Evaluation of The 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation in The Light of Jus Cogens Rules

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 57 - 74

Yusuf Suiçmez

https://doi.org/10.62334/ulipod.1534215

Öz

Shortly after the establishment of the Republic of Cyprus, the events initiated by Makarios’ attempts to amend the constitution, which escalated into internal conflicts and external interventions, culminated in Turkey’s military intervention. The effects of this intervention continue to persist today. Due to this characteristic, it has been the subject of many studies; however, it has not been evaluated in terms of the jus cogens rules, which express the universally accepted principles of international law, and the stages of the just war theory. To address this need, the 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation, a long-standing international issue, has been examined within the framework of the jus cogens rules of international law, considering the three phases of just war theory: jus ad bellum, jus in bello, and jus post bellum. This examination aims to determine the level of compliance with jus cogens international law norms in the historical and political context of the Cyprus issue, as well as the developments before, during, and after the 1974 Peace Operation. In conclusion, it has been determined that the 1974 Peace Operation adhered to the jus cogens rules of international law to the maximum extent. In the source review, a balanced selection of sources was made to objectively evaluate the assessments of both the Turkish and Greek Cypriot sides on the issue. This study is qualitative in nature, employing both inductive and deductive methods.‎

Anahtar Kelimeler

1974 Cyprus Peace Operation, Jus Cogens, Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, Jus Post Bellum

1974 Kıbrıs Barış Harekatı'nın Jus Cogens Kuralları Işığında Değerlendirmesi

Öz

Kıbrıs Cumhuriyeti’nin kurulmasından kısa bir süre sonra Makarios’un anayasa değişikliği girişimleri ile başlayıp iç çatışma ve dış müdahalelere dönüşen olaylar Türkiye’nin askeri müdahalesi ile sonuçlandı. Bu müdahalenin etkileri bugün halen devam etmektedir. Bu özelliği sebebiyle birçok çalışmaya konu edinilmiş; ancak uluslararası hukukun genel geçer ilkelerini ifade eden jus cogens kuralları ve adil savaş düşüncesinin aşamaları açısından değerlendirilmemiştir. Bu ihtiyacın giderilmesi için uluslararası alanda uzun süredir devam eden bir mesele olan 1974 Kıbrıs Barış Harekâtı, uluslararası hukukun jus cogens nitelikli kuralları çerçevesinde, adil savaş düşüncesinin üç evresi olan jus ad bellum, jus in bello ve jus post bellum evreleri dikkate alarak incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme neticesinde Kıbrıs meselesinin tarihi ve siyasi bağlamının yanı sıra, 1974 Barış Harekâtı öncesi, fiili savaş durumu ve sonrasındaki gelişmelerin jus cogens nitelikli uluslararası hukuk normlarına uyum düzeyinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.‎ Sonuç itibari ile de 1974 Barış Harekatı’nın uluslararası hukukun jus cogens nitelikli kurallarına azami ölçüde uyulduğu tespiti yapılmıştır. Kaynak incelemelerinde ise hem Türk hem de Kıbrıs Rum tarafının konuya ilişkin değerlendirmelerini daha objektif bir şekilde değerlendirebilmek için dengeli bir kaynak seçimi yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma nitel bir çalışmadır ve araştırmada hem tüme varım hem de tümden gelim metotları birlikte kullanılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

1974 Kıbrıs Barış Harekâtı, Jus Cogens, Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, Jus Post Bellum

Etik Beyan

Gerek yok

Kaynakça

• Aksar, Y. (2001). “The European Court of Human Rights and The Cyprus Problem”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 50, Issue: 3, pp. 141-174.
• Alsan, Z. M. (1950). “1949 Cenevre Sözleşmeleri”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 7, Issue: 3, pp. 37-57.
• Anghie, A. and Koloş, U. (2013). “Francisco de Vitoria and the Colonial Origins of International Law”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, pp. 273-294.
• Arsava, A. F. (1996). “Kıbrıs Sorununun Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Volume: 51, Issue: 01, pp. 43-51.
• Aytaç, G. B. (2022). “Cyprus Peace Operation in The Perspective of Responsibility to Protect”, İçtimaiyat, Volume: 6, Issue: 2, pp. 669-680.
• Bora, E. (2013). “Cyprus in International Law”, Ankara Bar Review, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, pp. 27-58.
• Bowett, D. W. (2009). Self-defence in International Law, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. Clark.
• Casse, G. M. (1998). “How Might Turkey Have Applied Jus Ad Bellum Criteria to Its Intervention in Cyprus on 20 July 1974”, National War Coll Washington Dc, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA442701.pdf, (Accessed: 23.12.2023).
• Cassia, P. S. (1999). “Martyrdom and witnessing: Violence, Terror and Recollection in Cyprus”, Terrorism and Political Violence, Vollume: 11, Issue: 1, pp. 22-54.
• Cassia, P. S. (2005). Bodies of Evidence: Burial, Memory and the Recovery of Missing Persons in Cyprus, London and New York: Berghahn Books.
• Charlesworth, H. and Chinkin, C. (1993). “The Gender of Jus Cogens. Human Rights Quarterly”, Volume: 15, Issue: 1, pp. 63-76.
• Chrysostomides, K. (2021). The Republic of Cyprus: A Study in International Law (Vol. 35), Leiden: Brill.
• Commission, I. L. et all. (2019). “Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), A/74/10”, https://legal.un.org/ilc/reports/2019/english/chp5.pdf, (Accesed: 12.03.2024).
• Coyle, D. J. (1983). Minorities in Revolt: Political Violence in Ireland, Italy, and Cyprus, Rutherford [N.J.], London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Associated University Presses.
• Denktaş, R. R. (1982). The Cyprus Triangle, London: Allen and Unwin.
• Doğan, N. (2002). “The Cyprus Question in United-Nations Resolutions and European-Union Decisions”, Akdeniz University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty Journal, Volume: 2, Issue: 4, pp. 84-106.
• Dorman, E. (2016). “Thomas Aquinas ve Haklı Savaş Teorisi”, Felsefe Dünyası, Volume: 64, pp. 135-158.
• Druşotis, M. (2006). Kıbrıs, 1970-1974. EOKA B, Yunan Darbesi ve Türk İstilası, Lefkoşa: Galeri Kültür Publishing.
• Erdoğan, K. (2020). Cyber operations and Jus Ad Bellum, Unpublished Master Thesis, İstanbul: Galatasaray University.
• Ereker, F. A. (2004). “Just War Concept: From the Early Ages Upto Present”, The Journal of International Relations, Volume: 1, Issue: 3, pp. 1-36.
• Ertekün, M. (1984). The Cyprus dispute and the birth of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Nicosia: K. Rustem and Brother.
• European Court of Human Rights (2024). “Decision Against Turkey in Missing Persons Case Dating to 1974 Conflict with Cyprus”, https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2009-10-01/european-court-of-human-rights-decision-against-turkey-in-missing-persons-case-dating-to-1974-conflict-with-cyprus/, (Accessed: 14.09.2024).
• Fiala, A. (2008). The Just War Myth: The Moral Illusions of War, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Gibbons, H. S. (2003). Kıbrıs’ta Soykırım (Translation: E. Fehim), Ankara: Near East Publication.
• Gökçer, O.; G. Ercan, P. (2020). “Si̇ber Savaşlarda Jus Ad Bellum Ve Jus in Bello”, Alternative Politics, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, pp. 172-203.
• Gülgeç, Y. B. (2017). “The Problem of Jus Cogens from a Theoretical Perspective”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 66, Issue: 1, pp. 73-116.
• Handayani, I. (2019). “Concept and Position of Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens) in International Law: A Preliminary Study”, Hasanuddin Law Review, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, pp. 235-252.
• Hehir, J. B. (1992). “Just War Theory in a Post-Cold War World”, The Journal of Religious Ethics, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, pp. 237-257.
• Hoffmann, S. (1988). The Political Ethics of International Relations, New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs.
• Hossain, K. (2005). “The Concept of Jus Cogens and the Obligation Under the UN Charter”, Santa Clara J. Int’l L., Volume: 3, Issue 1, pp. 72-98.
• Imseis, A. (2023). “Prolonged Occupation: At the Vanishing Point of the Jus ad Bellum/Jus in Bello Distinction” Texas International Law Journal, Volume: 58, Issue: 3, pp. 33-48.
• International Law Commission (2022). “Draft Conclutions on Idendification and Legal Consequencies of Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens)”, https://legal.un.org/ilc/reports/2019/english/chp5.pdf, (Accessed: 20.02.2024).
• Jöbstl, H., and Rosenberg, D. (2023). “The Humanization of War Reparations: Combatant Deaths and Compensation in Unlawful Wars”, Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume: 45, Issue: 1, pp. 39-91.
• Kammerhofer, J. (2004). “Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems”, European Journal of International Law, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, pp. 523-553.
• Karvatska, S. (2021). “Jus cogens: Problem of the role in Тreaty interpretation”, Jurnal Cita Hukum (Indonesian Law Journal), Volume: 9, Issue: 2, pp. 305-318.
• Kıralp, Ş. (2023). “Attitudes of Makarios’s Post-1967 Nationalist Propaganda Towards Greek Cypriot Armed Opposition”, Journal of the Black Sea Studies, Volume: 20, Issue: 78, pp. 367-386.
• Kırmızıgül, F. Ç. (2021). “Fictional Trials on the Spatial Solitude of the Northern Cyprus Turkish Republic (NCTR) Closed Maraş (Varosha) Region as a Social Identity Archetype”, Journal of History and Future, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, pp. 520-544.
• Klēridēs, G. (1989). Cyprus, My Deposition, Nicosia, (Volume: 3), Cyprus: Alithia.
• Kretzmer, D. (2013). “The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum”, European Journal of International Law, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, pp. 235-282.
• Linderfalk, U. (2007). “The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences?”, European Journal of International Law, Volume: 18, Issue: 5, pp. 853-871.
• Linderfalk, U. (2011). “The creation of jus cogens–Making sense of Article 53 of the Vienna Convention”, ZaöRV, Volume: 71, Issue: 1, pp. 359-378.
• Linderfalk, U. (2020). “The legal Consequences of Jus Cogen and the Individuation of Norms”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Volume: 33, Issu 4, pp. 893-909.
• Mira Lulic, L. (2009). “International Law and Cyprus Problem”, Contemporary Legal and Economic Issues, Volume: 2, Issue: 1, pp. 65-96.
• Moore, J. N. (2012). “Jus Ad Bellum Before the International Court of Justice”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Volume: 52, pp. 903-961.
• Neff, S. C. (2005). War and The Law of Nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Okimoto, K. (2012). “The Cumulative Requirements of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in the Context of Self-Defense”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, pp. 45-75.
• Orend, B. (2002). “Justice After War”, Ethics and International Affairs, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, pp. 43-56.
• Österdahl, I. (2009). “Dangerous Liaison? The Disappearing Dichotomy between Jus ad Bellum and in Bello”, Nordic Journal of International Law, Volume: 78, Issue: 4, pp. 553-566.
• Özdemi̇r, E. (2022). “Justice After War In Just War Tradition (Jus Post Bellum)”, Kırklareli University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, pp. 385-422.
• Özersay, K. (2002). Kıbrıs sorunu: Hukuksal Bir İnceleme, Ankara: ASAM, Avrasya Stratejik Arastırmaları Merkezi.
• Öztürk, Y. (2017). “Jus Cogens Qualification of The Sovereign Equality Principle of States in International Law”, Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Volume: 31, Issue: 42, pp. 37-53.
• Peilouw, J. S. F., Manuputty, A., Ashri, M., and Sumardi, J. (2015). “Legal Doctrine Pre-Emptive Military Strike Against the Existence of Principles of Self-Defence and Non-Intervention in International Law”, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume: 5, Issue: 12, pp. 589–593.
• Polat, N. (1999). Ahlak, Siyaset, Şiddet: Bir Kuram Olarak Uluslararası Hukuk, İstanbul: Kızılelma Publishing.
• Redaelli, C. (2022). “Military Intervention on Request in Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello and the Question of Recognition of Governments”, Goettingen Journal of International Law, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, pp. 105–143.
• Sadrazam, H. (2013). Kıbrıs’ın Savaş Tarihi: Kıbrıs’ta Mitlerden Gerçeğe, 1. Baskı, Lefkoşa: Söylem.
• Şafak, E. (2021). “The Concept of Legal Sanctions and Sanctions Mechanisms in International Law in the Context of Us-Imposed Sanctions on Iran”, ESAM Journal of Economic and Social Studies, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, pp. 310–337.
• Sarıca, M., Teziç, E., and Eskiyurt, Ö. (1975). Kıbrıs Sorunu, İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası.
• Saruhan, A. (2020). Oral History Study on Cyprus Peace Operation in 1974 Through the Eyes of Cyprus Veterans in Aydın, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Aydın: Aydın Adnan Menderes University.
• Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina (1992). Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
• Stahn, C. (2006). “”Jus ad Bellum”, “Jus in Bello” “Jus Post Bellum”? -Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force”, European Journal of International Law, Volume: 17, Issue: 5, pp. 921–943.
• Statistics (2024). “Statistics”, https://www.cmp-cyprus.org/statistics/, (Accessed: 19.09.2024).
• Stephen, M. (2001). The Cyprus Question, London: Northgate Publications.
• Tamçelik, S. (2009). Kıbrıs’ta Güvenlik Stratejileri ve Kriz Yönetimi, Ankara: METU Publishing.
• Tarakçı, M. (1998). Kıbrıs Barış Harekatı, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Tladi, D. (2021). Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Disquisitions and Disputations, Leiden: Brill.
• Tomuschat, C. (2015). “The Securitye Council and Jus Cogens, (Eds. Cannizzaro, E.), The Present and Future of Jus Cogens (pp. 7-99), Rome: Sapienza Università Editrice.
• Treaty Section of the Office of Legal Affairs (2013). Treaty Handbook (Revised Edition of 2012), USA: United Nations.
• Türkmen, F. (2005). “Cyprus 1974 Revisited: Was It Humanitarian Intervention? Perceptions”, Journal of International Affairs, Volume: 10, Issue: 4, pp. 61-88.
• Veedross, A. (1966). “Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law”, American Journal of International Law, Volume: 60, 1, pp. 55-63.
• Weatherall, T. (2015). Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weisburd, A. M. (1995). “The Emptiness of the Concept of Jus Cogens, as Illustrated by the War in Bosnia-Herzegovina”, Mich. J. Int’l L., Volume: 17, Issue 1, pp. 1-51.
• Whiteman, M. M. (1977). “Jus Cogens in International Law, With a Projected List”, Ga. J. Int’l and Comp. L., Volume: 7, Issue: 2, pp. 609-627.
• Yiangou, A. (2009). “Cyprus, Protest and Revolt”, (Eds. Immanuel Ness), The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest (pp. 943-948), Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.