THE ADAPTABILITY OF MANAGEMENT MODELS ACROSS CULTURES

Yıl 2015, , 295 - 316, 20.04.2015

Yusuf Yüksel Tuncay Durna

https://doi.org/10.18092/ijeas.49505

Öz

With the emergence of globalization, the transfer of management principles and models and technology between the organizations has become a common practice. This situation inevitably increased in research about the issue of similarities and differences between societies, organizations, nations, and individuals. This article aims to contribute to this line of research by discussing the convergence or divergence of national cultures and related work values. This article suggests that although a degree of convergence occurs in the structure and ordinary practices of organizations, there is little convergence in the thinking, behavior, beliefs, and values of people in organizations. This assumption is elaborated, in this article, by referring to differences in national cultural features in terms of communication, leadership style, motivators, and performance measurement systems. All organizations need to take into account differences in the national cultural features before adapting a management model or principle originated in another country

Anahtar Kelimeler

National Culture, Communication, Leadership, Motivation, Performance Management

YÖNETİM MODELLERİNİN KÜLTÜRLERARASI UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ

Öz

Küreselleşmenin ortaya çıkması ile birlikte, yönetim prensipleri, modelleri ve teknolojinin farklı ülkelerde yer alan kurumlar arasında tranferi yaygın bir uygulamaya dönüşmüştür. Bu durum toplumlar, kurumlar, ülkeler ve kişiler arasındaki benzerlikler ve farklıklar ile ilgili araştırmaların kaçınılmaz biçimde artması sonucunu doğurmuştur. Bu makale, ulusal kültür ve iş yaşamı ile ilgili ulusal değerlerin benzeşmesi ve farklılaşmasını tartışarak bu yöndeki araştırmalara katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu makale, farklı ülkelerdeki kurumların yapısında ve günlük uygulamalarında belli bir oranda benzeşme olsa da, bu kurumlarda çalışan bireylerin düşünme tarzları, davranışları, inançları ve değerleri noktasında çok az benzerlik bulunduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Bu varsayım, farklı ulusal kültür özelliklerinin iletişim, liderlik tarzları, motivasyon ve performans yönetim sistemlerine yansımaları ile örneklendirilmektedir. Kurumların farklı ülke kaynaklı bir yönetim modeli ve prensibini kendi kurumuna uyarlarken ulusal kültür farklılıklarını dikkate alması gerekmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ulusal Kültür, İletişim, Liderlik, Motivasyon, Performans Yönetimi

Kaynakça

• ADLER, N. J. (1983), “Cross-cultural management research: The ostrich and the trend”, The Academy of Management Review, 8, 226-232.
• ADLER, N. J., & GRAHAM, J. L. (1989), “Cross-cultural interaction: The international comparison fallacy”, Journal of International Business Studies, 20, 515-537.
• ADLER, N. J., & BARTHOLOMEW, S. (1992), “Academic and professional countries of discourse: Generating knowledge on transnational human resource management”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 551-559.
• AWASTHİ, V, N, & CHOW, C.W., & WU, A. (1998), “Performance measure and resource expenditure choices in a teamwork environment: The effects of national culture”, Management Accounting Research, 9, 119-138.
• BURNS, J. M. (1978), “Leadership”, New York: Harper and Row.
• CALORI, R., & LUBATKIN, M. & VERY, P. (1994), “Control mechanisms in cross-border acquisitions: An international comparison”, Organization Studies, 15, 361-379.
• CHILD, J., & KIESER, A. (1981), “Organizational and managerial role in British and West German companies: An examination of the culture-free thesis”, In D.J. Hickson & C. J. McMillan (Eds.), Organization and nation: The Aston Programme IV (pp. 51-73). Hampshire: Gower Publishing Co.
• COLLINS, D. (1998), “Organizational change: Sociological perspectives”. London: Routledge.
• CULLEN, R. (1995), “Public sector performance and private sector management”, In D. P. Cushman & S. S. King (Eds.), Communicating organizational change: A management perspective (pp.147-190). Albany: State University of New York Press.
• DORFMAN, P. W., & HOWELL, J.P. (1997), “Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership”, Leadership Quarterly, 8, 232-274.
• EISENBERG, E. M. (1984), “Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication”, Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
• EISENBERG, E. M.,&GOODALL, H. L. (1993), “Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint”, Bedford: St Martin’s.
• FAIRCHILD, E. S. (1989), “National culture and police organization in Germany and the United States”, Public Administration Review, 49, 454-462.
• FEY, C. F. (2005), “Opening the black box of motivation: A cross-cultural comparison of Sweden and Russia”, International Business Review, 14, 345-367.
• GOODMAN, M. B. (Ed.) (1994), “Corporate Communication: Theory and Practice”, Albany: State university of New York Press.
• HACKMAN, M. Z., & JOHNSON, C. E. (2004), “Leadership: A communication perspective”, (4th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
• HOFSTEDE, G., & HOFSTEDE G. J. (2005), “Cultures and organizations”, Software of the mind, New York: McGraw Hill.
• HOFSTEDE, G. (1980a), “Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values”, Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
• HOFSTEDE, G. (1980b), “Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?”, Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 14-42.
• HUANG, X., & VLİERT, E. V. (2003), “Where intrinsic job satisfaction fails to work: National moderators of intrinsic Motivation”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 159-179.
• JAEGER, A. M. (1986), “Organizational development and national culture: Where is the fit?” Academy of Management Review, 11, 178-190.
• KEDIA, B. L., & BHAGAT, R. S. (1988), “Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management”, The Academy of Management Review, 13, 559-571.
• KIM, K, PARK, H., & SUZUKI, N. (1990), “Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures” Academy of Management Journal, 33, 188-198.
• KIRKMAN, B. L., LOWE, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006), “A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework”, Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285-320.
• KOOPMAN, P. L., & HARTOG, D. N. & KONRAD, E. (1999), “National culture and leadership profiles in Europe: Some results from the GLOBE study”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 503-520.
• LEWIN, A. Y., & KIM, J. (2004), “The nation-state and culture as influences on organizational change and innovation”, In M.S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp.324-353). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• LLORENS, F.J., MOLINA, L.M., & VERDU, A.J. (2005), “Flexibility of manufacturing systems, strategic change and performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, 98, 273-289.
• MARTIN, E. (1995), “Communication in Asian job interviews”, In D. P. Cushman & S. S. King (Eds.), Communicating organizational change: A management perspective (pp.275-309). Albany: State University of New York Press.
• MUELLER, F. (1994), “Societal effect, organizational effect and globalization”, Organization Studies, 15, 407-428.
• NEWMAN, K. L., & NOLLEN, S. D. (1996), “Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture”, Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 753-779.
• OLIE, R. (1994), “Shades of culture and institutions in international mergers”, Organization Studies, 15, 381-405.
• PUFFER, S.M., MCCARTHY, D.J., & NAUMOV, A.I. (1997), “Russian managers’ beliefs about work: Beyond the stereotypes”, Journal of World Business, 32, 258-276.
• RALSTON, D. A., HOLT, D. H., TERPSTRA, R. H., & KAI-CHENG, Y. (2008), “The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China”, Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 8-26.
• REDDING G. S. (1994), “Comparative management theory: Jungle, zoo or fossil bed?”, Organization Studies, 15, 323-359.
• RUBEN, B. D. (2005), “Excellence in Higher Education: A Guide to Assessment, Planning and Improvement in Colleges and Universities”, Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers.
• SCHNEIDER, S.C. (1989)., “Strategy formulation: The impact of national culture”, Organization Studies, 10, 149-168.
• SCOTT, C. R., CORMAN, S. R., & CHENEY, G. (1998), “Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization”, Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
• SMIRCICH, L., & CALAS, M. F. (1987), “Organizational culture: A critical assessment”, In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts & L. Porters (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication, 228-263. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
• TAYEB, M. (1994), “Organizations and national culture: Methodology considered” Organization Studies, 15, 429-445.
• WITHERSPOON, P. D. (1997), “Communicating leadership: An organizational perspective”, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.