KEMOTERAPİ ALAN HASTALARA DESTEK TAMAMLAYICI BİR YAKLAŞIM OLARAK ACCESS BARS TEKNİĞİ: GELENEKSEL DERLEME

Öz

Kanser tedavisinde en yaygın kullanılan yöntemlerden biri kemoterapidir. Kemoterapi, kanser hücrelerini yok etmek veya büyümelerini durdurmak amacıyla kullanılan güçlü ilaç tedavilerinden oluşmaktadır. Bununla birlikte kemoterapi sürecinde hastalarda yorgunluk, bulantı, ağrı, stres, kaygı ve depresyon gibi çeşitli fiziksel ve psikolojik yan etkiler ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Bu durum hastaların yaşam kalitesini olumsuz etkileyebilmekte ve bazı bireylerin tedavi sürecini desteklemek amacıyla tamamlayıcı ve alternatif yöntemlere yönelmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı, kemoterapi alan hastalarda tamamlayıcı bir yaklaşım olarak Access Bars tekniğinin potansiyel etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışma geleneksel derleme niteliğindedir. Çalışma kapsamında Access Bars uygulaması ve tamamlayıcı terapi yaklaşımlarının kanser ve psikolojik iyi oluş üzerindeki etkilerini inceleyen ulusal ve uluslararası literatür değerlendirilmiştir. İlgili çalışmalar doğrultusunda yöntemin olası etkileri ve klinik kullanım potansiyeli ele alınmıştır. Access Bars, baş bölgesinde bulunduğu kabul edilen 32 farklı enerji noktasına parmak uçlarıyla hafif dokunuşlar uygulanarak gerçekleştirilen bir enerji terapisi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Uygulamanın yaklaşık 60–90 dakika sürdüğü ve bireyin derin bir gevşeme durumuna ulaşmasını amaçladığı belirtilmektedir. Literatürde, Access Bars uygulamasının zihinsel ve duygusal yüklerin azaltılmasına, stres ve kaygı düzeyinin düşürülmesine ve genel iyilik halinin desteklenmesine katkı sağlayabileceği ifade edilmektedir. Ayrıca bazı pilot çalışmalarda Access Bars seanslarının kaygı ve depresyon belirtilerinde azalma ile ilişkili olabileceği bildirilmiştir. Bununla birlikte yönteme ilişkin bilimsel kanıtların sınırlı olduğu ve mevcut çalışmaların çoğunlukla küçük örneklem gruplarıyla gerçekleştirildiği görülmektedir. Access Bars uygulamasının stres yönetimi ve psikolojik iyilik haline katkı sağlayabileceği öne sürülmekle birlikte, kemoterapi alan hastalardaki etkinliğine ilişkin doğrudan kanıtlar yetersizdir. Mevcut çalışmaların büyük bölümü onkoloji dışı popülasyonlarda ve küçük örneklemlerle yürütülmüştür. Bu nedenle, onkoloji alanında yüksek metodolojik kalitede çalışmalara ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır. Ancak yöntemin klinik etkinliğinin ve güvenilirliğinin ortaya konabilmesi için daha geniş örneklemli ve randomize kontrollü çalışmalara ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kemoterapi
• Tamamlayıcı tıp
• Access bars
• Enerji terapileri

ACCESS BARS TECHNIQUE AS A COMPLEMENTARY SUPPORTIVE APPROACH FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY: A TRADITIONAL REVIEW

Öz

Chemotherapy is one of the most commonly used methods in cancer treatment. It consists of potent drug therapies aimed at destroying cancer cells or inhibiting their growth. However, during the chemotherapy process, patients may experience various physical and psychological side effects such as fatigue, nausea, pain, stress, anxiety, and depression. These conditions can negatively affect patients’ quality of life and may lead some individuals to seek complementary and alternative approaches to support their treatment process. The aim of this review is to examine the potential effects of the Access Bars technique as a complementary approach in patients receiving chemotherapy. This study is designed as a traditional review. Within the scope of the study, national and international literature investigating the effects of Access Bars practice and complementary therapy approaches on cancer and psychological well-being were evaluated. Based on the relevant studies, the possible effects of the method and its potential for clinical use were discussed. Access Bars is defined as an energy therapy performed by applying gentle fingertip touches to 32 different points on the head, which are believed to correspond to various areas of life. The practice is reported to last approximately 60–90 minutes and aims to induce a deep state of relaxation in the individual. In the literature, it is suggested that Access Bars may contribute to reducing mental and emotional burdens, lowering stress and anxiety levels, and supporting overall well-being. Additionally, some pilot studies have reported that Access Bars sessions may be associated with reductions in symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, scientific evidence regarding the method is limited, and most existing studies have been conducted with small sample sizes. Although Access Bars has been suggested as a complementary approach that may contribute to stress management and psychological well-being, there is currently insufficient direct evidence regarding its effectiveness in patients receiving chemotherapy. Most available studies have been conducted in non-oncological populations and involve small sample sizes. Therefore, further high-quality studies in oncology settings are needed. Nevertheless, larger-scale and randomized controlled studies are needed to establish the clinical effectiveness and reliability of this method.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Chemotherapy
• Complementary medicine
• Access bars
• Energy therapies

Kaynakça

1. 1. Bahrami H, Tafrihi M. Global trends of cancer: the role of diet, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Cancer Innov. 2023;2(4):290-301.
2. 2. Saklani S. Recent patterns of cancer incidence and mortality: global and Indian scenario. In: Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics. 2024:40-52.
3. 3. Kaur R, Bhardwaj A, Gupta S. Cancer treatment therapies: traditional to modern approaches to combat cancers. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50(11):9663-9676.
4. 4. Kamrani A, Hosseinzadeh R, Shomali N, et al. New immunotherapeutic approaches for cancer treatment. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;248:154632.
5. 5. Zafar A, Khatoon S, Khan MJ, Abu J, Naeem A. Advancements and limitations in traditional anti-cancer therapies: a comprehensive review of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy. Discov Oncol. 2025;16(1):607.
6. 6. Sharma A, Jasrotia S, Kumar A. Effects of chemotherapy on the immune system: implications for cancer treatment and patient outcomes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024;397(5):2551-2566.
7. 7. Schagen SB, Tsvetkov AS, Compter A, Wefel JS. Cognitive adverse effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy: are interventions within reach? Nat Rev Neurol. 2022;18(3):173-185.
8. 8. Almeida V, Pires D, Silva M, et al. Dermatological side effects of cancer treatment: psychosocial implications—a systematic review of the literature. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(19):2621.

9. 9. Di Mattei VE, Perego G, Milano F, Gatti F. The effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in the management of chemotherapy physical side effects: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(18):1880.
10. 10. Llamas-Ramos I, Alvarado-Omenat JJ, Rodrigo-Reguilón M, Llamas-Ramos R. Quality of life and side effects management in cancer treatment—a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):1708.
11. 11. Ejder ZB, Sanlier N. The relationship between loneliness, psychological resilience, quality of life and taste change in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(12):683.
12. 12. Getie A, Ayalneh M, Bimerew M. Global prevalence and determinant factors of pain, depression, and anxiety among cancer patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25(1):156.
13. 13. Hickmann E, Richter P, Schlieter H, et al. Practical approaches to patient-centered care in Europe: mixed methods study developing a conceptual framework for comprehensive cancer care networks. JMIR Cancer. 2025;11(1):e59683.
14. 14. Cortiana V, Abbas RH, Nadar S, et al. Reviewing the landscape of cancer survivorship: insights from Dr. Lidia Schapira’s programs and beyond. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(6):1216.
15. 15. Dürsch H, Boltenhagen U, Mahler C, et al. A qualitative investigation of factors influencing the integration of complementary and integrative healthcare recommendations in the daily lives of patients with cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2024;23:15347354241252195.
16. 16. Al Eleiwah AAE, Abdalrahim MS, Alhusamiah BK, Habashneh S. Evaluating the effectiveness of acupressure in managing cancer-related symptoms among patients with various types of cancer: systematic review. J Integr Care. 2026:1-18.
17. 17. Kleebayoon A, Wiwanitkit V. Role of traditional and alternative medicine in cancer therapy. In: Nutrition and Complementary Medicine in Cancer: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024:429-457.
18. 18. Alzeer J. Lifestylopathy as personalized medicine: a holistic approach to health. Med Res Arch. 2025;13(1).
19. 19. Carneiro CDS, Sá ACD, Hirano GSB, Barros ALBL. Definitions of the elements of the NANDA-I nursing diagnosis “Imbalanced Energy Field”: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2025;78(3):e20240317.
20. 20. Ocaña MPC, López AGS, Fonseca LGC. Evaluation of the impact of access consciousness sessions on emotional and physical well-being. Salud Cienc Tecnol Conf Ser. 2023;2:428.
21. 21. Kackar A, Juneja A. Access bar therapy: a review. Int J Res Anal Rev. 2019;6(1):449-450. 22. Freitag VL. Práticas integrativas e complementares: barras de acesso à consciência como estratégia de cuidado à saúde. Res Soc Dev. 2020;9(8):e24985221.
22. 23. Kaur S, Mayanglambam P, Bajwan D, Thakur N. Chemotherapy and its adverse effects: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Educ Res. 2022;10(4):399-402.
23. 24. Kuderer NM, Desai A, Lustberg MB, Lyman GH. Mitigating acute chemotherapy-associated adverse events in patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(11):681-697.
24. 25. Łysiak K, Łysiak A, Maziarz B, et al. Nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy and principles of management in their prevention. Prospects Pharm Sci. 2025;23(1):74-79.
25. 26. Badarudin NS, Shah NM, Ismail F, Islahudin F, Tahir NAM. Challenges in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) management: a systematic review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2024;23(3):653-668.
26. 27. Cui C, Wang L, Wang X. Effects of physical and psychological symptoms on cancer-related fatigue among esophageal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):398.
27. 28. Hussey C, Gupta A. Exercise interventions to combat cancer-related fatigue in cancer patients undergoing treatment: a review. Cancer Investig. 2022;40(9):822-838.
28. 29. Molinares D, Kurtevski S, Zhu Y. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: diagnosis, agents, general clinical presentation, and treatments. Curr Oncol Rep. 2023;25(11):1227-1235.
29. 30. Ghosh M, Chakraborty M, Bhattacharjee A, Ranjan Bhuyan N. Clinical manifestations of neuropathic pain and the deleterious effects of chemotherapeutic agents. Curr Drug Saf. 2025.
30. 31. Al-Amouri FM, Badrasawi M. Taste alteration and its relationship with nutritional status among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2024;19(5):e0302990.
31. 32. Zhang Q, Song M, Zhang X, et al. Characteristics of malnutrition in malignant cancer patients. Precis Nutr. 2024;3(3):e00082.
32. 33. Cabrera-Jaime S, Martí-Dillet MM, Roura-Martí P, et al. Factors contributing to sleep disturbance in inpatients with cancer: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Nurs. 2025:10-1097.
33. 34. Yu L, Jiang Y, Zhou Q. Sleep disorders in young and middle-aged adults with acute leukemia undergoing chemotherapy: a qualitative study from a biopsychosocial perspective. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025:4957-4968.
34. 35. Luo Y, Mao D, Zhang L, et al. Identification of symptom clusters and sentinel symptoms during the first cycle of chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(6):385.
35. 36. Hughes L, Taylor RM, Beckett AE, et al. The emotional impact of a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of adolescent and young adult experience. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(7):1332.
36. 37. Papadopoulou A, Govina O, Tsatsou I, et al. Quality of life, distress, anxiety and depression of ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Med Pharm Rep. 2022;95(4):418.
37. 38. Guo YQ, Ju QM, You M, et al. Depression, anxiety and stress among metastatic breast cancer patients on chemotherapy in China. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):33.
38. 39. Ostovar S, Modarresi Chahardehi A, Mohd Hashim IH, et al. Prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients in Southeast Asian countries: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31(6):e13669.
39. 40. Więckiewicz G, Weber S, Florczyk I, Gorczyca P. Socioeconomic burden of psychiatric cancer patients: a narrative review. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(6):1108.
40. 41. Ma Y, Kroemer G. The cancer-immune dialogue in the context of stress. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24(4):264-281.
41. 42. Amani O, Mazaheri MA, Moghani MM, et al. Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2021. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024;7(2):e1989.
42. 43. Conti L, Pizzoli SFM, Marzorati C, et al. Cognitive alterations and brain functional changes following chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients: a systematic review on resting-state fMRI studies. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025;32(6):1803-1818.
43. 44. Kim S, Lee J, Boone D. Protective and risk factors at the intersection of chronic pain, depression, anxiety, and somatic amplification: a latent profile approach. J Pain Res. 2022:1107-1121.
44. 45. Gao Y, Guo M. Impact of oncology nursing interventions on chemotherapy-induced toxicities in lung cancer patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025:1549-1558.
45. 46. Dehghan M, Hoseini FS, Mohammadi Akbarabadi F, et al. Quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients: what is the role of using complementary and alternative medicines? Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(11):9421-9432.
46. 47. Mao JJ, Pillai GG, Andrade CJ, et al. Integrative oncology: addressing the global challenges of cancer prevention and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(2):144-164.
47. 48. Bao T, Greenlee H, Lopez AM, et al. How to make evidence-based integrative medicine a part of everyday oncology practice. ASCO Educ Book. 2023;43:e389830.
48. 49. Win Myint O, Yoong SQ, Toh E, et al. Effectiveness of massage therapy for cancer pain, quality of life and anxiety levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2025;34(1):49-87.
49. 50. Indraswati I, Septiyan RB, Matchaya P, Finch R. Effectiveness of massage therapy on fatigue in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: scoping review. J Berita Ilmu Keperawatan. 2024;17(1):82-91.
50. 51. Uzunoglu A, Matta-Diaz P, Bustos-Gajardo V, et al. Efficacy of massage therapy for symptom management in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13(24):3268.
51. 52. Khan N, Allana A, Haider G. The role of aromatherapy in alleviating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients. Pak J Med Health Educ. 2024;4(2):116-126.
52. 53. Zhang X, Wang Y, He J, Li H, Wang Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of aromatherapy in alleviating post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting among cancer patients. Biol Res Nurs. 2026;28(1):16-29. 54. Rathnayake HGMD. “Neuroaromatics”: aromatherapy and the limbic stress response. J Soc Sci NISD. 2025;3(1).
53. 55. Guo K, Lu Y, Wang X, et al. Multi-level exploration of auricular acupuncture: from traditional Chinese medicine theory to modern medical application. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1426618.
54. 56. Vera G, Nurgali K, Abalo R. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025;37(8):e14976.
55. 57. Sengul T, Özkan A, Eminoğlu A, et al. Enhancing nursing students' compassion, empathy and communication through mindfulness-based meditation: a mixed-methods study. Nurs Open. 2025;12(11):e70325.
56. 58. Liu Q, Wang C, Wang Y, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction with acupressure for sleep quality in breast cancer patients with insomnia undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022;61:102219.
57. 59. Yildirim D, Yildiz CÇ, Ozdemir FA, et al. Effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on stress, depression, and psychological well-being in patients with cancer: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2024;47(2):E84-E92.
58. 60. Biddy AM. The effects of an online, evidence-based educational program about healing touch for nurses' consideration for a change in practice. Brandman University; 2017.
59. 61. Rogers L, Phillips K, Cooper N. Energy healing therapies: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Health Psychol Rev. 2021;2:162-170.
60. 62. Douglas G. Access Bars Manual. Access Consciousness; 2022.
61. 63. Access Consciousness. What You Learn. Access Consciousness website. Accessed July 10, 2026. https://www.accessconsciousness.com/en/micrositesfolder/accessbars/special-event/what-you-learn/
62. 64. Hope T. The effects of Access Bars on depression, anxiety, and stress in police officers: a case series. Energy Psychol. 2023;15(2).
63. 65. McGlone F, Uvnäs Moberg K, Norholt H, Eggart M, Mueller-Oerlinghausen B. Touch medicine: bridging the gap between recent insights from touch research and clinical medicine and its special significance for the treatment of affective disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1390673.
64. 66. Nolazco JI, Chang SL. The role of health-related quality of life in improving cancer outcomes. J Clin Transl Res. 2023;9(2):110.
65. 67. Zhou X, Wang DY, Ding CY, Liu H, Sun ZQ. Psychosocial adaptation and influencing factors among patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(15):4843.
66. 68. Brueggemann AD, Ekwonye AU. Perceived benefits of Magdalena energy healing sessions: an exploratory study of clients’ perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(23):3087.
67. 69. Ağralı C. A narrative review of the impact of Reiki and therapeutic touch on sleep quality and health in women. Pediatr Nursol. 2025;1(1):39-43.
68. 70. Brockman H. A Foot in Both Worlds: How Shamanic Healing and Energy Psychology Are Transforming Psychotherapy. Columbia Press LLC; 2025.
69. 71. Harris RA, Rogers CA, Harris J, Lim E. A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025;25(1):188.
70. 72. Ionescu AI, Anghel AV, Antone-Iordache IL, et al. Assessing the impact of organ failure and metastases on quality of life in breast cancer patients: a prospective study based on utilizing EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR45 questionnaires in Romania. J Pers Med. 2024;14(2):214.
71. 73. Alaradi ES, Alharbi NOM, Alotibi JDA, et al. Integrating healthcare assistants into holistic nursing practices to enhance patient-centered care. J Int Crisis Risk Commun Res. 2024;7(S4):54.
72. 74. Long Y, Zhou Z, Zhou S, Zhang G. The effectiveness of different non-pharmacological therapies on cancer-related fatigue in cancer patients: a network meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;160:104904.
73. 75. Scheck L, Bossert J, Wensing M, Klafke N, Poß-Doering R. Opportunities and challenges of an integrative care structure for oncological patients: a qualitative analysis of provider perspectives. Health Serv Insights. 2025;18:117863292