Arı Kovanlarından Propolis Üretimi için Reçine Bakımından Zengin Alanları Tespit Etmek için Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemlerini ve Uzaktan Algılamayı Kullanma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 16 - 24, 19.05.2022

Abdulraouf Amro , Hossam Abou-shaara

https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.1027232

Cited By: 1

Öz

Propolis (arı tutkalı), tıbbi özellikleri olan arı ürünleri arasında sayılmaktadır. Mısır'daki bitkilerin çoğu, çiftçiler tarafından yetiştirilen tarla bitkileridir. Bu tür mahsuller, nektar/polen ile arı kolonilerine besin sağlayabilir, ancak kısa yaşam döngüleri nedeniyle reçine için iyi kaynaklar değildir. Bu çalışma, uzaktan algılama analizine dayalı olarak arı kolonilerinden yüksek miktarda propolis üretmek için potansiyel alanları keşfetmeyi amaçladı. Çalışma Mısır'da yoğun tarımsal faaliyet gösteren bir Valilik (Assiut Valiliği) üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Metodoloji, ağaçların çok sayıda coğrafi koordinatlarına dayalı olarak denetimli sınıflandırmanın ardından denetimsiz sınıflandırma kullanılarak uydu görüntüsünden ağaçların yalıtılmasına dayanıyordu. Ağaçlar noktalara aktarılmış ve daha sonra çalışma yerinin yoğunluğa göre sınıflara ayırmak için nokta yoğunluğu hesaplanmıştır. Çok yüksek sayıda ağaç bulunan alanlar, özellikle arıcılar tarafından ticari ölçekte propolis üretimi için tavsiye edildi. Propolis üretimine daha fazla önem verilmesi, arıcıların gelirini artırabilir ve arı kolonilerinden ekonomik faydayı en üst düzeye çıkarabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Reçine, CBS, Ağaçlar, Yoğunluk, Arıcılık

USING GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND REMOTE SENSING TO DETECT RESIN-RICH AREAS FOR PROPOLIS PRODUCTION FROM APIARIES

Öz

Propolis (bee glue) is considered among bee products with medicinal properties. The majority of plants in Egypt are field crops which cultivated by farmers. Such crops may supply bee colonies with nectar/pollen, but are not good sources for resin due to their short life cycles. This study aimed to explore potential sites for producing high amounts of propolis from bee colonies based on a remote sensing analysis. The study was performed on a Governorate with intensive agricultural activity in Egypt (Assiut Governorate). The methodology depended on isolating trees from the satellite image using unsupervised classification followed by supervised classification based on numerous geographical coordinates of trees. Trees were transferred into points, and then point density was calculated to classify the study location into classes according to density. Sites with the very high numbers of trees were especially recommended for producing propolis on a commercial scale by beekeepers. Giving more attention to propolis production can enhance the income of beekeepers and maximize the economic benefit from bee colonies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Resin, GIS, Trees, Density, Beekeeping

Kaynakça

• Abou-Shaara, HF. (2013). Using geographical information system (GIS) and satellite remote sensing for understanding the impacts of land cover on apiculture over time. Int. J. Remote Sens. Appl. 3(4):171-174., doi:10.14355/ijrsa.2013.0304.01.
• Abou-Shaara, HF. (2014a). Recycling behaviour and wisdom in the beehive. Bee World. 91(1):12-13., doi:10.1080/0005772X.2014.11417576.
• Abou-Shaara, HF. (2014b). The foraging behaviour of honey bees, Apis mellifera: a review. Vet. Med. 59(1):1-10., doi:10.17221/VETMED.
• Abou-Shaara, HF. (2015). Potential honey bee plants of Egypt. Cercet. Agron. Mold. 48(2):99-108. doi:10.1515/cerce-2015-0034.
• Abou-Shaara, HF. (2017). Using safe materials to control Varroa mites with studying grooming behavior of honey bees and morphology of Varroa over winter. Ann. Agric. Sci. 62(2):205-210. doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2017.12.002.
• Abou-Shaara, HF. (2019). Geographical Information System for Beekeeping Development. J. Apic. Sci. 63(1):5-16. doi.org/10.2478/jas-2019-0015.
• Abou-Shaara, HF., Al-Ghamdi, AA., Mohamed, AA. (2013). A suitability map for keeping honey bees under harsh environmental conditions using Geographical Information System. World Appl. Sci. J. 22(8):1099-1105., doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.22.08.7384.
• Abou-Shaara, HF., Eid, KS. (2019). Increasing the profitability of propolis production in honey bee colonies by utilizing remote sensing techniques to spot locations of trees as potential sources of resin. Remote Sens. Lett. 10(9):922-927., doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2019.1633488.
• Abou-Shaara, HF., Kelany, MM. (2020). Using shape extraction to enhance classification of Landsat satellite images to visualize vegetation. J. Agric. Inf. 11(1):1-8. doi.org/10.17700/jai.2020.11.1.556.
• Abou-Shaara, HF., Kelany, MM. (2020). Using shape extraction to enhance classification of Landsat satellite images to visualize vegetation. J. Agric. Inf. 11(1):1-8. doi.org/10.17700/jai.2020.11.1.556.
• Abou-Shaara, HF., Kelany, MM. (2021). A methodology to assist in locating drone congregation area using remote sensing technique. J. Apic. Res., doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2021.1898786.
• Al-Ghamdi, AA., Alsharhi, MM., Abou-Shaara, HF. (2016). Current status of beekeeping in the Arabian countries and urgent needs for its development inferred from a soci-economic analysis. Asian J. Agric. Res. 10:87-98., doi.org/10.3923/ajar.2016.87.98.
• Ambarwulan, W., Sjamsudin, CE., Syaufina, L. (2017). Geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process for land use planning of beekeeping in forest margin of Bogor Regency, Indonesia. J. Silvik. Trop. 7(3):50-57.
• Amulen, DR., D’Haese, M., D'Haene, E., Okwee Acai, J., Agea, JG., Smagghe, G., Cross, P. (2019). Estimating the potential of beekeeping to alleviate household poverty in rural Uganda. PloS one, 14(3): e0214113., doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214113
• Ausseil, AG., Dymond, JR., Newstrom, L. (2018). Mapping floral resources for honey bees in New Zealand at the catchment scale. Ecol. Appl. 28(5):1182-1196., doi.org/10.1002/eap.1717.
• Bankova, V., Bertelli, D., Borba, R., Conti, BJ., da Silva Cunha IB., Danert, C., Zampini, C. et al. (2019). Standard methods for Apis mellifera propolis research. J. Apic. Res. 58(2):1-49., doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2016.1222661.
• Bankova, VS., de Castro, SL., Marcucci, MC. (2000). Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie, 31(1), 3-15., doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000102.
• Blažytė-Čereškienė, L., Vaitkevičienė, G., Venskutonytė, S., Būda, V. (2010). Honey bee foraging in spring oilseed rape crops under high ambient temperature conditions. Žemdirb, Agric, 97:61-70.
• Borba, RS., Klyczek, KK., Mogen, KL., Spivak, M. (2015). Seasonal benefits of a natural propolis envelope to honey bee immunity and colony health. J. Exp. Biol. 218(22):3689-3699., doi.org/10.1242/jeb.127324.
• Calderone, NW. (2012). Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992–2009. PloS one, 7(5): e37235., doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037235.
• Cheng, PC., Wong, G. (1996). Honey bee propolis: prospects in medicine. Bee world, 77(1):8-15. doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1996.11099278.
• Conrad, R. (2016). Processing Propolis: Part 1. Bee Culture. https://www.beeculture.com/processing-propolis-part-1/.
• Damiani, N., Maggi, MD., Gende, LB., Faverin, C., Eguaras, MJ., Marcangeli, JA. (2010). Evaluation of the toxicity of a propolis extract on Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Apic. Res. 49(3):257-264., doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.3.05.
• Drescher, N., Wallace, HM., Katouli, M., Massaro, CF., Leonhardt, SD. (2014). Diversity matters: how bees benefit from different resin sources. Oecologia, 176(4):943-953., doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3070-z.
• Fernandez, P., Roqu, N., Anjos, O. (2016). Spatial Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Potential Beekeeping Assessment. Case Study: Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). In 19th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science - Geospatial Data in a Changing World, Edited by T. Sarjakoski, M. Y. Santos, and L. T. Sarjakoski, Helsinki, Finland.
• Fratellone, PM., Tsimis, F., Fratellone, G. (2016). Apitherapy products for medicinal use. J. Altern. Complement Med. 22(12):1020-1022., doi.org/10.1089/acm.2015.0346.
• Garedew, A., Lamprecht, I., Schmolz, E., Schricker, B. (2002). The varroacidal action of propolis: a laboratory assay. Apidologie, 33(1):41-50., doi.org/10.1051/apido:2001006.
• Grange, JM., Davey, RW. (1990). Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). J. R. Soc. Med. 83(3):159-160., doi.org/10.1177/014107689008300310.
• Güler, A., Demir, M. (2005). Beekeeping potential in Turkey. Bee world, 86(4):114-119.‏, doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2005.11417326.
• Habryka, C., Kruczek, M., Drygaś, B. (2016). Bee products used in apitherapy. W. S. N. 48:254-258.‏
• Hegazi, A., Abdou, AM., Abd Allah, F. (2014). Egyptian Propolis 11: Its antimicrobial activity with comparison with different localities. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 3(9):530-538.
• Hussein, MH., Abdel‐Aal, SA. (1982). Wild and honey bees as pollinators of 10 plant species in Assiut area, Egypt. Zeitschrift. für. Angew. Entomol. 93(1‐5):342-346.‏, doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1982.tb03606.x.
• Jingli, YDW., Zhsgg, F. (2008). Effect of Chinese propolis and nano-propolis on common pathogens in vitro. Chin. Pharmacist, 10:1167-1169.‏
• Jo, MH., Kim, JB., Baek, SR. (2001). Selection technique for honey Plant complex area using landsat image and GIS. In 22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 5-9.
• Klatt, BK., Holzschuh, A., Westphal, C., Clough, Y., Smit, I., Pawelzik, E., Tscharntke, T. (2014). Bee pollination improves crop quality, shelf life and commercial value. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biol. Sci. 281(1775): 20132440., doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2440.
• König, B. (1985). Plant Sources of Propolis. Bee World, 66:136–139., doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1985.11098844.
• Morse, RA., Calderone, NW. (2000). The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in 2000 .Bee Culture, 128:2-15.
• Nagai, T., Inoue, R., Suzuki, N., Nagashima, T. (2006). Antioxidant properties of enzymatic hydrolysates from royal jelly. J. Med. Food, 9(3):363-367.‏, doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2006.9.363.
• Pilati, L., Prestamburgo, M. (2016). Sequential relationship between profitability and sustainability: The Case of Migratory Beekeeping. Sustainability, 8(1):94.‏, doi.org/10.3390/su8010094.
• Qaiser, T., Ali, M., Taj, S., Akmal, N. (2013). Impact assessment of beekeeping in sustainable rural livelihood. J. Soc. Sci. 2(2):82-90. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246417.
• Salatino, A., Teixeira, ÉW., Negri, G. (2005). Origin and chemical variation of Brazilian propolis. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med. 2:33–38., doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh060.
• Sharma, R., Bhatia, R. (2001). Economics of stationary and migratory beekeeping in Himachal Pradesh. Agric. Sci. Digest. 21(3):196-197.
• Zoccali, P., Malacrinò, A., Campolo, O., Laudani, F., Algeri, GM., Giunti, G., Strano, CP., Benelli, G., Palmeri, V. (2017). A novel GIS-based approach to assess beekeeping suitability of Mediterranean lands. Saudi. J. boil. Sci. 24(5):1045-1050., doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.062.