DİJİTAL ÇAĞDA TÜKENMİŞLİĞİN YENİDEN ELE ALINMASI: YALIN BİR TÜKENMİŞLİK ÖLÇEĞİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ VE DOĞRULANMASI

Öz

Bu çalışma, dijitalleşme, uzaktan ve hibrit çalışma modellerinin yaygınlaşması ve artan bilişsel iş talepleriyle dönüşen modern çalışma yaşamı bağlamında tükenmişlik olgusunu yeniden ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Geleneksel yaklaşımlar tükenmişliği ağırlıklı olarak duygusal tükenme ve kişilerarası boyutlar üzerinden açıklarken, günümüz çalışma koşullarının ürettiği bilişsel yüklenme, sürekli zihinsel meşguliyet ve iş-yaşam sınırlarının belirsizleşmesi gibi deneyimleri sınırlı düzeyde yansıtmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda araştırmanın temel amacı, çağdaş çalışma koşullarını dikkate alan yalın bir tükenmişlik ölçeği geliştirmek ve psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Araştırma üç bağımsız örneklem üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Açıklayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) sonuçları, ölçeğin iki boyutlu bir yapı sergilediğini göstermiştir: “Kaynak Tükenmesi” ve “Psikolojik Kopuş”. Bulgular, bu yapının farklı sektörlerde tutarlı biçimde ortaya çıktığını ve modelin iyi uyum değerlerine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ölçüt bağımlılığı geçerliliği kapsamında tükenmişlik ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca ölçeğin yüksek iç tutarlılık düzeyine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, tükenmişliği modern çalışma yaşamının bilişsel ve psikolojik dinamikleri çerçevesinde ele alan, kısa ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı sunarak literatüre kuramsal ve uygulamaya dönük katkılar sağlamaktadır. Ölçek maddeleri çalışmanın sonunda hem İngilizce hem de Türkçe olarak sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tükenmişlik
• Kaynak Tükenmesi
• Psikolojik Kopuş
• Ölçek Geliştirme
• Geçerlilik
• Güvenilirlik

RETHINKING BURNOUT IN THE DIGITAL AGE: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A PARSIMONIOUS BURNOUT SCALE

Öz

This study aims to re-examine the phenomenon of burnout in the context of modern working life, which is undergoing transformation due to digitalization, the widespread adoption of remote and hybrid work models, and increasing cognitive demands. While traditional approaches primarily explain burnout through emotional exhaustion and interpersonal dimensions, they reflect only to a limited extent the experiences generated by today’s work conditions, such as cognitive overload, constant mental engagement, and the blurring of work-life boundaries. Accordingly, the primary objective of this study is to develop a concise burnout scale that accounts for contemporary work conditions and to examine its psychometric properties. The study was conducted across three independent samples. Results from Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated that the scale exhibits a two-dimensional structure: “Resource Depletion” and “Psychological Disengagement.” The findings indicate that this structure emerges consistently across different sectors and that the model possesses good fit indices. Within the scope of criterion-related validity, a positive and significant relationship was identified between burnout and intention to leave. Additionally, the scale was found to have a high level of internal consistency. In conclusion, this study contributes both theoretically and practically to the literature by providing a brief and reliable measurement tool that addresses burnout within the cognitive and psychological dynamics of modern work life. The scale items are presented in both English and Turkish at the end of the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Burnout
• Resource Depletion
• Psychological Detachment
• Scale Development
• Validity
• Reliability

Kaynakça

1. Ahmadi, S., & Maleki, A. (2022). The relationship between burnout and intention to leave work among midwives: the long‐lasting impacts of COVID‐19. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022(1), 8608732.
2. Ahmed, E., Jaber, M., & Albanna, H. (2022). The relationship between job satisfaction and intention to quit a job: mediating factor job burnout. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 11(9).
3. Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Girişimci Davranış: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 14(1), 1-10.
4. Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
6. Baquero, A. (2023). Hotel employees’ burnout and intention to quit: the role of psychological distress and financial well-being in a moderation mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 84.
7. Bianchi, R., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2023). Examining the evidence base for burnout. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 101(11), 743. http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.289996
8. Bianchi, R., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2025). Beliefs about burnout. Work & Stress, 39(2), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2024.2364590

9. Biró, A., Jánosi-Rancz, K. T., & Szilágyi, L. (2024). Real-time artificial intelligence text analysis for identifying burnout syndromes in high-performance athletes. In 2024 IEEE 22nd world symposium on applied machine intelligence and informatics (SAMI) (pp. 000253–000258). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI60510.2024.10432817
10. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
12. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
13. Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.
14. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
15. Çalışkan, A. & Koç, M. (2025). Intention To Quit Scale: A New Approach In The Context Of Changing Working Conditions. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11 (1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1682394
16. Çalışkan, A. (2025). Assessing Organizational Change Capability Through A Multisectoral Study: Development and Validation of The Change Management Scale. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11 (2), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1811002
17. Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, Ö. (2023). Job Satisfaction: A Scale Development Study. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (2), 112-134. https://dx.doi.org/10.54969/abuijss.1440762
18. Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, Ö. (2025). Toward a comprehensive assessment of work climate: scale development and validation across sectors. Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM), 12(2), 40-52. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2009
19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
20. Demerouti, E. (2024). Burnout: a comprehensive review. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 78(4), 492-504.
21. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2025). Revitalising burnout research. Work & Stress, 39(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2025.2473385
22. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
23. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Edú-Valsania, S., Laguía, A., & Moriano, J. A. (2022). Burnout: A Review of Theory and Measurement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031780
25. Ercan, İ & Kan, İ. (2004). Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik, Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3):211-216.
26. Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
27. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
28. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
29. Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165.
30. Guseva Canu, I., Marca, S. C., Dell’Oro, F., Balázs, Á, Bergamaschi, E., Besse, C., Bianchi, R., Bianchi, R., Bislimovska, J., Koscec Bjelajac, A., Bugge, M., Busneag, C. I., Çağlayan, Ç., Cernițanu, M., Costa Pereira, C., Dernovšček Hafner, N., Droz, N., Eglite, M., Godderis, L., … Wahlen, A. (2021). Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 47 (2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3935
31. Gün, İ., Çetinkaya Kutun, F., & Söyük, S. (2025). Mediating effect of turnover intention on the relationship between job burnout and quiet quitting in nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(10), 6569-6577.
32. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
33. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Edition Prentice Hall.
34. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
35. Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C; & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA.
36. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev., 31, 2–24.
37. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
39. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
40. Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). Faktör analizi. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağıtım. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
41. Kniffin, K M, Narayanan, J, Anseel, F, Antonakis, J, Ashford, S P, Bakker, A B, Bamberger, P, Bapuji, H, Bhave, D P, Choi, V K, Creary, S J, Demerouti, E, Flynn, F J, Gelfand, M J, Greer, L L, Johns, G, Kesebir, S, Klein, P G, Lee, S Y, Ozcelik, H, Petriglieri, J L, Rothbard, N P, Rudolph, C W, Shaw, J D, Sirola, N, Wanberg, C R, Whillans, A, Wilmot, M P and van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76 (1). pp. 63-77. ISSN 0003-066X https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000716
42. Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720 Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2020). The job demands–resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 34(2), 1–30.
43. Lesener, T.; Gusy, B.; Wolter, C. (2018). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work. Stress, 33, 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065
44. Liu H, Ding N, Li X, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(11):e2448714. https://doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48714
45. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2 (2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
46. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
47. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. (1996). The maslach burnout inventory manual (3rd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press.
48. McConnell, J. W. (2025). Who will burn out, and who will leave? Demographic predictors of burnout and intent to quit in world language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 13621688251320584.
49. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfac-tion and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237-240.
50. Mohamad, M. S., Makhbul, Z. K. M., Ayob, A. H., & Ali, M. H. (2023). Intention to quit as mediator in occupational stress and burnout relationship. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(8), 7.
51. Mohr DC, Elnahal S, Marks ML, Derickson R, Osatuke K. Burnout Trends Among US Health Care Workers. JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8 (4): e255954. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5954
52. Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020).
53. Wellbeing Costs of Technology Use during Covid-19 Remote Working: An Investigation Using the Italian Translation of the Technostress Creators Scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
54. Nadon, L., De Beer, L. T., & Morin, A. J. S. (2022). Should Burnout Be Conceptualized as a Mental Disorder? Behavioral Sciences, 12(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12030082
55. Opoku, D. A., Ayisi-Boateng, N. K., Osarfo, J., Sulemana, A., Mohammed, A., Spangenberg, K., ... & Edusei, A. K. (2022). Attrition of nursing professionals in Ghana: an effect of burnout on intention to quit. Nursing Research and Practice, 2022(1), 3100344.
56. Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(1-2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.48
57. Schweizer, K. (2014). On the Ways of Investigating the Discriminant Validity of a Scale in Giving Special Emphasis to Estimation Problems When Investigating Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56(1), 45-59.
58. Sonnentag, S. (2018). The recovery paradox: Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIOB.2018.11.002
59. Spagnoli, P., Haynes, N., Kovalchuk, L. S., Clark, M. A., Buono, C., & Balducci, C. (2020). Workload, workaholism, and job performance: Uncovering their complex relationship. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186536
60. Spagnoli, P., Molino, M., Molinaro, D., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). Workaholism and Technostress During the COVID-19 Emergency: The Crucial Role of the Leaders on Remote Working. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 620310. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.620310
61. Stevan E. Hobfoll, Jonathon Halbesleben, Jean-Pierre Neveu, Mina Westman. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annual Review Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 5:103-128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
62. Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010). Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.003
63. Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169
64. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
65. Turunç, Ö., Çalışkan, A., Turgut, H., & Mert, İ. S. (2018). Moderating role of job satisfaciton on the relation between leadership styles and organizational silence, Journal of Business Research-Turk, 10(3), 350-361.
66. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work. Journal of Management, 42, 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
67. Vaziri, H., Casper, W. J., Wayne, J. H., & Matthews, R. A. (2020). Changes to the work-family interface during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining predictors and implications using latent transition analysis. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000819
68. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
69. Westen, D. & Rosenthal R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (3), 608-618.
70. World Health Organization (2019). Burn-out an occupational phenomenon: International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).
71. Worthington, R.L. and Whittaker, T.A. (2006) Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127