The Status of Sustainability in Architectural Education

Abstract

Mimarlık disiplini güncel gelişmelerden etkilenerek değişimlere entegre olan bir alandır ve mimarlık eğitimi de bu değişimler doğrultusunda güncellenerek evrenselliğini korumak zorundadır. Geleceğin mimarları olan öğrencilerin güncel tartışma konularından biri olan sürdürülebilirliğe yönelik donanımlı olmaları, sürdürülebilirliğin hedeflenen amaçlarına ulaşmasında oldukça önemlidir. İnsanların, canlı organizmaların ve inorganik öğelerin meydana getirdiği küresel ekosistemin devamlılığını sürdürebilmesi için çözümler geliştirmek ve bunları uygulamaya koymak mimarların görevleri arasındadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, mimarlık bölümü lisans ve lisansüstü eğitiminde yer alan sürdürülebilirlik konulu dersler ve derslerin içerikleri kapsamında bir analiz yapmaktır. Çalışma kapsamında, Türkiye’de mimarlık alanında lisans ve lisansüstü düzeyde eğitim veren devlet üniversitelerinin bilgisi, en son yayımlanan 2023 Yükseköğretim Program Atlası incelenerek elde edilmiştir. Üniversitelerin ders bilgi paketleri analiz edilerek sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında ders içerikleri, dersin hangi yarıyılda verildiği, zorunlu ya da seçmeli, teorik ya da uygulama ağırlıklı ders olması ve derslerde bilgisayar programının kullanılma durumu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak lisans düzeyinde verilen derslerden sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında ele alınan derslerin pek çoğunun seçmeli ve teorik ders olarak programlarda yer aldığı; lisansüstü eğitimde ise simülasyon programı, sayısal hesaplama veya sertifika konulu derslerin teorik anlatıma göre oldukça az sayıda olduğu ve genellikle yüksek lisans programlarında yer aldığı sonucu elde edilmiştir.

Keywords

• architectural education
• awareness of sustainability
• architecture
• ecology
• sustainability

Sürdürülebilirliğin Mimarlık Eğitimindeki Yeri

Öz

The discipline of architecture is a field that is influenced by current developments and integrated with changes, and architectural education must maintain its universality by updating in line with these changes. It is very important for students, who are the architects of the future, to be equipped for sustainability, which is one of the current topics of discussion, to achieve the targeted goals of sustainability. Developing solutions and implementing them to ensure the continuity of the global ecosystem consisting of people, living organisms, and inorganic elements are among the duties of architects. The purpose of this study is to make an analysis within the scope of sustainability-related courses and their contents in undergraduate and graduate education in the department of architecture. Within the scope of the study, information about state universities providing undergraduate and graduate education in the field of architecture in Turkey was obtained by examining the most recently published 2023 Higher Education Program Atlas. By analyzing the course information packages of the universities, the course contents in the context of sustainability, the semester in which the course was given, whether it was compulsory or elective, theoretical or application-oriented, and the use of computer programs in the courses were determined. As a result, many of the courses given at the undergraduate level in the context of sustainability are included in the programs as elective and theoretical courses. It has been concluded that in postgraduate education, courses on simulation programs, numerical calculations, or certificates are very few in number compared to the theoretical explanation and are generally included in master’s programs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• mimarlık eğitimi
• sürdürülebilirlik kültürü
• ekoloji
• mimarlık
• sürdürülebilirlik

Kaynakça

1. Alexandrou, E., Bougiatioti, F., Katsaros, M., Kotsenos, A., & Zacharopoulos, E. (2022). Sustainability challenges in architectural education: assessment of an architectural technology course on the bioclimatic redesign of existing buildings in Greece. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 41(6), 609-628.
2. Altomonte, S., Cadima, P., Yannas, S., De Herde, A., Riemer, H., Cangelli, E., De Asiain, M.L. & Horvath, S. (2012). Educate! Sustainable environmental design in architectural education and practice, In Proceedings of the 28th International PLEA Conference on Sustainable Architecture + Urban Design: Opportunities, Limits and Needs—Towards an Environmentally Responsible Architecture, Lima, Peru.
3. Ateş Can, S. & Kurtoğlu, D. (2017). Sürdürülebilir Mimari Kapsamında Geliştirilen Teknoloji ve Ürünler. Yalvaç Akademi Dergisi, 2 (2), 22-31.
4. Bennetts, H., Radford, A., & Williamson, T. (2003). Understanding sustainable architecture. Taylor & Francis.
5. Boarin, P., & Martinez-Molina, A. (2022). Integration of environmental sustainability considerations within architectural programmes in higher education: A review of teaching and implementation approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 342, 130989.
6. Borrini, G., & Buchan, D. (1997). Beyond fences: seeking social sustainability in conservation. Vol. 2: A resource book.
7. Çelebi, G. and Gültekin, A.B. (2007). Scope of Sustainable Architecture, an Overview through a Conceptual Framework, Mimaran Journal Konya: Konya Chamber of Architects, Issue: 2, 30-36.
8. Çotuksöken, B. (2004). Özne olarak mimar, Ayşe Şentürer, Şafak Ural, Ayla Atasoy (Ed.), Mimarlık ve Felsefe (ss. 18-23), Yapı yayınları.

9. Domenica Iulo, L., Gorby, C., Poerschke, U., Nickolas Kalisperis, L., & Woollen, M. (2013). Environmentally conscious design–educating future architects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 434-448.
10. Erkan, H. (2022). Ekonomi politikasının temelleri. İzmir: İzmir Akademi Derneği. E-ISBN: 978-605-72213-0-8
11. Gaulmyn, C., & Dupre, K. (2019). Teaching sustainable design in architecture education: Critical review of Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED). Frontiers of architectural research, 8(2), 238-260. 10.1016/j.foar.2019.03.001
12. Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1875-1885.
13. Grover, R., Emmitt, S., & Copping, A. (2020). Critical learning for sustainable architecture: Opportunities for design studio pedagogy. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101876.
14. Gucyeter, B. 2016. “The Place of Sustainability in Architectural Education: Discussion and Suggestions.” Athens Journal of Architecture, 2 (3): 237–256. doi:10.30958/aja.2-3-4.
15. Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture’s essential role in public planning. Champaign, Illinois: Common Ground.
16. Kaypak, Ş. (2012). Ekolojik turizm ve sürdürülebilir kırsal kalkınma. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14 (22), 11-29.
17. Keumala, N., Younus, M. A., Kuan, Y., Razak, A. S. B. A., Ismail, M. A., & Al-Obaidi, K. M. (2016). Pedagogy of architectural education on SuStainability in MalaySia–Student PerSPective. Open House International, 41(4), 104-108.
18. Khan, A. Z., Vandevyvere, H., & Allacker, K. (2013). Design for the ecological age: Rethinking the role of sustainability in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 67(2), 175-185.
19. Kim, J. J., and Rigdon, B. (1998). Sustainable Architecture Module: Introduction to Sustainable Design. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, The University of Michigan, pp.8-15.
20. Kohler, N. (1999). The relevance of Green Building Challenge: an observer’s perspective. Building Research & Information, 27(4-5), 309–320. doi:10.1080/096132199369426
21. Lakot Alemdağ, E., Al Şensoy, S. & İsmailoğlu, S. (2022). Kültürel Mirasın Sürdürülebilirliği: Rize Kafdağı Konak Oteli Örneği. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 15 (30), 1570-1601. DOI: 10.21602/sduarte.1182998
22. Lang, J., & Moleski, W. (2016). Functionalism Revisited: Architectural Theory and Practice and the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge, New York, NY.
23. Lökçe, S. (2002). Mimarlık eğitim programları: Mimari tasarım ve teknoloji ile bütünleşme. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1-16.
24. Mahdavinejad, M., Zia, A., Larki, A. N., Ghanavati, S., & Elmi, N. (2014). Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International journal of sustainable built environment, 3(2), 235-246.
25. Murillo Camacho, K. S., Fouseki, K., & Altamirano Medina, H. (2022). Decision-Making Processes of Residents in Preservation, Thermal Comfort, and Energy Efficiency in Heritage Buildings: A Pilot Study in Mexico City. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1486.
26. Ng, V., & Lin, C. L. (2022). Re-thinking Architecture Education: Conceptualising Curriculum Through the Lens of 21st Century Graduate Attributes. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 22(2), 85-92.
27. Oğuz, G. P. ve Ateş, D. K. (2018, December). Sürdürülebilirlik kapsamında bir kültür mirası yapısının müzeye dönüşümü: Diyarbakır içkale eski jandarma istihbarat binası örneği. 1.Uluslararası Mimarlık Sempozyumu.
28. Oktay, D. (2020). Architectural education for sustainability. In: Sayigh, A. (Ed.), Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Springer, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_14.
29. Pappas, E., Pierrakos, O., & Nagel, R. (2013). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to teach sustainability in multiple contexts. Journal of cleaner production, 48, 54-64.
30. Ragheb, A., El-Shimy, H., & Ragheb, G. (2016). Green architecture: A concept of sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 778-787. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.075.
31. Reza, M. I. H., & Abdullah, S. A. (2011). Regional Index of Ecological Integrity: A need for sustainable management of natural resources. Ecological indicators, 11(2), 220-229.
32. Taleghani, M., Ansari, H. R., & Jennings, P. (2011). Sustainability in architectural education: A comparison of Iran and Australia. Renewable energy, 36(7), 2021-2025. 10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.024
33. Ummihusna, A. and Zairul, M. (2020), “Investigating immersive learning technology intervention in architecture education: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14 (1), 264-281, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0279.
34. Url- 1, Yükseköğretim Program Atlası, https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/ Date of Access: 21.03.2023 Vitruvius (2017). Mimarlık Üzerine Vitruvius, (Çev. Çiğdem Dürüşken). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
35. Wright, J. (2003). Introducing sustainability into the architecture curriculum in the United States. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(2), 100-105.
36. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Yücel, A., (2004). Mimarlık Nedir, Mimar Kimdir, (Felsefeye Nasıl Başvurur)?, Mimarlık ve Felsefe. A. Şentürer, Ş. Ural, A. Atasoy (Ed.), İstanbul: Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.