Dini Dogmatizmin Yordayıcısı Olarak Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük

Öz

Bu çalışmada, belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlüğün dinî dogmatizmi yordayıp yordamadığı test edilmiş, ayrıca yaş, cinsiyet ve eğitim düzeyinin yordayıcı rolleri incelenmiştir. Belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük, bireylerin öngörülemeyen durumlara karşı artan stres ve kaygı tepkilerini ifade ederken; dinî dogmatizm, dinî inançların mutlak gerçekler olarak sorgusuz sualsiz kabul edilmesi şeklinde tanımlanmaktadır. Her iki yapının da düşük bilişsel esneklik ve güçlü bir kesinlik ihtiyacına dayanan ortak bir bilişsel temele sahip olduğu öne sürülmektedir. Nicel, betimsel bir yaklaşım ve ilişkisel tarama deseni benimsenerek yürütülen bu çalışmada, kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle Türkiye’de yaşayan 421 yetişkinden veri toplanmıştır. Kurulan çoklu doğrusal regresyon modeli istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuş (F(4, 416) = 12.844, p < .001) ve modelin dini dogmatizmdeki varyansın %11’ini açıkladığı görülmüştür (R² = .11). Yordayıcılar incelendiğinde, belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlüğün dini dogmatizmin en güçlü yordayıcısı olduğu görülmektedir (β = .244, p < .001). Yaş da dini dogmatizmi anlamlı biçimde yordamakla birlikte, etkisi görece sınırlıdır (β = .104, p = .034). Eğitim düzeyi ise dini dogmatizm üzerinde anlamlı bir negatif etkiye sahiptir (β = -.210, p < .001); eğitim düzeyi yükseldikçe dini dogmatizm azalmaktadır. Buna karşılık, cinsiyetin dini dogmatizm üzerinde anlamlı bir yordayıcı etkisi bulunmamaktadır (β = .020, p = .676). Bulgular, bireylerin belirsizliğe karşı psikolojik tepkilerinin dini tutumlarını doğrudan şekillendirdiğine işaret etmektedir. Belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük, bireyleri netlik ve istikrar sunan katı dini inançları benimsemeye yönlendirebilir. Bu bağlamda, bilişsel esnekliği, eleştirel düşünmeyi ve belirsizliğe tahammülü geliştirmeyi amaçlayan eğitim programları, daha açık ve hoşgörülü dini yönelimlerin oluşumunu destekleyebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Din psikolojisi
• Belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük
• Dini Dogmatism
• Bilişsel Esneklik

Intolerance of Uncertainty as a Predictor of Religious Dogmatism

Öz

This study examined whether intolerance of uncertainty predicts religious dogmatism and investigated the predictive roles of age, gender, and educational attainment. Intolerance of uncertainty refers to heightened stress and anxiety responses to unpredictable situations, while religious dogmatism is defined as the unquestioning acceptance of religious beliefs as absolute truths. Both constructs are theorized to share a common cognitive foundation characterized by low cognitive flexibility and a strong need for certainty. The study employed a quantitative, descriptive approach with a correlational survey design, and data were collected from 421 adults living in Türkiye through convenience sampling. The multiple linear regression model was found statistically significant (F(4, 416) = 12.844, p < .001), accounting for 11% of the variance in religious dogmatism (R² = .11). The findings indicated that intolerance of uncertainty was the strongest predictor of religious dogmatism (β = .244, p < .001). Age also significantly predicted religious dogmatism, though its effect was relatively modest (β = .104, p = .034). Educational attainment was negatively associated with religious dogmatism (β = -.210, p < .001), suggesting that higher levels of education are linked to lower levels of dogmatism. In contrast, gender did not significantly predict religious dogmatism (β = .020, p = .676). These findings suggest that individuals’ psychological responses to uncertainty directly shape their religious attitudes. Intolerance of uncertainty may drive individuals toward rigid religious beliefs that offer clarity and stability. In this regard, educational programs aimed at fostering cognitive flexibility, critical thinking, and tolerance of ambiguity may support the development of more open and tolerant religious orientations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psychology of religion
• Intolerance of uncertainty
• Religious dogmatism
• Cognitive flexibility
• Need for certainty

Kaynakça

1. Altemeyer, Bob. “Dogmatic Behavior among Students: Testing a New Measure of Dogmatism.” The Journal of Social Psychology 142/6 (December 2002), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603931
2. Birrell, Jane et al. “Toward a Definition of Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Review of Factor Analytical Studies of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.” Clinical Psychology Review 31/7 (November 2011), 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.009
3. Brown, Adam. “A Cognitive Approach to Dogmatism: An Investigation into the Relationship of Verbal Working Memory and Dogmatism.” Journal of Research in Personality 41 (March 2022), 946–952.
4. Buhr, Kristin - Dugas, Michel J. “The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: Psychometric Properties of the English Version.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 40/8 (August 1, 2002), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4
5. Carleton, R. Nicholas. “Into the Unknown: A Review and Synthesis of Contemporary Models Involving Uncertainty.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 39 (April 2016), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007
6. Carlucci, Leonardo et al. “Does a Fundamentalist Mindset Predict a State or Trait Anxiety? The Covariate Role of Dogmatism.” Journal of Religion and Health 60/2 (April 2021), 1029–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01016-5
7. Dedeoğlu, Mehmet Münir. “Bir Zihniyet Tutumu ve Düşünme Formu Olarak Dogmatizm ve Dogmatik Tutum.” Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 7/13 (February 2026). https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.303769
8. Duman, Nesrin. “Üniversite Öğrencilerinde COVID-19 Korkusu ve Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük.” The Journal of Social Science 4/8 (September 2020), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.30520/tjsosci.748404

9. Duriez, Bart. “Vivisecting the Religious Mind: Religiosity and Motivated Social Cognition.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 6/1 (2003), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367467031000085928
10. Friedman, Jared - Jack, Anthony. “What Makes You So Sure? Dogmatism, Fundamentalism, Analytic Thinking, Perspective Taking and Moral Concern in the Religious and Nonreligious.” Journal of Religion and
11. Health 57 (February 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0433-x
12. Furnham, Adrian - Ribchester, Tracy. “Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Concept, Its Measurement and Applications.” Current Psychology 14/3 (September 1995), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686907
13. Gaffney, Amber M. - Vogue, Natasha La. “Dogmatism and the Need for Closure.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Accessed February 19, 2026. https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-318
14. Glover, John A. et al. “Effects of a Simulation Game upon Tolerance for Ambiguity, Dogmatism, and Risk Taking.” The Journal of Social Psychology 105/2 (August 1978), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924126
15. Gönültaş, Osman - Güleç, Sezen. “Ergenlerde Kariyer Kaygısının Yordayıcısı Olarak Bilişsel Esneklik ve Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük.” Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 22/3 (December 2024), 2435–2449. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1490061
16. Gürses, İbrahim. “Dogmatik Zihnin Bazı Özellikleri.” Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11/1 (2002), 183–192. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/143945
17. Howell, Ashley N. et al. “Intolerance of Uncertainty Moderates the Relations among Religiosity and Motives for Religion, Depression, and Social Evaluation Fears.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 75/1 (January 2019), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22691
18. Kalaycı, Merve Yağar - Aydın, Yasin. “Intolerance of Uncertainty and Psychological Flexibility Predict Worry in Young Adults.” Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education 14/1 (January 2025), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1368769
19. Kasapoğlu, Figen. “COVID-19 Salgını Sürecinde Kaygı Ile Maneviyat, Psikolojik Sağlamlık ve Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi.” Journal of Turkish Studies Volume 15 Issue 4 (January 2020), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44284
20. Kayıklık, Hasan. Din Psikolojisi: Bireysel Dindarlık Üzerine. Adana: Karahan Kitapevi, 2019.
21. Keski̇n, Merve - Özer Kaya, Derya. “Afetlerle Tetiklenen Belirsizlik ve Stres Sürecinin Nöroanatomisi ve Kontrolü.” İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 8/2 (June 2023), 741–747.
22. Kilit, Zeynep et al. “Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük, Endişe ve Bilişsel Sınav Kaygısı İlişkisi.” Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi 12/2 (June 2020), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.21601/ortadogutipdergisi.741156
23. Kossowska, Małgorzata et al. “Many Faces of Dogmatism: Prejudice as a Way of Protecting Certainty against Value Violators among Dogmatic Believers and Atheists.” British Journal of Psychology 108/1 (February 2017), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12186
24. Kossowska, Małgorzata - Sekerdej, Maciej. “Searching for Certainty: Religious Beliefs and Intolerance toward Value-Violating Groups.” Personality and Individual Differences 83 (September 2015), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.053
25. MacDonald, Alfred P. “Revised Scale for Ambiguity Tolerance: Reliability and Validity.” Psychological Reports 26/3 (1970), 791–798. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1970.26.3.791
26. Mckee, Mollie A. An Empirical Investigation of Critical Thinking, Dogmatism, and Gender. Oregon State University., Master Thesis, 1990.
27. Parlak, Simel et al. “Relationships Between Hostility, Resilience and Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies 22 (March 2022), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2022.1.1
28. Rasel, Ahmed et al. “A Study Of Dogmatism As Related To Intergeneration Gap And Gender Differences In Bangladesh.” Journal of Life and Earth Science 6 (February 6, 2012). https://doi.org/10.3329/jles.v6i0.9729 Rokeach, Milton. The Open and Closed Mind. Oxford: Basic Books, 1960.
29. Sagioglou, Christina - Forstmann, Matthias. “Activating Christian Religious Concepts Increases Intolerance of Ambiguity and Judgment Certainty.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49/5 (September 2013), 933–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.003
30. Sarıçam, Hakan. “Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlüğün Mutluluğa Etkisi.” Ortadoğu ve Göç 4 (December 2014), 1–12.
31. Saroglou, Vassilis. “Beyond Dogmatism: The Need for Closure as Related to Religion.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 5/2 (2002), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670210144130
32. Schmitz, Paul G. “Das Ausma–S Des Dogmatismus Bei Verschiedenen Altersgruppen (3.–7. Lebensjahrzehnt). [Dogmatism in Different Age-Groups (3rd7th Decades of Age).].” Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie 15/6 (1982), 344–349.
33. Schulz, Lion et al. “Dogmatism Manifests in Lowered Information Search under Uncertainty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117/49 (December 2020), 31527–31534. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009641117
34. Spilka, Bernard et al. “Din Psikolojisi Açısından Genel Bir Atıf Teorisi.” trans. Ali Kuşat. Erciyes Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 19/11 (2001), 173–196. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eruifd/article/79372
35. Turhan, Meltem - Boyacıoğlu, Nur. “Covid-19 Hastalığı Tanısı Alan Hastalarda Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük ve Ölüm Kaygısı.” Sağlık ve Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi 4 (November 2022), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.33308/2687248X.202243273
36. Uzun, Kıvanç - Karataş, Zeynep. “Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlüğün Yordayıcısı Olarak Endişe ile İlgili Olumlu ve Olumsuz İnançlar.” Kastamonu Education Journal 26/4 (July 2018), 1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.434169
37. Yapıcı, Asım. “Dinî Yaşayışın Farklı Görüntüleri ve Dogmatik Dindarlık.” Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (ÇÜİFD) 2/2 (June 2002), 75. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cuilah/article/54556
38. Zhao, Shunying et al. “The Association Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Job-Seeking Anxiety: A Moderated Mediation Model.” Journal of Career Development 51/1 (February 2024), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453231213634