Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Filiz Çoban Oran

https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1521177

Öz

Since the perceptions of threats have been revised and multiplexed across time, each theoretical tradition within International Security Studies has interpreted environmental threats and security very differently, advocating competing standing points to answer the essential questions of who or what is to be secured and what is to be secured against. Despite the diversity of academic studies on environmental security, more systematic work still needs to be done to explore the linkage between ecofeminism and security. Thus, this study firstly exhibits the evolution of different approaches to environmental security and consequently shows how the lens of ecofeminism provides transformative insight into the human and nature relationship for planetary security and justice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ecofeminizm Environmental security Climate change Ecological security Sustainable development

Kaynakça

  • Adams, L. C. and Gruen, L. (2014) Eco-Feminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals & the Earth, New York, Bloomsbury
  • Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (1998) (eds.), Security Communities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • Agarwal, B. (1989) “Rural Women, Poverty, and Natural Resources: Sustenance, Sustainability, and Struggle for Change,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 24, No. 43, WS46-WS65.
  • Batricevic, A. and Paunović, N. (2019) “Ecofeminism and Environmental Security”, Facta Universitatis Series Law and Politics, 17(2):125-136.
  • Ayoob, M. (1991) “The Security Problematic of the Third World”, World Politics, 43, No 2, 257-283.
  • Biehl, J. (1991), Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics, New York: Black Rose Books.
  • Booth, K. (1991) “Security and Emancipation”, Review of International Studies, 17/4, 323-326.
  • Braidotti, R., Charkiewicz, E., Hausler, S. and Wieringa, S. (1994) Women, the Environment and Sustainable Development, London: Zed Press
  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987) “Brundtland and the World Commission on Environment and Development: Statement to the 42nd session of the General Assembly of the United Nations”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/146404?ln=en&v=pdf
  • Buzan, B. and Hansen, L. (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Carlassare, E. (2000) “Socialist and cultural ecofeminism: allies in resistance”, Ethics and the Environment, 5, 89–106.
  • Commission on Human Security (2003) Human Security Now: Final Report, New York, CHS.
  • Dalby, S. (2013) “Climate Change: New Dimensions of Environmental Security”, The RUSI Journal, 158(3), pp. 34–43.
  • Dalby, S. (2002) Environmental Security, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press
  • Daoudy, M., (2021) “Rethinking the climate–conflict nexus: a human–environmental–climate security approach,” Global Environmental Politics, 21 (3), 4–25
  • Daudney, D. (1999) “Environmental security: a Critique” Daudney, D. and Matthew, R. (eds.) Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics, Albany, SUNY Press, 187–219.
  • d’Eaubonne, F. (2022) Feminism or Death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet, NY, Verso.
  • de Wilde, J.H. (2008) “Environmental Security Deconstructed,” Brauch, H.G. (ed.) Globalization and Environmental Challenges, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Denton, F. (2002) “Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter?”, Gender & Development, 10(2), 10–20.
  • Detraz, N. (2009) “Environmental Security and Gender: Necessary Shifts in an Evolving Debate”, Security Studies 18 (2): 345–369.
  • Eckersley, R. (1992) Environmentalism and Political Theory: Towards an Ecocentric Approach, New York, SUNY Press
  • Egeland, K. (2023) “Climate security reversed: the implications of alternative security policies for global warming”, Environmental Politics, 32:5, 883-902
  • Elliott, L. (2015) “Human security/environmental security,”, Contemporary Politics, 21(1), 11–24.
  • Falk, R. A. (1971) This endangered planet: prospects and proposals for human survival, New York, Random House.
  • Floyd, R. (2013) “Whither Environmental Security Studies? An Afterword” Floyd, R. and Richard, A. M. (eds.) Environmental Security: Approaches and Issues, London, Routledge.
  • Floyd, R. (2008) “The Environmental Security Debate and its Significance for Climate Change”, The International Spectator, 43:3, 51-65.
  • Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hanisch, C. (1970) “Personal is Political”, in Firestone, S. and Koedt, A. (eds.) Notes from the Second Year: Women's Liberation, NY, Radical Feminism.
  • Hemmati, M., and Röhr, U. (2009) “Engendering the climate-change negotiations: experiences, challenges, and steps forward”, Gender & Development, 17(1), 19–32
  • Ide, T. et al. (2023) “The Future of Environmental Peace and Conflict Research”, Environmental Politics, 32(6), 1077–1103.
  • Elshtain, J. B. (1987) Women and War, NY, Basic Books.
  • Jotzo, F. et al. (2018) “US and international climate policy under President Trump”, Climate Policy, 18:7, 813-817.
  • Kaplan, R. (1994) “The Coming Anarchy”, the Atlantic, 273/2, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/
  • Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996) Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, NY, Columbia University Press.
  • Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. (1977) Power, and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, Little Brown.
  • Killean, R. (2021) “From ecocide to eco-sensitivity: ‘greening’ reparations at the International Criminal Court”, The International Journal of Human Rights, 25:2, 323-347.
  • Koren, O., Bagozzi, B.E., and Benson, T., (2021) “Food and water insecurity as causes of social unrest: evidence from geolocated Twitter data”, Journal of Peace Research,58 (1),67-82.
  • Li, Z. (2022) “Ecofeminism and Daoism: the feminist analysis of female warrior of Nie Yinniang in The Assassin (2015)”, Feminist Media Studies, 23(7), pp. 3468–3482.
  • Lisowski, M. (2002) “Playing the Two-level Game: Us President Bush's Decision to Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol”, Environmental Politics, 11:4, 101-119.
  • Litfin, K. T. (1999) “Constructing Environmental Security and Ecological Interdependence”, Global Governance, 5, no. 3: 359–378.
  • Mach, K.J., et al. (2019) “Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict”, Nature, 571 (7764),193–197.
  • Malone, L.A., (2015) “Environmental Justice Reimagined Through Human Security and Post-Modern Ecological Feminism: A Neglected Perspective on Climate Change”, Faculty Publications, 1789, 1445-1471.
  • McDonald, M. (2023) “Geoengineering, climate change, and ecological security”, Environmental Politics, 32:4, 565-585.
  • McDonald, M., (2021) Ecological security: climate change and the construction of security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • McDonald, M. (2018) “Climate change and security: towards ecological security?”, International Theory, 10:2, 153-180
  • Mellor, M. (1994) “Varieties of ecofeminism”, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 5(4), 117–125.
  • Minkova, G.L. (2023) “The Fifth International Crime: Reflections on the Definition of Ecocide”, Journal of Genocide Research, 25:1, 62-83
  • Pandey, A. (2013) “Globalization and ecofeminism in the South: keeping the ‘Third World’ alive”, Journal of Global Ethics, 9:3, 345-358.
  • Pettman, J. (1996) Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics, London, Routledge.
  • Rao, N., Lawson, E. T., Raditloaneng, W. N., Solomon, D., & Angula, M. N. (2017) “Gendered vulnerabilities to climate change: insights from the semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia”, Climate and Development, 11(1), 14–26.
  • Rochette, A. (2002) “Stop the Rape of the World. An Ecofeminist Critique of Sustainable Development”, U. N. B. Law Journal, 51, 145-174.
  • Ruether, R. R. (1978) New Women New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation, Seabury Press, New York
  • Plumwood, V. (1986) “Ecofeminism: An Overview and Discussion of Positions and Arguments”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(sup1), 120–138.
  • Salleh, A. (1997) Ecofeminism as Politics, London, Zed Books.
  • Selby, J. and Hoffmann, C. (2014) “Rethinking Climate Change, Conflict, and Security”, Geopolitics, 19(4), 747–756.
  • Shiva, V. (1989) Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development, London, Zed Books.
  • Siegel, L. (2024) “Ecofeminism ↔ Intraconnectivism: working beyond binaries in environmental education”, Gender and Education, 36(4), 328–344.
  • Smith, M. (2020) Uluslararası Güvenlik, İstanbul, Felix Kitap.
  • Terry, G. (2009) “No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues”, Gender and Development, 17(1), 5–18.
  • Thomas, C. (1987) In Search for Security: The Third World in International Relations, Boulder, Lynne Rienner
  • Tickner, A. J. (1993a) Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, NY, Columbia University Press.
  • Tickner, A. J. (1993b) “States and Markets: An Ecofeminist Perspective on International Political Economy”, International Political Science Review, 14(1), 59-69.
  • Tornham, S. (2001) “Second Wave of Feminism” in Gamble, S. (ed.) Routledge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism, NY, Routledge, 25-36.
  • Trombetta, M. J. (2008) “Environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21:4, 585-602.
  • United Nations (2008) “Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World”, UN Human Development Report 2007-2008, https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210576963c003
  • United Nations (2015), “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
  • United Nations (2023) “The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023”, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf, (05.06.2024).
  • United Nations Development Programme (1994) Human Development Report 1994 – New Dimensions of Human Security, https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdr1994encompletenostats.pdf
  • von Lucke, F., Wellmann, Z. and Diez, T. (2014) “What’s at Stake in Securitising Climate Change? Towards a Differentiated Approach”, Geopolitics, 19(4), 857–884.
  • Walt, S. M. (1991) “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 35, No:2, 1991, 211-239.
  • Walters, M. (2005) Feminism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Warren, K. J. (2000) Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters, Boulder, Rowman & Littlefield.
  • WEDO (2011) “World Women’s Congress for a Healthy Planet, 1991”, https://wedo.org/bella-abzug/
  • Wendt, A. (1992) “Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics”, International Organization 46(2): 391-425.
  • Williams, G. (1980) “The Brandt Report: A Critical Introduction”, Review of African Political Economy, 7:19, 77-86.
  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1792) A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects, London, St. Paul’s Church Yard.

ULUSLARARASI GÜVENLİK VE ÇEVRE: EKOFEMINIST BİR YAKLAŞIMA DOĞRU

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Filiz Çoban Oran

https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1521177

Öz

Tehdit algıları zaman içinde değiştiğinden ve çok yönlü hale geldiğinden, Uluslararası Güvenlik Çalışmaları içindeki her bir teorik gelenek, çevresel tehditleri ve güvenliği çok farklı yorumlamış, kimin veya neyin güvence altına alınacağı ve neye karşı güvence altına alınacağı gibi temel soruları yanıtlamak için birbiriyle çatışan dayanak noktalarını savunmuştur. Çevresel güvenlik üzerine yapılan akademik çalışmaların çeşitliliğine rağmen, ekofeminizm ve güvenlik arasındaki bağlantıyı ortaya koymak için daha sistematik çalışmalar yapılması gerekmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, öncelikle çevresel güvenliğe yönelik farklı yaklaşımların gelişimini ortaya koymakta ve sonuç olarak ekofeminizm yaklaşımının gezegensel güvenlik ve adalet için insan ve doğa ilişkisine nasıl dönüştürücü bir bakış açısı sağladığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevre güvenliği Ekofeminizm İklim Değişikliği Ekolojik güvenlik Sürdürülebilir kalkınma

Kaynakça

  • Adams, L. C. and Gruen, L. (2014) Eco-Feminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals & the Earth, New York, Bloomsbury
  • Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (1998) (eds.), Security Communities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • Agarwal, B. (1989) “Rural Women, Poverty, and Natural Resources: Sustenance, Sustainability, and Struggle for Change,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 24, No. 43, WS46-WS65.
  • Batricevic, A. and Paunović, N. (2019) “Ecofeminism and Environmental Security”, Facta Universitatis Series Law and Politics, 17(2):125-136.
  • Ayoob, M. (1991) “The Security Problematic of the Third World”, World Politics, 43, No 2, 257-283.
  • Biehl, J. (1991), Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics, New York: Black Rose Books.
  • Booth, K. (1991) “Security and Emancipation”, Review of International Studies, 17/4, 323-326.
  • Braidotti, R., Charkiewicz, E., Hausler, S. and Wieringa, S. (1994) Women, the Environment and Sustainable Development, London: Zed Press
  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987) “Brundtland and the World Commission on Environment and Development: Statement to the 42nd session of the General Assembly of the United Nations”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/146404?ln=en&v=pdf
  • Buzan, B. and Hansen, L. (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Carlassare, E. (2000) “Socialist and cultural ecofeminism: allies in resistance”, Ethics and the Environment, 5, 89–106.
  • Commission on Human Security (2003) Human Security Now: Final Report, New York, CHS.
  • Dalby, S. (2013) “Climate Change: New Dimensions of Environmental Security”, The RUSI Journal, 158(3), pp. 34–43.
  • Dalby, S. (2002) Environmental Security, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press
  • Daoudy, M., (2021) “Rethinking the climate–conflict nexus: a human–environmental–climate security approach,” Global Environmental Politics, 21 (3), 4–25
  • Daudney, D. (1999) “Environmental security: a Critique” Daudney, D. and Matthew, R. (eds.) Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics, Albany, SUNY Press, 187–219.
  • d’Eaubonne, F. (2022) Feminism or Death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet, NY, Verso.
  • de Wilde, J.H. (2008) “Environmental Security Deconstructed,” Brauch, H.G. (ed.) Globalization and Environmental Challenges, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Denton, F. (2002) “Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter?”, Gender & Development, 10(2), 10–20.
  • Detraz, N. (2009) “Environmental Security and Gender: Necessary Shifts in an Evolving Debate”, Security Studies 18 (2): 345–369.
  • Eckersley, R. (1992) Environmentalism and Political Theory: Towards an Ecocentric Approach, New York, SUNY Press
  • Egeland, K. (2023) “Climate security reversed: the implications of alternative security policies for global warming”, Environmental Politics, 32:5, 883-902
  • Elliott, L. (2015) “Human security/environmental security,”, Contemporary Politics, 21(1), 11–24.
  • Falk, R. A. (1971) This endangered planet: prospects and proposals for human survival, New York, Random House.
  • Floyd, R. (2013) “Whither Environmental Security Studies? An Afterword” Floyd, R. and Richard, A. M. (eds.) Environmental Security: Approaches and Issues, London, Routledge.
  • Floyd, R. (2008) “The Environmental Security Debate and its Significance for Climate Change”, The International Spectator, 43:3, 51-65.
  • Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hanisch, C. (1970) “Personal is Political”, in Firestone, S. and Koedt, A. (eds.) Notes from the Second Year: Women's Liberation, NY, Radical Feminism.
  • Hemmati, M., and Röhr, U. (2009) “Engendering the climate-change negotiations: experiences, challenges, and steps forward”, Gender & Development, 17(1), 19–32
  • Ide, T. et al. (2023) “The Future of Environmental Peace and Conflict Research”, Environmental Politics, 32(6), 1077–1103.
  • Elshtain, J. B. (1987) Women and War, NY, Basic Books.
  • Jotzo, F. et al. (2018) “US and international climate policy under President Trump”, Climate Policy, 18:7, 813-817.
  • Kaplan, R. (1994) “The Coming Anarchy”, the Atlantic, 273/2, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/
  • Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996) Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, NY, Columbia University Press.
  • Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. (1977) Power, and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, Little Brown.
  • Killean, R. (2021) “From ecocide to eco-sensitivity: ‘greening’ reparations at the International Criminal Court”, The International Journal of Human Rights, 25:2, 323-347.
  • Koren, O., Bagozzi, B.E., and Benson, T., (2021) “Food and water insecurity as causes of social unrest: evidence from geolocated Twitter data”, Journal of Peace Research,58 (1),67-82.
  • Li, Z. (2022) “Ecofeminism and Daoism: the feminist analysis of female warrior of Nie Yinniang in The Assassin (2015)”, Feminist Media Studies, 23(7), pp. 3468–3482.
  • Lisowski, M. (2002) “Playing the Two-level Game: Us President Bush's Decision to Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol”, Environmental Politics, 11:4, 101-119.
  • Litfin, K. T. (1999) “Constructing Environmental Security and Ecological Interdependence”, Global Governance, 5, no. 3: 359–378.
  • Mach, K.J., et al. (2019) “Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict”, Nature, 571 (7764),193–197.
  • Malone, L.A., (2015) “Environmental Justice Reimagined Through Human Security and Post-Modern Ecological Feminism: A Neglected Perspective on Climate Change”, Faculty Publications, 1789, 1445-1471.
  • McDonald, M. (2023) “Geoengineering, climate change, and ecological security”, Environmental Politics, 32:4, 565-585.
  • McDonald, M., (2021) Ecological security: climate change and the construction of security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • McDonald, M. (2018) “Climate change and security: towards ecological security?”, International Theory, 10:2, 153-180
  • Mellor, M. (1994) “Varieties of ecofeminism”, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 5(4), 117–125.
  • Minkova, G.L. (2023) “The Fifth International Crime: Reflections on the Definition of Ecocide”, Journal of Genocide Research, 25:1, 62-83
  • Pandey, A. (2013) “Globalization and ecofeminism in the South: keeping the ‘Third World’ alive”, Journal of Global Ethics, 9:3, 345-358.
  • Pettman, J. (1996) Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics, London, Routledge.
  • Rao, N., Lawson, E. T., Raditloaneng, W. N., Solomon, D., & Angula, M. N. (2017) “Gendered vulnerabilities to climate change: insights from the semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia”, Climate and Development, 11(1), 14–26.
  • Rochette, A. (2002) “Stop the Rape of the World. An Ecofeminist Critique of Sustainable Development”, U. N. B. Law Journal, 51, 145-174.
  • Ruether, R. R. (1978) New Women New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation, Seabury Press, New York
  • Plumwood, V. (1986) “Ecofeminism: An Overview and Discussion of Positions and Arguments”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(sup1), 120–138.
  • Salleh, A. (1997) Ecofeminism as Politics, London, Zed Books.
  • Selby, J. and Hoffmann, C. (2014) “Rethinking Climate Change, Conflict, and Security”, Geopolitics, 19(4), 747–756.
  • Shiva, V. (1989) Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development, London, Zed Books.
  • Siegel, L. (2024) “Ecofeminism ↔ Intraconnectivism: working beyond binaries in environmental education”, Gender and Education, 36(4), 328–344.
  • Smith, M. (2020) Uluslararası Güvenlik, İstanbul, Felix Kitap.
  • Terry, G. (2009) “No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues”, Gender and Development, 17(1), 5–18.
  • Thomas, C. (1987) In Search for Security: The Third World in International Relations, Boulder, Lynne Rienner
  • Tickner, A. J. (1993a) Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, NY, Columbia University Press.
  • Tickner, A. J. (1993b) “States and Markets: An Ecofeminist Perspective on International Political Economy”, International Political Science Review, 14(1), 59-69.
  • Tornham, S. (2001) “Second Wave of Feminism” in Gamble, S. (ed.) Routledge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism, NY, Routledge, 25-36.
  • Trombetta, M. J. (2008) “Environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21:4, 585-602.
  • United Nations (2008) “Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World”, UN Human Development Report 2007-2008, https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210576963c003
  • United Nations (2015), “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
  • United Nations (2023) “The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023”, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf, (05.06.2024).
  • United Nations Development Programme (1994) Human Development Report 1994 – New Dimensions of Human Security, https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdr1994encompletenostats.pdf
  • von Lucke, F., Wellmann, Z. and Diez, T. (2014) “What’s at Stake in Securitising Climate Change? Towards a Differentiated Approach”, Geopolitics, 19(4), 857–884.
  • Walt, S. M. (1991) “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 35, No:2, 1991, 211-239.
  • Walters, M. (2005) Feminism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Warren, K. J. (2000) Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters, Boulder, Rowman & Littlefield.
  • WEDO (2011) “World Women’s Congress for a Healthy Planet, 1991”, https://wedo.org/bella-abzug/
  • Wendt, A. (1992) “Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics”, International Organization 46(2): 391-425.
  • Williams, G. (1980) “The Brandt Report: A Critical Introduction”, Review of African Political Economy, 7:19, 77-86.
  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1792) A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects, London, St. Paul’s Church Yard.
Toplam 77 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Uluslararası Güvenlik, Uluslararası İlişkilerde Siyaset
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Filiz Çoban Oran 0000-0003-1789-8411

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Aralık 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Temmuz 2024
Kabul Tarihi 1 Kasım 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çoban Oran, F. (2024). INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH. Uluslararası İlişkiler Ve Diplomasi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1521177
AMA Çoban Oran F. INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH. UİD/Jird. Aralık 2024;7(2). doi:10.51763/uid.1521177
Chicago Çoban Oran, Filiz. “INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Ve Diplomasi 7, sy. 2 (Aralık 2024). https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1521177.
EndNote Çoban Oran F (01 Aralık 2024) INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi 7 2
IEEE F. Çoban Oran, “INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH”, UİD/Jird, c. 7, sy. 2, 2024, doi: 10.51763/uid.1521177.
ISNAD Çoban Oran, Filiz. “INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi 7/2 (Aralık 2024). https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1521177.
JAMA Çoban Oran F. INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH. UİD/Jird. 2024;7. doi:10.51763/uid.1521177.
MLA Çoban Oran, Filiz. “INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Ve Diplomasi, c. 7, sy. 2, 2024, doi:10.51763/uid.1521177.
Vancouver Çoban Oran F. INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN ECOFEMINIST APPROACH. UİD/Jird. 2024;7(2).

Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi birbirinden ayrılamaz bir bütünün iki parçasıdır. Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplini içerisinde yer alan çoğu konu diplomasi ışığında ele alınmakta, en başta gelen politik, ekonomik konular uluslararası ilişkiler ve diplomasinin birlikte hareket etmesi ile açıklanmakta ya da çözüme kavuşturulabilmektedir. Bu nedenle derginin isminin Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi olmasına karar verilmiştir. Dergimizin; Uluslararası İlişkiler, Diplomasi, Ekonomi, Temel Bilimler ve Sosyal Bilimlerin, siyaset, ekonomi, ekonomi-politik, diplomasi uygulamaları, siyasi tarih, uluslararası antlaşmalar, uluslararası örgütler, hukuk, uluslararası hukuk gibi alanları ile alakalı olarak bilim dünyasına önemli katkı yapması beklenmektedir.