Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Alanında Yürütülen Doktora Tezlerinin Sistematik ve Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Sosyal ve beşeri bilimler alanlarında yapılan doktora tezleri, araştırmacılara ve politika yapıcılara akademideki sorunlara çözüm sunmalı ve toplumun sosyal ve ekonomik refahını artırmaya katkıda bulunmalıdır. Tezlerden elde edilen bilimsel yayın sayısı ve bunlara yapılan atıflar, tezlerin akademiye, topluma ve doktora eğitiminin kalitesine ne kadar katkıda bulunduğunu belirlemenin bir yoludur. Bu amaçla tezlerin alanlarına katkılarını anlamak için hem sistematik inceleme hem de bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Sistematik inceleme sonucunda Türkiye'deki 12 devlet üniversitesinde 2014-2017 yılları arasında tamamlanan 142 adet tez Türkiye Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK) Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanında yer almaktadır. Ayrıca bu tezlerden çıkarılan bilimsel yayınlar ve bu yayınlara yapılan atıflar CoHE Academic, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS ve Web of Science veri tabanlarında taranmıştır. Bibliyometrik analiz bulguları, 142 tezden 105 bilimsel yayının çıkarıldığını ve bunların atıf sayısının 241 olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak, bu yayınlar ağırlıklı olarak ulusal düşük etki faktörü indeksli dergilerde yayınlanmış ve alıntılanmıştır. Bu durumun nedenini anlamak için her bir tezin araştırma tasarımı, veri toplama ve veri analizi ile ilgili yöntemleri ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular, bu tezlerde çoğunlukla kullanılan nitel araştırma deseni ve ikincil verilerin bu soruna neden olabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ardından, ana tez çıktılarının kalitesine ilişkin tespit edilen sorunları azaltmak için bazı temel önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Atıf Sayısı
• Doktora Tezleri
• Sosyal ve Beşeri bilimler
• Sistematik Analiz

A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Turkish Doctoral Dissertations Completed in the Fields of Social Sciences and Humanities

Abstract

Dissertations conducted in the fields of social sciences and humanities should provide researchers and decision makers with solutions to the problems in academia and contribute to enhancing society's social and economic welfare. The number of scientific publications extracted from dissertations and citations on them is one way to determine how much dissertations contribute to academia, society, and the quality of doctoral education. Systematic review and bibliometric analysis were implemented to understand the contributions of the dissertations to their fields. Through the systematic review, 142 dissertations, completed at 12 Turkish public universities between 2014 and 2017, in the National Thesis Center database of the Turkish Council of Higher Education were derived. The scientific publications extracted from these dissertations and citations to these publications were searched in the databases CoHE Academic, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Findings of bibliometric analysis indicate that 105 scientific publications were extracted from 142 dissertations, and their citation count was 241. However, these publications were predominantly published and cited in the national low impact factor indexed journals. To understand the reason for this situation, the methods of each dissertation concerning research design, data collection, and data analysis were examined thoroughly. The findings reveal that qualitative research design and secondary data, mostly used in these dissertations, might be the reasons for this issue. Some suggestions were made to reduce the problems identified concerning the quality of the main dissertation outputs.

Keywords

• Bibliometric Analysis
• Citation Count
• Doctoral Dissertations
• Social Sciences and Humanities
• Systematic Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Açıkgöz, Ö., & Günay, A. (2020). The early impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the global and Turkish economy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 520-526. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tbtkmedical/issue/53865/724507
2. Akçiğit, U., & Özcan-Tok, E. (2020). Türkiye Bilimler Akademesi [Turkish Academy of Sciences] Türkiye bilim raporu. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları.
3. Alpaydın, Y., & Akın, M. H. (2014). Türkiye’de sosyal ve beşeri bilimlerde doktora tezleri hazırlamada ana yönelimler. İnsan ve Toplum, 4(8), 1-28. Doi:dx.doi.org/10.12658/human.society.4.8.M0110.
4. Alper, M., & Döğer, C. (2021). Türkiye akademik performans analizi-2021. Researchgate doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35576.37127/3
5. Aslan, A., Açıkgöz, Ö., & Günay, A. (2021). Scientific impact of the Turkish educational dissertations. Turkish Journal of Education, 10(3), 237-250. DOI:10.19128/turje.850728
6. Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2018). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim yönetimi alanında üretilen doktora tezlerine ilişkin bir inceleme [An examination for the PhD dissertations completed in the field of the management of the higher education in Turkey]. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 8(2), 305-313.
7. Baloğlu, M., & Bilgiç, Ş. (2021a). Türkiye’de akademisyenlerin WoS yayın performansları. Nobel Yayıncılık.
8. Baloğlu, M., & Bilgiç, Ş. (2021b). Türkiye’de üniversitelerin WoS yayın performansları. Nobel Yayıncılık.

9. Batur, Z., & Özcan, H. Z. (2020). Eleştirel düşünme üzerine yazılan lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 9(2), 834-854.
10. Benedictine University. (2022). Public health research guide: primary and secondary data definitions. Retrieved from https://researchguides.ben.edu/c.php?g=282050&p=4036581
11. Buchanan, A. L., & Herubel, J.-P. V. M. (1994). Profiling PhD Dissertation Bibliographies. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1300/J103v13n01_01
12. Cloete, N., Mouton, J., & Sheppard, C. (2015). Doctoral education in South Africa. Cape Town: African Minds. CoHE. (2018). The regulation for thesis submission to the National Thesis Center database of the CoHE. Retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2547.pdf.
13. Çelikkaya, S., & Demirgil, H. (2019). Bölgesel kalkınma üzerine hazırlanan lisansüstütezlere yönelik bibliyometrik bir araştırma/ A bibliometric research on graduate thesis prepared about regional development. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 11 (30), 746-763.
14. Eskin, B., & Kurt, A. (2020). Bibliometric investigation of registered master’s and doctoral thesis prepared under the title of environmental problems in Turkey. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 5(4), 676-684.
15. European Commision (2020). Eurostat. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/background
16. European Qualifications Framework. (2020). European qualifications framework. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/content/descriptors-page
17. Granovsky, Y. V., Luibimova, T. N., Murashova, T. I., & Myatlev, V. D. (1992). Information-based evaluation of the quality of doctoral theses. Scientometrics, 23(3), 361-376.
18. Greenfeld, Liah and Nisbet, Robert A.. “social science”. Retrieved from Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Oct. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-science.
19. Hall, C. M. (1991). Tourism as the Subject of Post-graduate Dissertations in Australia. Annals of Tourism Research. 18(3): 520-523.
20. Hsieh, PN., Chuang, TM., & Wang, ML. (2013). A bibliometric analysis oft he theses and dissertations on information literacy published in the United States and Taiwan. In Chang, Rs., Jain L., Peng SL (eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Applications- Volume 1. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 20. Springer Publications.
21. InterUniversity Council. (2021). The criteria for the promotion and appointment for the associate professorship. Retrieved from https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2021-eylul-donemi/basvuru-sartlari/TA_Tablo11_2021E_15092021.pdf
22. Jayaprakashy, G. H., & Kannappanavar, B. U. (2015). Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in commerce submitted to GOA University GOA: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 5(2), 160-177.
23. Jing, Su, Zhai Qinghua, & Hans Landström. 2015. Entrepreneurship across regions: Internationalization and/or contextualization? In handbook of research on global competitive advantage through innovation and entrepreneurship, 372-392. IGI Global.
24. Kaya, M. & Erbay, E. (2020). Global Trends of the researches on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis via VOSviewer. Journal of Ankara Health Sciences, 9(2), 201-216. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.46971/ausbid.817925
25. Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M. & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194.
26. OECD (2019). OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en
27. OECD (2018). The future of education and skills. Education 2030 the future we want. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org >2030-project.
28. OECD. (2020). Cities in the world: a new perspective on urbanization, OECD urban studies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d0efcbda-en.
29. Osman, I., Alemna, A. A., & Kumah, M. A. (2018). Analysis of doctoral thesis citation patterns: a case study of the Sam Jonah Library, Ghana. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1692.
30. Sadlak, J. (2004). Preface- and Introduction to Theme. J. Sadlak (Ed.), UNESCO CEPES Studies on Higher Education. Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: status and prospects (p. 7-11). Bucharest: UNESCO.
31. Sarı, D. B., & Akıncı, Z. (2020). Kadın ve turizm konulu lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 557-566.
32. Skinner, J. (2016). Bibliometrics and social network analysis of doctoral research: research trends in distance learning. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of New Mexico. Retrieved from https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/oils_etds/32
33. Sökmen, Y. (2021). Content analysis of articles published in the field of social studies education. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13 (2), 1564-1582.
34. TUBITAK Ulakbim Cahit Arf Information Center. (2021). Bibliometric analysis. Retrieved from https://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/bibliyometrik-analiz/bibliyometrik-analiz
35. Turkish Graduate Education Regulation (2016). 29690 numbered Official Gazette.
36. Turkish Qualifications Framework. (2015). Turkish Qualifications Framework. Retrieved from https://www.myk.gov.tr//TRR/File6.pdf
37. TÜİK. (2020). Demographic indicators 2000-2025. Retrieved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Nufus-ve-Demografi-109
38. UN Refugee Agency (2020). Refugee Population Data [online]. Website https://www.unhcr.org/ [accessed 21 January 2022].
39. UNDP. (2022). Development challenges and solutions. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/development-challenges-and-solutions
40. World Bank (2022a). World Bank Open Data: Population (total) [online]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
41. World Bank (2022b). World Bank Open Data: Gross Domestic Production (current US$) [online]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
42. Ziman, J. (1993). Competition undermines creativity. The Times Higher Education Supplemen