CAN EUROPEAN IDENTITY EXIST ALONGSIDE A NATIONAL IDENTITY? POSSIBLE INGREDIENTS FOR THE RELATIVE POSITIONING OF EUROPEAN IDENTITY BY ITS CITIZENS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 70 - 104, 30.06.2024

Arzu Ulusoy Shipstone

Öz

The European Union has long been considered the beacon of a deeper economic and legislative integration for establishing and sustaining peace. However, defining European identity as cohesive enough to combat the cultural, financial and political troubles of a modern world continues to challenge EU politicians. Taking ‘identity as a dynamic, processual, and contextual phenomenon, this study examines the components of creating a collective identity with a focus on bringing legitimacy for further integration through European Citizenship. While doing that it shows that the European Identity has become more important in a world of cascading crisis. It emphasises that efforts in constructing European identity so far need a step change to strengthen a coherent and stably organized community. It underlines the fact that the EU might fail to generate a distinctive supranational identity without a real commitment to the founding liberal principles of the original European project. It demonstrates that for human agents to conform to Kant’s conditions for universal hospitality, the EU will need to develop its education and social models further to capture global tolerance and transculturalism. The study therefore offers political democratic citizenship, trans-cultural space and social policy as possible ingredients of situational European Identity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Identity, European Citizenship, Separatist Movements in Europe, Supranational Identity, Multiculturalism

CAN EUROPEAN IDENTITY EXIST ALONGSIDE A NATIONAL IDENTITY? POSSIBLE INGREDIENTS FOR THE RELATIVE POSITIONING OF EUROPEAN IDENTITY BY ITS CITIZENS

Öz

The European Union has long been considered the beacon of a deeper economic and legislative integration for establishing and sustaining peace. However, defining European identity as cohesive enough to combat the cultural, financial and political troubles of a modern world continues to challenge EU politicians. Taking ‘identity as a dynamic, processual, and contextual phenomenon, this study examines the components of creating a collective identity with a focus on bringing legitimacy for further integration through European Citizenship. While doing that it shows that the European Identity has become more important in a world of cascading crisis. It emphasises that efforts in constructing European identity so far need a step change to strengthen a coherent and stably organized community. It underlines the fact that the EU might fail to generate a distinctive supranational identity without a real commitment to the founding liberal principles of the original European project. It demonstrates that for the human agents to conform to Kant’s conditions for universal hospitality, the EU will need to develop its education and social models further to capture global tolerance and trans-culturalism. The study therefore offers political democratic citizenship, trans-cultural space and social policy as possible ingredients of situational European Identity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Identity, European Citizenship, Separatist Movements in Europe

Kaynakça

• Arnorsson, AgustandZoega, Glyfi (2016), “On the causes of Brexit”, CESinfoWorkingPapers, No: 6056, 2016
• Bee, Cristiano (2008), “The ‘InstitutionallyConstructed’ European Identity: CitizenshipandPublic Sphere NarratedbytheCommission”, Perspectives on EuropeanPoliticsandSociety, Vol. 9:4, pp.431-450
• Biedermann, Ferry (2022), “A New ColdWar, But HopefullyDifferent”, Birmingham City University, 24 February 2022, (Çevrimiçi)https://centreforbrexitstudiesblog.wordpress.com/, 17 May 2022
• Cohn, Theodore H. (2012), “Global PoliticalEconomy”, 6th Edition, Boston, Pearson Education Cornelissen, Lars (2022), “Elements of neo-liberal Euroscepticism: how neoliberal intellectuals came to support Brexit”, British Politics, Vol.17, pp. 44-61
• Dorling, Danny (2016), “Brexit: the decision of a divided country”, The BJM, Vol: 354, pp.3697-3698
• EuropeanCommission (2021), “Cohesion in Europe towards 2050”, Publication Office of European, Luxemburg
• Fabbrini, Federico (2022), “the war in UkraineandtheFuture of EuropeanUnion” DCU Brexit Institute, 28 February 2022, (Çevrimiçi) https://dcubrexitinstitute.eu/2022/02/war-inukrainefuture-european-union/, 15 March 2022
• Feyman, Fuat E.(2008), “Türkiye’de Çokkültürlü Anayasal Vatandaşlık ve Demokratikleşme”, in Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü Üyelikten Haklara, Ed.by. Ayşe Kadıoğlu, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul
• Fligstein, Neil, Polyakova, AlinaandSandholtz, Wayne (2012), “European Integration, NationalismandEuropean Identity”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.50: S1, pp. 106- 122
• Gülboy, Burak S. (2017), “Kant’ınEbediBarış ve KüreselleşmeÖngörüsü”, Globalization as a Source of ConflictorCooperationCongress, 13-15 Mayıs, GirneAmerikanÜniversitesi
• Güney, Ülkü (2014), “Yerel/ Küresel Aidiyetler ve Yurttaşlık: Britanyalı Olmak ya da Olmamak”, in Yurttaşlığı Yeniden Düşünmek: Sosyolojik, Hukuki ve Siyasal Tartişmalar, Ed. by Ayşe Durakbaşa et. al., İstanbul, Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, pp.197-212