İŞLETMELERİN ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK GÖSTERGELERİNE YÖNELİK FARKLI BİR DEĞERLENDİRME: MODİFİYE EDİLMİŞ DİJİTAL MANTIK (MDL)

Yıl 2017, 16. Ulusal İşletmecilik Kongresi, 709 - 728, 08.11.2017

Gülsün Nakıboğlu , Berna Bulğurcu

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.323490

Cited By: 1

Öz

Kısıtlı doğal kaynakları kullanması, süreçlerin kirliliğe sebep olması
ve çıktıların (ürünlerin) da benzer şekilde kullanım esnasında ve sonrasında
istenmeyen çevresel etkilere sebep olması, üretim işletmelerinin özellikle
çevresel sürdürülebilirlikleri açısından değerlendirilmesini gerektirmektedir.
Uygulamada ve literatürde sürdürülebilirlik göstergelerinden bahsedilse de,
genel kabul gören bir çevresel sürdürülebilirlik performans ölçütü ve sistemi
bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışma işletmelerin çevresel performanslarına ait
göstergelerin ve bu göstergelerin önem düzeylerinin belirlenmesine yönelik
olup, uygulama plastik sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir işletmede
gerçekleştirilmiş ve göstergelerin önemlerinin belirlenmesinde Denghan-Manshadi
vd. (2007) tarafından geliştirilen yeni bir ikili karşılaştırma tekniği olan
Modifiye Edilmiş Dijital Mantık (MDL) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, oldukça yeni
bir Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemini farklı bir alanda kullanmanın yanında,
grup kararı verirken grupta yer alan ve farklı özellikler taşıyan uzmanların bu
özelliklerinin de dikkate alınması amacıyla sezgisel bulanık sayıları
kullanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

çevresel sürdürülebilirlik, çevresel performans, modifiye edilmiş dijital mantık (MDL), sezgisel bulanık sayılar

Kaynakça

• Aghaei, H.A., Beheshtinia, M.A., Amalnick, M.S., Gholimotlagh, M.ve Fartash, K. (2014). Studying Technology Road Mapping Development and Selecting the Appropriate Model for Aircraft Design and Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Scientific Studies, 1(2),43-54.
• Ahi, P. ve Searcy, C. (2013). A Comparative Literature Analysis of Definitions For Green And Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341 DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
• Ahi P. ve Searcy, C. (2015). An Analysis of Metrics Used To Measure Performance in Green and Sustainable Supply Chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 360-377 DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005.
• Alemi-Ardakani, M., S.Milani, M., Yannacopoulos, S. ve Shokouhi, G. (2016). On The Effect Of Subjective, Objective And Combinative Weighting In Multiple Criteria Decision Making: A Case Study On Impact Optimization Of Composites. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 426–438.
• Atanassov, K.T. (1986). Intuitionistic Fuzzy-Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20 (1), 87-96.
• Beheshti-Nia, M.A. ve Nemati-Abozar, V. (2016). A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Supplier Selection Problem (A Case Study in Advertising industry). Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9 (4), 65-79.
• Bennett, M. ve James, P. (1998). ISO 14031 and the Future of Environmental Performance Evaluation. Greener Management International, Spring, 21, 71-86.
• Cowan, D.M., Dopart, P., Ferracini, T., Sahmel, J., Merryman, K., Gaffney, S. ve Paustenbach, D.J. (2010). A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reported Corporate Environmental Sustainability Practices. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 58, 524-538 DOI 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.004
• Dehghan-Manshadi,B. Mahmudi, H., Abedian, A. ve Mahmudi, R. (2007). A Novel Method for Materials Selection in Mechanical Design: Combination Of Non-Linear Normalization And A Modified Digital Logic Method. Materials and Design, 28, 8–15.
• Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L. ve Antunes, P. (2002). From Environmental Performance Evaluation to Eco-Efficiency and Sustainability Balanced Scorecards. Environmental Quality Management, Winter, 51-64 DOI 10.1002/tqem.10063.
• Ding, H., Liu, Q. ve Zheng, L. (2016). Assessing the Economic Performance of an Environmental Sustainable Supply Chain In Reducing Environmental Externalities. European Journal of Operational Research, 255, 463–480 DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.003.
• EEA (2014). Digest of EEA indicators 2014. EEA Technical Report No 8/2014 http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/digest-of-eea-indicators-2014 e.t. 12.01.2017.
• EPA online. EPA's Report on the Environment (ROE). https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/ e.t. 11.01.2017
• EPI online, http://epi.yale.edu/ e.t. 11.01.2017
• Fan, C., Carrell, J. ve Zhang, H.C. (2010). An Investigation of Indicators for Measuring Sustainable Manufacturing. International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology, May 19-21, 1-5 DOI 10.1109/ISSST.2010.5507764.
• Fayazbakhsh, K., Abedian, A., Dehghan Manshadi, B. ve Khabbaz , R. S. (2009). Introducing a Novel Method for Materials Selection in Mechanical Design Using Z-Transformation in Statistics for Normalization Of Material Properties. Materials and Design, 30, 4396–4404.
• Feng, S.C. ve Joung, C.B. (2009). An Overview of a Proposed Measurement Infrastructure for Sustainable Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing.
• GRI online. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx e.t. 10.01.2017.
• ISO online. https://www.iso.org/standard/52297.html e.t.12.01.2017
• Jasch, C. (2000). Environmental Performance Evaluation and Indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 79-88.
• Joung, C.B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P. ve Feng, S.C. (2013). Categorization of Indicators for Sustainable Manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148-157.
• Kluczek, A. (2016). Application of Multi-Criteria Approach For Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Processes. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(3), 62–78 DOI 10.1515/mper-2016-0026
• Labuschagne, C., Brenta, A.C. ve van Erck, R.P.G. (2005). Assessing the Sustainability Performances of Industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 373-385.
• Lee, V.H., Ooi, K.B., Chonc, A.Y.L. ve Lin, B. (2015). A Structural Analysis of Greening the Supplier, Environmental Performance and Competitive Advantage. Production Planning & Control, 26, 2, 116-130 DOI 10.1080/09537287.2013.859324
• Mani, M., Madan, J., Lee, J.H., Lyons, K.W. ve Gupta, S.K. (2014). Sustainability Characterisation for Manufacturing Processes. International Journal of Production Research, 52(20), 5895-5912 DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.886788.
• Ocampo, L.A. (2015). A Hierarchical Framework for Index Computation in Sustainable Manufacturing. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 10(1), 40–50 DOI 10.14743/apem2015.1.191.
• Ocampo, L.A., Vergara, V.G.N., Impas, C.G., Tordillo, J.A.S. ve Pastoril, J.S. (2015). Identifying Critical Indicators in Sustainable Manufacturing Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, 14(3-4), 1-8 DOI 10.12776/mie.v14i3-4.444
• OECD (2003). Environmental indicators Development, Measurement and Use Reference Paper. online https://www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/24993546.pdf e.t. 10.01.2017
• OECD (2004). OECD Key Environmental Indicators. online http://www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/31558547.pdf e.t. 10.01.2017.
• OECD (2010). Eco-Innovation in Industry: Enabling Green Growth, Executive Summary. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/44424374.pdf e.t. 15.01.2017
• OECD (2011). OECD Sustainable Manufacturing Toolkit Start-up Guide: Seven steps to environmental excellence. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/green/toolkit/48661768.pdf e.t. 15.01.2017
• Olsthoorn, X., Tyteca, D., Wehrmeyer, W. ve Wagner, M. (2001). Environmental Indicators for Business: A Review Of The Literature And Standardisation Methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 453–463.
• Rahdari, A.H. ve Rostamy, A.A.A. (2015). Designing a General Set of Sustainability Indicators at the Corporate Level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 757-771 DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.108.
• Rao, R. V. ve Davim, J. P. (2008). A Decision-Making Framework Model For Material Selection Using A Combined Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35, 751-760.
• Rathi, R., Khandujab, D. ve Sharmac, S.K. (2015). Six Sigma Project Selections Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Making Approach. Management Science Letters, 5, 447–456.
• RobecoSAM (2017), http://www.sustainability-indices.com/sustainability-assessment/index.jsp e.t. 10.01.2017
• S&P Dow Jones Indices (2017). DJSI World. http://eu.spindices.com/indices/equity/dow-jones-sustainability-world-index e.t. 10.01.2017
• Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Salem, A.H. ve Deif, A.M. (2014). An Integrated Approach to Assess Manufacturing Greenness Level. Proceida CIRP 17, 541-546 DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.127.
• Sarkar, P., Joung, C.B., Carrell, J. ve Feng, S.C. (2011). Sustainable Manufacturing Indicator Repository. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2011 August 29-31, Washington.
• Sundin, E., Nasslander, E. ve Lelah, A. (2015). Sustainability Indicators for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the Transition to Provide Product-Service Systems (PSS). 7th Industrial Product-Service Systems Conference – PSS, industry transformation for sustainability and business. Procedia CIRP 30, 149-154.
• Thoresen, J. (1999). Environmental Performance Evaluation - A Tool for Industrial Improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7, 365-370.
• UN (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. October 2007, Third Edition, NY. online, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/ guidelines.pdf e.t. 10.01.2017.
• UN (2014). Guide to Corporate Sustainability, United Nations Global Compact, NY. online, https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/publications/UN_Global_Compact_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.pdf e.t. 10.01.2017
• UNSD (1992). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992. United Nations Sustainable Development.
• Veleva, V. ve Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of Sustainable Production: Framework and Methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 519–549.
• Xu, Z.S. (2007). Intuitionist Fuzzy Aggregation Operators. IEE Transaction of Fuzzy Systems, 15(6), 1179–1187.