Araştırma Makalesi

Political Activism and Other Predictors of Immigration-Status-Based Prejudice: Secondary Data Analysis of the World Values Survey

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

Political Activism and Other Predictors of Immigration-Status-Based Prejudice: Secondary Data Analysis of the World Values Survey

Abstract

Political activism is motivated by the desire for equity in the distribution of social values, raising curiosity about how activism plays out in matters of prejudicial sentiments. Therefore, this work was designed to examine the prediction of immigration-status-based prejudice by activism in a cross-national data context. The data used are secondary data from Wave 7 of the 2017-2021 World Values Survey (N=76 897) and the 2017-2020 European Values Survey (N=58 103), which were conducted in 81 different countries. Binary logistic regression featuring the Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to analyze data. Results show that 21.7% of respondents were prejudiced against immigrants while the mean±SD of political activism was 6.46±2.26 (min.=4, max.=12). Politically active respondents were significantly less likely to have prejudice against immigrants (AOR=0.861; 95% CI=0.855, 0.866; p<0.01). Political activism remains a backing for diversity, social inclusion and other elements of left-wing political orientation which align with democratic norms.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Leech, B. L., and Kimball, D. C. (2009). Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bevelander, P., and Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2020). Europe at The Crossroads: Confronting Populist, Nationalist, And Global Challenges. Sweden: Nordic Academic Press.
  3. Boehnke, K., and Wong, B. (2011). Adolescent Political Activism and Long-Term Happiness: A 21 Year Longitudinal Study On the Development of Micro-and Macrosocial Worries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 435-447.
  4. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., and Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295-298.
  5. Cadimu, M., Latrofa, M., and Carnaghi, A. (2013). Comparing Self-Stereotyping with In-Group-Stereotyping and Out-Group-Stereotyping in Unequal-Status Groups: The Case of Gender. Self and Identity, 12(6), 582-596.
  6. Chasteen, A. L. (2005). Seeing Eye-To-Eye: Do Intergroup Biases Operate Similarly for Younger and Older Adults? The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(2), 123-139.
  7. Cheng, E. W. (2016). Street Politics in A Hybrid Regime: The Diffusion of Political Activism in Post-Colonial Hong Kong. The China Quarterly, 226, 383-406.
  8. Christ, O., Asbrock, F., Dhont, K., Pettigrew, T. F., and Wagner, U. (2015). The Effects of Intergroup Climate On Immigrants’ Acculturation Preferences. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221:252–57.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Politika ve Yönetim (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

3 Ekim 2023

Kabul Tarihi

1 Nisan 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ibrahim, B. A. (2024). Political Activism and Other Predictors of Immigration-Status-Based Prejudice: Secondary Data Analysis of the World Values Survey. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 8(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1370809

Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
İktisat Bölümü
Rize/ TÜRKİYE