Introduction to the Special Issue Anxiety and Change in International Relations

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 73, 1 - 11, 09.04.2022

Bahar Rumelili

Öz

Despite being the prevailing emotion of our times, anxiety has received scant attention in the international relations discipline. While political theorists and philosophers have long paid attention to anxiety as distinct from and constitutive of fear, international relations theory has assumed that much of international behavior is guided by fears of specific threats to state survival. However, today, the uncertainties surrounding the future of the world order, unanticipated crises like the COVID-19 pandemic that radically change our lives, unforeseeable terrorist attacks, and the unexplainable lure of radical fundamentalist ideologies all evoke a pervasive anxiety about what we do not know and what we cannot control, rather than the fear of a specific and known enemy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anxiety, Change, International Relations

Kaynakça

• Abulof, Uriel (2015). The Mortality and Morality of Nations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Adisonmez, Umut Can (2019). “When Conflict Traumas Fragment: Investigating the Socio-psychological Roots of Turkey’s Intractable Conflict”, Political Psychology, Vol. 40, No 6, p. 1373-1390.
• Adisonmez, Umut Can and Recep Onursal (2020). “Governing Anxiety, Trauma and Crisis: The Political Discourse on Ontological (In)Security after the July 15 Coup Attempt in Turkey”, Middle East Critique, Vol. 29, No 3, p. 291-306.
• Agius, Christine, Annika Bergman Rosamond and Catarina Kinnvall (2020). “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Gendered Nationalism: Masculinity, Climate Denial and Covid-19”, Politics, Religion & Ideology, Vol. 21, No 4, p. 432-450.
• Berenskoetter, Felix (2020). “Anxiety, Time, and Agency”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 273-290.
• Browning, Christopher S. (2018). “Brexit, Existential Anxiety and Ontological (In)security”, European Security, Vol. 27, No 3, p. 336-355.
• Browning, Christopher S. (2018). “‘Je suis en terrasse’: Political Violence, Civilizational Politics, and the Everyday Courage to Be”, Political Psychology, Vol. 39, p. 243-261.
• Browning, Christopher S., Pertti Joenniemi (2017). “Ontological Security, Self-articulation and the Securitization of Identity”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 52, No 1, p. 31-47.
• Campbell, David (1992). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
• Cash, John (2020). “Psychoanalysis, Cultures of Anarchy, and Ontological Insecurity”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 306-321.
• Chernobrov, Dmitry (2019). Public Perception of International Crises: Identity, Ontological Security, and Self-Affirmation. London, Rowman & Littlefield.
• Eberle, Jakub (2019). “Narrative, Desire, Ontological Security, Transgression: Fantasy as a Factor in International Politics”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 22, p. 243-268.
• Ejdus, Filip (2020). Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Anxiety Over Kosovo’s Secession. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
• Eklundh, Emmy, Andreja Zevnik and Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet (eds.) (2017). Politics of Anxiety. London, Rowman & Littlefield.
• George, Jim and David Campbell (1990). “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, No 3, pp. 269-293.
• Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge, Polity Press.
• Gustafsson, Karl (2016). “Routinised Recognition and Anxiety: Understanding the Deterioration in Sino-Japanese Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 42, No 4, p. 613-33.
• Gustafsson, Karl (2021). “Why is Anxiety’s Positive Potential so rarely Realised? Creativity and Change in International Politics”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 24, p. 1044-1049.
• Gustafsson, Karl and Nina C. Krickel-Choi (2020). “Returning to the Roots of Ontological Security: Insights from the Existentialist Anxiety Literature”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 26, No 3, p. 875-95.
• Hom, Andrew R. and Brent J. Steele (2020). “Anxiety, Time, and Ontological Security’s Third-image Potential”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 322-36.
• Horwitz, Allan V. (2013). Anxiety: A Short History. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Huysmans, Jef (1998). “Security! What Do You Mean?: From Concept to Thick Signifier”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 4, No 2, p. 226-255.
• Kinnvall, Catarina (2004). “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security”, Political Psychology, Vol. 25, No 5, p. 741-767.
• Kinnvall, Catarina (2019). “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the Masculinization of Indian politics”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 32, No 3, p. 283-302.
• Kinnvall, Catarina and Jennifer Mitzen (2020). “Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics: Thinking with and beyond Giddens”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 240-256.
• Kinnvall, Catarina and Ted Svensson (2022). “Exploring the Populist ‘mind’: Anxiety, Fantasy, and Everyday Populism”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, doi:10.1177/13691481221075925 (Accessed 8 March 2022).
• Kinnvall, Catarina, Ian Manners and Jennifer Mitzen (2018). “Introduction to 2018 Special Issue of European Security: “Ontological (In)security in the European Union”, European Security, Vol. 27, No 3, p. 249-265.
• Kinnvall, Catarina, Paul Nesbitt-Larking (2010). “The Political Psychology of (de)Securitization: Place-Making Strategies in Denmark, Sweden, and Canada”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 28, No 6, p. 1051-1070.
• Krickel-Choi, Nina C. (2021). Rethinking Ontological Security Theory: Conceptual Investigations into ‘Self’ and ‘Anxiety’. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economic History and International Relations, Stockholm University.
• Mälksoo, Maria (2015). “‘Memory must be Defended’: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 46, No 3, p. 221-237.
• Mitzen, Jennifer (2006). “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma”, European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 12, No 3, p. 341-370.
• Rumelili, Bahar (2015). “Ontological (In)Security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution”, Bahar Rumelili (ed.), Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties. London, Routledge, p. 10-29.
• Rumelili, Bahar (2020). “Integrating Anxiety into International Relations Theory: Hobbes, Existentialism, and Ontological Security”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 257-272.
• Rumelili, Bahar (2021). “[Our] Age of Anxiety: Existentialism and the Current State of International Relations”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 24, p. 1020-1036.
• Rumelili, Bahar and Ayşe Betül Çelik (2017). “Ontological Insecurity in Asymmetric Conflicts: Reflections on Agonistic Peace in Turkey’s Kurdish Issue”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 48, No 4, p. 279-296.
• Solomon, Ty (2018). “Ontological Security, Circulations of Affect, and the Arab Spring”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 21, p. 934-958.
• Steele, Brent J. (2008). Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. Abingdon, Routledge.
• Steele, Brent J. (2013). “The Politics and Limits of the Self: Kierkegaard, Neoconservatism and International Political Theory”, Journal of International Political Theory, Vol. 9, No 2, p. 158-177.
• Steele, Brent J. (2021). “Nowhere to Run to, Nowhere to Hide: Inescapable Dread in the 2020s”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 24, p. 1037-1043.
• Steele, Brent J. and Alexandra Homolar (2019). “Ontological Insecurities and the Politics of Contemporary Populism”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 32, No 3, p. 214-221.
• Yalvaç, Faruk (2022). “Alienation and Marxism: An Alternative Starting Point for Critical IR Theory”, E-International Relations. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2022/01/27/alienation-and-marxism-an-alternative-starting-pointfor-critical-ir-theory/ (Accessed 12 March 2022).
• Zevnik, Andreja (2021). “Anxiety, Subjectivity and the Possibility of Emancipatory Politics”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 24, p. 1050-1056.