KENTLEŞME İLE GELİR EŞİTSİZLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: BOOTSTRAP PANEL GRANGER NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 30, 211 - 228, 25.01.2021

Nazlı Keyifli

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.748025

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu çalışma seçilmiş 8 Yeni Sanayileşen Ülke (Brezilya, Çin, Endonezya, Filipinler, Malezya, Meksika, Tayland, Türkiye) özelinde kentleşme ve gelir eşitsizliği ilişkisini, 2000-2018 dönemi için yıllık veri seti kullanarak ampirik olarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi Kónya’nın (2006) Bootstrap panel Granger nedensellik analizinden yararlanılarak araştırılmıştır. Bootstrap panel Granger nedensellik sonucuna göre Brezilya, Filipinler, Endonezya, ve Malezya için kentleşmeden gelir eşitsizliğine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi; Çin için gelir eşitsizliğinden kentleşmeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu; Meksika ve Türkiye için ise çift yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kentleşme, Gelir Eşitsizliği, Bootstrap Panel Granger Nedensellik Analizi, , NIC

Kaynakça

• Adams, S., ve Klobodu, E. K. M. (2019). Urbanization, Economic Structure, Political Regime, And Income Inequality. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 971–995.
• Al, İ. Ve Belke, M. (2018). Politik İstikrarsızlık ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: MENA Ülkeleri için Panel Nedensellik Analizi. UİİD-IJEAS, (Özel Sayı), 271-286.
• Annez, P. C., ve Buckley, R. M. (2009). Urbanization And Growth: Setting The Context. In M. Spence, P. C. Annez, & R. M. Buckley (Eds.). Urban and growth (pp. 1–45). Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Bertinelli, L., ve Black, D. (2004). Urbanization And Growth. Journal Of Urban Economics, 56(1), 80–96.
• Bölükbaş, M. (2018). Para ve Maliye Politikalarının Enflasyon Üzerindeki Etkisi: BRICS Ülkeleri ve Türkiye için Bir Bootstrap Panel Granger Nedensellik Analizi. Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı 105, 47-62.
• Carruthers, J, ve Ulfarsson, G. (2003). Urban Sprawl And the Cost Of Public Services. Environmental Planning B: Planning and Design, 30 (4), 503-522 .
• Castells‐Quintana, D. (2018). Beyond Kuznets: Inequality And The Size And Distribution Of Cities. Journal of Regional Science, 58(3), 564–580.
• Chen, G., Glasmeier, A. K., Zhang, M., ve Shao, Y. (2016). Urbanization And Income Inequality In Post-Reform China: A Causal Analysis Based On Time Series Data. PLoS One, 11(7), 1-16.
• Ciccone, A., ve Hall R. E. (1996). Productivity And The Density Of Economic Activity. American Economic Review 86 (1), 54–70.
• Çakır, S. (2007). Kentleşme Ve Gecekondu Sorunu, Fakülte Kitapevi, Isparta.
• Dinler, Z. (1998). Bölgesel İktisat, 5. Bası, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa.
• Dongfeng, Y., Chengzhi, Y. ve Ying, L. (2013). Urbanization And Sustainability In China: An Analysis Based On The Urbanization Kuznets-curve. Planning Theory, 12(4), 391-405.
• Duranton, G., ve Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations Of Urban Agglomeration Aconomies. In V. Henderson, & J. Thisse (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of Regional And Urban Economics: 4, (ss. 2063–2117). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Fay, M., ve Opal, C. (2000). Urbanization Without Growth: A not-so-uncommon Phenomenon. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 2412.
• Glaeser, E. L., ve Maré D. (2001). Cities And Skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 19 (2), 316–42.
• Glaeser, E. L., ve Joshi-Ghani, A. (2013). Rethinking Cities: Toward Shared Prosperity. Economic Premise, 126, World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Gollin, D., Jedwab, R., ve Vollrath, D. (2016). Urbanization With And Without Industrialization. Journal Of Economic Growth, 21(1), 35–70.
• Hardoy, J., Mitlin, D. ve Satterthwaite, D. (2001). Environmental Problems In An Urbanizing World: Finding Solutions for Cities in Africa, Asia and Latin America. lONDON: Earthscan.
• Henderson, V. (2003). The Urbanization Process And Economic Growth: The So-What Question. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(1), 47–71.
• Jones, B. G., ve Kone, S. (1996). An Exploration Of Relationships Between Urbanization And Per Capita Income: United States And Countries Of The World. Papers in Regional Science, 75(2), 135–153.
• Kanbur, R., ve Zhang, X. (1999). Which Regional Inequality? The Evolution Of Rural–Urban And Inland–Coastal Inequality In China From 1983 To 1995. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27(4), 686–701.
• Kanbur, R., ve Zhuang, J. (2013). Urbanization And Inequality In Asia. Asian Development Review, 30(1), 131–147.
• Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and Growth: Granger Causality Analysis On OECD Countries With A Panel Data Approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992.
• Kuepper, J. (2018). A Guide To Investing In Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs). https://www.thebalance. com/what-are-newly-industrialized-countries-nics-1978978, (Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2020).
• Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth And Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
• Liddle, B., ve Messinis, G. (2015). Which Comes First–Urbanization Or Economic Growth? Evidence From Heterogeneous Panel Causality Tests. Applied Economics Letters, 22(5), 349-355.
• Linard, C., Tatem, J. ve Gilbert, M. (2013). Modelling Spatial Patterns Of Urban Growth In Africa. Science Direct: Applied Geography, 44,23-32.
• Nord, S. (1980). An Empirical Analysis Of Income Inequality And City Size. Southern Economic Journal, 46(3), 863–872.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 435, London: BP.
• Pesaran, M.H. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity In Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). A Bias‐Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross‐Section Independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
• Robinson, S. (1976). A Note On The U Hypothesis Relating Income Inequality And Economic Development. The American Economic Review, 66(3), 437–440.
• Sarı, R. (2003). Gelir Dağılımında Eğitim Faktörü: Kentsel Bazda Bir Örnek. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 58(2), 177-189.
• Seto, K., M. Fragkias, B. Güneralp, ve Reilly, M. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion. Plos One, 6 (8), 1-9.
• Siddique, M. A. B., Wibowo, H., ve Wu, Y. (2014). Fiscal Decentralisation And Inequality In Indonesia: 1999–2008. University of Western Australia, Business School Discussion Paper 14.22.
• Suleman, I., Nketiah-Amponsah, E. ve Codjoe, E. A. (2019). Urbanization And Income Inequality In Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 10-15.
• Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970). Efficient Inference In A Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323.
• Şen, H. ve Kaya, A. (2018). Kamu Kesimi Büyüklüğü, Dış Şoklar ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Seçilmiş OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Çalışma. Bankacılar Dergisi, Sayı 105, 27-46.
• UN Habitat (2012). Sustainable Urbanization. UN System Task Team On The Post-2015 Un Development Agenda.
• Wan, G., ve Zhou, Z. (2005). Income Inequality In Rural China: Regression‐Based Decomposition Using Household Data. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 107–120.
• White, M. (1981). Optimal Inequality In A System Of Cities Or Regions. Journal of Regional Science, 21(3), 375–387.
• World Bank (2012). East Asia’s Changing Urban Landscape Measuring A Decade Of Spatial Growth. World Bank Group, Public Disclosure Authorized.
• World Bank (2015). Urbanization in Africa: Trends, Promises, And Challenges http://www.worldbank.org/en/events/2015/06/01/ urbanization-in-africa-trends-promises-and-challenges.
• World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2020).
• Wu, D., ve Rao, P. (2017). Urbanization And Income Inequality In China: An Empirical Investigation At Provincial Level. Social Indicators Research, 131(1), 189–214.