Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 36 - 59, 29.05.2017

Öz

Ukrayna krizi Avrupa güvenliğinin kurumsal yapısını derinden etkilemektedir. Ancak Ukrayna krizi Avrupa güvenliğindeki yapısal sorunların nedeni olmaktan ziyade bir sonucu olarak kabul edilmelidir. Bu çalışmanın temel varsayımı Avrupa güvenlik yapılanmasının Ukrayna krizini önleyebilecek araçlara sahip olmadığı ve hatta krizin ortaya çıkmasına büyük ölçüde bu yapılanmadaki temel sorunların yol açtığıdır. Üzerinde durulan başlıca yapısal sorun Rusya’nın Avrupa güvenlik mimarisinde nasıl konumlandırılacağıdır. Bu noktada ortaya atılan tez Avrupa güvenlik kurumlarının Rus güvenlik ihtiyaçlarını yansıtacak şekilde inşa edilmediği ve Avrupa güvenliğinin dışına itildikçe Rusya’nın Avrupa için bir tehdit haline geldiğidir. Dolayısıyla Ukrayna krizini Rusya’nın yayılmacı ve saldırgan politikası ile açıklamak indirgemeci bir yaklaşım olmaktadır. Ukrayna krizini açıklayabilmek adına Avrupa güvenlik mimarisinin karşılaştığı yapısal sorunlar ortaya konulmak ve ayrıca Ukrayna krizinin bu yapısal sorunlara getirdiği yeni dinamikler tartışılmak istenmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • ARBATOVA Nadezhda K. – Alexander A. Dynkın, “World Order after Ukraine”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, , LVIII/1, 2016, s. 71-90. BARANOVSKY Vladimir, “Russia: A Part of Europe or Apart from Europe?”, International Affairs, LXXVI/3, 2000, s. 443-458. CHARAP Samuel, “Ukraine: Seeking an Elusive New Normal”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, LVI/3, 2014, s. 85-94. CHARAP Samuel – Keith Darden, “Russia and Ukraine”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, LVI/2, 2014, s. 7-14. CHARAP Samuel – Jeremy Shapıro, “A New European Security Order: The Ukraine Crisis and the Missing Post-Cold War Bargain”, Les notes de la Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, Sayı:15, 2014. CHARAP Samuel – Mikhail Troıtskıy, “Russia, the West and the Integration Dilemma”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, LV/6, 2013, s. 49-62. CORNELL Svante E., “The Fallacy of ‘Compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria”, European View, XV/1, 2016, s. 97-109. EROL Mehmet Seyfettin, “‘Ukrayna-Kırım Krizi’ ya da ‘İkinci Yalta Süreci’”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, XI/41, 2014, s. 1-14. EROL Mehmet Seyfettin – Aidarbek Amirbek, “Avrasya’da Yeni Tehditler ve Güvenlik Arayışı: Kolektif Güvenlik Antlaşması Örgütü’nün Geleeği”, Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, der., Türk Dış Politikasında Strateji Arayışları: Türkiye’nin Güncel Güvenlik Sorunları: Ülkeler, Bölgeler, Örgütler, Barış Kitabevi, Ankara 2011, s. 313-334. HIGASHINO Atsuko, “For the Sake of ‘Peace and Security’? The Role of Security in the European Union Enlargement Eastwards”, Cooperation and Conflict, XXXIX/4, 2004, s. 347-368. KALB Marvin, Imperial Gamble: Putin, Ukraine, and the New Cold War, Brookings Institution Press, 2015. KAMP Karl-Heinz, “From Wales to Warsaw: NATO's Future beyond the Ukraine Crisis”, American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, XXXVI/6, 2014, s. 361-365. LARRABEE F. Stephen vd., The Ukrainian Crisis and European Security Implications for the United States and U.S. Army, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2015. LAYTON Samuel, “Reframing European security: Russia’s proposal for a new European security architecture”, International Relations, XXVIII/1, 2014, s. 25-45. LEGVOLD Robert, Return to Cold War, Polity Press, Cambridge 2016. LUCAS Edward, The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West, 3. Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, Londra 2014. MEARSHEIMER John J., “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin”, Foreign Affairs, XCIII/5, 2014, s. 77-89. North Atlantic Council, London Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, Londra 5-6 Temmuz 1990, 28 Nisan 2017, http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c900706a.htm. North Atlantic Council, Bucharest Summit Declaration Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008, Bükreş, 28 Nisan 2017, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8443.htm. PABRIKS Artis, “European Security: Stop Sleeping and Wake Up”, European View, XIII/2, 2014, s. 259-268. RASMUSSEN Mikkel Vedby vd., The Ukraine Crisis and the End of the Post-Cold War European Order: Options for NATO and the EU, Centre for Military Studies University of Copenhagen, Kopenhag 2014. SAKWA Richard, “The Death of Europe? Continental Fates after Ukraine”, International Affairs, XCI/3, 2015, s. 553-579. TRENIN Dmitri, The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border Between Geopolitics and Globalization, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC 2002. WALKER Edward W., “Between East and West: NATO Enlargement and the Geopolitics of the Ukraine Crisis”. Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska – Richard Sakwa, der., Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives, E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol 2015, s. 141-154. WÆVER Ole, “The European Security Triangle”, Jaap de Wilde, der., Organized Anarchy in Europe: The Role of States and Intergovernmental Organizations, Tauris, London 1995, s. 245–266. WÆVER Ole, “European Security Identities”, Journal of Common Market Studies, XXXIV/1, 1996, s. 103-132.

The Ukrainian Crisis and the Future of European Security Architecture

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 36 - 59, 29.05.2017

Öz

The Ukrainian crisis is deeply affecting the institutional structure of European security. However, the Ukrainian crisis should be regarded as a consequence of the structural problems of European security, not a reason for them. The basic assumption of this work is that the European security structure did not have the means to prevent the Ukrainian crisis and the emergence of the crisis is largely caused by fundamental problems in this edifice. The main operational problem is how Russia will be positioned in European security architecture. European security institutions do not reflect Russian security concerns. Russia’s ability to affect developments in European security is reduced. Russia finds itself pushed to the periphery of the continent. Therefore, it is a reductionist approach to explaining the Ukrainian crisis with the expansionist and aggressive policy of Russia. This work is aimed at revealing the structural problems faced by the European security architecture and discussing the new dynamics added by the Ukrainian crisis on these structural problems.

Kaynakça

  • ARBATOVA Nadezhda K. – Alexander A. Dynkın, “World Order after Ukraine”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, , LVIII/1, 2016, s. 71-90. BARANOVSKY Vladimir, “Russia: A Part of Europe or Apart from Europe?”, International Affairs, LXXVI/3, 2000, s. 443-458. CHARAP Samuel, “Ukraine: Seeking an Elusive New Normal”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, LVI/3, 2014, s. 85-94. CHARAP Samuel – Keith Darden, “Russia and Ukraine”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, LVI/2, 2014, s. 7-14. CHARAP Samuel – Jeremy Shapıro, “A New European Security Order: The Ukraine Crisis and the Missing Post-Cold War Bargain”, Les notes de la Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, Sayı:15, 2014. CHARAP Samuel – Mikhail Troıtskıy, “Russia, the West and the Integration Dilemma”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, LV/6, 2013, s. 49-62. CORNELL Svante E., “The Fallacy of ‘Compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria”, European View, XV/1, 2016, s. 97-109. EROL Mehmet Seyfettin, “‘Ukrayna-Kırım Krizi’ ya da ‘İkinci Yalta Süreci’”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, XI/41, 2014, s. 1-14. EROL Mehmet Seyfettin – Aidarbek Amirbek, “Avrasya’da Yeni Tehditler ve Güvenlik Arayışı: Kolektif Güvenlik Antlaşması Örgütü’nün Geleeği”, Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, der., Türk Dış Politikasında Strateji Arayışları: Türkiye’nin Güncel Güvenlik Sorunları: Ülkeler, Bölgeler, Örgütler, Barış Kitabevi, Ankara 2011, s. 313-334. HIGASHINO Atsuko, “For the Sake of ‘Peace and Security’? The Role of Security in the European Union Enlargement Eastwards”, Cooperation and Conflict, XXXIX/4, 2004, s. 347-368. KALB Marvin, Imperial Gamble: Putin, Ukraine, and the New Cold War, Brookings Institution Press, 2015. KAMP Karl-Heinz, “From Wales to Warsaw: NATO's Future beyond the Ukraine Crisis”, American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, XXXVI/6, 2014, s. 361-365. LARRABEE F. Stephen vd., The Ukrainian Crisis and European Security Implications for the United States and U.S. Army, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2015. LAYTON Samuel, “Reframing European security: Russia’s proposal for a new European security architecture”, International Relations, XXVIII/1, 2014, s. 25-45. LEGVOLD Robert, Return to Cold War, Polity Press, Cambridge 2016. LUCAS Edward, The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West, 3. Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, Londra 2014. MEARSHEIMER John J., “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin”, Foreign Affairs, XCIII/5, 2014, s. 77-89. North Atlantic Council, London Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, Londra 5-6 Temmuz 1990, 28 Nisan 2017, http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c900706a.htm. North Atlantic Council, Bucharest Summit Declaration Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008, Bükreş, 28 Nisan 2017, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8443.htm. PABRIKS Artis, “European Security: Stop Sleeping and Wake Up”, European View, XIII/2, 2014, s. 259-268. RASMUSSEN Mikkel Vedby vd., The Ukraine Crisis and the End of the Post-Cold War European Order: Options for NATO and the EU, Centre for Military Studies University of Copenhagen, Kopenhag 2014. SAKWA Richard, “The Death of Europe? Continental Fates after Ukraine”, International Affairs, XCI/3, 2015, s. 553-579. TRENIN Dmitri, The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border Between Geopolitics and Globalization, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC 2002. WALKER Edward W., “Between East and West: NATO Enlargement and the Geopolitics of the Ukraine Crisis”. Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska – Richard Sakwa, der., Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives, E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol 2015, s. 141-154. WÆVER Ole, “The European Security Triangle”, Jaap de Wilde, der., Organized Anarchy in Europe: The Role of States and Intergovernmental Organizations, Tauris, London 1995, s. 245–266. WÆVER Ole, “European Security Identities”, Journal of Common Market Studies, XXXIV/1, 1996, s. 103-132.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Emre Ozan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Mayıs 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ozan, E. (2017). UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI. Uluslararası Kriz Ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 36-59.
AMA Ozan E. UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI. UKSAD. Mayıs 2017;1(1):36-59.
Chicago Ozan, Emre. “UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI”. Uluslararası Kriz Ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi 1, sy. 1 (Mayıs 2017): 36-59.
EndNote Ozan E (01 Mayıs 2017) UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI. Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi 1 1 36–59.
IEEE E. Ozan, “UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI”, UKSAD, c. 1, sy. 1, ss. 36–59, 2017.
ISNAD Ozan, Emre. “UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI”. Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi 1/1 (Mayıs 2017), 36-59.
JAMA Ozan E. UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI. UKSAD. 2017;1:36–59.
MLA Ozan, Emre. “UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI”. Uluslararası Kriz Ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 36-59.
Vancouver Ozan E. UKRAYNA KRIZI VE AVRUPA GÜVENLIK MIMARISININ GELECEĞI. UKSAD. 2017;1(1):36-59.