Uluslararası Öğrencilerin Memnuniyet Düzeylerine Etki Eden Faktörlerin CHAID Analizi ile Belirlenmesi

Öz

Uluslararasılaşma, son zamanlarda yükseköğretim kurumları için tüm dünyada vazgeçilmez bir unsur haline gelmiştir. Yükseköğretim kurumlarında uluslararasılaşmayı sağlayan pek çok bileşen olmakla birlikte, öğrenim gördükleri ülkeye sağladıkları önemli katkılar nedeniyle uluslararası öğrenciler bu konuda diğerlerine göre daha fazla ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bu nedenle, tüm dünyada yükseköğretim kurumları uluslararası öğrenci sayılarını ve bu öğrencilerin memnuniyet düzeylerini artırma arayışındadır. Uluslararası öğrencilerin taşıdığı önemden yola çıkan bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim gören uluslararası öğrencilerin memnuniyet düzeylerine etki eden faktörleri ortaya koymak amacındadır. Bu amaç için Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesinde (ODTÜ) öğrenim gören toplam 330 uluslararası öğrenciye 25 soruluk bir on-line anket uygulanmış ve anket verileri CHAID analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları; uluslararası öğrencilerin izlenimlerinin, öğrenim derecelerinin ve cinsiyetlerinin memnuniyet düzeyleri üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. CHAID analiziyle ortaya konulan bu faktörlerin dikkate alınması, yükseköğretim kurumlarına daha fazla sayıda uluslararası öğrenci çekmek amacıyla belirlenen ya da geliştirilen uluslararasılaşma stratejilerine katkısı olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası öğrenci
• Öğrenci memnuniyeti
• Yükseköğretim
• Türkiye
• CHAID analysis

Determination of Factors Affecting International Students’ Satisfaction Levels Using CHAID Analysis

Öz

Internationalization has recently been a core element for higher education institutions (HEIs) worldwide. Various components provide internationalization in HEIs. However, international students stand out from the others due to providing numerous benefits to host countries. Therefore, HEIs around the world seek to increase the number of international students and their satisfaction levels. This study, inspired from the importance of international students, seeks to determine the factors affecting the satisfaction levels of international students who study at a Turkish state university. To this end, an on-line survey consisting of 25 questions were administered to a total of 330 international students studying at Middle East Technical University (METU). Survey data were evaluated using the CHAID (Chi-Squared Automatic Interaction Detection) analysis. The findings of the analysis indicated that the international students’ implications, study degree and gender played a major role in their satisfaction levels. Considering these influential factors determined by the CHAID analysis will contribute to the internationalization strategies which is developed to attract more international students to HEIs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International students
• Student satisfaction
• Higher Education
• Türkiye
• CHAID Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Alemu, A. M. & Cordier, J. (2017). Factors influencing international student satisfaction in Korean universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 57, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.006 Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. (3rd. ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
2. Collins, A., Sanal, Z. G. & Takır, A. (2021). The qualitative study of factors influencing to international students’ satisfaction: the case of a private university in Turkey. In Belal Shneikat, Cihan Çobanoğlu and Cem Tanova (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Recruiting International Students: Challenges and Opportunities, (pp. 155-172), Emerald Publishing Limited.
3. De Souza, C. S., Abba, M. J. & Streck, D. R. (2020). Internationalization as a Process of Change: An Interview with Jane Knight. ETD- Educação Temática Digital Campinas, 22(3), 529-537.
4. De Witt, H. J.W.M. (2001). Internationalisation of Higher Education in the United States of America and Europe (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research.
5. De Wit, H., Hunter, F. Howard, I. & Egron-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalization of Higher Education. European Parliament Policy Department: Brussels, Belgium.
6. De Witt, H. (2020). Internationalization of Higher Education: The More Ethical and Qualitative Approach. Journal of International Students, 10(1), i-iv.
7. De Witt, H & Altbach, P. (February 2023). International Higher Education for the Future: Major Crises and Post-Pandemic Challenges. Change Magazine, 17-23.
8. Gibbs, R. M. (2011). Psychological Adjustment and Socio-cultural Adaptation of International Students in Turkey. (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Seattle Pacific University, USA.

9. Guilbault, M. (2018). Students as customers in higher education: The (controversial) debate needs to end. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 295-298.
10. Haverila, M.J., Haverila, K and McLaughlin, C. (2020). Variables affecting the retention intentions of students in Higher education institutions: a comparison between international and domestic students. Journal of International students, 10(2), 358-382.
11. Hennings, M., & S. Tanabe. (2018). Study abroad objectives and satisfaction of international students in Japan. Journal of International Students, 8(4), 1914-1925. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v8i4.238
12. IBM (2024). IBMM SPSS Decision Trees. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics/decision-trees.
13. Jiang, Q., Yuen, M. & Horta, H. (2020). Factors influencing life satisfaction of international students in mainland China. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42, 393-413.
14. Karamova, Y. Y. & Alikberova, A. R. (2019). An investigation of factors affecting the Russia and Korea student satisfaction: The cases of language and culture. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10 (SP), 1289-1299. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2019.15372
15. Kartal, B. (2019). Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Uluslararası Öğrenci Memnuniyet Araştırması. Kartal, B. (Ed.), Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Yayınları.
16. Khan, A. A. & Hague, A. (2018). Factors affecting international students’ level of satisfaction towards selected public higher learning institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Knowledge Management, 1(3): 1-19.
17. Khosravi, A. A., Poushaneh, K., Roozegar, A. & Sohrabifardd, N. (2013). Determination of factors affecting student satisfaction of Islamic Azad University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
18. Knight, J. (2003). Updated Definition of Internationalization. International Higher Education, 33, 2-3. ciences, 84, 579-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.607
19. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318786425
20. Knight, J. (2021). Higher education internationalization: concepts, rationales and frameworks. Revista REDALINT, 1(1), 65-88.
21. Korobova, N. & Starobin, S. S. (2015). A comparative study of student engagement, satisfaction, and academic success among international and American students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v5i1.444
22. Kondakçı, Y (2011). Student Mobility Reviewed: Attraction and Satisfaction of International Students in Turkey. High Educ. 62, 573–592.
23. Koyuncugil, A.S., Özgülbaş, N. (2008). İMKB’de İşlem Gören KOBİ’lerin Güçlü ve Zayıf Yönleri: CHAID Karar Ağacı Uygulaması, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. 23(1), 1-21.
24. METU-Middle East Technical University. (2023). 2023-2027 Strategic Plan. Retrieved from http://sp.metu.edu.tr/system/files/SP_2023-27-ENG.pdf
25. METU-Middle East Technical University. (2022). Administration Activity Report. https://sgdb.metu.edu.tr/tr/system/files/2022_odtu_idare_faaliyet_raporu.pdf
26. Milanovic, M. & Stanmenkovic, M. (2016). CHAID decision tree: methodological frame and application. Economic Themes, 54(4), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2016-0029
27. Min, S & Khoon, C. C. (2014). Demographic factors in the evaluation of service quality in higher education: a structural equation model approach (SEM). International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v6n1p90
28. Mittelmeier, J., Lomer, S. and Unkule, K. (Eds.) (2024). Research with International Studies: Critical conceptual and methodological considerations, Routhledge.
29. Ngamkamollert, T. & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2015). Factors influencing foreign students’ satisfaction toward international program in Thai universities. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(3), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.497
30. OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en.
31. OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en.
32. Pereira, M. A. C. & Da Silva, M. T. (2003). A Key question for higher education: who are the customers? Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society, (pp. 1-16), Atlanta, GE.
33. Polat, C. (2015). How to measure the customer satisfaction among international students? An explorative case study on university students. Niğde University Academic Review of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 41-59.
34. Quiting, C. & Qianqian, M. (2016). Study on the status of international students’ satisfaction with the quality of higher education service. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 65, 375-378. https://doi.org/10.2991/icemse-16.2016.94
35. Round University Rankings. (2023). World University Rankings. Retrieved from https://roundranking.com/ranking/world-university-rankings.html#world-2023
36. Öztrak, M. & Karaşin, Y. (2022). Eğitim Amacıyla Türkiye’yi Tercih Eden Yabancı Uyruklu Öğrencilerin Memnuniyeti ve Üniversiteyi Tavsiye Etme Durumunun İncelenmesi: Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesinde Bir Araştırma. UHUSBAD-Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 53-65.
37. Şeker, M., Akdenizli, N. O., Urat, C. & Halavuk, F. (2023). Examining the effect of organizational justice on organizational dissent with CHAID analysis and structural equation modeling. Anadolu Academy Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 71-93.
38. Topal, F. & Tauscher, S. (2020). Uluslararası Öğrenci̇leri̇n Akademi̇k ve Sosyal Yaşamlarında Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar Üzeri̇ne İnceleme. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 15/1, 309-336.
39. Uddin, M. R., Mamun, A., Soumana, A. O., & Khan, Md. M. (2017). Factors and predictors of international student’s satisfaction in Turkey. Educational Process: International Journal, 6(2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2017.62.4
40. UNESCO National Commission in Alliance with Higher Education Quality Council. (2022). Higher Education Report: Türkiye. Retrieved from https://whec2022.net/resources/Country%20report %20-%20Turkiye.pdf
41. UNESCO.org. (2023). Internationally mobile students. Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/internationally-mobile-students.
42. URAP-University Ranking by Academic Performance. (2023). 2022-23 General Rankings of All Turkish Universities. Retrieved from https://newtr.urapcenter.org/Rankings/2022-2023/GENEL-SIRALAMASI-2022
43. YÖK-Turkish Higher Education Council. (2024). Education statistics of 2018-2019 academic year, pivottable of student numbers. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
44. YÖK-Turkish Higher Education Council (2024). Higher Education Information Management System, Higher Education statistics/Student numbers and faculties. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
45. YÖK-Turkish Higher Education Council. (2024). 2022-23 Student Statistics. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr.
46. YÖK-Turkish Higher Education Council. (2017). Paper of Internationalization strategy in higher education 2018-2022, Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/AnaSayfa/Yuksekogretimde _Uluslararasilasma_Strateji_Belgesi_2018_2022.pdf.
47. Webometrics. (2023). Ranking web of universities. Retrieved from http://161.111.47.11/en/world?page=4 Yu, B. & Wright, E. (2015). Socio-cultural adaptation, academic adaptation and satisfaction of international higher degree research students in Australia. Tertiary Education and Management, 22(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2015.1127405