Shadows in Disguise: The Evolution of Mista’arvim Units in Israel’s Strategic Culture

Öz

This article explores how the creation and normalization of Mista’arvim units reflect Israel’s strategic culture and constructed perceptions of threat. Rooted in the belief that Israel exists in a permanently hostile regional environment, its strategic culture emphasizes preemptive and covert security practices. The study focuses on three interrelated dimensions of threat construction: the social production of threat, the normalization of clandestine operations, and the reproduction of threat narratives in popular culture. Employing interpretive analysis of official and media narratives as its primary methodology, the article investigates how Mista’arvim units—Israeli undercover forces operating by impersonating Palestinians—both embody and reinforce state narratives. The article assumes threat perception is not an objective reality but is shaped by political discourse and institutional practices. The findings suggest that these units do not merely respond to security concerns but actively participate in constructing the very threats they aim to eliminate. This analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between strategic culture and threat perception in Israel.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Israel
• Strategic Culture
• Threat Perception
• Mista'arvim

Kılık Değiştirmiş Gölgeler: İsrail'in Stratejik Kültüründe Mista’arvim Birimlerinin Dönüşümü

Öz

Bu makale, Mista’arvim birimlerinin kurulması ve normalleşmesinin, İsrail’in stratejik kültürünü ve inşa edilmiş tehdit algılarını nasıl yansıttığını incelemektedir. İsrail’in kalıcı olarak düşmanca bir bölgesel ortamda var olduğu inancına dayanan stratejik kültürü, önleyici ve örtük güvenlik uygulamalarını vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, tehdit inşasının üç birbiriyle ilişkili boyutuna odaklanmaktadır: tehdidin toplumsal üretimi, gizli operasyonların normalleşmesi ve tehdit anlatılarının popüler kültürde yeniden üretilmesi. Resmî ve medya anlatılarının yorumlayıcı analizini birincil yöntemi olarak kullanan bu makale, Mista’arvim birimlerinin — Filistinli kılığına girerek operasyon yürüten İsrail gizli kuvvetlerinin — nasıl hem devlet anlatılarını somutlaştırdığını hem de pekiştirdiğini incelemektedir. Makale, tehdit algısının nesnel bir gerçeklik değil; siyasal söylem ve kurumsal pratikler tarafından şekillendirildiği varsayımına dayanmaktadır. Bulgular, bu birimlerin yalnızca güvenlik endişelerine yanıt vermediğini, aynı zamanda ortadan kaldırmayı hedefledikleri tehditleri aktif biçimde inşa ettiklerini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu analiz, İsrail’de stratejik kültür ile tehdit algısı arasındaki etkileşime dair daha derin bir anlayışa katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Israel
• Stratejik Kültür
• Tehtit Algısı
• Mista'arvim

Kaynakça

1. Ali, S. (2022). “Strategic Culture and Inter-State Relations: A Case of Pakistan and India.” Margalla Papers 26 (1): 121-131.
2. Alkhateeb, H. (2024). The securitisation of the other through language planning: The Israeli case. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1(23). https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2024.2442203
3. Barak, O., & Inbar, D. (2021). Studying international relations through horror films: A new approach and illustrations from Cannon Fodder and Freak Out. International Studies Perspectives, 22(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa004
4. Beaumont, P. (2016, February 10). Netanyahu plans a fence around Israel to protect it from 'wild beasts.' The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/10/netanyahu-plans-fence-around-israel-to-protect-it-from-wild-beasts
5. Ben-Ephraim, S. (2020). From strategic narrative to strategic culture: Labor Zionism and the roots of Israeli strategic culture. Comparative Strategy, 39(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2020.1718988
6. Cohen, S. A. (1994, April). Mista’arvim – IDF ‘masqueraders’: The military unit and the public debate (BESA Security and Policy Studies No. 16). Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies.
7. Cormac, R., Walton, C., & Van Puyvelde, D. (2022). What constitutes successful covert action? Evaluating unacknowledged interventionism in foreign affairs. Review of International Studies, 48(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000231
8. Crandall, C., Cox, O., Beasley, R., & Omelicheva, M. (2016). Covert operations, wars, detainee destinations, and the psychology of democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(5), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716669572

9. David, A. (2018, January 11). The Mista’arvim — Israel’s notorious death squads or elite undercover units? Medium. https://medium.com/@annetdavid/the-mistaarvim-israel-s-notorious-death-squads-or-elite-undercover-units-18aa1f37c657
10. Denoël, Y. (2024). Mossad: 75 ans d'opérations spéciales. Historia, (926). https://www.historia.fr/histoire-du-monde/moyen-orient/le-mossad-75-ans-doperations-speciales-2071854
11. Fried, Y. (2020). Military, civilian, or both: David Ben-Gurion’s perception of national security after the War of Independence. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 7(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347798920901866
12. German, T. (2020). Harnessing protest potential: Russian strategic culture and the colored revolutions. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1757251
13. Giles, G. F. (2009). Continuity and change in Israel’s strategic culture. In Comparative Strategy (pp. 97–116). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618305_7
14. Joly, V. (2024, January 31). Les « mista’arvim », ces forces spéciales israéliennes qui s’infiltrent en territoire palestinien. La Croix. https://www.la-croix.com/international/les-mista-arvim-ces-forces-speciales-israeliennes-qui-sinfiltrent-en-territoire-palestinien-20240131
15. Kahana, E., & Suwaed, M. (2009). Historical dictionary of Middle Eastern intelligence. The Scarecrow Press.
16. Karkabi, N., & Mendel, Y. (2023). Sonic masquerading in Israeli popular music: Self-imitation, accent, and mockery. Cultural Studies, 37(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1981960
17. Lantis, J. S. (2002). Strategic culture and national security policy. International Studies Review, 4(3), 87–113 https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00266
18. Levy, Y. (2013). The theocratization of the Israeli military. Armed Forces & Society, 40(2), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X12466071
19. Libel, T. (2016). Explaining the security paradigm shift: Strategic culture, epistemic communities, and Israel’s changing national security policy. Defence Studies, 16(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2016.1165595
20. Mansour, J. (2004). The Arabists: Beginnings, crimes, training, and tasks. Journal of Israeli Issues, 15(Summer), 6–20.
21. Mendel, Y. (2013). Re-Arabizing the de-Arabized: The Mista'aravim Unit of the Palmach. In Z. Elmarsafy, A. Bernard, & D. Attwell (Eds.), Debating Orientalism (pp. 94-116). Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Mendel, Y., & Karkabi, N. (2023). The re-enchantment of the Orient: Mista‘arvim and their special status in Jewish-Israeli society. The Middle East Journal, 77(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.3751/77.2.12
23. Middle East Monitor. (2015, October 12). Profiling Israel’s elite undercover unit Duvdevan. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20151012-profiling-israels-elite-undercover-unit-duvdevan/
24. Moussa, E. (2022, April 18). The Mista'arvim: Israel's notorious undercover agents. The New Arab. https://www.newarab.com/analysis/mistaarvim-israels-notorious-undercover-agents
25. Munk, Y. (2019). Fauda: The Israeli occupation on a prime time television drama; or, the melodrama of the enemy. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 17(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2019.1666655
26. Olesker, R. (2013). National identity and securitization in Israel. Ethnicities, 14(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813504093
27. Schwartzbrod, A. (2019, February 20). “Espions de nulle part”, commando d’infortune. Libération. https://www.liberation.fr/livres/2019/02/20/espions-de-nulle-part-commando-d-infortune_1710590/
28. Sheffer, G., & Barak, O. (2013). Israel’s security networks: A theoretical and comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
29. Snyder, J. L. (1977). The Soviet strategic culture.
30. Sof, E. (2013, October 23). IDF Mistaravim (YAMAS). Combat Operators. https://combatoperators.com/units/tier-2/idf-mistaravim-yamas/
31. Taussig, M. (1993). Mimesis and alterity: A particular history of the senses. Routledge.
32. van Nieuwkerk, A. (2014). The strategic culture of foreign and security policymaking: Examining the Southern African Development Community. African Security, 7(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2014.880031
33. Zureik, T. E. (2016). Strategies of surveillance: The Israeli gaze. Jerusalem Quarterly, 66. https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/202338