THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND EMPLOYMENT: THE CASE OF TRANSITION ECONOMIES / Girişimcilik Ve İstihdam Arasındaki İlişki: Geçiş Ekonomileri Örneği

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 311 - 322, 23.10.2019

Seyil Najımudınova , Zamira Öskönbaeva

https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.590535

Öz

A strong
structure of the working population plays an important role in the development
of the country. Today, all countries are struggling to increase the rate of
employment. Entrepreneurship needs to be supported in the solution of the unemployment
problem. Entrepreneurship will lead to a revival of economic activities and an
increase in production on the other hand, a decrease in unemployment. The aim
of this study is to examine whether entrepreneurship affects employment in a
total of 10 transition countries such as Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Armenia,
Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Lithuania, Latvia, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Estonia. For
this purpose, annual data of selected transition countries for 2006-2016 period
were used. First, the stability of the series was investigated with panel unit
root test. Then, the relationship between the variables was tried to be
revealed through Panel ARDL model. The findings obtained by empirical
application were evaluated and recommendations were made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, Employment, Transition Economies, Panel Data Analysis

GİRİŞİMCİLİK VE İSTİHDAM ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİ ÖRNEĞİ / The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship And Employment: The Case Of Transition Economies

Öz

Ülkenin kalkınmasında çalışabilen
nüfusun güçlü yapısı son derece önemli rol oynamaktadır. Günümüzde istihdam
oranını arttırmak için bütün ülkeler mücadele vermektedir. İstihdam sorununun
çözümünde girişimciliğin desteklenmesi gerekmektedir. Girişimcilik bir yandan
ekonomik faaliyetlerin canlanmasına dolayısıyla üretimin artmasına diğer yandan
işsizliğin azalmasına yol açacaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kırgızistan, Belarus,
Ermenistan, Özbekistan, Tacikistan, Litvanya, Letonya, Gürcistan, Kazakistan ve
Estonya gibi toplam 10 geçiş ülkesinde girişimciliğin istihdam üzerinde etkili
olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda seçilmiş geçiş sürecindeki
ülkelerin 2006-2016 dönemine ait on bir yıllık verileri kullanılmıştır. İlk
önce serilerin durağanlığı panel birim kök testi ile araştırılmıştır. Daha
sonra Panel ARDL modeli aracılığıyla değişkenler arasındaki ilişki ortaya
konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Ampirik uygulama sonucu elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilerek
önerilerde bulunulmuştur. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, İstihdam, Geçiş Ekonomileri, Panel Veri Analizi

Kaynakça

• Acs, Z. (2006). How Is Entrepreneurship Good For Economic Growth?. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(97), 97-107.
• Acs, Zoltan J. and Catherine Armington (2004). Employment Growth and Entrepreneurial Activity in Cities. Regional Studies, 38(8), 911-927.
• Ageev, A. I., Gratchev, M. V. and Hisrich, R. D, (1995). Entrepreneurship in the Soviet Union and Post-Socialist Russia, Small Business Economics, 7(5)- 365-376.
• Audretsch, D. B., and Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth Regimes Over Time And Space. Regional Studies, 36, 113–124.
• Bal, H. (2004). Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Ekonomik Büyüme ve Dış Finansman. Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(12), 155-172.
• Bandt, Olivier R De; Catherine Bruneau and Widad El Amri (2009), Convergence in Household Credit Demand Across Euro Area Countries: Evidence from Panel Data. Applied Economics, 41 (27), 3447-3462.
• Baptista, R., Escaria, V. and Madruga, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Job Creation: The Case of Portugal, Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, 1-45.
• Baptista, R., and Thurik R. (2007). The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship And Unemployment: Is Portugal An Outlier?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(1), 75-89.
• Battilana, J. andT. Casciaro. (2012). Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (2), 381–398.
• Birch, D. G. (1987). Job Creation In America: How The Smallest Companies Put The Most People To Work. New York:The Free Press.
• Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test And Its Applications To Model Specification In Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, 47(1), 239-253.
• Camp, S. Michael (2005). The Innovation-Entrepreneurship NEXUS: A National Assessment of Entrepreneurship and Regional Economic Growth and Development. Small Business Research Summary Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy No. 256, April.
• Carod Arauzo, M.A., D.L. Solis ve M.M. Bofarull (2008). New Business Formation and Employment Growth: Some Evidence for the Spanish Manufacturing Industry, Small Business Economics, 30, 73-84.
• Chen C.C. (2014). Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth, And Employment: A Case Study Of Taiwan, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 55 (1), 71-88.
• Decker, Ryan, Haltiwanger, John, Ron S. Jarmin and Javier Miranda (2014). The Role of Entrepreneurship in US Job Creation and Economic Dynamism, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 3–24.
• Doran, J., McCarthy N. and O’Connor, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship And Employment Growth Across European Regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 121-128
• Dünya Bankası Veri Tabanı, Erişim adresi: www.worldbank.org
• Folster, Stefan (2000). Do Entrepreneurs Create Jobs?, Small Business Economics, 14(2), 137-148.
• Fritsch, M., P. Mueller and A. Weyh (2005). Direct and Indirect Effects of New Business Formation on Regional Employment. Applied Economics Letters, 12, 545-548.
• Ganescu, Mariana-Cristina (2014). Entrepreneurship, A Solution to Improve Youth Employment in The European Union. Management Strategies Journal, 26(4), 580-588.
• Gartner W.B., (1989). Some Suggestions For Research On Entrepreneurial Traits And Characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 27-37.
• Gittell, R., Sohl, J. And Tebaldi E. (2014). Do Entrepreneurship and High-Tech Concentration Create Jobs? Exploring the Growth in Employment in U.S. Metropolitan Areas From 1991 to 2007. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 244-253.
• Güner H. ve Korkmaz A., (2011). İstihdamın Arttırılmasında Girişimciliğin Önemi: Girişimcilik Destekleme Modeli Olarak İŞGEM’LER. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 2(1), 42-65.
• Haltiwanger, John, Ron S. Jarmin and Javier Miranda (2013). Who Creates Jobs? Small vs. Large vs. Young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347-61.
• Henderson, J. (2006). Understanding Rural Entrepreneurs at the County Level: Data Challenges Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City– Omaha Branch Working Paper, 1-30.
• Henderson, J. and Weiler, S. (2010). Entrepreneurs and Job Growth: Probing the Boundaries of Time and Space. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(1), 23–32.
• House Committee on Small Business. (2009). Traffic Congestion Costing U.S. $87.2 Billion a Year. Erişim adresi: http://www.house.gov/smbiz/ PressReleases/ 2009/pr-7-16- 09-highway-bill.html
• Korkmaz S. ve Korkmaz O. (2011). Türkiye’de Girişimciliğin İstihdama Etkisi. Girişimcilik, İnovasyon ve Kalkınma 3. Uluslararası İstanbul İktisatçılar Zirvesi, 10-12 Ekim 2011, İstanbul, Türkiye.
• Kritikos, A. (2014). Entrepreneurs And Their Impact On Jobs And Economic Growth. IZA World of Labor, 8.
• Lundstrom, A., Davidsson, P., Lindmark, L., Lowstedt, E., Niederbach, P. and Olofsson, C. (1993). The Role of the New and Small Companies in the Swedish Economy (Stockholm: NUTEK).
• Nitu- Antonie, R. and E-Sz. Feder (2012). Labour Market Dynamics as Time-Lagged Effect of Entrepreneurship in the Case of Central and Eastern European Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 950-959.
• Pesaran, H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests For Cross Section Dependence In Panels. Working Paper, No: 0435 University of Cambridge.
• Pesaran, H. and Shin, Y. (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration in Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium Cambridge University Press, Chapter 4, 371-413.
• Pesaran, H. and Smith, R. (1995). Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 79-113.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265–312.
• Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R.P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
• Ramadani, V. and Dana, L. P. (2013). The State Of Entrepreneurship In The Balkans: Evidence From Selected Countries. In V. Ramadani&R.C. Schneider (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the Balkans, Berlin: Springer.
• Robert, B. (2000). The Role Of Entrepreneurship In U.S. And European Job Growth. Monthly Labor Review, 123(7), 3-16.
• Rupasingha, A. and Goetz, S. J. (2013). Self-Employment And Local Economic Performance: Evidence From US Counties. Papers in Regional Science, 92, 141–161.
• Spletzer, J.R. (2000). The Contribution Of Establishment Births And Deaths To Employment Growth. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18, 113-126.
• Stiglitz, J. (1999). Whiter Reform, Ten Years Of The Transition. Key Note Address. In World Bank Annual Conference On Development Economics.
• Van Stel, A. and Storey, D. (2002). The Relationship Between Firm Births And Job Creation. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
• Van Stel, A. and Suddle, K. (2008). The Impact Of New Firm Formation On Regional Development In The Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30, 31–47.
• Van Stel, Andre, Martin Carree and Roy Thurik (2005). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth. Small Business Economics, 24, 311-321.