EVALUATION OF PLANTS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL TOLERANCE CRITERIA: A CASE STUDY OF URBAN OPEN GREEN SPACES IN RIZE, TURKIYE

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 108 - 132, 31.10.2024

Erdi Ekren , Ömer Lütfü Çorbacı , Sinan Kordon

https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1550116

Öz

In addition to aggressive urbanization, climate change and ecological challenges also have serious negative effects on urban green areas. Moreover, the selection of inappropriate plants in urban green space landscape projects increases the severity of these negatives. Therefore, inappropriate plant selection is considered a significant threat to the sustainability of urban green spaces. This situation highlights the importance of selecting plants with high ecological tolerance in urban park landscape projects. In this study, all tree, shrub, and ground cover plants identified in 11 urban parks and open green areas in Rize province were evaluated in terms of ecological tolerance criteria (air pollution, drought, wind, temperature, cold, and salinity). A total of 223 plant taxa were examined (77 native, 3 semi-native, 143 exotic), and it was determined that 149 taxa (49 native, 100 exotic) were sensitive to at least one of these criteria, while the remaining 74 taxa (27 native, 47 exotic) had sufficient tolerance to all ecological variables examined. Prunus serrulata Lindl. ‘Kanzan’ was identified as the taxon with the weakest ecological tolerance, and the resilience statuses of the other taxa were presented in the assessment table created. As a result, it was found that there are taxa used in Rize urban open green areas that pose risks against ecological factors, and recommendations were made for future landscape planting projects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ecological tolerance, Plant material, Rize

BİTKİLERİN EKOLOJİK TOLERANS KRİTERLERİNE GÖRE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: RİZE KENTSEL AÇIK YEŞİL ALANLAR ÖRNEĞİ, TÜRKİYE

Öz

Kentleşmeden kaynaklanan yeşil alan miktarındaki azalmaya ek olarak iklim değişikliği ve bunun neden olduğu ekolojik değişiklikler de kentsel yeşil alanlar üzerinde ciddi olumsuz etkiler oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca, kentsel yeşil alan peyzaj projelerinde uygun olmayan bitki seçimleri de bu olumsuzlukların derecesini artırmakta ve yeşil alanların sürdürülebilirliği için önemli bir tehdit olarak görülmektedir. Bu durum yeşil alan bitkilendirme çalışmalarında ekolojik toleransı yüksek bitki seçiminin önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sebeple bu çalışmada Rize ilinde bulunan 11 kent parkı ve açık yeşil alanda tespit edilen tüm ağaç, ağaççık, çalı ve yer örtücü bitkiler ekolojik tolerans kriterleri (hava kirliliği, kuraklık, rüzgar, sıcaklık, soğuk ve tuzluluk) açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada 223 bitki taksonu incelenmiş olup (77 doğal, 3 yarı doğal, 143 egzotik) 149 taksonun (49 doğal, 100 egzotik) bu kriterlerden en az birine karşı duyarlı olduğu ve kalan 74 taksonun (27 doğal 47 egzotik) incelenen tüm ekolojik değişkenlere karşı yeterli toleransa sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Prunus serrulata Lindl. ‘Kanzan’ ekolojik toleransı en zayıf takson olarak tespit edilmiş ve diğer taksonların dirençlilik durumları oluşturulan değerlendirme tablosunda belirtilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Rize kentsel açık yeşil alanlarında kullanılan bitki taksonlarından ekolojik faktörlere karşı risk barındıran taksonlar olduğu tespit edilmiş, gelecekte yapılması planlanan bitkilendirme çalışmaları için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekolojik Tolerans, Bitki materyali, Rize

Kaynakça

• Acar, C., & Sarı, D. (2010). Evaluation of plant species in urban residential landscapes based on their characteristics for landscape preferences; A sample of Trabzon city. Ecology, 19, 173-180.
• AHS (2024). American horticultural society heat zone map. https://ahsgardening.org/about-us/news-press/cool_timeline/heat-zone-map-developed/ Accessed: 20.03.2024.
• Akkemik, Ü. (2018). Native and Exotic Trees and Shrubs of Türkiye I. General Directorate of Forestry Press, 736p., Ankara.
• Appleton, B., Huff, R.R. & French. S.C. (1999). Evaluating trees for saltwater spray tolerance for oceanfront sites. Journal of Arboriculture. 25 (4), 205-210.
• AUB (2024). American University of Beirut landscape plant database. https://landscapeplants.aub.edu.lb Accessed: 30.03.2024.
• Bainbridge, D.A. (2015). Gardening with Less Water. Storey Publishing, 127p., Massachusetts.
• Bharti, S.K., Trivedi, A. & Kumar N. (2018). Air pollution tolerance index of plants growing near an industrial site. Urban Climate, 24, 820-829.
• Bita, C. E., & Gerats, T. (2013). Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 273. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728475/pdf/fpls-04-00273.pdf
• Chen, L., Sun, Y., Niu, G., Liu, Q., & Altland, J. (2017). Relative salt tolerance of eight Japanese barberry cultivars. HortScience, 52(12), 1810-1815.
• Çetinkaya, G. & Uzun, O. (2014). Landscape Planning. Birsen Publishing, 219, İstanbul.
• Çorbacı, Ö. L. & Ekren, E. (2021). Evaluation of medicinal and aromatic plants used in urban open green areas: The case of Rize. Duzce University Journal of Forestry, 17(1), 159-172.
• Çorbacı, Ö. L. & Ekren, E. (2022). Evaluation of urban open green areas in terms of xeriscape: The case of Ankara Altınpark. Journal of Landscape Researches and Practices. 1, 2022, 1-11.
• Çorbacı, Ö. L. & Özyavuz, M. (2024). Kentsel açık yeşil alanlarda kurakçıl peyzaj (xeriscape) çalışmaları, İnce, K.(ed.) Kentsel Yeşil Alanların Sürdürülebilir Yönetimi, 109-171.
• Çorbacı, Ö. L., & Bayramoğu, E. (2021). Drought tolerant landscape design approach example of RTE Campus. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 30(11), 11948-11955.
• Çorbacı, Ö. L., Abay, G., Oğuztürk, T., & Üçok, M. (2020). Plant existence in urban recreational areas; Rize example. Duzce University Journal of Forestry, 16(2), 16-44.
• Çorbacı, Ö.L., Abay, G., Oğuztürk, T. & Üçok, M. (2019). Rize ili park ve bahçelerindeki türlerin envanteri. Recep Tayyip Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi, NAP Projesi. Sonuç Raporu.
• Doğan, T.G. & Eroğlu, E. (2021). Using GIS and the diversity indices: A combined approach to woody plant diversity in the urban landscape. In: Vegetation Index and Dynamics. Eusebio Cano Carmona (Ed.) Publisher: InTech Open.
• Doğan, T.G. & Eroğlu, E. (2024). The role of floristic diversity in urban landscapes. In: Architectural Sciences and Outdoor Recreation. Tendü Hilal Göktuğ (Ed.) Publisher: IKSAD.
• Ebben Nurseries (2024). Ebben Nurseries: Wide range of trees and shrubs. https://www.ebben.nl/tr/ Accessed: 20.03.2024.
• Ekren, E. (2017). Advantages and risks of vertical gardens. Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry, 19(1), 51-57.
• Ganesan, N. & Arul Pragasan, L. (2017). Assessment of air pollution tolerance levels of selected plants at Tamaka industrial site of Kolar, Karnataka, India. Indian Journal of Scientific Research. 17(1), 25-29.
• Horaginamani, S.M., Ravichandran, M. & Kamdod, A.S.M. (2012). Air pollution tolerance of selected plant species considered for urban green belt development in Tiruchy. World Journal of Environmental Bioscience, 1(1), 51-54.
• Jones, S., & Somper, C. (2014). The role of green infrastructure in climate change adaptation in London. The Geographical Journal, 180(2), 191-196.
• Kordon, S., & Miller, P. (2023). People’s reasons not to participate in community gardens in disadvantaged neighborhoods of Roanoke, Virginia. ArtGRID-Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts, 5(2), 110-125.
• Kordon, S., Miller, P. A., & Bohannon, C. L. (2022). Attitudes and perceptions of community gardens: Making a place for them in our neighborhoods. Land, 11(10), 1762.
• Korkut, A., Kiper, T., & Topal, T.Ü. (2017). Ecological approaches in urban landscape design. Artium, 5(1), 14-26.
• Kösa, S. (2023). Evaluation of woody plant taxa in some urban parks of Antalya in terms of ecological tolerance criteria. Bartın Faculty of Forestry, 25(1), 119-136.
• Mamıkoğlu, N.G. (2012). Trees and Shrubs of Türkiye, NTV Publishing, 728p., İstanbul.
• Manoli, G., Fatichi, S., Schläpfer, M., Kailiang, Y., Crowther, T.W., Meili, N., Burlando, P., Katul, G. G. & Bou-Zeid, E. (2019). Magnitude of urban heat islands largely explained by climate and population. Nature, 573(7772), 55-60. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1512-9.pdf
• MGM (2022). Meteorological general directorate plant cold and heat tolerance maps. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/tarim/bitki-soguga-ve-sicaga-dayaniklilik.aspx?g=h Accessed: 15.03.2024.
• MGM (2024). Meteorological general directorate. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/Veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=RIZE Accessed: 20.05.2024.
• NCSUE (2024). North Carolina State University extension gardener plant toolbox. https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu Accessed: 25.03.2024.
• Oğuztürk, G. E., & Bayramoğlu, E. (2020). Kurakçıl peyzaj açısından Rize sahil parkının incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 10(21), 13-24.
• Oğuztürk, G. E., Sipahi, M., Çorbacı, Ö. L., & Oğuztürk, T. (2023). Rize province Ziraat Botanical Park urban area tea garden design and application. Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 208-218.
• OSU (2024). Oregon State University landscape plants. https://landscapeplants.oregonstate.edu/ Accessed: 27.03.2024.
• Penick, P. (2016). The Water-Saving Garden: How to Grow a Gorgeous Garden with a lot Less Water. Ten Speed Press, 246p., New York.
• PFAF (2024). Plants for a Future. https://pfaf.org/user/Default.aspx. Accessed: 26.03.2024.
• Raza, A., Ashraf, F., Zou, X., Zhang, X., & Tosif, H. (2020). Plant adaptation and tolerance to environmental stresses: Mechanisms and perspectives. Plant ecophysiology and adaptation under climate change: Mechanisms and perspectives I: General consequences and plant responses, 117-145.
• Rockledge Gardens (2024). Salt tolerant plants. https://www.rockledgegardens.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/SaltList.pdf. Accessed: 30.03.2024.
• Silva, R. A., West, J. J., Zhang, Y., Anenberg, S. C., Lamarque, J. F., Shindell, D. T., ... & Zeng, G. (2013). Global premature mortality due to anthropogenic outdoor air pollution and the contribution of past climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), 034005.
• Tanfer, M. (2019). Investigation of the plant cover of campus of faculty of forestry the Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Master Thesis, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul.
• URL-1 (2024). Google Earth. http://earth.google.com/web/. Accessed: 25.05.2024.
• URL-2 (2024). Hardiness Zone. https://hardiness.zone/ Accessed:20.04.2024.
• USDA (2023). United States Department of Agriculture plant hardiness zone map. https://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/ Accessed: 20.03.2024.
• USDA (2024). United States Department of Agriculture Plants Database. https://plants.usda.gov/home Accessed: 26.03.2024.
• Wade, G. L., Midcap, J. T., Coder, K. D., Landry, G. W., Tyson, A. W., & Neal Jr, W. (2010). Xeriscape: a guide to developing a water-wise landscape. University of Georgia Press. USA.
• Williams, S. (2013). Creating the Prairie Xeriscape. Coteau Books, 336p., Canada.
• Yener, D., Seyidoğlu Akdeniz, N., & Zencirkiran, M. (2020). Ecological tolerance and landscape woody plants. Trends in landscape, agriculture forestry and natural Science. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 1-21.
• Zencirkıran, M. (2004). Bursa kent peyzajında kullanılan bitki türleri ve bu amaç için kullanılabilecek yerli ve yabancı orijinli bitkilerin saptanması. Uludağ University. Scientific Research Project (2002/24.304).
• Zencirkıran, M., & Seyidoğlu Akdeniz, N. (2017). Evaluation of woody plant taxons in the Bursa urban parks in terms of ecological tolerance criteria. Bartın Faculty of Forestry, 19(2), 11-19.
• Zencirkıran, M., & Sönmez, A. C. (2023). Evaluation of tolerance status of woody landscape plants against stress factors: The case of Ankara Altınpark. Duzce University Journal of Forestry, 19(1), 116-137.
• Zencirkiran, M. (2009). Determination of native woody landscape plants in Bursa and Uludag. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(21), 5737-5746.