Rethinking Small State Paradigm: Nuclear Pragmatism in Slovakia under the European Green Deal

Öz

This article argues that the binary of compliance versus resistance does not explain Slovakia’s behaviour, but domestic economic structures, technological capabilities, and geopolitical vulnerabilities characterise its adaptation to European Union (EU) climate commitments. It synthesises small state and securitisation theories, and the empirical findings drawn upon semi-structured elite interviews with representatives from Slovak government institutions, European organisations, industry associations, trade unions, think tanks, and academia show that the 2022 Russian attack on Ukraine has heightened a securitised understanding of climate governance in Slovakia. In this context, the concepts of resilience, energy security, competitiveness, and decarbonisation come to the forefront. The results also indicate that nuclear energy is not only seen as a low-carbon technology and an energy-security instrument but also as a strategic asset, which supports cooperation in the context of EU climate governance, diversification of suppliers, technological continuity, and industrial competitiveness. Thus, nuclear pragmatism emerges as a preference of Slovakia. The article also adds to the debates about the European integration process, EU climate governance, energy security, and the potential for small states.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• EU climate governance
• Energy security
• Industrial competitiveness
• Securitisation
• Slovakia

Destekleyen Kurum

This study is funded by National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic for the Support of Mobility of Students, PhD Students, University Teachers, Researchers and Artists, SAIA Grant, n.o., in 2025/2026.

Teşekkür

Special thanks to Andrej Findor and Martin Hochel for making this study possible.

Küçük Devlet Paradigmasını Yeniden Düşünmek: Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı Kapsamında Slovakya’da Nükleer Pragmatizm

Öz

Bu makale, uyum ve direnç ikiliğinin Slovakya’nın davranışını açıklamadığını, bunun yerine iç ekonomik yapıların, teknolojik yeteneklerin ve jeopolitik kırılganlıkların Avrupa Birliği (AB) iklim taahhütlerine uyumunu karakterize ettiğini savunmaktadır. Küçük devlet ve güvenlikleştirme teorileri sentezlenmekte ve Slovak devlet kurumları, Avrupa örgütleri, sanayi birlikleri, sendikalar, düşünce kuruluşları ve akademiden temsilcilerle yapılan yarı yapılandırılmış elit görüşmelerden elde edilen ampirik bulgular ise, 2022 Rusya’nın Ukrayna’ya saldırısının Slovakya’da iklim yönetimine ilişkin güvenlikleştirilmiş bir anlayışı artırdığını göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda dayanıklılık, enerji güvenliği, rekabet gücü ve karbonsuzlaştırma kavramları ön plana çıkmaktadır. Sonuçlar ayrıca, nükleer enerjinin sadece düşük karbonlu bir teknoloji ve enerji güvenliği aracı olarak değil, aynı zamanda AB iklim yönetimi bağlamında iş birliğini, tedarikçi çeşitlendirmesini, teknolojik sürekliliği ve endüstriyel rekabet gücünü destekleyen stratejik bir varlık olarak da görüldüğüne işaret etmektedir. Bu nedenle, nükleer pragmatizm Slovakya’nın bir tercihi olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Makale ayrıca Avrupa entegrasyon süreci, AB iklim yönetimi, enerji güvenliği ve küçük devletlerin potansiyelleri hakkındaki tartışmalara katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• AB iklim yönetimi
• Enerji güvenliği
• Endüstriyel rekabet gücü
• Güvenlikleştirme
• Slovakya

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışma 2025/2026 Slovakya Cumhuriyeti Ulusal Burs Programı (Öğrencilerin, Doktora Öğrencilerinin, Üniversite Öğretim Üyelerinin, Araştırmacıların ve Sanatçıların Hareketliliğini Destekleme), SAIA Hibesi tarafından desteklenmiştir.

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmanın gerçekleşmesindeki katkılarından dolayı Andrej Findor ve Martin Hochel'e özel teşekkürlerimi sunarım.

Kaynakça

1. Adem, S. (2024). Ali Mazrui’s nuclear pragmatism: Could it inspire practical policies to reduce nuclear threats? The Nonproliferation Review, 31(4-6), 189-209.
2. Aszódi, A., Biro, B., Adorjan, L., Dobos, A. C., Illes, G., Toth, N. K., Zagyi, D., and Zsiboras, Z. T. (2023). The effect of the future of nuclear energy on the decarbonization pathways and continuous supply of electricity in the European Union. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 415, 112688.
3. Baehr, P. R. (1975). Small states: A tool for analysis? World Politics, 27(3), 456-466.
4. Bailes, A. J. K., and Thorhallsson, B. (2012). Instrumentalizing the European Union in small state strategies. Journal of European Integration, 35(2), 99-115.
5. Baldacchino, G., and Wivel, A. (2020). Small states: Concepts and theories. In G. Baldacchino, and A. Wivel (Eds.), Handbook on the politics of small states (pp. 2-19). Edward Elgar Publishing.
6. Benford, R. D., and Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
7. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage. Crowards, T. (2002). Defining the category of ‘small’ states. Journal of International Development, 14(2), 143-179.
8. Dağ, R., and Fırat, M. F. (2020). Securitization and desecuritization of energy resources: Insights from Alsace-Lorraine for Cyprus Island. E-Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 1-19.

9. Dewulf, A., Karpouzoglou, T., Warner, J., Wesselink, A., Mao, F., Vos, J., Tamas, P., Groot, A. E., Heijmans, A., Ahmed, F., Hoang, L., Vij, S., and Buytaert, W. (2019). The power to define resilience in social-hydrological systems: Toward a power‐sensitive resilience framework. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(6), e1377.
10. Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford University Press.
11. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
12. Figulová, A., and Gondášová, I. (2023). Energy transition in Slovakia-Destiny in/and change. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 11(1), 169-187.
13. Figulová, A., and Vicenová, R. (2025). Nativist framing of energy issues in times of crises across the Slovak political spectrum. In M. Mišík, and A. Figulová (Eds.), EU energy and climate policy after COVID-19 and the invasion of Ukraine (pp. 211-231). Routledge.
14. Fırat, M. F., and Dağ, R. (2023). Turkey’s desecuritization of energy resources in the eastern mediterranean after russia-ukraine war. Novus Orbis: Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 5(2), 148-171.
15. Grøn, C. H., and Wivel, A. (2011). Maximizing influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: From small state policy to smart state strategy. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 523-539.
16. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
17. Hebda, W., and Mišík, M. (2024). In search of energy security: Nuclear energy development in the Visegrad group countries. Energies, 17, 5390.
18. Heinrich, A., and Szulecki, K. (2017). Energy securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen school’s framework to energy. In K. Szulecki (Ed.), Energy security in Europe: Divergent perceptions and policy challenges (pp. 33-59). Springer.
19. Katzenstein, P. J. (2003). Small states and small states revisited. New Political Economy, 8(1), 9-30.
20. Kratochvíl, P., and Mišík, M. (2020). Bad external actors and good nuclear energy: Media discourse on energy supplies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Energy Policy, 136, 111058.
21. Leal-Arcas, R., and Burstein, B. D. (2023). Slovakia: Energy policy. In G. Tiess, T. Majumder, and P. Cameron (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mineral and energy policy (pp. 657-673). Springer.
22. Levický, M., Urbanikova, M., and Dragunova, M. (2021). Progress in the transition of the circular economy in Slovakia and the European Union. Journal of Business, 10(1), 44-51.
23. Liu, L., Guo, H., Dai, L., Liu, M., Xiao, Y., Cong, T., and Gu, H. (2023). The role of nuclear energy in the carbon neutrality goal. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 162, 104772.
24. Maass, M. (2009). The elusive definition of the small state. International Politics, 46(1), 65-83.
25. Mez, L. (2012). Nuclear energy-any solution for sustainability and climate protection? Energy Policy, 48, 56-63.
26. Mišík, M., and Oravcová, V. (2022). Energy governance in Slovakia. In M. Knodt, and J. Kemmerzell (Eds.), Handbook of energy governance in Europe (pp. 1055-1082). Springer.
27. Nasra, S. (2011). Governance in EU foreign policy: Exploring small state influence. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 164-180.
28. Pan, Y. (2023). Managing the atomic divorce: The challenges of East Central Europe’s nuclear energy decoupling from Russia. The Electricity Journal, 36(1), 107241
29. Panke, D. (2010). Small states in the European Union: Structural disadvantages in EU policy-making and counter-strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 799-817.
30. Pascual, C., and Elkind, J. (Eds.). (2010). Energy security: economics, politics, strategies, and implications. Rowman & Littlefield.
31. Petruška, I., Litavcová, E., and Chovancová, J. (2022). Impact of renewable energy sources and nuclear energy on CO2 emissions reductions—the case of the EU countries. Energies, 15(24), 9563.
32. Prăvălie, R., and Bandoc, G. (2018). Nuclear energy: Between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 209, 81-92.
33. Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. Sage.
34. Schön, D., and Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Book.
35. Sconfienza, U. M., and Durand, F. (2024). Contested nuclear discourses during the 2022 French presidential campaign. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 26(4), 417-433.
36. Takáč, K. (2018). Slovakia: Energy dependence vulnerabilities. In O. Shentov, R. Stefanov, and M. Vladimirov (Eds.), The Russian economic grip on Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 221-231). Routledge.
37. Thorhallsson, B. (2006). The size of states in the European Union: Theoretical and conceptual perspectives. European Integration, 28(1), 7-31.
38. Thorhallsson, B., and Wivel, A. (2006). Small states in the European Union: What do we know and what would we like to know? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19(4), 651-668.
39. Van Hulst, M., Metze, T., Dewulf, A., De Vries, J., Van Bommel, S., and Van Ostaijen, M. (2025). Discourse, framing and narrative: Three ways of doing critical, interpretive policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies, 19(1), 74-96.
40. Wagenaar, H. (2015). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Routledge.
41. Wilson, J. D. (2019). A securitisation approach to international energy politics. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, 114-125.
42. Zucconi, P. (2024). Energy cooperation with Russia in time of war in Ukraine: Are Hungary and Slovakia “trapped”? Comparativ: Leipziger Beiträge zur Universalgeschichte und Vergleichenden Gesellschaftsforschung, 34(1/2).