TESTING WEAK AND SEMI-STRONG FORM EFFICIENCY OF STOCK EXCHANGES IN EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION COUNTRIES: PANEL DATA CAUSALITY AND CO-INTEGRATION ANALYSIS

Yıl 2008, Sayı: 1, 0 - , 14.05.2015

Mustafa Torun Serdar Kurt

Öz

This study investigated that whether or not there is weak and semi-strong form efficiency of stock ex-changes in European Monetary Union Countries with panel data variables stock market price index, con-sumer price index, purchasing power of euro, unemployment. In order to test the weak form efficiency, we used panel unit root tests and also for the testing semi-strong form efficiency panel co-integration and causality analysis. The result from unit root analysis show that stock markets of European Monetary Un-ion countries is weak efficient. According to results of co-integration and causality analysis, some coun-tries aren’t semi-strong form efficient.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• ALPARSLAN, S. M. (1989), “Test of Weak Form Efficiency in Istanbul Stock Exchange”, Unpublished Master Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.
• BALABAN, E. (1995), “Informationally Efficiency of the Istanbul Securities Exchange and Some Rational for Public Regulation”, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department. Working Paper No: 9502, April.
• CHOI, I. (2001), “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data” Journal of International Money and Finance”, April, 20 (2), 249–272.
• COOPER, R. V. L. (1974), “Efficient Capital Markets and the Quantity The-ory of Money”, Journal of Finance, 29 (3), 887-908.
• DARRAT, A. F., MUKHERJEE, T. K. (1986), “The Behavior of Stock Mar-ket in a Developing Economy”, Economics Letters, 22, 273-278.
• ELY, D. P., ROBINSON, K. J. (1994), “Are Stocks a Hedge Against Infla-tion? International Evidence Using Co-integration Analysis”, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Financial Industry Studies Working Paper, No: 94-3.
• FAMA, E. F. (1970), “Efficient Capital Market: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Work”, Journal of Finance, May, 25 (2), 383-417.
• FAMA, E. F. (1981), “Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation and Money”, American Economic Review, 71 (4), 545-564.
• FRENNBERG, P., HANSSON, B. (1993), “Random Walk Hypothesis on Swedish Stock Prices: 1919-1990”, Journal of Banking and Finance, February, 17, 175-191.
• GONZÁLEZ, F., LAUNONEN, S. (2005), “Towards European Monetary In-tegration, the Evolution of Currency Risk Premium as a Measure for Monetary Con-vergence Prior to the Implementation of Currency Unions”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No: 569, December.
• HOLTZ-EAKIN, D., NEWEY, W., ROSEN, H. S. (1988), “Estimating Vec-tor Autoregressions with Panel Data”, Econometrica, 56 (6), 1371-1395.
• HOMA, K. E., JAFFEE, D. M. (1971), “The Supply of Money and Common Stock Prices”, The Journal of Finance, December, XXVI (5), 1045-1065.
• IM, K. S., PESARAN, M. H., SHIN, Y. (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115 (1), 53–74.
• KAO, C. (1999), “Spurious Regression and Residual Based Tests for Cointe-gration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 90 (1), 1–44.
• KILIC, S. B. (2005), “Test of the Weak Form Efficient Market Hypothesis for the Istanbul Stock Exchange by Markov Chains Methodology”, Journal of Çuku-rova University Institute of Social Sciences, 14 (1), 333-342.
• KWON, C. S., SHIN, T. S. (1999), “Co-integration and Causality between Macroeconomic Variables and Market Returns”, Global Finance Journal, 10(1), 71-81.
• LEE, B-S. (1992), “Causal Relations among Stock Returns, Interest Rates, Real Activity, and Inflation”, The Journal of Finance, September, XLVII (4), 1591-1603.
• LEVIN, A., LIN, C. F., C. CHU. (2002), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: As-ymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
• MADDALA, G. S., S. WU. (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–52.
• MOOKERJEE, R. (1987), “Monetary Policy and the Informationally Effi-ciency of Stock Market: the Evidence from Many Countries”, Applied Economics, 19, 1521-1532.
• MUBAREK, A., KEASEY, K. (2000), “Weak-Form Market Efficiency of an Emerging Market: Evidence from Dhaka Stock Market of Bangladesh”, OSLO ENBS Conference, May.
• MURADOĞLU, G., ÖNKAL, D. (1992), “Türk Hisse Senedi Piyasasında Yarı-Güçlü Etkinlik”, ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 19 (2), 197-207.
• PALMER, M. (1970), “Money Supply, Portfolio Adjustment and Stock Prices”, Financial Analysts Journal, July-August, 19-22.
• PEDRONI, P. (1999), “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heteroge-neous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statis-tics, 61 (4), 653-670.
• PEDRONİ, P. (2004), “Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Econometric Theory, 20, 3, 597–625.
• POSHAKWALE, S. (1996), “Evidence on Weak Form Efficiency and Day of the Week Effect in the Indian Stock Market”, Finance India, September, X (3), 605-616.
• RAPACH, D. E. (2001), “Macro Shocks and Real Stock Prices”, Journal of Economics and Business, 53 (1), 5-26.
• ROZEFF, M. S. (1974), “Market Efficiency and the Lag in Effect of Mone-tary Policy”, Journal of Finance Economics, 1 (3), 245-302.
• THORNTON, J. (1993), “Money, Output and Stock Prices in the UK: Evi-dence on some (none) Relationships”, Applied Financial Economics, 3, 335-338.
• ZENGIN, H., KURT, S. (2004), “IMKB’nin Zayıf ve Yarı Güçlü Formda Etkinliğinin Ekonometrik Analizi”, Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 6 (21), 145-152.