KONTEYNER HATLARININ FİNANSAL PERFORMANSLARININ OPERASYONEL NİTELİKLER ÜZERİNDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2020, Prof. Dr. Talha Ustasüleyman Özel Sayısı, 123 - 134, 20.02.2020

Aylin Çalışkan Yücel Öztürkoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.578213

Cited By: 1

Öz

Lojistik aktivitelerinin can damarı olarak nitelendirilen konteyner
taşımacılığı yoğun rekabet ortamı, yüksek maliyet ve karlılığın azalması
sebebiyle farklı stratejiler geliştirmeye mecbur kalmıştır. Özellikle son
yıllarda, konteyner hatları çözümü stratejik birleşmelerde ve gemi
paylaşımlarında aramaktadır. Ancak bu çözümler navlun oranlarının ve operasyon
içeriklerinin birbirine benzer hale gelmesine yol açmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı
farklılaşma imkânı tanımaya konu olabilecek konteyner taşımacılığı
operasyonlarının ve operasyon sürecinin konteyner hatlarının finansal
performansına etkilerini incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türkiye’de bulunan
ancak tüm dünyada faaliyet gösteren uluslararası 104 konteyner hattı acentesi
temsilcilerinden veriler toplanmış ve kısmi en küçük kareler yol analizi yöntemi
uygulanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda finansal performans üzerinde en büyük ve
anlamlı etkinin operasyon sürecine, en düşük ve anlamlı etkinin ise temel
operasyonlara ait olduğu görülmüştür. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lojistik, konteyner hatları, finansal performans

Kaynakça

• Alderton, P. M. ve Saieva, G. (2013). Port Management and Operations. Taylor & Francis.
• Asuliwonno, C. (2011). Improving Port Efficiency and Custom Operations in Ghana: The Case of Ghana Community Network Services Limited (GCNET) Under Customs Excise and Preventive Service (CEPS). (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi).
• Banomyong, R. ve Supatn, N. (2011). Selecting Logistics Providers in Thailand: A Shippers’ Perspective. European Journal of Marketing 45 (3), 419-37.
• Blauwens, G., Vandaele, N., VandeVoorde, E., Vernimmen, B. ve Witlox, F. (2006). Towards a Modal Shift in Freight Transport? A Business Logistics Analysis of Some Policy Measures. Transport Reviews, 26(2), 239–251.
• Brooks, M. R. (1995). Understanding the Ocean Container Market—A Seven Country Study. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(1), 39-49.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behaviors Science.(2nd). New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale.
• Crum, M. R. Ve Allen, B. J. (1997). A Longitudinal Assessment of Motor Carrier-Shipper Relationship Trends, 1990 vs. 1996. Transportation Journal, 37(1), 5-17.
• Danso, A., Adomako, S., Amankwah‐Amoah, J., Owusu‐Agyei, S. Ve Konadu, R. (2019). Environmental Sustainability Orientation, Competitive Strategy and Financial Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment.
• Demirlioğlu, H. (2008). Türkiye Denizyolu Konteyner Taşımacılığının Kombine Taşımacılık İle Geliştirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi).
• Dobie, K. (2005). The Core Shipper Concept: A Proactive Strategy for Motor Freight Carriers. Transportation Journal, 44 (2), 37-53.
• Dong, J. X. ve Song, D. P. (2009). Container Fleet Sizing and Empty Repositioning in Liner Shipping Systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(6), 860-877.
• Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S. ve Mehta, S. C. (2002). Understanding the Interfaces: How Ocean Freight Shipping Lines Can Maximize Satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 491-504.
• Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., Straub, D. (2011). Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 3-14.
• Glave, T., Joerss, M. Ve Saxon, S. (2014). The Hidden Opportunity in Container Shipping. McKinsey & Company, 1-14.
• Haralambides, H. E. (2007). Structure and Operations in the Liner Shipping Industry. Handbook of Transport Modelling. Pergamon-Elsevier Science, 761-775.
• Kannan, V., Bose, S. K., & Kannan, N. G. (2011). An evaluation of ocean container carrier selection criteria: An Indian shipper's perspective. Management Research Review, 34(7), 754-772.
• Kent, J. L.ve Parker, S.R. (1999). International Containership Carrier Selection Criteria: Shippers/Carriers Differences. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 29(6), 398-408.
• Kolar, P., Schramm, H. J. ve Prockl, G. (2018). Intermodal Transport and Repositioning of Empty Containers in Central and Eastern Europe Hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 73-82.
• Lambourdière, E., Rebolledo, C. ve Corbin, E. (2017, January). Exploring Sources of Competitive Advantage Among Logistics Service Providers in the Americas. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 18(1), 36-45.
• Lirn, T. C. ve Wong, R. D. (2013). Determinants of Grain Shippers’ and Importers’ Freight Transport Choice Behaviour. Production Planning & Control, 24 (7), 575-588.
• Lu, C. S. (2003). The Impact of Carrier Service Attributes on Shipper–Carrier Partnering Relationships: A Shipper’s Perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(5), 399-415.
• Lu, C. S. (2007). Evaluating Key Resources and Capabilities for Liner Shipping Services. Transport Reviews, 27 (3), 285-310.
• Maloni, M. J., Gligor, D. M. ve Lagoudis, I. N. (2016). Linking Ocean Container Carrier Capabilities to Shipper–Carrier Relationships: A Case Study. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(8), 959-975.
• Meixell, M.J. ve Norbis, M. (2008). A Review of The Transportation Mode Choice and Carrier Selection Literature. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19 (2), 183–211.
• Murnane, J., Saxon, S. ve Widdows, R. (2016). Container Shipping: The Untapped Value of Customer Engagement. Travel, Transport & Logistics: McKinsey & Company, 1- 8.
• Notteboom, T. E., and Vernimmen, B. (2009). The Effect of High Fuel Costs on Liner Service Configuration in Container Shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 17 (5): 325-37.
• Onwuegbuchunam, D.E (2013). Port Selection Criteria by Shippers in Nigeria: A Discrete Choice Analysis. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(4/5), 532-550.
• Onwuegbuchunam, D. E., Okeke, K. O., Igboanusi, C. ve Ugboma, O. (2018). Structural Changes in the Global Transport Chain: Implications for Ports. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 3(1), 22-28.
• Pearson, R. (1980). Container Line Performance and Service Quality. University of Liverpool, Marine Transport Center, Liverpool.
• Peng, Z., Wang, H., Wang, W. ve Jiang, Y. (2019). Intermodal Transportation of Full and Empty Containers in Harbor-İnland Regions Based on Revenue Management. European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 7.
• Premeaux, S. R. (2011, November). The Similarity of Motor Carriers’ and Shippers’ Perceptions of the Carrier Choice Decision Improve. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 48(1).
• Serksnis, T. (2019). Shipping and Packaging. In Designing Electronic Product Enclosures (pp. 187-194). Springer, Cham.
• Slack, B., Comtois, C.ve McCalla, R. (2002). Strategic Alliances in the Container Shipping Industry: A Global Perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(1), 65-76.
• Sharp, B. ve Dawes, J. (2001). What is Differentiation and How Does It Work?. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(7-8), 739-759.
• Thai, V. V. (2008). Service Quality in Maritime Transport: Conceptual Model and Empirical Evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 493-518.
• Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W. Ve Higgins, C. A. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 284-324.
• Voss, M. D., Page Jr, T. J., Keller, S. B. ve Ozment, J. (2006). Determining Important Carrier Attributes: A Fresh Perspective Using The Theory of Reasoned Action. Transportation Journal, 7-19.
• Wiegmans, B. W., Hoest, A. V. D. Notteboom, T. E. (2008). Port and Terminal Selection by Deep-Sea Container Operators. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(6), 517-534.
• Wong, P. C., Yan, H.ve Bamford, C. (2008). Evaluation of Factors for Carrier Selection in the China Pearl River Delta. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(1), 27-52.
• Zhang, X. ve Roe, M. (2019). Maritime Governance, Security Measures and Port Competition in the EU. Maritime Container Port Security, 241-260. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.