Posthümanist Düşünce ve Sibernetik İnsan Bağlamında Performans: Stelarc

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 19, 485 - 504, 31.12.2025

Beril Özer

https://doi.org/10.55004/tykhe.1641069

Öz

Bu makale, Stelarc’ın performans sanatını posthümanist düşünce ve Donna Haraway’in sibernetik insan kavramı çerçevesinde ele almaktadır. Stelarc, bedenin biyolojik sınırlarını aşarak teknolojiyle bütünleşebileceğini savunmakta ve insan-makine etkileşimini sanatsal bir deneyim alanı olarak sunmaktadır. Onun performansları, sanat ile bilim, beden ile teknoloji arasındaki sınırları bulanıklaştırarak yeni bir varoluş biçimi önerir. Çalışmada öncelikle performans sanatının gelişimi ve Stelarc’ın sanattaki yeri ele alınmakta, ardından posthümanizmin insan bedenine bakış açısı incelenmektedir. Stelarc’ın Üçüncü El, Mide Heykeli, Dış İskelet ve Kolda Kulak gibi deneysel projeleri üzerinden, bedenin teknolojiyle nasıl yeniden şekillendiği tartışılmaktadır. Bu performanslar, insanın biyoteknoloji ve dijital sistemlerle nasıl dönüşebileceğini gözler önüne sermektedir. Makale, Stelarc’ın sanatının sadece bir estetik ifade biçimi mi yoksa insan sonrası çağın bir öngörüsü mü sunduğunu sorgulamakta ve bu dönüşümün felsefi, etik ve toplumsal boyutlarını değerlendirmektedir. Sonuç olarak, teknoloji ve sanatın kesişiminde, bedenin nasıl yeniden tanımlandığına dair disiplinlerarası bir perspektif sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Posthümanizm , performans sanatı , Stelarc , Donna Haraway , cyborg , sibernetik insan

Performance in the Context of Posthumanist Thought and the Cyborg Human: Stelarc

Öz

This article examines Stelarc’s performance art within the framework of posthumanist thought and Donna Haraway’s concept of the cyborg. Stelarc argues that the body can transcend its biological limits and integrate with technology, presenting human-machine interaction as a field of artistic experimentation. His performances blur the boundaries between art and science, body and technology, proposing a new mode of existence. The study first explores the development of performance art and Stelarc’s place within it, followed by an analysis of posthumanist perspectives on the human body. Through experimental projects such as Third Hand, Stomach Sculpture, Exoskeleton, and Ear on Arm , the article discusses how the body is reshaped through technology. These performances illustrate the ways in which humans can transform through biotechnology and digital systems. The article questions whether Stelarc’s art is merely an aesthetic expression or a foresight into the posthuman era, while also evaluating the philosophical, ethical, and social dimensions of this transformation. Ultimately, it offers an interdisciplinary perspective on how the body is redefined at the intersection of technology and art.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Posthumanism , performance art , Stelarc , Donna Haraway , cyborg , cybernetic human

Kaynakça

• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), ss. 801-831.
• Beer, S. (2002). What is cybernetics? Kybernetes, 31(2), ss. 209-219.
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.
• Broeckmann, A. (2016). Machine art in the twentieth century. The MIT Press.
• Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.
• Clynes, M. E., & Kline, N. S. (1960). Cyborgs and space. Astronautics, 26, ss. 74-76.
• Collins, L. T. (2024). CyberGaia: Earth as cyborg. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), s. 322.
• Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. MIT Press. Danto, A. C. (1987) The state of the art. Prentice Hall.
• de Carnero, R. O. M. (2023). The human body from a biotechnological perspective in art contexts: active space of experimentation in constant transformation. Artnodes, 32, ss. 1-8.
• Dery, M. (1996). Escape velocity: Cyberculture at the end of the century. Grove Press.
• Filas, M. (2013). My Dinner with Stelarc: A review of techno‑flesh hybridity in art. The Information Society, 29(5), 287-296. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01972243.2013.825688
• Grinin, L. & Grinin, A. (2020). Cybernetic revolution and the future of humanity. Springer.
• Grusin, R. (2015). The nonhuman turn. University of Minnesota Press.
• Haraway, D. (1987). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), ss. 1-42.
• Haraway, D. (1991.) Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
• Haraway, D. (2006). Siborg manifestosu. (Çev. O. Akınhay). Agora Kitaplığı.
• Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
• Herbrechter, Stefan. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Kluszczyński, R. W. (2005). Orlan, Stelarc and the art of the virtual body. Art Inquiry. Recherches Sur les Arts, 7, ss. 85-94.
• McCarthy, C. (1983). Posthuman bodies and cyberspace. Cambridge University Press.
• Murphie, A. & Potts, J. (2003). Culture and technology. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Overall, C. (1991). Aging, death, and human longevity: A philosophical inquiry. University of California Press.
• Patten, B. C. & Odum, E. P. (1981). The cybernetic nature of ecosystems. The American Naturalist, 118(6), ss. 886-895.
• Pulvermüller, F., Garagnani, M. & Wennekers, T. (2014). Thinking in circuits: Towards neurobiological explanation in cognitive neuroscience. Biological Cybernetics, 108(5), ss. 573-593.
• Smith, M. (2005). Stelarc: The monograph. MIT.
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (Ed.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture içinde, ss. 271-313. University of Illinois Press.
• Stelarc, S. (1991). Prosthetics, robotics and remote existence: Postevolutionary strategies. Leonardo, 24(5), ss. 591-595.
• Stelarc, S. (1996). Obsolete body: Suspensions and the technological augmentation of the body. Artlink.
• Stelarc, S. (2014). On the body as an artistic material: Interview with Stahl Stenslie in August - September 2014. The Journal of Somaesthetics, 1(1), ss. 20-41.
• Thibault, K. L. (2014). Technologies and artworks: An interdisciplinary exploration through Ihde and Latour. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Commonwealth University.
• Virilio, P. (1993). The art of the motor. University of Minnesota Press.
• Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press.
• Wolfe, C. (2018). Posthumanist performativity. R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary içinde, ss. 359–361. Bloomsbury Academic.