ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRETMEN KİMLİKLERİ VE KİŞİSEL SORUMLULUK HİSLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaçları, öğretmen kimlikleri ve kişisel sorumluluk hisleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi ve başarı amaçlarıyla kişisel sorumluluk hisleri arasındaki ilişkilerde öğretmen kimliğinin arabuluculuk rollerinin araştırılmasıdır. Araştırmada ilişkisel araştırma yönteminden hareketle, açımlayıcı ilişkisel desen kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya 2019-2020 akademik yılının güz döneminde Batı Karadeniz Bölgesindeki bir üniversitenin eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim gören toplam 658 öğretmen adayı gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Veriler, Öğretmenler için 3 x 2 Başarı Yönelimi Ölçeği, Meslek Öncesi Öğretmen Kimliği Ölçeği, Öğretmen Sorumluluk Ölçeği ve İyi İzlenim Bırakma Ölçeği aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Verilerin güvenilir biçimde çözümlenmesi amacıyla korelasyon ve yol analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaçlarının çok boyutlu olduğunu ve Öğretmenler için 3 x 2 Başarı Yönelimi Ölçeğinin altı faktörlü yapısı ile güvenilir biçimde tanımlanabildiğini göstermiştir. Sonuçlar ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaçlarının, öğretmen kimlikleri ve kişisel sorumluluk hisleriyle demografik ve kontrol değişkenlerinin etkilerinden bağımsız olarak anlamlı düzeyde ilişkilendiğini de göstermiştir. Daha önemlisi, sonuçlar öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaçları ile kişisel sorumluluk hisleri arasındaki ilişkilerde öğretmen kimliklerinin aracı rolü oynadığını da ortaya koymuştur. Araştırmada, öğretmen eğitimine ve gelecekte yapılabilecek araştırmalara ilişkin önerilere de yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• başarı amaçları
• öğretmen kimliği
• kişisel sorumluluk hissi
• öğretmen eğitimi

THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ ACHIEVEMENT GOALS, EARLY TEACHER IDENTITY, AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Öz

The aim of the present study is to examine the relationships among prospective teachers’ achievement goals, early teacher identities, and sense of personal responsibility, with the intention of exploring the mediating roles of early teacher identities. Based on the correlational method, an explanatory correlational research design was used in the study. A total of 658 prospective teachers from the faculty of education of a large university located in Western Black Sea region of Turkey, voluntarily participated in the study during the fall semester of the 2019-2020 academic year. The data were obtained through 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Teachers, Early Teacher Identity Measure, Teacher Responsibility Scale, and Good Impression Scale. Correlation and path analyses were conducted to analyze the data in a reliable manner. The results showed that prospective teachers’ achievement goals were indeed multi-dimensional and could be reliably described through the six-factor structure of the 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Teachers. The results further showed that, regardless of the intervening effects of demographic and control variables, prospective teachers’ achievement goals were significantly and positively related to their early teacher identities, and sense of personal responsibility. More importantly, the results also revealed that prospective teachers’ early teacher identities played significant mediating roles in the relationships between their achievement goals and sense of personal responsibility. Implications for teacher education and directions for future studies were also discussed in the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• achievement goals
• early teacher identity
• sense of personal responsibility
• teacher education

Kaynakça

1. Agee, J. (2004). Negotiating a teaching identity: An African American teacher’s struggle to teach in test-driven contexts. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 747-774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00357.x
2. Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Research on Motivation in Education, 1, 177-207.
4. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
5. Arpacı, D. & Bardakçı, M. (2015). Adaptation of early teacher identity measure into Turkish. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(3), 687-719. doi: https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.256762
6. Avalos, B. & Aylwin, P. (2007). How young teachers experience their professional work in Chile. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 515-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.003
7. Aykac, N., Yildirim, K., Altinkurt, Y., & Marsh, M. M. (2017). Understanding the underlying factors affecting the perception of pre-service teachers’ teacher identity: A new ınstrument to support teacher education. Universitepark Bulletin, 6(1), 67-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.22521/unibulletin.2017.61.6
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

9. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
10. Barrett, B. D. (2009). No child left behind and the assault on teachers’ professional practices and identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1018-1025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.021
11. Beauchamp, C. & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
12. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
13. Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749-764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8
14. Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
15. Broussard, S. C. & Garrison, M. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary‐school‐aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 106-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X04269573
16. Bullough, R.V. (1997). Becoming a teacher: Self and the social location of teacher education. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, and I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 79-134). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Butler, R. (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers’ help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 241-252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.241
18. Butler, R. (2012). Striving to connect: Extending an achievement goal approach to teacher motivation to include relational goals for teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 726-742. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028613
19. Butler, R. & Shibaz, L. (2008). Achievement goals for teaching as predictors of students’ perceptions of instructional practices and students’ help seeking and cheating. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 453-467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.004
20. Carrillo, C. & Baguley, M. (2011). From school teacher to university lecturer: Illuminating the journey from the classroom to the university for two arts educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 62-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.003
21. Cho, Y. & Shim, S. S. (2013). Predicting teachers’ achievement goals for teaching: The role of perceived school goal structure and teacher’ sense of efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 12-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.12.003
22. Chong, S., Low, E. L., & Goh, K. C. (2011). Emerging professional teacher identity of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8), 50-64.
23. Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., Vigdor, J., & Diaz, R. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low performing schools to attract and retain high quality teachers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 251-271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20003
24. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.
25. Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00475.x
26. Daniels, L. M., Radil, A. I., & Goegan, L. D. (2017). Combinations of personal responsibility: Differences on pre-service and practicing teachers’ efficacy, engagement, classroom goal structures and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(906), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00906
27. Daniels, L. M., Radil, A., & Wagner, A. K. (2016). Concordance between preservice teachers’ personal responsibilities and intended ınstructional practices. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(3), 529-553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1054333
28. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
29. Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677-692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00065-X
30. Day, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 563-577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.001
31. Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., & Kington, A. (2006). Variations in the work and lives of teachers: Relative and relational effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 169-192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500467381
32. Deci, E. L., Spiegel, N. H., Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Kauffman, M. (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: Behavior of controlling teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(6), 852-889. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.852
33. Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.75
34. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
35. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
36. Eggers, J. H. & Clark, D. (2000). Executive coaching that wins. Ivey Business Journal, 65(1), 66-70.
37. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
38. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
39. Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchal model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
40. Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
41. Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
42. Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 173-189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9076-0
43. Eren, A. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin başarı amaçları ve zihinsel zaman yolculuğu becerileri. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 7(14), 157-175.
44. Eren, A. (2014). Uncovering the links between prospective teachers’ personal responsibility, academic optimism, hope, and emotions about teaching: A mediation analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 73-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9243-5
45. Eren, A. (2017). Investigating prospective teachers’ teaching-specific hopes as predictors of their sense of personal responsibility. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 267-284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1169507
46. Eren, A. & Çetin, G. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the teaching profession, curriculum orientations, and personal responsibility. Curriculum Perspectives, 39(1), 19-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-018-00061-1
47. Eren, A. & Duman G. (2019). Eğitim ortamlarında güdülenme-öğrenme ilişkisi ve başarı amaçları. İçinde S. Çelenk (Ed.), Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (3. baskı, s. 243-274). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. (ISBN:978-605-318-559-8)
48. Erikson, E. H. (1964). Childhood and society. Oxford, England: W. W. Norton & Company.
49. Fasching, M. S., Dresel, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Nitsche, S. (2010). Goal orientations of teacher trainees: Longitudinal analysis of magnitude, change and relevance. Journal for Educational Research Online, 2(2), 9-33.
50. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: how do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran- Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, and K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 697-705). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
51. Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532-538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
52. Fetters, M. K., Czerniak, C. M., Fish, L., & Shawberry, J. (2002). Confronting, challenging, and changing teachers’ beliefs: Implications from a local systemic change professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 101-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015113613731
53. Fischman, W., DiBara, J. A., & Gardner, H. (2006). Creating good education against the odds. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 383-398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600866007
54. Fletcher, S. (2007). Mentoring adult learners: Realizing possible selves. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 114, 75-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.258
55. Flink, C., Boggiano, A. K., & Barrett, M. (1990). Controlling teaching strategies: undermining children’s self-determination and performance. Journal of Personality and Social. Psychology, 59, 916-924. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.916
56. Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
57. Friesen, M. D. & Besley, S. C. (2013). Teacher identity development in the first year of teacher education: A developmental and social psychological perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 23-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.005
58. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2014). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Publishing.
59. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
60. Givens Rolland, R. (2012). Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 396-435. doi: https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3102/0034654312464909
61. Gorozidis, G. & Papaioannou, A. (2011). Teachers’ self-efficacy, achievement goals, attitudes and intentions to implement the new Greek physical education curriculum. European Physical Education Review, 17(2), 231-253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X11413654
62. Gorozidis, G. S., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2016). Teachers' achievement goals and self-determination to engage in work tasks promoting educational innovations. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 46-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.014
63. Guskey, T. R. (1981). Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 44-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718103200310
64. Guskey, T. R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 245-259. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1162442
65. Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X
66. Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
67. Halvorsen, A. L., Lee, V. E., & Andrade, F. H. (2009). A mixed-method study of teachers’ attitudes about teaching in urban and low-income schools. Urban Education, 44(2), 181-224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085908318696
68. Hanna, F., Oostdam, R., Severiens, S. E., & Zijlstra, B. J. (2019). Domains of teacher identity: A review of quantitative measurement instruments. Educational Research Review, 27, 15-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.003
69. Hayes, A. F. & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis does method really matter?. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918-1927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
70. Hidayat, R., Zamri, S. N. A. S., & Zulnaidi, H. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of achievement goals for ındonesian students in mathematics education programmes. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12),1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99173
71. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52 (12), 1280-1300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.52.12.1280
72. Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self- regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 276-286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.66.2.276
73. Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2009). ‘I’m neither entertaining nor charismatic …’ Negotiating university teacher identity within diverse student groups. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 483-494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903186642
74. Ingersoll, R. M. & Collins, G. J. (2017). Accountability and control in American schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 75-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205142
75. Izadinia, M. (2013). A review of research on student teachers’ professional identity. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 694-713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2012.679614
76. Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128-141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6
77. Jones, B. D. & Egley, R. J. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers’ perceptions of highstakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39), 1-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n39.2004
78. Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
79. Kaufman, A. & Dodge, T. (2009). Student perceptions and motivation in the classroom: Exploring relatedness and value. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 101-112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9070-2
80. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
81. Knowles, G. J. (1992). Models for understanding pre-service and beginning teachers’ biographies: Illustrations from case studies. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 99-152). London, England: Routledge.
82. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 77-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
83. Kreber, C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 171-194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902953048
84. Kucsera, J. V., Roberts, R., Walls, S., Walker, J., & Svinicki, M. (2011). Goal orientation towards teaching (GOTT) scale. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 597-610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602212
85. Lamote, C. & Engels, N. (2010). The development of student teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 3-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903457735
86. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899-916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
87. Lauermann, F. (2014). Teacher responsibility from the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 75-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.005
88. Lauermann, F. & Karabenick, S. (2011a). Motivation to become a teacher, teacher responsibility, and implications for mastery and performance approaches to instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 10 April, 2011, New Orleans, LA.
89. Lauermann, F. & Karabenick, S. A. (2011b). Taking teacher responsibility into account(ability): explicating its multiple components and theoretical status. Educational Psychogist, 46, 122-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.558818
90. Lauermann, F. & Karabenick, S. A. (2013). The meaning and measure of teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30(1), 13-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.001
91. Lauermann, F. & Karabenick, S. A. (2014). Teacher responsibility: What does it mean for teachers’ motivation and emotions? In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 116-132). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
92. Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching practicum–a systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 392-407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.994060
93. Lee, V. E. & Smith, J. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104(2), 103-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/444122
94. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
95. Levy-Tossman, I., Kaplan, A., & Assor, A. (2007). Academic goal orientations, multiple goal profiles, and friendship intimacy among early adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2), 231-252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.06.001
96. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
97. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
98. Mansfield, C. & Beltman, S. (2014). Teacher motivation from a goal content perspective: Beginning teachers’ goals for teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 54-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.010
99. Mansfield, C., Wosnitza, M., & Beltman, S. (2012). Goals for teaching: Towards a framework for examining motivation of graduating teachers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 12, 21-34.
100. Martens, K., Rusconi, A., & Leuze, K. (Eds.) (2007). New arenas of education governance: The impact of international organizations and markets on educational policy making. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
101. Mascret, N., Elliot, A. J., & Cury, F. (2017). The 3×2 achievement goal questionnaire for teachers. Educational Psychology, 37(3), 346-361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1096324
102. Matteucci, M. C., & Kopp, B. (2013). Do they feel responsible? Antecedents of teachers’ sense of responsibility. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 1-3 July, 2013, Barcelona, Spain.
103. Matteucci, M. C., Guglielmi, D., & Lauermann, F. (2017). Teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes and its associations with teachers’ instructional approaches and professional wellbeing. Social Psychology of Education, 20(2), 275-298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9369-y
104. Mausethagen, S. (2013). A research review of the impact of accountability policies on teachers’ workplace relations. Educational Research Review, 9, 16-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.001
105. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
106. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
107. Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059
108. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2011). TIMMS 2011 international results in mathematics. Boston & Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) and TIMMS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
109. Nevgi, A. & Löfström, E. (2015). The development of academics’ teacher identity: Enhancing reflection and task perception through a university teacher development programme. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 53-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.01.003
110. Ng, J. C. (2006). Understanding the impact of accountability on preservice teachers’ decisions about where to teach. The Urban Review, 38(5), 353-372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-006-0038-2
111. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
112. Niemiec, C. P. & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
113. Nitsche, S., Dickhäuser, O., Fasching, M. S., & Dresel, M. (2011). Rethinking teachers’ goal orientations: Conceptual and methodological enhancements. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 574-586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.12.001
114. Nitsche, S., Dickhäuser, O., Fasching, M. S., & Dresel, M. (2013). Teachers’ professional goal orientations: Importance for further training and sick leave. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 272-278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.017
115. Olsen, B. (2008). How reasons for entry into the profession illuminate teacher identity development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 23-40.
116. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.
117. Özer, A. (2005). İyi izlenim bırakma ölçeğinin hazırlanması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 1-20.
118. Papaioannou, A. & Christodoulidis, T. (2007). A measure of teachers’ achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 349-361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601104148
119. Parker, P. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. A. (2012). Teachers’ workplace well-being: Exploring a process model of goal orientation, coping behavior, engagement, and burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 503-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.001
120. Paulick, I., Retelsdorf, J., & Möller, J. (2013). Motivation for choosing teacher education: Associations with teachers’ achievement goals and instructional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 60-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.04.001
121. Pelletier, L., Seguin-Levesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 186-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.186
122. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
123. Polat, N., & Mahalingappa, L. (2013). Pre-and in-service teachers’ beliefs about ELLs in content area classes: A case for inclusion, responsibility, and instructional support. Teaching Education, 24(1), 58-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.713930
124. Potvin, P. & Papillon, S. (1992). Teacher’s sense of responsibility towards student achievement and their attitude. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 8(1), 33-42.
125. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
126. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159-175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
127. Retelsdorf, J., Butler, R., Streblow, L., & Schiefele, U. (2010). Teachers’ goal orientations for teaching: Associations with instructional practices, interest in teaching, and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 30-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.001
128. Retelsdorf, J., & Günther, C. (2011). Achievement goals for teaching and teachers’ reference norms: Relations with instructional practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1111-1119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.05.007
129. Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
130. Rodgers, C. R. & Scott, K. H. (2008). Development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith and S. Feiman-Nemser (Eds.), Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 732-755). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence. Earlbaum.
131. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
132. Rots, I., Kelchtermans, G., & Aelterman, A. (2012). Learning (not) to become a teacher: A qualitative analysis of the job entrance issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.008
133. Runhaar, P., Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2010). Stimulating teachers’ reflection and feedback asking: An interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1154-1161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.011
134. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
135. Ryan, R. M. & Weinstein, N. (2009). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 224-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104327.
136. Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149-161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930116819
137. Sammons, P., Day, C., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Stobart, G., & Smees, R. (2007). Exploring variations in teachers’ work, lives and their effects on pupils: key findings and implications from a longitudinal mixed-method study. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 681-701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582264
138. Schraw, G. (2010). No school left behind. Educational Psychologist, 45, 71-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461521003720189
139. Shim, S. S., Cho, Y., & Cassady, J. (2013). Goal structures: The role of teachers’ achievement goals and theories of intelligence. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(1), 84-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.635168
140. Silverman, S. K. (2010). What is diversity? An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 292-329. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210365096
141. Skelton, A. (2012). Value conflicts in higher education teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3), 257-268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.611875
142. Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: examining the development of beginning preservice teachers’ understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 455-465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006
143. Timostsuk, I. & Ugaste, A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1563-1570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100286
144. Trent, J. (2011). ‘Four years on, I’m ready to teach’: Teacher education and the construction of teacher identities. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 529-543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602207
145. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454-463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002
146. Ulubey, Ö., Yıldırım, K., & Alpaslan, M. M. (2018). Pedagojik formasyon eğitimi sertifika programının öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen kimliği algısına etkisinin incelenmesi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 48-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.403519
147. Valli, L. & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306859
148. Van den Berg, G. V. D. & Coetzee, L. R. (2014). Academic self-concept and motivation as predictors of academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 469-478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890158
149. Van den Berg, R. (2002). Teachers’ meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 577-625. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072004577
150. Van Lankveld, T., Schoonenboom, J., Volman, M., Croiset, G., & Beishuizen, J. (2017). Developing a teacher identity in the university context: A systematic review of the literature. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 325-342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154
151. Yerdelen, S., & Padir, M. A. (2017). Öğretmenler için 3x2 başarı yönelimi ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlilik-güvenirlik çalışması. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(3), 1027-1039. doi: https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.335069
152. Yuan, E. R. (2016). The dark side of mentoring on pre-service language teachers’ identity formation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 188-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.012
153. Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice Scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167-202
154. Watts, J. A., Gaines, G., F., & Creech, J. D. (1998). Getting results: A fresh look at school accountability. New York, NY: Southern Regional Education Board.
155. Winter, P. A., Brenner, D. B., & Petrosko, J. M. (2006). Teacher job satisfaction in a reform state: The influence of teacher characteristics, job dimensions, and psychological states. Journal of School Leadership, 16(4), 416-437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460601600403