Kompozit Rezin Venerler: Güncel Teknikler ve Uzun Dönem Klinik Başarı

Abstract

Artan estetik beklentiler ve minimal invaziv yaklaşımların önem kazanmasıyla birlikte, anterior bölgede uygulanan kompozit rezin venerler estetik diş hekimliğinde önemli bir yer edinmiştir. Bu derlemede, direkt ve prefabrik kompozit rezin venerlerin güncel uygulama teknikleri ile uzun dönem klinik başarıları incelenmiştir. Direkt kompozit venerler tek seansta uygulanabilmeleri, düşük maliyetleri ve onarılabilir olmaları nedeniyle avantaj sağlarken, uygulayıcı bağımlılığı yüksek bir tekniktir. Bu nedenle uygulamayı kolaylaştırmak amacıyla şeffaf şablonlar, injection molding sistemi ve prefabrik kompozit venerler gibi çeşitli yardımcı materyaller geliştirilmiştir. Prefabrik kompozit venerler, laboratuvar ortamında yüksek basınç, ısı ve ışık altında polymerize edildikleri için yüzey özellikleri bakımından daha üstün ve standart formda restorasyonlar sunmaktadır. Ancak servikal ve aproksimal bölgelerde adaptasyon sorunları ile tabakalama yapılamaması gibi bazı sınırlılıkları da mevcuttur. Literatürde seramik venerlerin 10 yıl üzeri klinik başarıları daha iyi belgelenmişken, kompozit venerler için uzun dönem veriler daha sınırlıdır. Yine de iyi planlanmış direkt kompozit uygulamaların 3-5 yıllık takiplerde yüksek başarı oranlarına ulaşabildiği bildirilmektedir. Ayrıca kompozit restorasyonların onarılabilir olması, biyolojik ve ekonomik açıdan avantaj sağlamaktadır. Bu derleme, kompozit venerlerin klinik uygulamalarındaki güncel gelişmeleri özetlemekte ve uzun dönem başarılarına dair mevcut verileri kapsamlı şekilde değerlendirmektedir.

Keywords

• Kompozit Rezinler
• Lamina
• Dental Materyaller
• Tedavi Sonucu
• Sağkalım Analizi

Composite Resin Veneers: Current Techniques and Long-Term Clinical Success

Abstract

With increasing aesthetic demands and the growing emphasis on minimally invasive approaches, composite resin veneers applied in the anterior region have gained significant importance in esthetic dentistry. This review examines current application techniques and the long-term clinical success of direct and prefabricated composite resin veneers. While direct composite veneers offer advantages such as single-session application, low cost, and reparability, they are highly operator-dependent. Therefore, various auxiliary materials such as transparent templates, the injection molding system, and prefabricated composite veneers have been developed to facilitate their use. Prefabricated composite veneers are polymerized under high pressure, heat, and light in laboratory conditions, providing superior surface properties and standardized restorations. However, they present limitations such as adaptation issues in the cervical and proximal areas and lack of layering capability. While ceramic veneers have better-documented long-term clinical success exceeding 10 years, long-term data for composite veneers are limited. Nevertheless, well-planned direct composite applications have shown high success rates in 3 to 5 years follow-ups. Additionally, the reparability of composite restorations provides biological and economic advantages. This review summarizes the latest developments in composite veneer applications and comprehensively evaluates the available long-term data.

Keywords

• Composite Resins
• Dental Veneers
• Dental Materials
• Treatment Outcome
• Survival Analysis

References

1. 1. Araujo E, Perdigão J. Anterior veneer restorations – an evidence-based minimal-intervention perspective. J Adhes Dent. 2021;23(2):91-110. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b1079529
2. 2. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Anterior composite restorations: a systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015;31(10):1214-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005
3. 3. Dietschi D, Shahidi C, Krejci I. Clinical performance of direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic literature review and critical appraisal. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(3):252-70.
4. 4. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Gonçalves DS, Sales MP, Erhardt MCG, Corrêa MB, Opdam NJM, Demarco FF. Direct anterior composite veneers in vital and non-vital teeth: a retrospective clinical evaluation. J Dent. 2015;43(11):1330-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.011
5. 5. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
6. 6. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000;28(3):163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4
7. 7. Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations: a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31(5):481-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.015
8. 8. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020

9. 9. Korkut B, Türkmen C. Longevity of direct diastema closure and recontouring restorations with resin composites in maxillary anterior teeth: a 4-year clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(4):590-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12697
10. 10. Pincus CR. Building mouth personality. J South Calif Dent Assoc. 1938;14:125-9.
11. 11. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 1983;62:297.
12. 12. Ergücü Z, Turkun LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2008;33(4):413-20. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-107
13. 13. Dietschi D. Optimising aesthetics and facilitating clinical application of free-hand bonding using the ‘natural layering concept’. Br Dent J. 2008;204(4):181-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.100
14. 14. Gomes G, Perdigao J. Prefabricated resin composite veneers—a clinical review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(5):302-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12114
15. 15. Dietschi D, Devigus A. Prefabricated composite veneers: historical perspectives, indications and clinical application. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011;6(2):178-87.
16. 16. Dietschi D. Current status and future perspectives for the use of resin composites in the smile frame—methods following the ‘bio-esthetic concept’. J Cosmet Dent. 2011;27:112-27.
17. 17. Santana IL, Lodovici E, Matos JR, Medeiros IS, Miyazaki CL, Rodrigues-Filho LE. Effect of experimental heat treatment on mechanical properties of resin composite. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(3):205-10.
18. 18. Bilen H, Turkun LS. Clinical comparison of prefabricated and direct resin composite veneers formed with transparent templates. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:4185-4238.
19. 19. Dua P, Londhe SM, Dua G, Kotwal A, Gupta S. Clinical evaluation of “Componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(4):424-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402009000300006.
20. 20. Singh I, Shetty R, Mehta D, Lampl S, Chida N. Prefabricated laser sintered composite veneers and occlusal vertical dimensions: case reports. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(11):1417-23. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2442
21. 21. Abu Alhuda S, Arossi GA, Anagnostopoulos-King F, Alkhubaizi Q, Mokeem LS, Sampaio de Melo MA. Current evidence and advances in CAD/CAM resin composite blocks for chairside dental restorations. Appl Sci. 2024;14(22):10423. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210423
22. 22. Rafeie N, Sampaio CS, Hirata R. Transitioning from injectable resin composite restorations to resin composite CAD/CAM veneers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Sep;36(9):1221-1227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13216
23. 23. Schlichting LH, Resende TH, Reis KR, dos Santos AR, Correa IC, Magne P. Ultrathin CAD/CAM glass ceramic and composite resin occlusal veneers: up to 3-year RCT. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug;128(2):158.e1-158.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.009
24. 24. Vervack V, De Coster P, Vandeweghe S. Clinical evaluation of resin composite CAD/CAM restorations placed by undergraduate students. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 24;10(15):3269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153269
25. 25. Veneziani M. Composite injection molding technique. Innovative customized hybrid index and updated clinical procedures: Part 1. Int J Esthet Dent. 2025;20(1):22-45.
26. 26. Lewis MW, Braxton AD, Wasson W. Prefabricated composite veneers—a conservative solution for the aesthetic zone. Dent Today. 2015;34(8):100-2.
27. 27. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main clinical outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and complication rates. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(1):38-49. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp4315
28. 28. Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita MA, Coachman C, Morimoto S. Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(1):31-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1488
29. 29. Horvath S, Schulz CP. Minimally invasive restoration of a maxillary central incisor with a partial veneer. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012;7(1):6-16.
30. 30. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6(1):65-76.
31. 31. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(1):79-85.
32. 32. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two microhybrid resin composites. J Dent. 2012;40(9):766-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.010
33. 33. Demirhan AO, Turkun LS. Clinical comparison of prefabricated indirect vs direct resin composite veneers: 2-year result. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:2545.
34. 34. Loomans B, Ozcan M. Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S68-78.
35. 35. Alghazawy T. Clinical survival rate and laboratory failure of dental veneers: a narrative literature review. J Funct Biomater. 2024 May 16;15(5):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15050131