Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 87, 185 - 202, 18.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1747943

Öz

This study examines the interplay between cyberspace and traditional foreign policy, addressing two key questions: (1) How does cyberspace influence foreign policy decision-making? and (2) What framework can integrate factors from real and cyber politics to guide leaders during conflicts? Using a rationalist lens, this study proposes a model centered on leadership, emphasizing two variables: perceived hostility and balance of power dynamics. The model categorizes state-led cyber actions into three levels—cyber espionage, destabilization, and conflict—based on attribution risks and geopolitical conditions. Empirical analyses of cases such as Stuxnet, Russia-Ukraine, and U.S.-China cyber activities demonstrate how leaders rationally select cyber actions to navigate complex geopolitical and cyber landscapes. This research advances our understanding of cyber-enabled statecraft and offers a structured framework for policymakers to address emerging challenges in the digital age.

Kaynakça

  • Brantly, Aaron Franklin. 2016. The Decision to Attack: Military and Intelligence Decision-Making. Athens, University of Georgia Press.
  • Brantly, Aaron Franklin. 2021. Risk and Uncertainty Can Be Analyzed in Cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity 7, 1: 1–12.
  • Beqa, Mentor. 2017. Neoclassical Realism : Its Promises and Limits as a Theory of Foreign Policy. European Academic Research 1: 1–16.
  • Buchanan, Ben. 2020. The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics. Global Security and Intelligence Studies. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  • Cavelty, Myriam Dunn. 2008. Cyber-Terror-Looming Threat or Phantom Menace? The Framing of the US Cyber-Threat Debate. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 4, 1: 19–36.
  • Choucri, Nazli. 2012. Cyberpolitics in International Relations. London, The MIT Press.
  • Choucri, Nazli and David D. Clark. 2019. International Relations in the Cyber Age: The Co-Evolution Dilemma. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  • Douzet, Frédérick and Taillat Stéphane. 2021. Prepping for Long-Term Competition? U.S. Leadership in Cyberspace from Trump to Biden. In US Leadership in a World of Uncertainties, ed. Michael Stricof and Isabelle Vagnoux. London, Palgrave Macmillan
  • Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49, 3: 379–414.
  • Fearon, James D. 1997. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, 1: 68–90
  • Finnemore, Martha and Duncan B Hollis. 2016. Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity. American Journal of International Law 110, 3: 425–479.
  • Gilad, Amitai, Eyal Pecht and Asher Tishler. 2020. Intelligence, Cyberspace, and National Security. Defence and Peace Economics 32, 1: 18–45.
  • Haas, Ernst B. 1953. The Balance of Power as a Guide to Policy-Making. The Journal of Politics 15, 3: 370–398.
  • Harknett, Richard J. and James A Stever. 2011. The New Policy World of Cybersecurity. Public Administration Review 71, 3: 455–560.
  • Harold, Scott, Martin Libicki and Astrid Cevallos. 2016. Getting to Yes with China in Cyberspace. Rand Corporation.
  • Hudson, Valerie. M. and Christopher. S. Vore. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review 39, 2: 209–238.
  • Hofmann, Stephanie C. and Patryk Pawlak. 2023. Governing Cyberspace: Policy Boundary Politics across Organizations. Review of International Political Economy 30, 6: 2122–2149.
  • NIC. 2007. Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports%20and%20Pubs/20071203_release.pdf (accessed June 25, 2024).
  • Jeff Stein. 2016. Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. in New Snowden/NSA Document. https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991 (accessed February 26, 2016).
  • Jervis, Robert. 1998. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Jones, Jeff B. 2020. Confronting China’s Efforts to Steal Defense Information. National Security Fellowship Program Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Kolodii, Roman. 2024. The Pedagogy of Cyber-WAR: Explaining Ukraine’s Resilience against Russian Cyber-Aggression. Defense and Security Analysis 40, 2: 1–22.
  • Kösen, Mustafa Gökcan and Ş. Gökçe Gezer. 2025. Emotion Norms and International Securitization in Foreign Policy Analysis: The Official Russian Narratives on the Ukrainian-Russian War. Uluslararası İlişkiler Advanced Online Publication: 1–20.
  • Lee, Melissa M. 2018. The International Politics of Incomplete Sovereignty: How Hostile Neighbors Weaken the State. International Organization 72, 2: 283–315.
  • Lewis, James A. 2015. Statement before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs: Cyber War: Definitions, Deterrence, and Foreign Policy. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs- public/legacy_files/files/attachments/ts150930_Lewis.pdf (accessed June 25, 2024).
  • Lewis, James A. 2022. Cyber War and Ukraine. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/220616_Lewis_Cyber_War.pdf?VersionId=S.iEKeom79InugnYWlcZL4r3Ljuq.ash (accessed July 20, 2024).
  • Libicki, Martin C. 2007. Conquest in Cyberspace National Security and Information Warfare. New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindsay, Jon R. 2013. Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare. Security Studies 22, 3: 365–404.
  • Lonergan, Shawn William. 2017. Cyber Power and the International System. PhD Thesis, Columbia University.
  • Lorci, Enescan. 2024. Ben Buchanan, The Hacker, and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics (Harvard University Press, 2020), Uluslararası İlişkiler Advanced Online Publication, 24 May: 1-3.
  • Lorents, Peeter, Rain Ottis and Raul Rikk. 2009. Cyber Society and Cooperative Cyber Defence. In Internationalization, Design and Global Development, ed. Nuray Aykin. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 180-186.
  • Maness, Ryan C. and Brandon Valeriano. 2016. The Impact of Cyber Conflict on International Interactions. Armed Forces and Society 42, 2: 301–323.
  • Mearsheimer, John J. and Sebastian Rosato. 2023. How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy. London, Yale University Press.
  • Mohee, Ahmad. 2022. A Realistic Analysis of the Stuxnet Cyber-Attack. MA Arabic Studies – Political Sciences, 1–11.
  • Mueller, Milton L. 2020. Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace. International Studies Review 22, 4: 779–801
  • Müller, Thomas, and Mathias Albert. 2021. Whose Balance? A Constructivist Approach to Balance of Power Politics. European Journal of International Security 6, 1: 109–128.
  • Muncaster, Robert G. and Dina A. Zinnes. 1990. Structure and Hostility in International Systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, 1: 31–58.
  • Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Balance of Power in the Balance. World Politics 61, 2: 330–359.
  • Niou, Emerson. 2016. The China Factor in Taiwan’s Domestic Politics. In Democratization in Taiwan, ed. Philip Paolino and James Meernik. London, Routledge: 185–200.
  • Nye, Joseph S. 1998. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics 40, 2: 235-251.
  • Mencütek Şahin, Zeynep N., Ela Gökalp Aras and Bezen Balamir Coşkun. 2020. Turkey’s Response to Syrian Mass Migration: A Neoclassical Realist Analysis. Uluslararası İlişkiler 17, 68: 93–111.
  • Ottis, Rain, and Peeter Lorents. 2011. Cyberspace: Definition and Implications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Warfare and Security, Dayton, US, 8-9 April: 267-270.
  • Panwar, R. S. 2017. 21st Century Warfare: From "Battlefield" to "Battlespace". https://futurewars.rspanwar.net/21st-century-warfare-from-battlefield-to-battlespace/. (accessed July, 20, 2024).
  • Patel, Kathan and Dhaval Chudasama. 2021. National Security Threats in Cyberspace. National Journal of Cyber Security Law 4, 1: 2–10
  • Richard B. Andres. 2012. The Emerging Structure of Strategic Cyber Offense, Cyber Defense, and Cyber Deterrence. In Cyberspace and National Security: Threats, Opportunities, and Power in Virtual World. ed. Derek S. Reveron. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press: 89–104.
  • Rid, Thomas. 2013. Cyberwar and Peace: Hacking Can Reduce Real-World Violence. Foreign Affairs 92, 6: 77–87.
  • Robinson, Michael., Kevin Jones and Helge Janicke. 2015. Cyber Warfare: Issues and Challenges. Computers & Security 49: 70–94.
  • Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51, 1: 144–172.
  • Sánchez, Karina, and Nezir Akyesilmen. 2021. Competition for High Politics in Cyberspace: Technological Conflicts Between China and the USA. Polish Political Science Yearbook 50, 1: 43-69.
  • Schweller, Randall L. 2003. The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, ed. Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman. London, The MIT Press: 68-99.
  • Slantchev, Branislav L. 2005. State and Anarchy. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/12153178/introduction-to-international-relations-lecture-2-state-and-anarchy (accessed November 1, 2024).
  • Simpson, Emile. 2012. War From the Ground up: Twenty-First Century Combat as Politics. Oxford University Press.
  • Snyder, Greta Fowler and Andre Hui. 2023. Complexity and Quantum in International Relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, 1–26.
  • The Guardian. 2018. British Spies ‘Hacked into Belgian Telecoms Firm on Ministers’ Orders.’ September.
  • Thomas C. Schelling. 1966. Arm And Influence. Yale University Press.
  • Thornton, Rod, and Marina Miron. 2022. Winning Future Wars: Russian Offensive Cyber and Its Vital Importance. The Cyber Defense Review 7, 3: 117–135.
  • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Wohlforth, William C. 2016. Realism and Foreign Policy. In Foreign Policy Theories, Actors, Cases. ed. Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield, and Tim Dunne. Oxford University Press: 381–396.
  • Zilincik, Samuel and Isabelle Duyvesteyn. 2023. Strategic Studies and Cyber Warfare. Journal of Strategic Studies 46, 4: 836–857.
  • Zinnes, Dina A. 1962. Hostility in International Decision-Making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 3: 236–243.

Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 87, 185 - 202, 18.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1747943

Öz

This study examines the interplay between cyberspace and traditional foreign policy, addressing two key questions: (1) How does cyberspace influence foreign policy decision-making? and (2) What framework can integrate factors from real and cyber politics to guide leaders during conflicts? Using a rationalist lens, this study proposes a model centered on leadership, emphasizing two variables: perceived hostility and balance of power dynamics. The model categorizes state-led cyber actions into three levels—cyber espionage, destabilization, and conflict—based on attribution risks and geopolitical conditions. Empirical analyses of cases such as Stuxnet, Russia-Ukraine, and U.S.-China cyber activities demonstrate how leaders rationally select cyber actions to navigate complex geopolitical and cyber landscapes. This research advances our understanding of cyber-enabled statecraft and offers a structured framework for policymakers to address emerging challenges in the digital age.

Kaynakça

  • Brantly, Aaron Franklin. 2016. The Decision to Attack: Military and Intelligence Decision-Making. Athens, University of Georgia Press.
  • Brantly, Aaron Franklin. 2021. Risk and Uncertainty Can Be Analyzed in Cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity 7, 1: 1–12.
  • Beqa, Mentor. 2017. Neoclassical Realism : Its Promises and Limits as a Theory of Foreign Policy. European Academic Research 1: 1–16.
  • Buchanan, Ben. 2020. The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics. Global Security and Intelligence Studies. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  • Cavelty, Myriam Dunn. 2008. Cyber-Terror-Looming Threat or Phantom Menace? The Framing of the US Cyber-Threat Debate. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 4, 1: 19–36.
  • Choucri, Nazli. 2012. Cyberpolitics in International Relations. London, The MIT Press.
  • Choucri, Nazli and David D. Clark. 2019. International Relations in the Cyber Age: The Co-Evolution Dilemma. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  • Douzet, Frédérick and Taillat Stéphane. 2021. Prepping for Long-Term Competition? U.S. Leadership in Cyberspace from Trump to Biden. In US Leadership in a World of Uncertainties, ed. Michael Stricof and Isabelle Vagnoux. London, Palgrave Macmillan
  • Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49, 3: 379–414.
  • Fearon, James D. 1997. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, 1: 68–90
  • Finnemore, Martha and Duncan B Hollis. 2016. Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity. American Journal of International Law 110, 3: 425–479.
  • Gilad, Amitai, Eyal Pecht and Asher Tishler. 2020. Intelligence, Cyberspace, and National Security. Defence and Peace Economics 32, 1: 18–45.
  • Haas, Ernst B. 1953. The Balance of Power as a Guide to Policy-Making. The Journal of Politics 15, 3: 370–398.
  • Harknett, Richard J. and James A Stever. 2011. The New Policy World of Cybersecurity. Public Administration Review 71, 3: 455–560.
  • Harold, Scott, Martin Libicki and Astrid Cevallos. 2016. Getting to Yes with China in Cyberspace. Rand Corporation.
  • Hudson, Valerie. M. and Christopher. S. Vore. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review 39, 2: 209–238.
  • Hofmann, Stephanie C. and Patryk Pawlak. 2023. Governing Cyberspace: Policy Boundary Politics across Organizations. Review of International Political Economy 30, 6: 2122–2149.
  • NIC. 2007. Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports%20and%20Pubs/20071203_release.pdf (accessed June 25, 2024).
  • Jeff Stein. 2016. Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. in New Snowden/NSA Document. https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991 (accessed February 26, 2016).
  • Jervis, Robert. 1998. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Jones, Jeff B. 2020. Confronting China’s Efforts to Steal Defense Information. National Security Fellowship Program Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Kolodii, Roman. 2024. The Pedagogy of Cyber-WAR: Explaining Ukraine’s Resilience against Russian Cyber-Aggression. Defense and Security Analysis 40, 2: 1–22.
  • Kösen, Mustafa Gökcan and Ş. Gökçe Gezer. 2025. Emotion Norms and International Securitization in Foreign Policy Analysis: The Official Russian Narratives on the Ukrainian-Russian War. Uluslararası İlişkiler Advanced Online Publication: 1–20.
  • Lee, Melissa M. 2018. The International Politics of Incomplete Sovereignty: How Hostile Neighbors Weaken the State. International Organization 72, 2: 283–315.
  • Lewis, James A. 2015. Statement before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs: Cyber War: Definitions, Deterrence, and Foreign Policy. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs- public/legacy_files/files/attachments/ts150930_Lewis.pdf (accessed June 25, 2024).
  • Lewis, James A. 2022. Cyber War and Ukraine. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/220616_Lewis_Cyber_War.pdf?VersionId=S.iEKeom79InugnYWlcZL4r3Ljuq.ash (accessed July 20, 2024).
  • Libicki, Martin C. 2007. Conquest in Cyberspace National Security and Information Warfare. New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindsay, Jon R. 2013. Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare. Security Studies 22, 3: 365–404.
  • Lonergan, Shawn William. 2017. Cyber Power and the International System. PhD Thesis, Columbia University.
  • Lorci, Enescan. 2024. Ben Buchanan, The Hacker, and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics (Harvard University Press, 2020), Uluslararası İlişkiler Advanced Online Publication, 24 May: 1-3.
  • Lorents, Peeter, Rain Ottis and Raul Rikk. 2009. Cyber Society and Cooperative Cyber Defence. In Internationalization, Design and Global Development, ed. Nuray Aykin. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 180-186.
  • Maness, Ryan C. and Brandon Valeriano. 2016. The Impact of Cyber Conflict on International Interactions. Armed Forces and Society 42, 2: 301–323.
  • Mearsheimer, John J. and Sebastian Rosato. 2023. How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy. London, Yale University Press.
  • Mohee, Ahmad. 2022. A Realistic Analysis of the Stuxnet Cyber-Attack. MA Arabic Studies – Political Sciences, 1–11.
  • Mueller, Milton L. 2020. Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace. International Studies Review 22, 4: 779–801
  • Müller, Thomas, and Mathias Albert. 2021. Whose Balance? A Constructivist Approach to Balance of Power Politics. European Journal of International Security 6, 1: 109–128.
  • Muncaster, Robert G. and Dina A. Zinnes. 1990. Structure and Hostility in International Systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, 1: 31–58.
  • Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Balance of Power in the Balance. World Politics 61, 2: 330–359.
  • Niou, Emerson. 2016. The China Factor in Taiwan’s Domestic Politics. In Democratization in Taiwan, ed. Philip Paolino and James Meernik. London, Routledge: 185–200.
  • Nye, Joseph S. 1998. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics 40, 2: 235-251.
  • Mencütek Şahin, Zeynep N., Ela Gökalp Aras and Bezen Balamir Coşkun. 2020. Turkey’s Response to Syrian Mass Migration: A Neoclassical Realist Analysis. Uluslararası İlişkiler 17, 68: 93–111.
  • Ottis, Rain, and Peeter Lorents. 2011. Cyberspace: Definition and Implications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Warfare and Security, Dayton, US, 8-9 April: 267-270.
  • Panwar, R. S. 2017. 21st Century Warfare: From "Battlefield" to "Battlespace". https://futurewars.rspanwar.net/21st-century-warfare-from-battlefield-to-battlespace/. (accessed July, 20, 2024).
  • Patel, Kathan and Dhaval Chudasama. 2021. National Security Threats in Cyberspace. National Journal of Cyber Security Law 4, 1: 2–10
  • Richard B. Andres. 2012. The Emerging Structure of Strategic Cyber Offense, Cyber Defense, and Cyber Deterrence. In Cyberspace and National Security: Threats, Opportunities, and Power in Virtual World. ed. Derek S. Reveron. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press: 89–104.
  • Rid, Thomas. 2013. Cyberwar and Peace: Hacking Can Reduce Real-World Violence. Foreign Affairs 92, 6: 77–87.
  • Robinson, Michael., Kevin Jones and Helge Janicke. 2015. Cyber Warfare: Issues and Challenges. Computers & Security 49: 70–94.
  • Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51, 1: 144–172.
  • Sánchez, Karina, and Nezir Akyesilmen. 2021. Competition for High Politics in Cyberspace: Technological Conflicts Between China and the USA. Polish Political Science Yearbook 50, 1: 43-69.
  • Schweller, Randall L. 2003. The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, ed. Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman. London, The MIT Press: 68-99.
  • Slantchev, Branislav L. 2005. State and Anarchy. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/12153178/introduction-to-international-relations-lecture-2-state-and-anarchy (accessed November 1, 2024).
  • Simpson, Emile. 2012. War From the Ground up: Twenty-First Century Combat as Politics. Oxford University Press.
  • Snyder, Greta Fowler and Andre Hui. 2023. Complexity and Quantum in International Relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, 1–26.
  • The Guardian. 2018. British Spies ‘Hacked into Belgian Telecoms Firm on Ministers’ Orders.’ September.
  • Thomas C. Schelling. 1966. Arm And Influence. Yale University Press.
  • Thornton, Rod, and Marina Miron. 2022. Winning Future Wars: Russian Offensive Cyber and Its Vital Importance. The Cyber Defense Review 7, 3: 117–135.
  • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Wohlforth, William C. 2016. Realism and Foreign Policy. In Foreign Policy Theories, Actors, Cases. ed. Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield, and Tim Dunne. Oxford University Press: 381–396.
  • Zilincik, Samuel and Isabelle Duyvesteyn. 2023. Strategic Studies and Cyber Warfare. Journal of Strategic Studies 46, 4: 836–857.
  • Zinnes, Dina A. 1962. Hostility in International Decision-Making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 3: 236–243.
Toplam 60 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Uluslararası İlişkiler (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Pao-wen Li Bu kişi benim 0009-0004-7045-4689

Enescan Lorci 0000-0003-0111-6331

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 6 Ağustos 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Eylül 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Mayıs 2024
Kabul Tarihi 22 Temmuz 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 87

Kaynak Göster

APA Li, P.- wen, & Lorci, E. (2025). Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 22(87), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1747943
AMA Li P wen, Lorci E. Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace. uidergisi. Eylül 2025;22(87):185-202. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1747943
Chicago Li, Pao-wen, ve Enescan Lorci. “Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 22, sy. 87 (Eylül 2025): 185-202. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1747943.
EndNote Li P- wen, Lorci E (01 Eylül 2025) Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 22 87 185–202.
IEEE P.- wen Li ve E. Lorci, “Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace”, uidergisi, c. 22, sy. 87, ss. 185–202, 2025, doi: 10.33458/uidergisi.1747943.
ISNAD Li, Pao-wen - Lorci, Enescan. “Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 22/87 (Eylül2025), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1747943.
JAMA Li P- wen, Lorci E. Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace. uidergisi. 2025;22:185–202.
MLA Li, Pao-wen ve Enescan Lorci. “Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, c. 22, sy. 87, 2025, ss. 185-02, doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1747943.
Vancouver Li P- wen, Lorci E. Navigating the Foreign Policy in Cyber Landscape: A Novel Model for State Decision-Making in Cyberspace. uidergisi. 2025;22(87):185-202.