E-HİZMET KALİTESİ ÖLÇÜMÜ: UZAKTAN EĞİTİM HİZMETİ VEREN KAMU ÜNİVERSİTELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2020, Prof. Dr. Talha Ustasüleyman Özel Sayısı, 77 - 98, 20.02.2020

Pelin Çelik Selçuk Perçin

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.566172

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bilişim ve eğitim
alanında yaşanan gelişmelerle karşımıza çıkan e-öğrenme, öğrenci merkezli,
birçok avantajı bulunan, çağdaş bir eğitim ve öğretim sistemi olarak tanımlanabilmektedir.
Günümüzde e-öğrenme sistemi ülkemizdeki birçok üniversite tarafından
kullanılmaktadır ve bu durum beraberinde rekabeti getirmiştir. E-öğrenme
sisteminde başarılı olunması ve memnuniyetin sağlanması için e-öğrenme öğrenci
gereksinimleri ve teknik gereksinimlerin karşılanması gerekmektedir. E-öğrenme
sisteminin öneminden hareketle bu çalışmada Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknoloji
Bakanlığı’nın Üniversitelerarası Yenilikçilik ve Girişimcilik Endeksi
sıralamasına giren ve uzaktan eğitim hizmeti veren otuz devlet üniversitesi
e-hizmet kalitesi bakımından değerlendirilmiştir. Uygulamada Kalite Fonksiyon
Göçerimi, Bulanık Doğrusal Regresyon, 0-1 Hedef Programlama ve Entropi-Ağırlıklı
Uzaklık Metriği yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Uygulama sonucunda söz konusu
yöntemler kullanılarak üniversitelerin sıralanması sağlanmıştır. Modelin
üniversitelerin e-öğrenme sistemlerinin performans değerlendirme konusunda
kullanılabilecek etkin bir karar verme aracı olması ve eğitim sektörüne katkıda
bulunması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-Hizmet Kalitesi, E-Öğrenme, Kalite Fonksiyon Göçerimi, Bulanık Doğrusal Regresyon, 0-1 Hedef Programlama

Kaynakça

• Alsabawy, A. Y., Cater-Steel, A. ve Soar, J.(2011). Measuring E-Learning System Success. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), 1 – 15.Alptekin, S. E. ve Karsak, E. E. (2011). An Integrated Decision Framework for Evaluating and Selecting E-Learning Products. Applied Soft Computing, 11, 2990 – 2998.Al-Mushasha, N. B. ve Nassuora, A. B. (2012). Factors Determining E-Learning Service Quality in Jordanian Higher Education Environment. Journal of Applied Sciences, 12 (14), 1474 – 1480.Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Couses. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32 – 54. Arbaugh, J. B. ve Duray Rebecca (2002). Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses: An Exploratory Study of Two On-Line MBA Program. Management Learning, 33 (3), 331 – 347.Beam, P. ve Cameron, B. (1998). But What Did We Learn…? Evaluating Online Learning as a Process. Proceedings on the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Computer Documentation, Eylül 24-26, Kanada, 258 – 264.Carshwell, L. (1998). The Virtual University: Toward an Internet Paradigm?,. Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing/ 3rd Annual Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education on Changing the Delivery of Computer Science Education, 30 (3), 46 – 50.Chachi, J., Taheri, S. M. ve Arghami, N. R. (2014). A Hybrid Fuzzy Regression Model and Its Application in Hydrology Engineering. Applied Soft Computing, 25, 149-158.Chao, R.-J. ve Chen Y.-H. (2009). Evaluation of the Criteria and Effectiveness of Distance E-Learning with Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 10657 – 10662.Chen, Y., Tang, J., Fung, R. Y. K. ve Ren, Z. (2004). Fuzzy Regression-Based Mathematical Programming Model For Quality Function Deployment. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (5), 1009 – 1027.Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. ve MAstrogiacomo, L. (2015). Customer Requirement Prioritization on QFD: A New Proposal Based on the Generalized Yager’s Algorithm. Res. Eng. Design, 26, 171 – 187.Fung, R. Y. K., Chen, Y., Chen L. Ve Tang, J. (2005). A Fuzzy Expected Value-Based Goal Programming Model for Product Planning Using Quality Function Deployment. Engineering Optimization, 37 (6), 633-647.Ghosh, S., Surjadjaja, H. Ve Antony, J. (2004). Optimisation of the Determinants of E-Service Operations. Business Process Management Journal, 10 (6), 616 – 635.Gilbert, Jennifer (2007). e-Learning: The Student Experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (4), 560 – 573.Hiltz, S. R. ve Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous Learning Networks As a Virtual Classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40 (9), 44 – 49.Hong, Kian-Sam (2002). Relationships Between Students’ and Instructional Variables with Satisfaction and Learning from a Web-Based Course. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 267 – 281.Ji, P., Jin, J., Wang, T. Ve Chen, T. (2014). Quantification and Integration of Kano’s Model Into QFD for Optimising Product Design. International Journal of Production Research, 52 (21), 6335 – 6348.Jones, D. ve Tamiz M. (2010). Practical Goal Programming, Springer, New York.Jung, Insung (2011). The Dimensions of E-Learning Quality: From Learner’s Perspective. Educational Tech Research Dev, 59, 445 – 464.Kanwal, F. ve Rehman, M. (2016). Measuring Information, System and Service Qualities For The Evaluation of E-Learning Systems in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Science, 68 (3), 302 – 307.Karsak, E. E. (2008). Robot Selection Using an Integrated Approach Based on Quality Function Deployment and Fuzzy Regression. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (3), 723 – 738.Karsak, E. E. ve Özoğul, C. O. (2009). An Integrated Decision Making Approach for ERP System Selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 660-667.Kim, K. J., Moskowitz, H., Dhingra, A. Ve Evans, G. (2000). Fuzzy Multicriteria Models for Quality Function Deployment. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 504-518.Markovic, S. ve Jovanovic, N. (2012). Learning Style as a Factor Which Affects the Quality of E-Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 38 (4), 303 – 312.Martinez-Argüelles, M., Castan, J. ve Juan, A. (2010). How Do Students Measure Service Quality in e-Learning? A Case Regarding an Internet-Based University. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8 (2), 151 – 160.Mazur, G. H. (2015). Quality Funtion Deployment – Voice of Customer Meets Voice of Process. The Journal for Quality & Participation, 24 – 29.McAllister, N. C. ve McAllister, D. F. (1996). Providing Education Electronically to Nontraditional Sites: New Delivery to a New Audience. SIGDOC '96 Proceedings Of The 14th Annual International Conference On Systems Documentation: Marshaling New Technological Forces: Building A Corporate, Academic, And User-Oriented Triangle, 187 – 193.Melemez, K., Di Gironimo, G., Esposito, G. ve Lanzotti, A. (2013). Concept Design in Virtual Reality of a Forestry Trailer Using a QFD – TRIZ Based Approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37, 789 – 801.Moskowitz, H. ve Kim, K. (1993). On Assessing the H Value in Fuzzy Linear Regression. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Systems, 58 (3), 303 – 327.Myint, S. (2003). A Framework of an Intelligent Quality Function Deployment (IQFD) For Discrete Assembly Environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 45, 269 – 283.Paechter, M., Maier, B. ve Macher, D. (2010). Students’ Expectations of, and Experiences in E-Learning: Their Relation to Learning Achievements and Course Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54, 222 – 229.Parasuraman A., Zeithalm, V. A. Ve Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL, A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7 (10), 1 – 21. Partovi, F. Y. ve Corredoira, R. A. (2002). Quality Function Deployment for the Good of Soccer. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 642 – 656.Perçin, S. ve Min, H. (2013a). Optimal Machine Tools Selection Using Quality Function Deployment and Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making Approach. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 24, 163 – 174.Perçin, S. ve Min, H. (2013b). A Hybrid Quality Function Deployment and Fuzzy Decision-Making Methodology for the Optimal Selection of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 16 (5), 380 – 397.Rowley, J. (2006). An Analysis of the E-Service Literature: Towards a Research Agenda. Internet Research, 16 (3), 339 – 359.Santos, J. (2003). E-Service Quality: A Model of Virtual Service Quality Dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13 (3), 233 – 246.Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical Success Factors for E-Learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models. Computers & Education, 49, 396 – 413.Shee, D. Y. ve Wang, Y.-S. (2008). Multi-Criteria Evaluation of the Web-Based E-Learning System: A Methodology Based on Learner Satisfaction and Its Applications. Computers & Education, 50, 894 – 905.Shemsadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M. ve Tarokh, M. J. (2011). A Fuzzy VIKOR Method for Supplier Selection Based on Entropy Measure for Objective Weighting. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12160 – 12167.Soong, M. H. B., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C. Ve Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical Success Factors for On-Line Course Resource., Computers & Education, 36, 101 – 120.Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y. Ve Yeh, D. (2008). What Drives a Successful E-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183 – 1202.Tanaka, H., Uejima, S. ve Asai, K. (1982). Linear Regression Analysis With Fuzzy Model. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 12, 903 – 907.Thurmond, V. A., Wambach, K., Connors, H. R. ve Frey, B. B. (2002). Evaluation of Student Satisfaction: Determining the Impact of a Web-Based Environment by Controlling for Student Characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (3), 169 – 189.Tripathy, B. B. ve Biswal, M. P. (2007). A Zero-One Goal Programming Approach For Project Selection. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 28 (4), 619 – 626.Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K. ve Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to Assess The Quality of E-Learning Experience. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, 1272 – 1283.Wang, Y.-S. (2003). Assessment of Learner Satisfaction with Asynchronous Electronic Learning Systems. Information & Management, 41, 75 – 86.Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L. Ve Zha, Y. (2011). Determination of Weights For Ultimate Cross Efficiency Using Shannon Entropy. Expert Systems With Applications, 38, 5162 – 5165.Wu, H.-Y. ve Lin, H.-Y. (2012). A Hybrid Approach to Develop an Analytical Model for Enhancing the Service Quality of E-Learning. Computers & Education, 58, 1318 – 1338.Zeithaml V.A., Berry, L. L. ve Parasuraman, A. (1988). Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 52, 35-48.Zhang, D. ve Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering E-Learning In The Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5 (2), 207 – 218.Zhu, Q., Shen, L., Liu, P., Zhao, Y. Yi, Y., Huang, D., Wang, P. ve Yang, J. (2015). Evolution of the Water Resources System Based on Synergetic and Entropy Theory. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2727 – 2738.