Uncovering QuillBot: Filipino Senior High School Students' Experiences and Factors Influencing Its Use in Enhancing Language Writing Skills

Öz

English is the second language in the Philippines and is imperative in the contemporary global landscape. However, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) compelled educational institutions to explore its implications. One is the QuillBot, which provides learners with an opportunity for academic output with enhanced grammar, vocabulary, and writing coherence. Despite its innate negative notion, various AI-powered language learning tools became the learners' reliable friends in improving their academic writing skills. Thus, this study aimed to explore Filipino senior high school learners' experiences and the factors affecting their utilization. This study utilized a qualitative research design and Saldaña's (2009) coding process to analyze the data gathered. Findings revealed various benefits and drawbacks of QuillBot for learners' language writing skills. The learners highlight the features that helped improve their writing skills and the possibility of overreliance on it. On the other hand, the COVID-19 pandemic, to make writing more convenient and faster, and avoiding plagiarism are the factors that emerged from the analyzed data. The pedagogical implications of incorporating the AI-powered tool QuillBot into the curricula should be investigated, emphasizing the possibility of combining AI tools with traditional teaching methods in improving the English language skills balanced with learners' critical thinking skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• english language
• quillbot
• artificial intelligence
• writing skills

Kaynakça

1. Ahmadi, H. (2020) Cheating in education; A focus on plagiarism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344653140_Cheating_in_Education_A_Focus_on_Plagiarism
2. Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G.R. (2020). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 380-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-06-2020-0131
3. Al-Tkhayneh, K.M., Alghazo, E. M., & Tahat, D. (2023). The advantages and disadvantages of using artificial intelligence in education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(4), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0094
4. Amyatun, R.L., & Kholis, A. (2023). Can artificial intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI assist students’ writing skills? Assisting learning to write texts using AI. English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533
5. Baron, G., Lorenzo, C., & Benoît, D. (2023). Students’ perception on the use of QuillBot to improve grammar. Lingeduca Journal of Language and Education Studies, 2(3), 250-265. https://doi.org/10.55849/lingeduca.v2i3.547
6. Barreiro, V., Jr. (2023). Beyond ChatGPT: How students and educators grapple with AI in the classroom. https://www.rappler.com/technology/features/beyond-chatgpt-how-students-educators-grapple-artificial-intelligence-classroom
7. Bora, P. (2023). Importance of writing skill to develop students’ communication skill. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 7(35), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.7.35.009
8. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7716416

9. Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10(1), A223–A236.
10. Chandler, S. (2019). How technology is being used by students to cheat on tests. https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonchandler/2019/09/11/how-technology-is-being-used-by-students-to-cheat-on-tests/?sh=2f406ce384fa
11. Chui, H. (2022). The QuillBot grammar checker: Friend or foe of ESL student writers? Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 10(1), 10-31. https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/v1/images/v10n1/Article2.pdf
12. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.) Sage.
13. Ellerton, W. (2023). The human and machine, 2022-23: Open AI, ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly, Google, Google Docs & Humans. Visible Language, 57(1), 38-52.
14. Estrellado, C. J. P., & Miranda, J. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the Philippine educational context: Circumspection and future inquiries. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(5), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.05.2023.p13704
15. Fatima, S., Desouza, K. C., Dowson, G. S., & Denford, J. S. (2021). Analyzing artificial intelligence plans in 34 countries. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/analyzing-artificial-intelligence-plans-in-34-countries/
16. Fitria, T. N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education and Humanities, 9(1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233
17. Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
18. Ghosal, B. (2023). Pros and cons of artificial intelligence in education: A review. In. C. Krishnan, M. Babbar, & G. Singh (Eds.), Digital transformation in education: Emerging markets and opportunities (pp. 46-62). Bentham Science. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815124750123010007
19. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
20. Hiếu, B. V., Huy, H. M., & Hằng, C. T. T. (2022). Employing the QuillBot application in order to sharpen paraphrasing skills in writing academic essays for English - Majored students at the school of foreign languages -Thai Nguyen University. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 227(13), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.6717
21. Ibrahim, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the Philippines. https://mb.com.ph/2022/08/16/artificial-intelligence-in-the-philippines/
22. Idroes, G. M., Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Irvanizam, I., Jalil, Z., Lensoni, L., Lala, A., Abas, A. H., Tallei, T. E., & Idroes, R. (2023). Student perspectives on the role of artificial intelligence in education: A survey-based analysis. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 1(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v1i1.58 Ishnazarovna, M. N., & Krimpas, P. G. (2022). The importance of improving writing competence in teaching English to students in higher education. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(2), 3479-3486. https://doi.org/10.9756/int-jecse Jaladara, A. R., Jafar, M. B. & Salija, K. (2023). QuillBot web-application: Utilizing online technology on academic writing at an Indonesian Islamic higher education. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v3i2.152
23. Jamal, A. (2023) .The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in teacher Education: Opportunities & challenges. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10(1), 139-146. Karthikeyan, J., Hie, T. S., & Jin, N. Y. (Eds). (2021). Learning outcomes of classroom research. L Ordine Nuovo Publication.
24. Kengam, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16375.65445
25. Kurniati, E., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of QuillBot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852
26. Mohammad, T., Alzubi, A. A. F., Nazim, M., & Khan, S. I. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of QuillBot-mediated instruction in enhancing EFL students’ paraphrasing skills. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(24), 8349-8357.
27. Mohammad, T., Nazim, M., Alzubi, A. A. F., & Khan, S. I. (2021). Examining EFL students’ motivation level in using QuillBot to improve paraphrasing skills. World Journal of English Language, 14(1), 501-510. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n1p501
28. Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023). Teachers’ reflections on academic dishonesty in EFL Students’ writings in the era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10
29. Moustakas, C. (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
30. Ness Labs (2023) Building the most powerful AI writing companion with Rohan Gupta, co-founder of QuillBot. https://nesslabs.com/QuillBot-featured-tool
31. Nurmayanti, N., & Suryadi (2023). The effectiveness of using QuillBot in improving writing for students of English education study program. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6392
32. Park, J. (2019). An AI-based English grammar checker vs. human raters in evaluating EFL learners’ writing. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 112-131.
33. Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Aleksieva, L., & Yovkova, B. (2018). The impact of technology on cheating and plagiarism in the assessment-The teachers’ and students’ perspectives. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082055
34. Pothen, A.S. (2021) Artificial intelligence and its increasing importance. In J. Karthkeyan, T. S. Hie, & N. Y. Jin (Eds.), Learning outcomes of classroom research. (pp. 74-81). L Ordine Nuovo Publication. QuillBot (no date). https://QuillBot.com/about
35. Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F., & Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (QuillBot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: a systematic review. International Journal of Integrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599-622.
36. Rahmani, E. F. (2023). Undergraduate students’ perceptions on QuillBot paraphrasing tool. Scripta English Department Journal, 10(2), 182-190. https://doi.org/10.37729/scripta.v10i2.3674
37. Reuters (2023) Generation AI: Education reluctantly embraces the bots. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/technology/features/generation-ai-education-reluctantly-embraces-bots/
38. Sadiku, L.M. (2015). The importance of four skills reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 29-31. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v1i1.p29-31
39. Sahu, S. (2024). QuillBot users statistics in number 2024. Productivity side. https://productivityside.com/QuillBot-statistics.html
40. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
41. Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
42. Samortin, M., Corcuera, L. C., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., & Palmero, H. R. (2022). Education and the Pandemic: Examining students’ remote learning experiences in the Philippines. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1064312
43. Shabbir, U. (2023). QuillBot vs. Grammarly: Which tool is a better writing assistant? https://www.makeuseof.com/QuillBot-vs-grammarly
44. Singh, J. (2023). What is QuillBot, and how to use it? Cointelegraph. https://cointelegraph.com/news/what-is-QuillBot
45. Torres Diaz, J. C., Duart, J. M., Torres Carrion, P. V., & Gutierrez, I. M., (2021). Plagiarism and use of technology by high school students. Campus Virtuales, 10(2), 175-184.
46. UNESCO. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/artificial-intelligence
47. Vaintrob, L. (2023). The state of AI in different countries — An overview. BlueDot Impact. https://aisafetyfundamentals.com/blog/state-of-ai-in-different-countries.
48. Wilson, J. R. (2022). Academic writing. https://wilson.fas.harvard.edu/files/jeffreywilson/files/jeffrey_r._wilson_academic_writing.pdf
49. World Economic Forum. (2023). Global competitiveness report special edition 2020: How countries are performing on the road to recovery. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-global-competitiveness-report-2020/
50. Xuyen, N. T. (2023). Using the online paraphrasing tool QuillBot to assist students in paraphrasing the source information: English-majored students’ perceptions. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.150.3
51. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT User experience: Implications for Education. Social Science Research Network [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418