THE CUSTOMARY STATUS OF THE MONTREUX CONVENTION: A LEGAL BASIS FOR REGIONAL STABILITY AND ITS INTERNATIONAL IMPLICATIONS
Öz
This study examines whether the Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits has acquired normative status under customary international law, focusing on its role in regional stability and its broader legal implications. The research employs a legal-analytical framework grounded in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), assessing the two foundational elements of customary international law—state practice (usus) and opinio juris. The analysis draws on nearly ninety years of consistent implementation by both party and non-party states, including NATO, the EU, and the US, as well as treaty interpretations, diplomatic notes, and scholarly discourse. The study demonstrates that the Montreux Convention has evolved beyond a treaty-based regime into a customary norm, particularly at the regional level. Key provisions, such as warship passage restrictions, tonnage limitations, and notification requirements, reflect entrenched and stable state practice accompanied by a belief in their legal obligation. Despite partial doctrinal objections and conflicts with UNCLOS, the Convention’s widespread adherence supports its recognition as a regional customary rule. The Montreux Convention’s customary character ensures its enduring validity, even in the event of termination. Its core principles contribute to regional maritime security and the predictability of international law, reinforcing its dual role as both a treaty and a customary regime.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Montreux Convention, Customary International Law, International Straits
Kaynakça
- Akehurst, M. (1974). Custom as a Source of International Law. British Yearbook of International Law, 47(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/47.1.1
- Aras, F. Ç. (2023). 7. Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı ve Hindistan'ın Yaklaşımı. In A. Özer & F. Taşdemir (Eds.), Stepler, Dinyeper ve Barut: Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı'nın Uluslararası Hukuk Veçhesi (pp. 763–784). Adalet Yayınevi.
- BBC Turkish. (2021, March 29). Mustafa Şentop: The President Can Annul Montreux if He Wishes. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-56573368, [Accessed on 09.05.2025].
- Bozkaya, M. (2021, April 15). Legal Observations on Recent Debates about the Montreux Convention Regarding the Straits and Kanal Istanbul. Institude. https://www.institude.org/opinion/montro-bogazlar-sozlesmesi-ve-kanal-istanbul-hakkindaki-guncel-tartismalara-iliskin-hukuki-gozlemler, [Accessed on 19.04.2025].
- Byers, M. (1999). Conclusions. In Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law. Cambridge University Press.
- Daly, J. C. K. (2008, August 21). Analysis: Naval aspects of the South Ossetia confrontation. United Press International. https://www.upi.com/Energy-News/2008/08/21/Analysis-Naval-aspects-of-the-South-Ossetia-confrontation/52431219349503/
- D'Amato, A. (1988). Custom and Treaty: A Response to Professor Weisburd. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 21(3), 459–474. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol21/iss 3/2
- D'Amato, A. A. (1969). The Concept of Special Custom in International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 63(2), 211–223.
- Demir, İ. (2018). The Denunciation of Montreux Straits Convention. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 136(1), 327–358. https://tbbdergisi.barobirlik.org.tr/m2018-136-1778
- Doğru, S. (2013). Türk Boğazları’nın Hukukî Statüsü: Sevr ve Lozan’dan Montrö’ye Geçiş. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 123-169.