Kuhn, S. Thomas.l 970. The Structure of Sicentific RevoIutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Kuhn, S. Thomas. 1982. (Çev. N. Kuyaş) Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı. İstanbul: Alan Yay.
• Kuyaş, Nilüfer.1982. "Çevirmenin Sunuşu." Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı. (T.S. Kuhn) İstanbul: Alan Yayıncılık.
• Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
• Öztürkmen, Arzu. 1998. Türkiye'de Folklor ve Milliyetçilik. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınevi.
• Parsons, Talcott.1968. "Professions." International EncyCıopedia of the Social Sciences, c.12, s. 36-47.
• Sayer, Andrew.1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
• Shoemaker, George H.1990. The Emergence of Folklore in Everyday Life. Bloomington: Trickster Press.
• Toelken, Barre.1979. The Dynamics of Folklore. Boston: Hougto Mifflin Company.
• Tuna, Korkut.2000. Batılı Bilginin Eleştirisi Üzerine. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları.
• Tylor, Edward.l958.[1871]. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art and Custom. London: 1. Murray.
• Wilson, A. Wilson. 1976. Folklore and Nationalism in Modern Finland. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Wilson, A. Wilson.l990."Herder, Folklore and Romantic Nationalism." Folk Groups and Folklore Genres. (ed. E. Oring), s.21-37. Logan: Utah State University Press.
• Zumwalt. Uviy R.1988. American Folklore Scholarship: A Dialogue of Dissent. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.