AN INDIVIDUAL LEVEL INVESTIGATION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BEING A SINGLE PARENT AND POVERTY

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 450 - 460, 30.06.2023

Esra Karapınar Kocağ

https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1272664

Öz

Single parenting has been a growing type of family structure both in Western countries and Eastern ones. Changing economic and social conditions have contributed to this growth. Poverty or worsening welfare is also a growing concern in society. This study, therefore, investigates whether being a single parent is associated with a poverty risk. To do so, The Current Population Survey (CPS) which is a commonly used data source applied in social science from Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) database were utilised. Being a reliable source with large sample sizes and various subjects covered in the U.S. population makes IPUMS widely preferable data source with micro level data on individuals and household. This empirical investigation, therefore, relies on IPUMS CPS data to explain poverty risk of single parents. Findings reveal that being a single parent is significantly associated with being below the poverty line. Additionally, sex, age, employment status, education level, race, and citizenship status were found to be significant to explain poverty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Single-parent family, poverty risk, IPUMS CPS

TEK EBEVEYN OLMAK İLE YOKSULLUK İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİREYSEL DÜZEYDE BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Tek ebeveynlik, hem Batı ülkelerinde hem de Doğu ülkelerinde büyüyen bir aile yapısı türü olmuştur. Değişen ekonomik ve sosyal koşullar bu büyümeye katkıda bulunmuştur. Yoksulluk veya kötüleşen refah da toplumda artan bir endişe kaynağıdır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma, bekâr bir ebeveyn olmanın yoksulluk riski ile ilişkili olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Bunun için, Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) veri tabanından sosyal bilimlerde uygulanan ve yaygın olarak kullanılan bir veri kaynağı olan Current Population Survey (CPS) kullanılmıştır. Büyük örneklem boyutları ve ABD popülasyonunda kapsanan çeşitli konularla güvenilir bir kaynak olması, bireyler ve hanehalkı hakkında mikro düzeyde veriler içeren IPUMS'u yaygın olarak tercih edilen bir veri kaynağı haline getirmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu ampirik araştırma, bekar ebeveynlerin yoksulluk riskini açıklamak için IPUMS CPS verilerine dayanmaktadır. Bulgular, tek ebeveyn olmanın yoksulluk sınırının altında olmakla önemli ölçüde ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca cinsiyet, yaş, çalışma durumu, eğitim düzeyi, ırk ve vatandaşlık durumunun da yoksulluğu açıklamada anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

tek ebeveynli aile, yoksulluk riski, IPUMS CPS

Kaynakça

• Atkinson, A. B. (1992). Measuring Poverty and Differences in Family Composition. Economica, 59(233), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555062
• Beiser, M., Hou, F., Hyman, I., & Tousignant, M. (2002). Poverty, Family Process, and the Mental Health of Immigrant Children in Canada. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.2.220
• Butler, A. C. (1996). The Effect of Welfare Benefit Levels on Poverty among Single-Parent Families. Social Problems, 43(1), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096896
• Casper, L. M., McLanahan, S. S., & Garfinkel, I. (1994). The Gender-Poverty Gap: What We Can Learn from Other Countries. American Sociological Review, 59(4), 594–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095933
• Chamie, J. (2016). 320 Million Children in Single-Parent Families. Global Issues Social, Political, Economic and Environmental Issues That Affect Us All. https://www.globalissues.org/news/2016/10/15/22568#:~:text=NEW YORKpercent 2C Oct 15 (IPS,often headed by single mothers.
• Cheung, K. C.-K. (2015). Child Poverty in Hong Kong Single-Parent Families. Child Indicators Research, 8(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9256-4
• Flug, Karnit and Kasir, Nitsa, The Single Parent Law, Labor Supply and Poverty (April 1, 2006). Israel Economic Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 59-110 (2006), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2175604
• Garis, D. (1998). Poverty, Single-Parent Households, and Youth At-Risk Behavior: An Empirical Study. Journal of Economic Issues, 32(4), 1079–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506110
• Gillham, B., Tanner, G., Cheyne, B., Freeman, I., Rooney, M., & Lambie, A. (1998). Unemployment rates, single parent density, and indices of child poverty: Their relationship to different categories of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00134-8
• Guttmann, A., Dick, P., & To, T. (2004). Infant hospitalization and maternal depression, poverty and single parenthood – a population-based study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 30(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00390.x
• Li, Q. (2020). Mothers left without a man: Poverty and single parenthood in China. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 114–122.
• Maldonado, L. C., & Nieuwenhuis, R. (2015). Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978–2008. Community, Work & Family, 18(4), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1080661
• Nieuwenhuis, R., & Maldonado, L. C. (Eds.). (2018). The triple bind of single-parent families (1st ed.). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2204rvq
• Sarah Flood, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V10.0
• Walker, J., Crawford, K., & Taylor, F. (2008). Listening to children: gaining a perspective of the experiences of poverty and social exclusion from children and young people of single-parent families. Health & Social Care in the Community, 16(4), 429–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00781.x
• Zalewski, M., Lengua, L. J., Fisher, P. A., Trancik, A., Bush, N. R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2012). Poverty and Single Parenting: Relations with Preschoolers’ Cortisol and Effortful Control. Infant and Child Development, 21(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1759