Özel Yetenekliler Alanında Uluslararası Doktora Tezlerinin Analizi (2010-2020)

Öz

Bu çalışmada uluslararası alanyazında 2010-2020 (Ağustos) yılları arasında özel yetenekliler alanında tamamlanan doktora tezlerinin mevcut özelliklerinin ve genel eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Dahil etme ölçütleri (a) İngilizce yazılmış olması (b) doktora tezi olması (c) tam metne erişilebilmesi (d) özel yetenekli bireylerin, ailelerinin ya da eğitimcilerin (yönetici, genel sınıf öğretmeni, branş öğretmeni, özel eğitim öğretmeni, program koordinatörleri vb.) katılımcı olarak yer alması olarak belirlenmiştir. Dahil etme ölçütlerini karşılayan 112 doktora tezi üniversite, yıl, yöntem, desen; tema ve bulgular açısından içerik analizi tekniği ile incelenmiştir. Tezlerin yarısından fazlasında (%51,79) nitel, dörtte birinde nicel (%25,89) ve beşte birinden fazlasında karma (%22,32) yöntem kullanılmıştır. Nitel yöntemde durum çalışması ve fenomenoloji; nicel yöntemde tarama; karma yöntemde ise açımlayıcı sıralı desenin en çok tercih edildiği belirlenmiştir. Temaya göre dağılım incelendiğinde, sunulan eğitim hizmetinin %20,54 ile en fazla olduğu ve eğitimcilerle yürütülen çalışmanın %19,64 ile ikinci sırayı paylaştığı belirlenmiştir. Yetişkin ya da mezun özel yetenekli bireyler ile retrospektif ve/veya boylamsal çalışmalara daha az yer verildiği bulunmuştur. Bu çalışma, eğitim fakültesi lisans programlarına özel yetenekliler eğitimi ve çok kültürlülük derslerinin dahil edilmesi gerekliliğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• özel yetenekliler
• doktora tezleri
• içerik analizi

Analysis of International Dissertations in the Gifted and Talented Field (2010-2020)

Öz

The purpose of current study is to examine existing features and general inclinations of dissertations which were conducted in the field of gifted and talented during 2010-2020 (August). Including criteria were (a) published in English (b) dissertations (c) eligible full text (d) parcicipants shoul be gifted and talented individual, parent(s) or instructors (administrator, regular teacher, field teacher, gifted teacher, gifted programme coordinator etc.). Total of 112 dissertations meeting including criteria were analysed in terms of university, year, methodology, design; theme and findings. According to data, more than half of the dissertations (51,79%) is qualitative, one fourth (25,98%) is quantitative and more than one fifth (22,32%) is mixed. Case study and phenomenology are mostly preferred designs in qualitative methodology, survey in the quantitative methodology and explanatory sequential design in the mixed methodology. Dissertations related with educational services (20,54%) and with instructors (19,64%) are the first two in terms of themes. There are fewer dissertations with adult and graduate sample in longitutional and/or retrospective studies. Current study indicated that gifted and talented education and multiculturalism courses should be included undergraduate programs within the faculty of education. This study will shed light on the national gifted and talented literature with its unique and recent findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gifted and talented
• dissertations
• content analysis

Kaynakça

1. Bildiren, A., & Fırat, T. (2020). Giftedness or disability? Living with paradox, Education 3-13,
2. *Bliven Noll, L. J. (2012). Iowa educators’ perceptions on talented and gifted alternative education high school students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3511065)
3. Bolat, Y., & Tekin, M. (2017). Üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimi araştırmalarında eğilimler: Yöntem bilimsel bir analiz. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(27), 609-629.
4. *Brazile, R. D. (2010). Selection process for third and fourth grade African American gifted and talented: A case study in one urban school district (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3436765)
5. *Bright, S. (2020). How do personalized learning programs’ instructional design match gifted students’ experiences in using them? (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27995373)
6. *Bryant, L. E. (2011). The academic and social implications of virtual learning environments for gifted high school students with an autism spectrum disorder (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No.3509687)
7. *Buescher, S. H. (2013). Online learning: Experinces and perceptions of gifted midddle school students, their parents and principals (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3572682)
8. *Burnette, D. (2013). Casting minority gifted students: The pedagogical impact of cinema on the culture of schooling (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from Electronic Theses and Dissertations (63.)

9. *Case, M. (2019). Program evaluation of the Coping CAT program with gifted, elementary students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13809632)
10. *Calvert, E. (2012). Linked leadership: The role of technology in gifted education coordinators’ approaches to informed decision making (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3510821)
11. Cengizhan, S. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin özel yetenekli öğrenciler için etkinlik tasarlamada- uygulamada karşılaştıkları güçlükler ve eğitime ilişkin görüşleri. Anemon Muş Alparslan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(5), 27-36. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.506421
12. *Christo, J. (2019). Evaluation of the EXCEL and IMPACT! programs for gifted students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13426563)
13. Ciha, T. E., Harris, T. E., Hiffman, C., & Potter, M. V. (1974). Parents as identifiers of giftedness, ignored but accurate. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(3), 135-145.
14. *Cleveland, K. T. (2018). Who is selected to participate in gifted and talented programs in a small Southeastern school district (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13420855)
15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6. Edition). New York: Routledge.
16. *Cohoon, S. B. (2015). State policies in gifted and talented education on acceleration: An analysis of state policies and mandates (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 10002478)
17. *Connelly, J. (2010). A tradition of excellence transitions to the 21st century: Hungarian mathematics education 1988-2008 (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3420877)
18. *Coon, P. A. (2013). The impact of service learning on leadership skills of students who are gifted and talented in the middle school (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3605810)
19. *Coxon, S. V. (2011). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a first lego league-based robotics unit (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3492309)
20. Cross, T. (2004). Technology and the unseen world of gifted students: Social emotional needs. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 14-15.
21. *Culella, N. A. (2017). STEM vs. Non-STEM teacher perception and integration of technology among gifted and talented populations (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10279538)
22. Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126–138.
23. *Dial, M. (2011). The impact of classroom instructional practices in math on achievement and underachievement for academically gifted and talented students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3461793)
24. *Diaz Cardenas, G. A. (2020). The underrepresentation of Latin@ students in gifted programs: Teachers’ perception of giftedness and its effects in the nomination of potential gifted Latin@ students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27961595)
25. *Drakeford, J.G. (2010). The Howard Gardner School: A portrait of a small progressive, independent and alternative high school for bright, creative non-traditional learners (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3397311)
26. *DuBord Hill, E. (2020). Twice-Exceptional college students narratives: When giftedness and mental health intersect (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27962158)
27. *Fanning, M. E. (2011). Perceptions and usage of an online system in a gifted and talented program (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3469395)
28. Feldman, D. H. (1993). Child prodigies: A distinctive form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 188–193
29. *Fisher, J. (2016). High ability visual artists: A national mixed methods study of secondary art teacher training and practice (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 10116202)
30. *Fisher, T. A. (2013). The impact of multiple intelligence theory on teacher perception of giftedness and the referral of African American students to gifted and talented education programs (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3564572)
31. *Fitzgerald, E. (2013). Evaluating the achievement of students who did or did not participate in a high ability learning program (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3603766)
32. *Fitzgerald, M. (2019). Talented high school students' perceptions on how their parents influence their achievement (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No. 27669454)
33. *Fonder, D. (2020). Examining elementary gifted and talented programming (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27832783)
34. Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T.C., & Whiting, G.W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruiment and retention issues. Exceptional Children,74(3), 289- 306.
35. *Friesenhahn, D. S. (2019). The perceptions of teachers of minority gifted students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13881952)
36. Greene, M. J. (2006). Helping build lives: Career and life devel- opment of gifted and talented students. Professional School Counseling, 10, 34–42.
37. *Gresham, P. (2010). An exploratory study of the career aspirations and self-perceptions of university honors program students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3404438)
38. *Gottlieb, B. L. (2020). “Aren’t they gifted?”: Gifted educators’ understanding of academic underachievement (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27962538)
39. Gönen, S., & Kocakaya, S. (2006). Fizik öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitimler üzerine görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(19), 37-44.
40. *Habersham, M. (2014). Living up to standards: A case study examining programming practices of gifted and talented program in a minority school district (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3630868)
41. *Hays, C. (2018). Curiosity & gifted education: A mixed methods study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10825254)
42. *Humber, L. K. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the universal design for learning concept in teaching English-Language Arts in a selected Title I School (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27962445)
43. İnnalı, H. Ö. (2017). Türkiye’de üstün zekalı ve yetenekli çocukların dil becerilerine yönelik yapılan araştırmaların değerlendirilmesi. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 75-94.
44. *Jeong, H. W. G. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions regarding gifted and talented early childhood students (Three to eight years of age) (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3419721)
45. *Johnson, J. D. J. (2015). Gifted and talented selection criteria of North Carolina: An investigative study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3708422)
46. *Johnson, R. A. (2010). Portrait of being artistically talented with Asperger’s syndrome: A retrospective case study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3574555)
47. *Jones, H. P. (2018). The non-academic self-concept of homogeneously grouped sixth through eighth grade gifted and talented students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13839915)
48. *Jones, N. L. (2010). Culturally and linguistically diverse students and gifted and talented programs (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3428485)
49. *Jones, S. (2020). “I deserve to be here”: High-Achieving Black Women at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) in science, technology, engineerıng, and mathematics (STEM) (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27957302)
50. Kadıoğlu Ateş, H., & Mazı, M. (2017). Türkiye’de üstün yetenekliler eğitimi ile ilgili yapılan lisansüstü tezlere genel bir bakış. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 4 (3), 33-57.
51. Kağnıcı, D.Y. (2019). Kültür ve psikolojik danışma. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
52. Karadağ, E. (2009). Türkiye'de eğitim bilimleri alanında yapılmış doktora tezlerinin tematik ve metodolojik açıdan incelenmesi: Bir durum çalışması (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi) Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
53. Kardeş, S., Akman, B., & Yazıcı, D. N. (2018). Üstün yetenekliler alanında yapılmış tezlerin analizi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 11(3), 411-430. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.353279
54. *Katsaros-Molzahn, M. (2018). The transformative qualities of fine arts in academic settings: A means for equity for underrepresented gifted and talented students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No. 13424530)
55. *Kaya, F. (2013). The relationship between students’ verbal and nonverbal test scores within the context of poverty (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3572191)
56. *Khalaj-LeCorre, M. (2013). Meeting the needs of GATE middle school students in two Southern California public schools (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3582893)
57. *Kinsey, T. M. (2017). Pedagogical practices in homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouped classrooms (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10262397)
58. *Kregel, E. A. (2015). Addressing the social, emotional, and academic needs of gifted high school students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 10145086).
59. Koç, F., & Saranlı, A. G. (2017). Erken çocukluk dönemindeki üstün yetenekli çocuklara ilişkin Türkiye’deki lisansüstü çalışmaların çok boyutlu incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Dergisi, 41, 163-183.
60. *Koehler, K. E. (2013). Challenging gifted and talented high school students using a cognitive apprenticeship to build historical expertise (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3567763)
61. *LaCour, C. (2013). A phenomenological examination of socioeconomically disadvantaged gifted female students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3612239)
62. *Leigh Bourgeois, J. (2012). Implementation of gifted and talented education programs in urban elementary schools in California: Do perceptions coincide with outcomes? (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3547412)
63. Louis, B., & Lewis, M. (1992). Parental beliefs about giftedness in young children and their relation to their actual ability level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 27-31
64. *Mallatt-Grow, C. S. (2019). The trauma of the gifted child (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.27668760)
65. *Mathia, K. (2015). Impact of an afterschool science EBook club for gifted and talented elementary students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10291935)
66. Marland, S. P. Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: A report to the Congress of the United States by the Commissioner of Education. Washington DC: Office of Education.
67. *Masri, E. M. (2018). The underrepresentation of gifted and talented students within the intervention and the referral services (IRS) process (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10842553)
68. *Maxey, M. R. (2019). A Foucauldian archaeological analysis: Production of gifted and talented emergent bilingual learners in U.S. public law (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No. 27665125)
69. *McCulloch, A. C. (2010). How stakeholders perceive gifted education: A study of beliefs held by stakeholders in elementary gifted education programs (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3398692)
70. *Mcgirt, S. (2017). Improving academic self-efficacy in reading comprehension skills of 8th grade gifted and talented students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No.10634041)
71. *Mcguire, M. (2012). Technology as a tool: Uses in differentiated curriculum and instruction for gifted learners (Doktora tezi). Retrieved fromProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMI No. 3551714)
72. *Meadows, M. (2018). Gender differences in STEM sense of belonging for academically advanced middle school students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved fromProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No.13418728)
73. MEB. (2013). Özel yetenekli bireyler strateji ve uygulama planı (2013-2017). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı
74. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2. Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
75. *Miller, A. (2019). Student engagement with video instruction: How to engage 7th-grade social studies students and diverse academic abilities with video in the classroom (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13903112)
76. *Mintz, C. A. (2017). The effects of implementing an online professional learning community for teachers of gifted and talented courses: An action research study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10638243
77. *Miyares, G. M. (2012). Underachieving gifted science students and multi-user virtual environment (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3542579)
78. *Moats, K. (2017). High ability instructional designs and practices in Indiana (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and ThesesProQuest No.10257919
79. *Morris, S. B (2016). Using non-traditional testing methods to identify talent and potential in early childhood (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10820484)
80. *Mowoe, F. (2011). Underachieving gifted and talented minority students in a continuation education setting: An interpretive exploration (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3493481)
81. *Murray, K. K. (2012). Planting seeds in rich soil: A quantitative study of the reading and math growth of gifted and talented learners (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3542043)
82. Nacar, S. (2017). 2005-2014 yılları arasında üstün yeteneklilerin matematik eğitimi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8),48-63.
83. National Association for Gifted Children. (2016). A brief history of gifted and talented education. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/brief-history-gifted-and-talented-education
84. Neihart, M. (2008). Identifying and providing services to twice exceptional children. In S. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 115-137). Springer.
85. *Nelson, J. (2018). Undoing giftedness: Considering adolescent Latina identity performativity in United States public schools (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10937163)
86. *Nichols, L. (2012). Response to intervention for gifted students: Implementation by classroom teachers in Colorado (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3523289)
87. *Nisly, J. (2010). The perceptions of African American middle school students about participation in gifted programs: A qualitative study to promote social justice in gifted education (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMI No. 3412129)
88. *Nyeche, K. (2014). Perceptions of practitioners of traditional and alternative methods of gifted and talented referral for African American students: An action research approach (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3610135)
89. *Ohashi, M. T. (2018). Educator perceptions about the diverse needs of students who are gifted and talented: A descriptive case study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10928917)
90. *O'Neil, D. O. (2011). Survey of middle school teacher desire for staff development focused on competencies to teach gifted and talented student (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3475662)
91. *Olton-Weber, S. (2020). Reducing levels of maladaptive perfectionisim in gifted and talented youth through a mindfullness intervention (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27543960)
92. Özenç, M., & Gül Özenç, E. (2013). Türkiye’de üstün yetenekli öğrencilerle ilgili yapılan lisansüstü eğitim tezlerinin çok boyutlu olarak incelenmesi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 171, 13–28.
93. *Peairs, K. F. (2010). The social world of gifted adolescents: Sociometric status, friendship and social network centrality (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3469001)
94. *Perry-Levy, S. T. (2016). The perspectives of successful teachers in the identification of culturally diverse students for the gifted and talented education program (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10124337)
95. *Phelan, D. A. (2018). Social and emotional learning needs of gifted students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 10745481)
96. *Pickerill, J. (2017). Equitable identification of FRL-eligible gifted and talented students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13858650)
97. *Polk, R. L. (2016). Educational practices that contribute to the school success of low-income, gifted and talented, third grade students (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10192422)
98. *Porter, S. (2018). Excellence gaps among gifted and talented students: A quantitative study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10751248)
99. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5) 1-6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
100. *Regan, N. (2017). Developing appropriate challenge and rigor in the classroom: Perceptions of gifted middle schoolers (Doktora tezi). Retrieved fromProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No.10642889)
101. Rinn, A. N., & Bishop, J. (2015). Gifted Adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213-235.
102. *Riska, P. A. (2010). The impact of smart board technology on growth in mathematics achievement of gifted learners (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3432368)
103. *Roberson, J. J. (2020). The voices of leaders: Examining the underrepresentation of diverse students in advanced academic programs through a culturally responsive leadership lens (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27961393)
104. Ross, P. O. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing American’s talent. Washington DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
105. Sak, U., Öpengin, E., Bal Sezerel, B., Ayas, M. B., Özdemir, N. N., & Demirel, Ş. (2015). Türkiye'de üstün yeteneklilerin eğitiminin eleştirel bir değerlendirmesi. Türk Üstün Zekâ ve Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2) 110-132.
106. *Sandmeyer, J. (2014). Educational experiences of rural Minnesota high-ability mathematics learners (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3681121)
107. *Savino, J.A. (2012). Seeking summer support: What application essays reveal about applicants to a mentorship program for talented teens (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3529360)
108. *Scheibel, S. R. (2010). The gift of time: Today's academic acceleration case study voices of experience (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3415979)
109. Schreglmann, S. (2016). Türkiye’de üstün yetenekli öğrenciler ile ilgili yapılan yükseköğretim tezlerini içerik analizi (2010-2015). Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1),14-26.
110. *Seedorf, S.M. (2011). Response to Intervention: Teachers’ needs for implementation in gifted and talented programs (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3493632)
111. Serin, M.K., & Korkmaz, İ. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçlarının analizi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,15(1), 155-169
112. *Shea, R. (2019). The connection between learning and achievement of gifted and talented (GATE) high school students using a personalized learning framework from the perspective of high school teachers (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.13806155)
113. *Slaughter-Thierry, S. M. (2017). A phenomenological study of educational experiences of gifted and talented professionals working in areas of creative, artistic or performing arts teachers (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10620185)
114. *Smeets, S. (2013). Acceleration and well-being at age 50 in the top 1% in mathematical ability (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10295670)
115. *Smith, S. (2016). An analysis of fifth grade gifted and talented student math and reading achievement in South Texas public schools (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 10125222)
116. *Steelreed, J. M. (2019). Perseverance of gifted and talented graduates from international baccalaureate diploma programmes: A transcendental phenomenological study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No. 27547189)
117. *Stein, K.L. (2013). A qualitative narrative phenomenological study: Parental perceptions in choosing online educational classes for gifted children (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3571480)
118. *Stewart, M. (2018). Promising gifted education practices in Massachusetts (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10934837)
119. *Suggs, S. L. (2010). African American male giftedness: A high school's work to open greater access to college preparatory coursework (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMI No. 3535451)
120. *Summers, B. S. (2012). Adult perceptions of the experience of being identified “talented and gifted” as children: A phenomenological study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3507789)
121. *Swicord, B. (2010). A phenomenological study of gifted adolescents and their engagement with one on-line learning system (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3412293)
122. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed method research: Integrating quantitaive and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
123. *Thomerson, G. C. (2010). Who is she? A case study of a teacher of gifted learners (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMI No. 3433191)
124. *Tow, T. (2011). Comparing differences in math achievement and attitudes toward math in a sixth grade mathematics enrichment pilot program (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMI No. 3450356)
125. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2021). Nüfus ve demografi istatistikleri, Şubat ayı haber bülteni.
126. *Urbanovsky, C. F. (2017). Examining administrator perceptions: maintaining sociologically diverse gifted and talented programs in PK-12 settings (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest No.10271652)
127. * Urquhart, J. C. (2010). Classroom teachers in online gifted professional development: Their words (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3435892)
128. *Webber, S. (2010). Understanding the delivery and impact of gifted education in America: A phenomenological study (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3424333)
129. *Welsh, C. R. (2010). A learning paradox: Students who are gifted and learning disabled (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(UMI No. 3427475)
130. *Willerson, A. (2017). Artistic decision making and implications for engaging theatrically gifted and talented students in non-arts classes (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses(ProQuest No.10753913)