Araştırma Makalesi
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

The Effects of University-Industry Collaboration in R&D on the Growth of Innovative Companies

Yıl 2019, Cilt 2, Sayı 3, 183 - 186, 30.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.629218

Öz

Technological changes and innovations based on the Research and Development (R&D) are vital role to increase the competition level and economic growth for both firms and countries. For this reason, university-industry collaboration in R&D has important role for the growth of innovative companies. In this context, main of this study is the effects of university-industry collaboration in R&D on the growth of innovative companies. According to the empirical results, the mean of growth innovative companies increases as the level University industry collaboration in RD increases. As a result, it is critical to strengthen University industry collaboration in RD in order to increase the sustainable competition level and economic growth for both firms and countries.   

Kaynakça

  • Abdulai, A. F., Murphy, L., & Thomas, B. (2019). University Knowledge Transfer And Innovation Performance In Firms: The Ghanaian Experience. International Journal Of Innovation Management, 2050023.
  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6-7), 498-507.
  • Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university–industry interaction:: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative r&d projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272-285.
  • Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research policy, 39(7), 858-868.Dooley, L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332.
  • Freitas, I. M. B., Marques, R. A., & e Silva, E. M. D. P. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443-453.
  • Gertner, D., Roberts, J., & Charles, D. (2011). University-industry collaboration: a CoPs approach to KTPs. Journal of knowledge management, 15(4), 625-647.
  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional studies, 45(4), 507-523.
  • Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research policy, 25(6), 843-863.
  • Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The journal of Technology transfer, 25(2), 111-133.
  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research policy, 27(8), 835-851.
  • Ponds, R., Oort, F. V., & Frenken, K. (2009). Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231-255
  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.
  • Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964-1974.
  • Thune, T. (2007). University-industry collaboration: the network embeddedness approach. Science and public policy, 34(3), 158-168.

Yenilikçi Firmalarının Büyümesi Üzerinde Üniversite-Sanayi Ar-Ge İşbirliğinin Etkileri

Yıl 2019, Cilt 2, Sayı 3, 183 - 186, 30.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.629218

Öz

 Araştırma ve Geliştirmeye (AR-GE) dayanan teknolojik değişiklikler ve yenilikler hem firma hem de ülkeler için rekabet düzeyini ve ekonomik büyümeyi arttırmada hayati bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle Ar-Ge’de üniversite-sanayi işbirliği, yenilikçi firmaların büyümesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmanın ana amacı Ar-Ge’deki üniversite-sanayi işbirliğinin yenilikçi firmaların büyümesine etkisini incelemektir. Ampirik sonuçlara göre, Ar-Ge’de üniversite sanayi işbirliğinin seviyesi arttıkça, yenilikçi şirketlerin büyüme ortalaması artmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, hem firma hem de ülkeler için sürdürülebilir rekabet düzeyini ve ekonomik büyümeyi arttırmada Ar-Ge’de üniversite endüstri işbirliğini güçlendirmek çok önemlidir.

Kaynakça

  • Abdulai, A. F., Murphy, L., & Thomas, B. (2019). University Knowledge Transfer And Innovation Performance In Firms: The Ghanaian Experience. International Journal Of Innovation Management, 2050023.
  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6-7), 498-507.
  • Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university–industry interaction:: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative r&d projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272-285.
  • Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research policy, 39(7), 858-868.Dooley, L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332.
  • Freitas, I. M. B., Marques, R. A., & e Silva, E. M. D. P. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443-453.
  • Gertner, D., Roberts, J., & Charles, D. (2011). University-industry collaboration: a CoPs approach to KTPs. Journal of knowledge management, 15(4), 625-647.
  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional studies, 45(4), 507-523.
  • Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research policy, 25(6), 843-863.
  • Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The journal of Technology transfer, 25(2), 111-133.
  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research policy, 27(8), 835-851.
  • Ponds, R., Oort, F. V., & Frenken, K. (2009). Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231-255
  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.
  • Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964-1974.
  • Thune, T. (2007). University-industry collaboration: the network embeddedness approach. Science and public policy, 34(3), 158-168.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm Özgün Makale
Yazarlar

Gamze SART
İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ CERRAHPAŞA
0000-0002-0653-2855
Türkiye


Hülya KESKİN ÇALIŞKAN Bu kişi benim
İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSAT FAKÜLTESİ
0000-0002-5793-7772
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2019
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019, Cilt 2, Sayı 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Sart, G. & Keskin Çalışkan, H. (2019). The Effects of University-Industry Collaboration in R&D on the Growth of Innovative Companies . Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi , 2 (3) , 183-186 . DOI: 10.32329/uad.629218