Research Article

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses

Volume: 54 December 20, 2023
EN TR

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses

Abstract

In 2011, based on the R2P principles, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) authorized a military intervention led by NATO in Libya to “protect civilians”. Yet, the UNSC could not agree on sanctions or military action to protect civilians in Syria. Analyzing the relevant UNSC resolutions, official documents, and formal statements of state representatives, this study aims to uncover the discursive practices around military interventions. More specifically, it explores official discourses that legitimized the NATO-led military intervention in Libya and non-intervention in Syria. A comparative analysis of the Libyan and Syrian cases presents us with an opportunity to assess where R2P currently stands as an international norm.

Keywords

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav (2004). “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism”, International Organization, 58 (2): 239-275.
  2. Arab League (2011), “The Implications of the Current Events in Libya and the Arab Position”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/699706/files/S_2011_137-EN.pdf (24.08.2023).
  3. Bellamy, Alex J. (2011). “Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm”, Ethics & International Affair, 25 (3): 263-269.
  4. Bloomfield, Alan (2016). “Norm Antipreneurs and Theorizing Resistance to normative change”, Review of International Studies, 42: 310-333.
  5. Bloomfield, Alan (2017). “Resisting the responsibility to protect”, Alan Bloomfield and Shirley Scott (eds.), Norm Antipreneurs and the Politics of Resistance to Global Normative Change (London: Routledge): 20-38.
  6. Darweesh, Abbas Deygan and Hussein Dhahi Muzhir (2016). “Representation of the Syrian Crisis in the American Political Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis”, International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3 (1): 40-48.
  7. Deitelhoff, Nicole and Lisbeth Zimmermann (2013). “Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms”, PRIF Working Papers No 18, Frankfurt am Main.
  8. Deitelhoff, Nicole and Lisbeth Zimmermann (2019). “Norms under challenge: Unpacking the dynamics of norm robustness”, Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (1): 2-17.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

International Relations (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 20, 2023

Submission Date

September 1, 2023

Acceptance Date

December 5, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 54

APA
Bodur Ün, M., & Kelleci, T. (2023). The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 54, 53-74. https://doi.org/10.58699/tyir.1353781
AMA
1.Bodur Ün M, Kelleci T. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 2023;54:53-74. doi:10.58699/tyir.1353781
Chicago
Bodur Ün, Marella, and Tuğçe Kelleci. 2023. “The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 54 (December): 53-74. https://doi.org/10.58699/tyir.1353781.
EndNote
Bodur Ün M, Kelleci T (December 1, 2023) The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 54 53–74.
IEEE
[1]M. Bodur Ün and T. Kelleci, “The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, vol. 54, pp. 53–74, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.58699/tyir.1353781.
ISNAD
Bodur Ün, Marella - Kelleci, Tuğçe. “The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 54 (December 1, 2023): 53-74. https://doi.org/10.58699/tyir.1353781.
JAMA
1.Bodur Ün M, Kelleci T. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 2023;54:53–74.
MLA
Bodur Ün, Marella, and Tuğçe Kelleci. “The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, vol. 54, Dec. 2023, pp. 53-74, doi:10.58699/tyir.1353781.
Vancouver
1.Marella Bodur Ün, Tuğçe Kelleci. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya and Syria: An Analysis of Competing Normative Discourses. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 2023 Dec. 1;54:53-74. doi:10.58699/tyir.1353781