Development of the handwriting legibility of a 2nd grade Türkish student with disgraphia: Action Research

Öz

The purpose of this research was to explore the development of handwriting legibility of a second grade student with dysgraphia. This action research focused on a teacher’s practices and strategies to help the student with dysgraphia to improve his writing legibility. The participating student was a student in a public school setting in Ankara and a student in the researcher’s classroom science his first grade. Seven week long and 35 session action plan including sequences from big muscle movements to small muscle movements was proceeded to help the student to develop better handwriting legibility. To increase the legibility of the student’s handwriting, before and after the action copying and dictation applications were carried out. Findings indicated that the action plan was successfully shifted this student’s handwriting legibility level from inappropriate to moderate level. Thus, by effective methods and procedures teachers may help students with dysgraphia to develop better handwriting legibility.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• writing difficulties, dysgraphia, legibility, action research

Yazma Güçlüğü (Disgrafi) Olan Bir İlkokul 2. Sınıf Öğrencisinin El Yazısı Okunaklılığının Geliştirilmesi: Eylem Araştırması

Öz

Bu çalışma, ilkokul ikinci sınıfta öğrenim gören ve yazma güçlüğü olan bir öğrenicinin el yazısı okunaklılığının geliştirilmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, bir öğretmenin öğrencisinin yazma konusunda yaşadığı soruna çözüm üretme sürecini kapsadığından uygulamalı eylem araştırması olarak tasarlanmıştır. Öğrencinin okunaklı yazma becerisini geliştirmek için büyük kas hareketlerinden küçük kas hareketlerine doğru aşamalandırılmış bir yazı öğretimi eylem planı hazırlanarak uygulanmıştır. Yedi hafta süren uygulamada 35 ders gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğrencinin yazı okunaklılığındaki gelişimi belirleyebilmek için uygulama öncesi ve sonrası kopyalama ve dikte çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak öğrencinin okunaklılık bakımından yetersiz olan yazısının orta düzeyde okunaklı bir seviyeye ulaştığı görülmüştür. Çalışma, uygun yöntem ve tekniklerle yazma güçlüklerinin giderilebileceğini ve öğretmenlerin yazma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerine destek olabileceğini göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yazma güçlüğü, disgrafi, okunaklılık, eylem araştırması

Kaynakça

1. Akyol, H. (Mart, 2011a). Disgrafi . Eğitimci Öğretmen Dergisi, 1, 8-11.
2. Akyol, H. (2011b). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi (10. Baskı). Pegem: Ankara.
3. Ateş, S., Yıldırım, K., & Yıldız, M. (2010). Opinions of classroom teachers and prospective classroom teachers about the learning difficulties encountered in the teaching process of reading and writing. İlköğretim Online, 9(1), 44-51.
4. Akyol, H., & Yıldız, M. (2013). Okuma uzmanlığı ve okuma uzmanı yetiştirilmesine yönelik bir program önerisi. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları, 1(1), 1-8.
5. Berninger, V. W., & Graham, S. (1998). Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11–25.
6. Berninger, V. W., & Hooper, S. R. (2006). Introduction to special issue on writing. Development Neuropsychology, 29(1), 1–4.
7. Calp, M. (2013). Yazma problemi olan bir öğrenciye bitişik eğik yazı öğretimi (Bir eylem araştırması). E-İnternational Journal of Educatinal Research, 4(1), 1-28.
8. Cermak, S. (1985). Developmental dyspraxia. In E. Roy (Ed.), Advantages in psychology. Vol. 23: Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 225–248). New York: North Holland.

9. Cratty, B.J. (1994). Clumsy child syndromes, descriptions, evaluation and remediation (pp. 143–144). USA: Harwood Academic.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
11. Çinar-Özdemir, Ö. (2006). Disgrafi problemi olan çocuklarda üst ekstremite motor eğitiminin yazı yazma üzerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
12. Dennis, J.L. & Y. Swinth (2001). Pencil grasp and children’s handwriting legibility during different length writing tasks. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 171–183.
13. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-IV-TR,  DSM-IV-TR  , (2007). Ruhsal bozukluklar tanısal ve sayımsal el kitabı. Dördüncü baskı yeniden gözden geçirilmiş tam metin, Köroğlu, E. (çeviri ed) Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği, Washington DC, 2000. Ankara: Hekimler Birliği Yayınları.
14. Ediger, M. (2001). Assessing handwriting achievement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 082.
15. Engel-Yeger, B., Nagauker-Yanuv, L., & Rosenblum, S. (2009). Handwriting performance, self-reports, and perceived self-efficacy among children with dysgraphia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 182–192.
16. Erhardt, R., & Meade, V. (2005). Improving handwriting without teaching handwriting: The consultative clinical reasoning process. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 199–210.
17. Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Development Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 312–317.
18. Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students’ compositions, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.
19. Graham, S. & N.Weintraub (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980–1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7–86.
20. Graham, S., K.R. Harris & B. Fink (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633.
21. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Larsen, R. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research ve Practice, 16(2), 74-84.
22. Graham, S., Struck, M., Santoro, J., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: Motor programs, visual–spatial arrangement, and letter formation parameter setting. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 43–60.
23. Hamstra-Bletz, L., & Blote, A. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 689– 6
24. International Reading Assocation  IRA  . (2010). What reading educators need to know. Reading Today, 28, 1, August/September, 12-13.
25. Johnson, D.J. (1995). An overview of learning disabilities: Psychoeducational perspectives. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, S2–S8.
26. Jones, D. & C.A. Christensen (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and student’s ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49.
27. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In Denzin, N. K.&Lincon, Y.S. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd Edt), (p. 567-606). Thousand, CM.Yfornia: Sage Publication.
28. Laszlo, J.I. (1990). Child perceptuo-motor development: Normal and abnormal development of skilled behaviour. In C.A. Hauert (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Cognitive, perceptuo-motor and neurophysiological perspective (pp. 273–308). Amsterdam: North Holland.
29. Laszlo, J.I., P.J. Bairstow & J. Bartip (1988). A new approach to treatment of perceptuo-motordysfunction: previously called clumsiness. Support for Learning, 3, 35–40.
30. Marr, D., & Cermak, S. (2001). Consistency of handwriting development in the early elementary years: A literature review. The Israel Journal of Occupational Therapy, 10, E109–E129.
31. May-Benson, T., Ingolia, P., & Koomar, J. (2002). Daily living skills and developmental coordination disorder. In S. A. Cermak & D. Larkin (Eds.), Developmental coordination disorder (pp. 140–156). Albany, NY: Delmar.
32. McHale, K. & S.A. Cermak (1992). Fine motor activities in elementary school: Preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 898– 8
33. Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research A guide fort the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
34. Richards, R. G. (1999). Strategies for dealing dysgraphia. http://www.ldonline.org adresinden 13. 04. 2013 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır. Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P. L., & Parush, S. (2003). Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 41–81.
35. Rosen Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P. L., & Parush, S. (2004). Handwriting evaluation for developmental dysgraphia: Process versus product. Reading and Writing, 17, 433–458.
36. Rosenblum, S., Aloni, T., & Josman, N. (2010). Relationships between handwriting performance and organizational abilities among children with and without dysgraphia: A preliminary study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 502–509.
37. Rubin, N.& S.E.Henderson (1982). Two sides of the same coin: Variation in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. Special Education: Forward Trends, 9, 17–24.
38. Taylor, J. (2006). Developing handwriting skills. In M. Snowling ve J. Stackhouse (Eds.), Dyslexia, speech and language: A practitioner’s handbook (2nd Edition) (pp. 229 – 252). London: Whurr Publishers.
39. Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M., Niemeijer, A. S., & Van Galen, G. P. (2001). Fine motor deficiencies in children diagnosed as DCD based on poor grapho-motor ability. Human Movement Science, 20, 161–182.
40. Sovik, N., Arntzen, O., & Karlsdottir, R. (1993). Relationship between writing speed and some parameters in handwriting. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 25, 133–150.
41. Waber, D.P. & J.H. Bernstein (1994). Repetative graphomotor output in L.D. and nonlearning – disabled children. The Repeated Patterns Test. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10, 51–65.
42. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
43. Yıldız, M., & Ateş, S. (2007). İlköğretim 3. sınıf öğrenci yazılarının okunaklılık bakımından incelenmesi. I. Ulusal İlköğretim Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
44. Yıldız, M., Yıldırım, K., Ateş, S., & Rasinsky, T. (2012). Perceptions of Turkish parents with children identified as dyslexic about the problems that they and their children experience, Reading Psychology, 33(5), 399-422.