Neoklasik Realizm ve Küçük Devlet Davranışı: Kosova'nın Dış Politikasını Anlamak

Öz

Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve birçok Batılı müttefikin tanımasına rağmen Kosova henüz Avrupa Konseyi veya Birleşmiş Milletler üyesi değildir. Kosova'nın durumuna neoklasik realizm ve küçük devlet kavramı merceğinden bakan makale, Kosova'nın dış politika yapımında iç siyasi sistemin ve liderlik imajının önemini vurgulamaktadır. Milliyetçilikten etkilenen Kosova'nın siyasi elitinin ülkenin dış politikasını büyük ölçüde şekillendirdiği savunulmaktadır. Makale, küçük devletlerle ilişkili davranış kalıplarını araştırmakta, Kosova'nın korunma davranışına olan eğilimini not etmekte ve dış politikasında ortaya çıkan belirsizlikler ve riskler ortasında bu stratejinin etkinliğini sorgulumaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kosova
• Neoklasik Realizm
• Küçük Devletler
• Riskten Korunma (Hedging)
• Yumuşak Dengeleme

Neoclassical Realism and Small State Behavior: Understanding Kosovo’s Foreign Policy

Öz

Despite recognition from the United States and many Western allies, Kosovo is not yet a member of the European Council or the United Nations. Seeing the Kosovo's case through the lens of neoclassical realism and small state concept, this article highlights the importance of the domestic political system and leadership image in the foreign policy making of Kosovo. It argues that Kosovo's political elite, affected by nationalism, largely shapes the country's foreign policy. The “small state” emphasized here is broader in meaning than the “weak state” used in realism and was attempted to be used as an analytical tool in the international relations discipline after the 1960s, when small states emerged in the system. The aricle explores the behavioral patterns associated with small states and notes Kosovo's inclination towards hedging behavior and questions the effectiveness of this strategy amidst the uncertainties and risks arise in its foreign policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kosovo
• Neoclassical Realism
• Small States
• Hedging
• Soft-Balancing

Kaynakça

1. Azar, E. E., & Moon, C.-i. (1988). Legitimacy, Integration and Policy Capacity: The Software Side of Third World National Security. In E. E. Azar, & C.-i. Moon, National Security in the Third World: The Management of Internal and External Threats. Aldershot.
2. Baker, R. (1998). Small, Isolated States in a Rapidly Reconfiguring World: Challenge, Threat or Incentive? Public Administration and Development, 18, pp. 107-122.
3. Baldacchino, G. (2009). Thucydides or Kissinger? A Critical Review of Smaller State Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, & T. M. Shaw, The Diplomacies of Small States (pp. 21-40). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Baldur, T. (2005). What Features Determine Small States’ Activities in the International Arena? Iceland’s Approach to Foreign Relations Until Mid-1990’s. Disciplines, 1(1), 107-140.
5. Barnett, M. N., & Levy, J. S. (1991). Domestic Source of Alliances and Alignment: The Case of Egypt, 1962-73. International Organization, 45(3), 369-395.
6. Binhuwaidin, M. (2019). Oman’s Response to a Rising Iran: a Case of Strategic Hedging. Journal of Arabian Studies, 9(1), 1-12.
7. Briscoe, I., & Price, M. (2011). Political competition in Kosovo. Clingendael Institute.
8. Brzezinski, Z. (1997). A Geostrategy for Eurasia. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 50-64.

9. Choi, J. K. (2007). A Neoclassical Realist Account on External Security Behaviors of Weak Power Towards Great Power. The Korean Journal of International Relations, 47(5), 81-112.
10. Chong, A. (2010). Small State Soft Power Strategies: Virtual Enlargement in the Cases of the Vatican City and Singapore. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 383-405.
11. Ciorciari, J., & Haacke, J. (2019). Hedging in Internatational Relations: An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pasific, 19(3), 367-374.
12. Cooper, A., & Shaw, T. (2009). The Diplomacies of Small States at the Start of the Twenty-first Century: How Vulnerable? How Resilient? In A. Cooper, & T. Shaw, The Diplomacies of Small States (pp. 1-18). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Demir, İ. (2008). National Securities of Small States in the International System. Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(14), 135-149.
14. Dersan Orhan, D. (2023, Nisan 17). Strategic Hedging or Alignment? Qatar’s Foreign Policy Toward Iran in the Wake of the Blockade Crisis. Retrieved October 2023, from Uluslararası İlişkiler: www.uidergisi.com.tr
15. Devlen, B., & Özdamar, Ö. (2009). Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Crises. In E. H. Freyberg-Inan, & P. James, Rethinking Realism in International Relations (pp. 136-163). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
16. Donnelly, J. (2005). Realism. In S. Burchill, R. Linklater, J. D. Devetak, C. Reus-Smit, & J. True, Theories of International Relations (pp. 29-54). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Duke, S. (2001). Small States and European Security. In E. Reiter, & H. Gartner, Small States and Alliances (pp. 33-42). Berlin: Heidelberg Springer-Verlag.
18. El-Dessouki, A., & Mansour, O. (2020, Ocak). Small States and Strategic Hedging: the United Arab Emirates’ Policy towards Iran. Retrieved January 2023, from Review of Economics and Political Science: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2631-3561.htm
19. Feta, B. (2017). The Continuing Political Turmoil in Kosovo. Athens: ELIAMEP Working Paper No 88.
20. Fox, A. B. (2006). Power of Small States: Diplomacy in WWII. In C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann, S. Gstöhl, & J. Beyer, Small States in International Relations (pp. 39-54). Washington: Washington University Press.
21. Gerger, H. B. (1975). Small States: A Tool for Analysis. Turkish Yearbook, 15, 108-118.
22. Guzansky, Y. (2015). The Foreign-Policy Tools of Small Powers: Strategic Hedging in the Persian Gulf. Middle East Policy, 22(1), 112-122.
23. Haacke, J. (2019). The Concept of Hedging and its Application to Southeast Asia: a Critique and a Proposal for a Modified Conceptual and Methodological Framework. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 375-417.
24. Handel, M. (1981). Weak State in the International System. Londra: Frank Cass & Co.
25. Hosmer, S. T. (2001). Why Milosevic Decided to Settle When He Did. Pitsburgh: RAND.
26. Ingebritsen, C. (2004). Learning from Lilliput: Small States and EU Expansion. Scandinavian Studies, 76(3), 369-384.
27. Keohane, R. O. (1971). The Big Influence of Small Allies. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2, 161-182.
28. Krasniqi, V. (2016). Political Parties Ideologies in Kosovo. Revista de Stiinte Politice, 49, 108-119.
29. Krause, V., & Singer, D. J. (2001). Minor Powers, Alliances, and Armed Conflict: Some Preliminary Patterns. In E. Reiter, & H. Gartner, Small States and Alliances (pp. 15-23). Berlin: Heidelberg Springer-Verlag.
30. Kuik, C.-C. (2021). Getting Hedging Right: a Small State Perspective. China International Strategy Review, 3, 300-315.
31. Larson, D. W. (1997). Trust and Missed Opportunities in International Relations. Political Pyschology, 18(3), 701-734.
32. Marleku, A. (2012). Small States Foreign Policy: The Case of Kosovo. Alternatives Turkish Journal of International Relations, 11(3), 79-97.
33. Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics Among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knoff Inc.
34. Mosser, M. W. (2001). Engineering Influence: The Subtile Power of Small States in the CSCE/OSCE. In E. Reiter, & H. Gartner, Small States and Alliances (pp. 63-84). Berlin: Heidelberg Springer-Verlag.
35. Rothstein, R. (1976). Foreign Policy and Development Policy: From Nonalignment to International Class War. International Affairs, 52(4), 598-616.
36. Schweller, R. (1992). Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pasific? World Politics, 44(2), 235-269.
37. Schweller, R. (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in. International Security, 19(1), 72-107.
38. Schweller, R. (2004). Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. Internatioal Security, 29(2), 159-201.
39. SIPRI. (2023). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database 2023, Retrieved November 2024: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.
40. Steinsson, S. (2017). Neoclassical Realism in the North Atlantic: Explaining Behaviors and Outcomes in the Cod Wars. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 599-617.
41. Toje, A. (2010). The European Union as a Small Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Tziarras, Z. (2019). Cyprus Foreign Policy in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Trilateral Partnerships. In Z. Tziarras, The New Geopolitics of the Eastern Mediterranean (pp. 53-72). Oslo: Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).
43. Vital, D. (1967). The Inequality of States: A Study of Small Power in International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Vital, D. (1971). The Survival of Small States: Studies in Small Power/Great Power Conflict. Londra: Oxford University Press.
45. Vulovic, M. (2023). The Serbian Progressive Party’s re-articulation of The Serbian Progressive Party’s rearticulation of the Kosovo myth w. European Politics and Society, 24(4), 518-435.
46. Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
47. Walt, S. (1988). Testing Theories of Alliances Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia. International Organization, 42(2), 275-316.
48. Walt, S. M. (2005). Taming American Power. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 105-120.
49. Waltz, K. N. (1979). The Theory of International Politics. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
50. Warbrick, C. (2008). Kosovo: The Declaration of Independence. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(3), 675–690.
51. Ward, S. M. (2017). Lost in Translation: Social Identity Theory and the Study of Status in World Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 61, 821-834.
52. Wohlforth, W., De Carvalho, B., Leira, H., & Neumann, I. (2017). Moral Authority and Status in International Relations: Good States and the Social Dimension of Status Seeking. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 526–546. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210517000560
53. Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
54. Zejnullahi, V. (2016). Political Parties in Kosovo, Organizational Structure and Their Internal Democracy. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 30-34.