Çeviri

God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 31 Temmuz 2018
PDF İndir
TR EN

God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas

Öz

During the Middle Ages, most theological and philosophical works were translated into Latin language, such as Avicenna’s al-Shifā: Ilahiyāt(The Metaphysics of The Healing),al-Ghazālī’s Maqāsıd al-falāsifa(The Aims of Philosophers), and Averroes’s commentaries on Aristotle’s books. Thanks to these translations, Latin world have got acquainted with various controversial issues in the Islamic thought, such as whether “God knows particulars in their essence”, “whether God acts necessarily because of His nature” and “whether reason and revelation can be reconciled or not” conveyed into Latin West. In addition to these issues, Latin thinkers have also got to know the problem of what scope of God’s absolute power. In this paper, I tried to show the idea that God can do what is logically possible and this does not limit God’s absolute power was conveyed in to Latin West because of translation of Avicenna’s al-Shifāand al-Ghazālī’s Maqāsıdal-falāsifa.  As far as I can see, there is drastic textual similarity between idea of al-Ghazālīand Thomas Aquinas about this matter. Based on the similarities between al-Ghazālīand Aquinas, it is highly probable that Aquinas’ idea about God’s power goes back to Islamic tradition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Philosophy of Religion,Impossibility,Necessity,God’s Omnipotence,al-Ghazālī,Aquinas

Kaynakça

  1. Akdağ, Özcan. Tanrı ve Özgürlük: Gazālī ve Thomas Aquinas Ekseninde Bir İnceleme. Ankara: Elis Publications, 2016.
  2. Anselm. “Why God Became Man”. Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Trans. Brian Davies - G.R. Evans. New York: Oxford Universtiy, 1998.
  3. Aristoteles. Metafizik. Trans. Ahmet Arslan. Istanbul: Sosyal, 2010.
  4. Cüneyt Kaya. Aristoteles’ten İbn Sînā’ya Varlık ve İmkān. Istanbul: Klasik, 2012.
  5. Fârâbî. Peri Hermenias Muhtasarı. Trans. Mübahat Türker-Küyel. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi, 1990.
  6. Gazzālī. Düşünmede Doğru Yöntem. Trans. Ahmet Kayacık. Istanbul: Ahsen, 2012.
  7. Gazzālī. al-Iqtisād fi-l-ıtiqād. Ed. İbrahim Agah Çubukçu-Hüseyin Atay. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi, 1962.
  8. Gazzālī. al-Maqsad al-asna fi sharah asma' Allahu al-husna. Beirut: Dar al-kutub al-ilmiyah, nd.
  9. Gazzālī. İlahi Ahlak. Trans. Yaman Arıkan. Istanbul: Elif Ofset, 1983.
  10. Gazzālī. “İlcām al-avām an-ilmi al-kalām”. Maqāsıd al-falāsife. Ed. Ahmed Ferid Mezidî. Beirut: Dar al-kutub al-ilmiyah, 2008.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Akdağ, Ö. (2018). God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas. ULUM, 1(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1488221
AMA
1.Akdağ Ö. God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas. ULUM. 2018;1(1):23-34. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1488221
Chicago
Akdağ, Özcan. 2018. “God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas”. ULUM 1 (1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1488221.
EndNote
Akdağ Ö (01 Temmuz 2018) God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas. ULUM 1 1 23–34.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Akdağ, “God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas”, ULUM, c. 1, sy 1, ss. 23–34, Tem. 2018, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1488221.
ISNAD
Akdağ, Özcan. “God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas”. ULUM 1/1 (01 Temmuz 2018): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1488221.
JAMA
1.Akdağ Ö. God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas. ULUM. 2018;1:23–34.
MLA
Akdağ, Özcan. “God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas”. ULUM, c. 1, sy 1, Temmuz 2018, ss. 23-34, doi:10.5281/zenodo.1488221.
Vancouver
1.Özcan Akdağ. God’s Omnipotence and Impossibility in al-Ghazālī and Thomas Aquinas. ULUM. 01 Temmuz 2018;1(1):23-34. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1488221