Araştırma Makalesi

‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 70 13 Ağustos 2021
Raoul Bunskoek *, Chih-yu Shıh
PDF İndir
EN TR

‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective

Öz

Conventional explanations of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) focus on how the BRI will be in China’s interest, how it will strengthen China’s geopolitical position, or a combination of the two. We argue that such views are limited because they merely interpret the BRI through ‘Western’ IR lenses. This paper ‘re-worlds’ China by using the BRI as a case study to illustrate how in the discursive field(s) of China’s elite, China as a Westphalian nation state, and China as amorphous Tianxia under Confucianism coexist, struggle for recognition, and are interrelated. Consequently, we argue that China, because of the economic miracle it created domestically over the last few decades, is now convinced of its own ‘moral superiority’, and ready to export its self-perceived ‘benevolence’ abroad. In this light, we read the BRI to be undergirded by a combination of ‘Western’ and Confucian values, suggesting a post-Western/post-Chinese form of regionalism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Belt and Road, Post-Western, Regionalism, Tianxia, Confucianism

Kaynakça

  1. Ang, Yuen Yuen (2016). How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. Ithaca: New York, Cornell University Press.
  2. Bell, Daniel A. (2015). The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  3. Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
  4. Chan, Stephen (2009). “A Chinese Political Sociology in Our Times”, International Political Sociology, Vol. 3, No 3, p. 332-334.
  5. Chan, Stephen (2013). The Morality of China in Africa: The Middle Kingdom and the Dark Continent. London and New York, Zed Books.
  6. Chen, Zhimin and Junbo Jian (2009). “Chinese Provinces as Foreign Policy Actors in Africa”, China in Africa Project Occasional Paper No 22, https://media.africaportal.org/documents/SAIIA_Occasional_Paper_no_22.pdf (Accessed 19 February 2021).
  7. Cheung, Steven N. S. (1996). “A Simplistic General Equilibrium theory of Corruption”, Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 13, No 3, p. 1-5.
  8. Harrison, Lawrence E. and Samuel Huntington (eds.) (2000). Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York, Basic Books.
  9. He, Qinglian (1998). Xiandaihua de Xianjing (The Pitfall of Modernization). Guangzhou, Today’s China Press.
  10. J.P. (2017). “What is China’s belt and road initiative?”, The Economist, 15 May, https://www.economist.com/the-economistexplains/2017/05/14/what-is-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative (Accessed 27 December 2018).

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bunskoek, R., & Shıh, C.- yu. (2021). ‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 18(70), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.954744
AMA
1.Bunskoek R, Shıh C yu. ‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective. uidergisi. 2021;18(70):85-101. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.954744
Chicago
Bunskoek, Raoul, ve Chih-yu Shıh. 2021. “‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18 (70): 85-101. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.954744.
EndNote
Bunskoek R, Shıh C- yu (01 Ağustos 2021) ‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18 70 85–101.
IEEE
[1]R. Bunskoek ve C.- yu Shıh, “‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective”, uidergisi, c. 18, sy 70, ss. 85–101, Ağu. 2021, doi: 10.33458/uidergisi.954744.
ISNAD
Bunskoek, Raoul - Shıh, Chih-yu. “‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18/70 (01 Ağustos 2021): 85-101. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.954744.
JAMA
1.Bunskoek R, Shıh C- yu. ‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective. uidergisi. 2021;18:85–101.
MLA
Bunskoek, Raoul, ve Chih-yu Shıh. “‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, c. 18, sy 70, Ağustos 2021, ss. 85-101, doi:10.33458/uidergisi.954744.
Vancouver
1.Raoul Bunskoek, Chih-yu Shıh. ‘Community of Common Destiny’ as Post-Western Regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian Perspective. uidergisi. 01 Ağustos 2021;18(70):85-101. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.954744